RFI_2.pdf

DEMO 155, Pool, 500 and 4900

RFI

Date

Recv'd

Date Sent to CES RFI Response

Date

Answered

1 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

Can the government provide AS-Built or Location drawings of all site utilities at all locations? Are the existing utilities to be abandoned in place?

No as-builts exist for sites 500 and 4900. The essex house pool and bathhouse have the piping drawings in the package.

8-Sep-17

2 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

If utilities are to be removed from the site can the government provide linear footages of all utilities on site?

And location of where said utilities shall be capped.

No as-builts exist so no linear footage can be provided.

8-Sep-17

3 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

General Requirements Section, Para V. Utilities and

Services, Sub Para D, states that water lines shall be taken bake to the curb stop or corporation stop. Can the government provide those locations?

They are not available at this time 11-Sep-17

4 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

Documents state that photos shall be submitted to the government. Please provide information on taking photos at

Scott AFB?

No photographs shall be taken of the airfield with aircraft present. Other photos may be taken as necessary to accomplish the project documentation.

8-Sep-17

5 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

Asbestos/Lead Sampling reports were provided for CLINN

0002 and 0003. Were these reports considered

"deconstructive sampling" (Sampling taken in an event that a building is to be demolished)?

Yes 8-Sep-17

6 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17 The Mars facility seems to be the only site that requires a

NOI and SWPPP. Please confirm Yes 8-Sep-17

7 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

CLINN 0001 and 0003, state that the contractor shall use

Best Management Practices to limit the amount of sediment run-off from the site. Does the government anticipate silt fence around the entire site during demo?

No, only install silt fencing on the downhill side of the sites.

11-Sep-17

Requests For Information - RFP FA4407-17-R-0007

Date

Recv'd

Date Sent to CES RFI Response

Date

Answered

8 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

SOW CLIN 0001 thru 0003 has no mention of required compaction, density, soil classifications, etc. Will QA/QC testing be is required for this project? If so what types of test will the government be looking for? What accreditations/credentials does the testing firm/laboratory required to have?

The fill materials used as clean fill and classified as topsoil are the only fill materials requiring documentation that they satisfy the

SOW requirements.

11-Sep-17

9 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

In the solicitation, Standard Form 1442, Line 11, the duration of the project is left blank. However, on page 8 of

51, "CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT", Para

52.211-10, states that the successful offeror will receive the

NTP by October 10, 2017, and complete by January 10, 2017 (92 days). This date may be delayed due to the

SWPPP approval and NOI being approved by the state. Will additional time be given for state approval? Please advise on the completion date for this project.

10 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

CLINN 0001 During the site visit it was stated that the

Electrical Room connected to the pool house is to remain. Is the contractor responsible for a structural design of wall infill? Will there be an amended RFP? Please clarify.

No. The common wall on the back should be cut at both sides of the vault wall and no additional infill necessary.

8-Sep-17

11 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

CLIN 0001, Para # 2 Scope of Work, Item A, Sub Item 5, Requires the three light poles to remain. Are these lights feed from the pool house? If so will the contractor be responsible for rewiring these lights? Please clarify.

This is an error. The government will be removing the light poles. The contractor shall remove the conduits and conductors back to the electrical vault.

11-Sep-17

12 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

CLIN 0001, Para # 2 Scope of Work, Item A, Sub Item 7, Requires removal of all pool supply and return lines. Is this to include the lines inside the Pump House Mech Pits that appear to be 9 ft. deep? Drain Lines under the bottom of pool floor (approx. 12 to 15 feet deep)?

Yes to all plumbing throughout the entire area to include the pool piping, pumphouse supply and return lines and whereever they are located even under the pool for the drain lines.

8-Sep-17

Date

Recv'd

Date Sent to CES RFI Response

Date

Answered

13 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

CLIN 0001, Para # 2 Scope of Work, Item B, states that 24 inches of clean fill soil. Is this considered to be top soil? Or should a layer of topsoil be provide as the top layer of soil?

If so, what is the depth of topsoil? Please clarify.

Clean fill shall be placed where all concrete and gravel, piping was removed. The top twelve inches of cover shall be topsoil throughout the site.

8-Sep-17

14 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

CLIN 0001, Para # 2 Scope of Work, Item B, state the contractor shall break-up all deck and pool concrete into pieces no larger than four foot by four foot and use as fill. If so is the contractor to assume the pool bottom can be left in place? Please clarify.

No, the pool bottom must be broken up into smaller pieces to allow proper drainage from the site. The broken up concrete may be left in place but the majority of the accessable rebar/metal must be removed and recycled.

8-Sep-17

15 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

CLIN 0001, Para # 2 Scope of Work, Item E, states; "The contractor shall perform all necessary IDPH, EPA environmental testing, asbestos abatement and lead paint removal prior to demolition. The contractor shall include all cost associated with testing and abatement of lead base paints in their proposal." The contractor can provide a cost for required testing, however abatement costs will be determined by this report. At this time the contractor has no way to determine the quantities of Asbestos or Lead until these tests are complete. Does the government wish to provide quantified items for Asbestos and Lead?

No. A modification to the award would be made for the quantities of asbestos and/or lead based paint costs for abatement.

