Building_500_Storage_Tank_Report.pdf

I

ORlGir~AL

CORRECTIVE ACTION COMPLETION DOCUMENT:

No FURTHER REMEDIAL ACTION RECOMMENDATION FOR

FORMER PETROLEUM UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK

SITES 54, 58, ~l, 6~, 82, 83,'AND_-87 ·

HydroGeologic, Inc.

1155 Herndon Parkway Suite 900 Herndon, Virginia 20170

(703) 478-5186

SCOTT AFB, ILLINOIS·

Contract No. F41624-95-D-8005

Prepared for U.S. Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence

Brooks AFB, Texas

August 1997

Corrective Action Completion Document:

No Further Remedial Action Recommendation for

Former Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Sites 54, 58, 61, 63, 82, 83, and 87

Scott AFB, Illinois

Contract No. F41624-95-D-8005

Prepared for:

U.S. Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence Brooks AFB, Texas

August 1997

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 OBJECTIVES

1.2 INSTALLATION DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY

2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

2.1 LAND USE

2.2 PHYSIOGRAPHY

2.3 REGIONAL GEOLOGY

2.4 REGIONAL HYDROLOGY

3.0 TECHNICAL APPROACH/METHODOLOGY

3.1 STATE OF ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY TITLE 35

3.2 NO FURTHER ACTION DETERMINATION

4.0 OVERVIEW OF NO FURTHER ACTION TANK SITES

4.1 FORMER TANK SITE DESCRIPTIONS

5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

6.0 REFERENCES

Appendix A Corrective Action Completion Report Corrective Action Completion Report Corrective Action Completion Report Corrective Action Completion Report Corrective Action Completion Report Corrective Action Completion Report Corrective Action Completion Report

Tank 54 Tank 58 Tank 61 Tank 63 Tank 82 Tank 83 Tank 87

U.S. Air Force Cemer for Environmental Excellence

Corrective Action Completion Document:

No Further Remedial Action Recommendation for

Former Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Sites 54, 58, 61 , 63, 82, 83, and 87

Scott AFB, Illinois

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This document is being submitted to the State of Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEP A) on behalf of Scott Air Force Base, Illinois (Scott AFB, the base) to request issuance of No Further Remediation Letters for seven former petroleum underground storage tank (UST) sites, at Scott AFB. This document is authorized as part of Delivery Order 0009 under U.S. Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence (AFCEE) Contract Number F41624-95-D-8005. HydroGeoLogic, Inc. (HydroGeoLogic) has been contracted to characterize UST sites, to determine remedial activities to be performed at the former UST sites, and, upon completion of necessary remedial activities, to request closure of each UST site.

1.1 OBJECTIVES

The objective of this request is to obtain No Further Remediation Letters from IEPA for seven former UST sites that meet the requirements for a No Further Remediation determination as

-prescribed by the State of Illinois under Title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code. The USTs at the seven sites were removed on various dates between 1992 and 1993. This document contains seven site-specific Corrective Action Completion Reports, 45 Day Reports , Laboratory Reports , Laboratory Certification, and Professional Engineer Certifications submitted pursuant to Title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code, Parts 732 and 742. Laboratory Certification Forms were not completed by A TEC Corporation for Tank 87 as it was not required at the time of tank removal.

However , A TEC states in the 45 Day report and the Laboratory Report that EPA Certified Methods and Procedures were used in sample collection, transportation, and analysis.

1.2 INST ALLA Tl ON DESCRIPTION AND ffiSTORY

Scott AFB is located in St. Clair County, Illinois, approximately 25 miles southeast of St. Louis , Missouri, in southwestern Illinois. The City of Belleville, Illinois, is located approximately 6 miles southwest of the base and the City of O 'Fallon, Illinois, is located approximately 5 miles northwest of the base. Scott AFB property comprises approximately 2,503 acres of U.S.

Government-owned and easement land, including five off-base remote locations. Agricultural land borders all sides of the base (ERM, 1992; SOW, 1997).

Scott AFB was established in 1917 as an aircraft pilot training facility known as Scott Field.

Between approximately 1920 and 1937, dirigible airships were assigned to Scott Field. A basewide construction program began in 1938, and, between 1940 and 1942, four concrete

U.S. Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence

HydroGeoLogic, Inc. - Corrective Action Completion Document-Scott AFB, Illinois runways were constructed. During and after World War II, Scott AFB has been headquarters for various military commands (ERM, 1992). Today, several military headquarters , a reserve aeromedical airlift wing, and a U.S. Army reserve aviation support facility are stationed at the base. The primary missions of Scott AFB are managing a domestic aeromedical evacuation system, providing operational support for airlift within the United States, and providing initial qualification training for C-9 and C-21 pilots (Scott AFB Website, 1997).

2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

A cursory review of the land use, physiography, regional geology, and regional hydrology for Scott AFB is provided in the following sections. This information is provided to characterize the base environmental setting and is to be used in conjunction with the seven site-specific Corrective Action Completion Reports.

2.1 LAND USE

Scott AFB land is used exclusively as an active military base by the U.S. Department of Defense.

Airbase facilities and runways comprise the largest portion of the installation, which also includes living quarters and recreational facilities (ERM, 1992). Recently, St. Clair County entered a joint use agreement with the U.S . Air Force at Scott AFB for a civilian air carrier airport (Parsons, 1995).

The predominate land use surrounding Scott AFB is agricultural, with small retail shops located near the primary gates to the base. The Mascoutah-Wherry Elementary School is located approximately 1,000 feet north of the base (ERM, 1992).

2.2 PHYSIOGRAPHY

Scott AFB is located in the Springfield Plain subdivision of the Till Plains section of the Central Lowlands physiographic province. The land surface is approximately level with an elevation difference of 90 feet between the ridge north of the base and the Silver Creek floodplain located along the eastern boundary of the base. A belt of low ridges and mounded hills are located west northwest of the base (ERM, 1992).

2.3 REGIONAL GEOLOGY

Surface geology at Scott AFB , in descending order, consists of: eolian deposits , which include the Peoria Loess and the Roxana Silt; alluvial deposits , which include the Cahokia Alluvium; and glacial deposits, which include the Pearl Formation and the Hagarstown and Vandalia Till Members of the Glasford Formation. Total thickness of unconsolidated materials ranges between 50 and 100 feet. Bedrock geology, in descending order, consists of two Pennsylvanian-age formations: the Modesto and the Carbondale Formations. Both formations are somewhat similar in nature and are primarily composed of gray shale with lesser amounts of claystone, siltstone, sandstone, limestone, and coal. In the vicinity of Scott AFB, the Modesto Formation is less than 275 feet thick and the Carbondale Formation is approximately 175 feet thick (ERM, 1992).

2.4 REGIONAL HYDROLOGY

Significant regional aquifers do not exist in the area of western Illinois where Scott AFB is located, but groundwater within unconsolidated units and bedrock is often used locally as a source of potable water. It should be noted that Scott AFB and nearby communities purchase water from a municipal water distribution system that obtains water from the Mississippi River. No drinking water wells are known to be in use on the base, but several drinking water wells have been completed at the base in the past (ERM, 1992).

Three aquifers, in descending order, are present in the vicinity of the base: alluvial, glacial deposit, and bedrock aquifers. The alluvial aquifer in the Silver Creek sand and gravel layers of alluvium contains groundwater at a depth of 1 to 3 feet below land surface. The glacial deposit aquifers in the thin and discontinuous sand and gravel layers of the Pearl Formation and the Vandalia Till Member of the Glasford Formation contain water at a depth of 10 to 35 feet below land surface; however, the sand and gravel zones are almost totally enclosed in lower permeability silts and glacial till clays. The bedrock aquifers consist primarily of Pennsylvanian-age, non water-bearing shale and thin, discontinuous beds of sandstone and limestone that yield small quantities of potable water, with water-bearing fractures likely to occur in the upper 50 feet of the bedrock (ERM, 1992).