8-Sep-17

16 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

CLIN 0002, Para I, Section B, Item 8, states "Removal of existing brush on property and along fence line." Section B, Item 9, states, for the Fence & Gate to remain. The existing perimeter fence is roughly 80% covered with vines and brush, salvaging this fence is not a viable option. Is it acceptable for the contractor to price installation of new fencing?

The fabric may be replaced as long as none of the poles are removed. They identify the boundries of the government site and eliminating any of them could cause boundry disputes with the local farmers.

Date

Recv'd

Date Sent to CES RFI Response

Date

Answered

17 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

CLIN 0002 Para I, Section C, Item 2, states: Monitoring wells will be abandoned in accordance with 77 IAC Part

920.120. Water wells must be sealed within 30 days after

abandonment and must be sealed by a licensed water Well driller pursuant to the Water Well and Pump Installation

Contractor's License Act. The submersible pump, drop pipe, pressure tank, and associated electrical components shall be removed from the well. The Well casing or liner shall be removed to at least three feet below final grade. The well shall be sealed in accordance with 77 IAC Part 920.120(b)

(3) (A), which applies to unconsolidated formations.

(Reference attached Well Construction Report accordingly.)

When was this Well abandon? Can the government provide referenced Well Construction Report and size of the Well?

It is not a monitoring well but a drinking water well. It has not been removed. The well report was on the FBO site as of August

23.

8-Sep-17

18 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

CLIN 0002 Para I, Section D, Item 4, states: Any soil disturbed as a result of any aspect of this project shall be containerized and sampled for contaminants. The contractor shall provide results of the sampling to the government. If soil is clean of contaminants, it becomes the property of the contractor. If soil is contaminated, it shall be disposed of at a licensed landfill. The contactor shall provide documentation that contaminated soil was handled and disposed of in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations. Please

Advise.

This paragraph only applies to the creosole poles that will be removed and testing at each of the sites to determine the extent of possible contamination to the surrounding soils.

Testing at each pole location shall be figured into the total cost and any contaminated removal shall be addressed as a modification at a later date.

Date

Recv'd

Date Sent to CES RFI Response

Date

Answered

19 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

CLIN 0002Is the contractor to include in their proposal a cost for additional testing? If additional testing is required, at this time the contractor cannot account for disposal cost due to quantities unknow. Will the government provide quantities for disposing of any additional soil. Is the contractor to assume extra testing will be required, outside of attached soil sampling reports from SGBC Group dated

9/15/2014?

see response to question 18. 8-Sep-17

20 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

CLIN 0002, Para I, Section E, Item 1, states: The contractor shall be responsible for obtaining a No Further Remediation letter from the Illinois Environmental Management Agency

(IEMA) for Scott AFB's Tank #87 LUST site (Illinois

Emergency Management Agency (IEMA) Incident #930373)

IAW 35 Illinois Administrative Code (IAC) 734. Has this tank been Remediated, or is it the contractor's responsibility to remove this tank? Please advise.

It is the contractors responsibility to close out the tank as provided by the reports that are on the FBO site.

8-Sep-17

21 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

CLIN 0002, Para I, Section E, Item 3, states: Previous Tank

Removal Report, Corrective Action Completion Report

(CACR) for Tank #87, IEPA response letter to CACR, and

October 2014 Plum Hill Soil and Well Sampling Report are included as attachments to this statement of work. Can the government provide the Previous Tank Removal &

Corrective Action Completion Reports?

The discussed documents are on the FBO website as of August 23.

8-Sep-17

22 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

CLINN 0002, Para I, Section G, states, "Furnish testing

(laboratory or on-site) and surveying services appropriate to perform all work listed above. This is a broad statement.

What type of laboratories, testing, surveying, etc. does the government expect results from? What type of test? What would we survey? Etc.

Only the testing of the soils surrounding the poles. No additionas surveying or testing at this site would be required.

Date

Recv'd

Date Sent to CES RFI Response

Date

Answered

23 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

CLINN 0002, SOW, Ariel Environmental Sampling

(drawing), shows a Septic Tank A and a Septic Tank B. Are these two separate tanks? Or two sample from the same tank? Are these septic tanks to be removed?

Only one septic system existed. Testing was taken at the effluents for the pipes.

8-Sep-17

24 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

CLINN 0002, SOS, Ariel Environmental Sampling

(drawing), shows a Tank A and a Tank B. Are these two separate tanks? Or two samples from the same tank? Are these tanks to be removed?

See the respinse to question 23. 8-Sep-17

25 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

CLINN 0003, Para I, Section C, Confirmation Sampling.

Based on the attachments it appears soil sampling has been completed by the government. However this SOW state the contractor shall provide additional sampling. Please Advise.

Confirmation samples are required once the building footprint has been removed and sampling surrounding the footprint after the contaminated soils have been removed.

8-Sep-17

26 4-Sep-17 6-Sep-17

CLINN 0003, Para I, Section D, shows a web site for what appears to be laboratories, http://www.navylabs.navy.mil.

This address does not appear to work. Please send the correct web address.

The contractor shall go to the following site for the information:

www.denix.osd.mil/edqu/documents/qsm-version-5-1-final/

8-Sep-17

27 8-Sep-17 8-Sep-17

The current completion date calls for January 10, 2017. Is that supposed to read January 10, 2018 (based on an anticipated award date of October 10, 2017 as denoted?)

Yes 8-Sep-17