3.0 TECHNICAL APPROACH/METHODOLOGY

An overview of the methodology employed to determine no further remedial action eligibility is presented in the following sections. The objective of this investigation is to obtain No Further Remediation Letters from IEP A for seven USTs that meet the requirements for no further remediation prescribed by the State of Illinois under Title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code.

3.1 STATE OF ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY TITLE 35

The seven USTs were removed on various dates between 1992 and 1993. At the time of each tank removal , soil samples were collected and 45 Day Reports were submitted to the IEPA. Two different contractors oversaw tank removal events: IT Corporation and ATEC Corporation. For this document, HydroGeoLogic has compared the data collected by IT Corporation and ATEC Corporation during tank removal activities to the remediation objectives proposed by the State of Illinois under Title 35 , Subtitle G, Part 742, Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives (TACO) Tier 1 Remediation Objectives for soil in conjunction with Title 35, Subtitle G, Part 732, Petroleum Underground Storage Tanks.

HydroGeoLogic is submitting seven site-specific Corrective Action Completion Reports and accompanying Professional Engineer Certifications pursuant to Title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code Part 732.300(b) to demonstrate compliance with the remediation objectives required in Part 732.408 and in conjunction with Part 742, which contains remediation objectives for applicable indicator contaminants. The Corrective Action Completion Reports and accompanying Professional Engineer Certifications have been completed and submitted on forms prescribed and provided by the IEPA. These reports and certificates, along with supporting analytical tables and site maps, are presented in Appendix A.

3.2 NO FURTHER ACTION DETERMINATION

The most conservative, or most stringent, TACO Tier 1 soil remediation objectives for residential property use were used for screening analytical data. The specific objectives were the most stringent values chosen from the four Tier 1 residential soil exposure routes: ingestion, inhalation, the soil component of groundwater for Class I groundwater, and the soil component of groundwater for Class II groundwater. The most stringent remediation objectives are presented in the analytical data summary tables attached to the Corrective Action Completion Report form for each former tank site.

4.0 OVERVIEW OF NO FURTHER ACTION TANK SITES

Presented below are brief abstracts of each of the seven former tank sites for which Corrective Action Completion Reports and supporting documentation have been completed. The complete reports for each tank are included as separate tabbed sections in Appendix A of this document.

4.1 FORMER TANK SITE DESCRIPTIONS

Tank 54:

Taruc 58:

Tank 61:

Tank 63:

Tank 82:

Tank 54 was installed in 1968 to store diesel fuel for a backup generator and had a capacity of 1,000 gallons. Tank 54 was removed on May 19, 1993, at which time the Office of the Illinois State Fire Marshal (OSFM) inspector classified the site as "significant." Neither groundwater nor free product was encountered during tank removal activities.

Tank 58 was installed in 1986 to store diesel fuel for a backup generator and had a capacity of 500 gallons. Tank 58 was removed on April 13, 1993, at which time the OSFM inspector classified the site as "minor" and determined that no groundwater was encountered.

Tank 61 was installed in 1985 to store diesel fuel for a backup generator and had a capacity of 500 gallons. Tank 61 was removed on April 29, 1993 , at which time the OSFM inspector classified the site as "minor." Neither groundwater nor free product was encountered during tank removal activities.

Tank 63 was installed in 1974 to store diesel fuel and had a capacity of 275 gallons.

Tank 63 was removed on May 4, 1993 . Although no diesel-impacted soils were observed during tank removal activities, the OSFM inspector classified the site as "significant." Neither groundwater nor free product was encountered during tank removal.

Tank 82 was installed in 1964 to store diesel fuel for a backup generator and had a capacity of 500 gallons. Tank 82 was removed on April 29, 1993, at which time

Tank 83:

Tank 87:

HydroGeoLogic, Inc. - Corrective Acrion Completion Document-Scoa AFB, Illinois the OSFM inspector classified the site as "significant." Neither groundwater nor free product was encountered during tank removal activities.

Tank 83 was installed in 1964 to store diesel fuel for a back.up generator and had a capacity of 300 gallons. Tank 83 was removed on May 11, 1992, at which time the OSFM inspector classified the site as "minor." Neither groundwater nor free product was encountered during tank removal activities.

Tank 87 was installed to store #2 fuel oil for heating and had a capacity of 1,500 gallons. Tank 87 was removed on January 29, 1993, at which time the Office of the OSFM inspector classified the site as "significant." Neither groundwater nor free product was encountered during tank removal activities.

5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

As presented in each site-specific Corrective Action Completion Report, in Appendix A, analytical data collected during tank removal activities at six of the seven tank sites revealed concentrations of constituents below the most stringent TACO Tier 1 Remediation Objectives for soil. At only one site, Tank 82, the most stringent TACO Tier 1 Remediation Objectives for soil were slightly exceeded. In this case, the data were compared to the next-most stringent cleanup criteria and found to be below these levels. The analytical data collected during tank removal activities, the subsequent over-excavation of contaminated soil and backfill material, the lack of connection between underground utilities and groundwater, and the lack of receptor wells in the vicinity of the tank sites support HydroGeoLogic's recorrunendation that the State of Illinois issue a finding of No Further Action for the seven tank sites.

6.0 REFERENCES

Environmental Resources Management (ERM), Inc. , 1992, Installation Restoration Program Stage 1 - Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study, Final Technical Report, Volume 1.

Parsons Engineering Science, Incorporated, 1995, Final Multi-Site Preliminary Assessment/Site Investigation.

Scott Air Force Base, 1997, World Wide Web Sites , http://infosphere.safb.af.mil and http://www.safb.af. mil.

State of Illinois , 1997, Title 35, Subtitle G, Part 732 , Petroleum Underground Storage Tanks.

State of Illinois, 1997, Title 35, Subtitle G, Part 742, Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives (TACO) Tier 1 Remediation Objectives for soil.

HydroGeoLogic, Inc. - Corrective Action Completion Document-Scou AFB, Illinois

U.S. Air Force Center For Envirorunental Excellence, 1997, Statement of Work, Soil and Groundwater Investigation at Former Underground Storage Tanlc Sites for Project No.

VDYD 97-EC22/ST-10 at Scott Air Force Base, Illinois .

U.S. Air Force Cenier for Environmental Excellence

APPENDIX A

Tho Agency is autl,orizcd to require chis information wider Section 4 and Title XV! o ftlle Enviro,unenl3! Protc<:tion ,\ct (415 ILCS 514, 5157 - 57.17}. Failure to disclose dlis information may result in a civil pc-nalry of not to exceed $50,000.00 for tllc viola tion and an additional c ivil penally o f no t to exceed $ 10,000.00 for each day during which tlle violation continues (41 5 ILCS 5/42). Any person who knowing ly makes a false material statement or representation in any label, manifest, record, report. pcm1it, or license, or odler document filed , maimained or used for tllc purpose o f compliance witll Table XVI commits a Class 4 felony. Any second o r subsequent offense after conviction hereunder is a Class 3 felony (4 15 ILCS 5/57.17) . -n ,is form has been approved by dlc Fo m1s Managcmcm Center.

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program

Corrective Action Completion Report

A. Site Identification

IEMA Incident# (6 digi1>: 930373 IEPA Generator# oodigi1>: IL7570024177

Site Name: Building 500, Tank 87 (Plumb Hil1 Road)

Site Address (Not a P.O. Box}: 375 A WIEMO 701 Hangar Road

City: Scott Air Force Base

B. Site Information

1. Is this an amended report?

County: St. Clair

2. Has a High Priority Corrective Action Plan been approved?

Date of approval letter:

3. This completion report is being submitted pursuant to:

a. 35 Ill. Adm. Code 731.166 b . 35 Ill. Adm. Code 732.300(b)

c. 35 Ill. Adm. Code 732.400(b) d . 35 Ill . Adm. Code 732.400(c)

e. 35 Ill. Adm. Code 732.409(a)(2)(b)

4. Method of remediation chosen:

Yes_ No_lL

Yes_ No_x_

X a . Soil Over-excavation of the tank hold area including original tank backfil1 material and fuel oil-impacted soil.

b . Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered during removal activities.

5. Quantity of contaminated media remediated/recovered:

a. Soil

b. Groundwater

c. Free Product

IL 532 2288

LPC 514 Rev. Dec -96 l of 3

_..il. yds. 3

NIA gals.

NIA gals.

C. Completion Information (See Attachment)

Provide the following:

1. A chronological narrative of corrective action activities;

2. An explanation of how the corrective action activities remediated each of the threats which caused the site to be classified "High Priority" ;

3 . An explanation of how corrective action addressed the exposure pathway that caused the site to be classified "High Priority";

4 . A discussion of how the cleanup objectives were determined;

5. Media sampling and analytical procedures to verify completion of remediation;

6. The analytical results and cleanup objectives in tabular· format;

7. Laboratory reports;

8. Soil boring logs;

9. Monitoring well logs;

10. Laboratory Certification;

11 . Applicable Professional Engineer Certification;

12. Site maps to scale and oriented north showing the:

a. Final soil sample locations demonstrating completion of remediation;

b. Groundwater monitoring well locations;

c. Groundwater recovery/discharge points;

d. Plume of contamination as defined by laboratory analyses;

e. Area remediated.

13 . A legal description of the site or a reference to a plat showing the site boundaries.

14. The real estate tax index/parcel index number.

15 . Photographs documenting corrective action activities .

D. Signatures

I certify under penalty of law that this report, supporting documents and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision. To the best of my knowledge and belief, this report, supporting documents and all attachments are true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.

Owner

Name: George R. Auten, Jr., Lt. Col., USAF

Title: Base Civil Engineer

Address: 701 Hangar Road

Scott Air Force Base, IL 62225-5035

Phone: (618) 256-2701

IL 532 2288

LPC 514 Rev. Dec-96

Operator

Name: Daniel W. McKenzie, Lt. Col., USAF

Title: Commander, Environmental Mgmt

Address: 701 Hangar Road

Scott Air Force Base, IL 62265-5035

Phone: (618) 256-2092

2 of3

Sisnature: ~ ~ I

Date: 4: 0qf-1-J

Consultant

Firm: HvdroGeoLogic. Inc.

Contact: Miquette Gerber, P.G.

Title: Pro ject Manager

Address : 1155 Herndon Pkwv, Suite 900

Herndon. VA 20170

Phone : (703) 478-5186

Signarur~·:lti,c / lo (~~._.

- I

IL 532 2288

Signature M__tu ~c'r- Date: . :J S;J rz

LPC 514 Rev. Dec -96 3 of 3

Tank 87 - Attachment Page I of 4 8/25/97

C. Completion Information

Provide the following:

1. A chronological narrative of corrective action activities;

Tanlc 87 was installed near Building 500, located approximately 4 miles southwest of Scott Air Force Base (AFB), to store #2 fuel oil for heating purposes and had a capacity of 1,500 gallons. (See Figures 1 and 2.) Tank 87 was removed on January 29, 1993, at which time the Office of the Illinois State Fire Marshal (OSFM) inspector classified the site as "significant." Neither groundwater nor free product was encountered during tank removal activities.

A release from Tanlc 87 was reported to Illinois Emergency Services and Disaster Agency (IESDA, currently the Illinois Emergency Management Agency) on February 11 , 1993. The 20 Day Certification report was completed February 12, 1993, and the 45 Day Report was completed on March 25, 1993. The 45 Day Report was prepared on behalf of Scott AFB by ATEC Associates, Inc. (ATEC). It should be noted that for this document, HydroGeoLogic has compared the data collected by ATEC during tank removal activities to the remediation objectives proposed by the State of Illinois under Title 35, Subtitle G, Part 742, Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives (TACO) Tier 1 Remediation Objectives for soil.

At the time of the tank removal, the tank was in sound structural condition (no holes were observed) and the OSFM described the condition of the tank as "good." No signs of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination such as staining or petroleum odors were observed in the soils surrounding the tank. However, analytical results from samples collected from the excavation indicated that soils surrounding the tank had been impacted by fuel oil. (See Table A for a summary of analytical results.) The cause of the release was suspected overfill.

Seven soil samples (T87-1, T87-2, T87-3 , T87-4, T87-5 , T87-6, and T87-7) were collected during tank removal activities. Analytical results from these samples indicated the levels of contamination in soils at the site were below the most stringent TACO Tier 1 Remediation Objectives for soil. For a description of sampling results , please refer to Section 5, below.

Based on the excavation perimeter depicted in Figure 1, the extent of the soil excavation measured approximately 9 feet by 18 feet in area, with an assumed depth of 8 feet.

Therefore, after subtracting the volume of the tank, approximately 41 cubic yards of

Tanlc 87 - Attachment 8/25/97 original backfill material and contaminated soil were excavated during tank removal activities .

2 . An explanation of how the corrective action activities remediated each of the threats which caused the site to be classified "High Priority";

Not applicable.

3. An explanation of how corrective action addressed the exposure pathway that caused the site to be classified "High Priority";

Not applicable.

4 . A discussion of how the cleanup objectives were determined;

The most stringent cleanup objectives were used: TACO Tier 1 Soil Remediation Objectives for residential property , proposed by the State of Illinois under Title 35, Subtitle G, Part 742, Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives (TACO) Tier 1 Remediation Objectives for soil.

5. Media sampling and analytical procedures to verify completion of remediation;

After tank removal, a total of seven soil samples (T87-1, T87-2, T87-3 , T87-4, T87-5 , T87-6, and T87-7) were collected. (Please refer to Figure 1 and Table A for sampling locations and a summary of the analytical results, respectively.) Soil samples were collected and analyzed for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX) and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PNAs). (For a complete account of sampling procedures, please refer to the 45 Day Report prepared by ATEC , dated March 25, 1993, and provided in Attachment A.) The analytical results of the soil sample analyses indicated low concentrations of BTEX and carcinogenic PNAs. The concentrations of all constituents were below the most stringent TACO Tier 1 Remediation Objectives for soil.

Neither free product nor groundwater was encountered during tank removal activities.

The Tank 87 site is a remote site located south of Scott AFB.

6. The analytical results and cleanup objectives in tabular format;

See Table A.

Taruc 87 - Attachment 8/25/97

7. Laboratory reports;

Laboratory reports are contained in the 45 Day Report dated March 25 , 1993 and provided in Attachment A.

8. Soil boring logs;

Not applicable. No soil borings were advanced at the site.

9. Monitoring well logs;

Not applicable. No monitoring wells were installed at the site and groundwater was not encountered during tank removal activities.

10. Laboratory Certification;

Laboratory certifications are contained in the 45 Day Report dated March 25, 1993 and provided in Attachment A.

11. Applicable Professional Engineer Certification;

Presented as Attachment B.

12 . Site maps to scale and oriented north showing the:

a. Final soil sample locations demonstrating completion of remediation;

See Figure 1.

b. Groundwater monitoring well locations;

Not applicable. Monitoring wells were not installed at the site.

c. Groundwater recovery/discharge points;

Not applicable.

d. Plume of contamination as defined by laboratory analyses;

Not applicable.

Tank 87 - Attachment 8/25/97

e. Area remediated.

Figure 1 illustrates the area from which soil was removed to prevent possible migration of contaminants.

13. A legal description of the site or a reference to a plat showing the site boundaries.

The tank site is located in Township IN, Range 74, Section 12. Figure 2 illustrates the site boundary of the Tank 87, Building 500 site.

14. The real estate tax index/parcel index number.

As Scott AFB is owned by the U.S. Government, the property is exempt from real estate taxation.

15. Photographs documenting corrective action activities.

Not applicable. ATEC did not submit photographs for this location.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The concentrations of constituents in soil samples collected from the former tank hold area of Tank 87 were below the most stringent TACO Tier 1 Remediation Objectives for soil. The analytical data collected during tank removal activities and the amount of soil and backfill removed from the tank site support HydroGeoLogic's recommendation that the State of Illinois issue a finding of No Further Action for this tank site.

PRODUCT PIPE

EXCAVATION PERIMETER

~RO • IGc.

rB

AIR CONDITIONER

2.5 5

APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET

LEGEND N

SAMPLE POTNT

AREA REMEDIATED /

FORMER UST LOCATION

BUILDING

FIGURE 1

EXCAVATION AND SAM PLE POJ~TS

UST 87, BUILDING 500

SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE, ILLINOIS

Hy rlroCeologic, Inc.

FIGURE 2

Site Location

UST 87, Building 500 Scott AFB, Illinois

Air Force Center For Environmental Excellence

Brooks AFB~ Texas

LEGEND

• Building

Road

[~] Site Boundary

N i 1000 2000

Approximate Scale in feet

~RO eo!Qgi<;, Map Source:

USGS, / 990

"- I f~vdroOcologic. Inc.

QH/0 __J FIGURE 3

Site Proximity to Base UST 87, Building 500

/- , r 'i, Jl~ / > <t .;~ 1~ ·-r- I I 136 )) ~~~ ,~--R--- I Scott AFB, Illinois ~Cem

Air Force Center

' I ~-1 T -------- --- . StL/1 J t --\\fq For Environmental Excellence . I r- Brooks AFB, Texas -·1 . \~~; , • ,_6 I

LEGEND

- Building

Road

}1,~~ a Base Boundary "1::

I

--,1 I fL...r Creek or River

N t 0 10,000 20,000

Approximate Scale in feet

·, , I i I . I \I d~R..O IGc.

El Map Sourr:e:

Ci USGS, / 986 96

Tank-87 Page I of 2

Chemical Name

Acenaphthene

Anthracene

Benzene

Benzo[a)amhracenc

Benzo[bl nuoranthcnc

Benzo[k) fluoranthcnc

Benzo[a}pyrene

Chrysene

Dibenzol a, h janthraccne

Ethylbenzene

Fluoranthene

Fluorene

Indeno! I .2.3-c,dlpyrene

Naphthalene

Pyrene

Toluene

Xylenes (total) iank-87.ibl.w~d

TABLE A

Tier l Soil Remediation Obj ectives3 for Residential Properties

Most

Stringent Tier 1 Value1 T87-1 T87-2 T87-'3 T87-4

(mg/kg) North Wall South Wall East -Wall West Wall

570" ND (1.481) ND (l.348) ND (1.558) ND (0.846)

12,000h ND (0.815) ND (0.742) ND (0.857) ND (1.538)

0.03 ND (0.002) ND (0.002) ND (0.002) ND (0.002)

0.9c ND (0.011) 0.041 ND (0.012) ND (0.012)

0.9° ND (0.014) 0.040 ND (0.014) ND (0.014)

9" ND (0.014) 0.018 ND (0.014) ND (0.014)

0.09"·' ND (0.019) 0.018 ND (0.019) ND (0.019)

88c ND 0.051 ND ND (0.123) (0.112) (0.130) (0.128)

0.09"·' ND (0.025) ND (0.022) ND (0.026) ND (0.026)

13 ND (0.002) ND (0.002) ND (0.002) ND (0.002)

3 ,1 00" ND (0.8 15) ND (0.742) ND (0.857) ND (0.846)

560h ND (0.173) ND (0.157) ND (0.182) ND (0.179)

0.9° ND (0.036) ND (0.033) ND (0.038) ND (0.037)

8411 ND (0.815) ND (0.742) ND (0.857) ND (0.846)

2,300"

ND 0.125 ND ND

(0.222) (0.202) (0.234) (0.231 )

0.001

0.002 0.002 0.002 (0.002)

150 ND (0.006) ND (0.006) ND (0.006) ND (0.006)

T87-5 T87-6 T87-7 North.Base South Base Piping

ND (1.224) ND (l.237) ND (1.237)

ND (0.673) ND (0.680) ND (0.680)

ND (0.002) ND (0.002) ND (0.002)

ND (0.009) 0.073 ND (0.009)

ND (0.011) 0.067 ND (0.011)

ND (0.011) 0.032 ND (0.01 1)

ND (0.015) 0.042 ND (0.015)

ND 0.090 ND

(0.102) (0.103) (0.103)

ND (0.020) ND (0.021) ND (0.021)

ND (0.002) ND (0.002) ND (0.002)

ND (0.673) ND (0.068) ND (0.068)

ND (0. 143) ND (0.144) ND (0. 144)

ND (0.030) ND (0.030) ND (0.030)

ND (0.673) ND (0.680) ND (0.680)

ND

0.278

ND

(0. 184) (0.186)

ND ND 0.001

(0.002) (0.002) (0.002)

ND (0.005) ND (0.005) ND (0.005)

HydroGcoLogic, In<:. 8/14/97

Tank-87 b

TABLE A (continued) Tier 1 Soil Remediation Objectivef for Residential Properties

This column prescms lhc most stringem Tier 1 soil remediation value among the ingestion, inhalation, soil component of Class I groundwater ingestion, and soil component of Class II groundwater ingestion exposure routes. Values in this column are not included for chemicals for which no data was obtained. The remediation objective values are those proposed hy the State of Illinois under Title 35. Subtitle G. Part 742, Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives (TACO) Tier 1 Remediation Objectives for soil.

Soil remediation objectives based on human health cri teria only .

Calculated values correspond 10 a target hazard quo1ie111 of 1.

Calculated values correspond 10 a cancer risk level or 1 in 1,000,000.

Level is at or below Contract Laboratory Program required quantit.ation limit for Regular Analytical Services (RAS) .

NA = Not Analyzed

ND = Not Detected: detection limit in parenthesis unk-87 tbl. wp<I HydroGcol.ogic, Inc. 8/14197

ATTACHMENT A

45 DAY REPORTS

LABORATORY REPORTS

LABO RA TORY CERTIFICATION

This information has been omitted as requested by AFCEE and Scott AFB.

ATTACHMENT B

PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER CERTIFICATION

The Agency is authorized to require this infonnatioo under Sectioo 4 and Title >..'VI of the Fnviromnental Protection Act (415 ILCS 5/4, 5/57 -57.17). Failure to disclose this information may result in a civil penalty of not to exceed $50,000.00 for the violation and ao additional civil penalty of not co exceed S!0,000.00 for each day during which the violation continues (415 lLCS 5/42). Any person who knowingly makes a false material statement or representation in any label, manifest, record, repon, permit, or license, or other document filed, maintained or used for the purpose of compliance with Table ){VJ commits a Oass 4 felooy. Any second or subsequent offense after conviction hereunder is a Class 3 felony (415 TLCS 5/57 . 17). This fonn has been approved by the Fonns Management Center. • ·

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program

Professional Engineer Certification

A. Site Identification

IEMA Incident # <6 digit) :---"-9=-3-""""0=3__,_7=-3 ____ _ IEPA Generator# OOdigi1): IL7570024177

Site Name: -=B~u=ild=i=n_g=5-00=·~T=a=nk~8~7~( ..... P=lum==b~H=ill-R=o=a=d-) _____________ _

Site Address (Not a P.O. Box): 3 7 5 AW /EMO 701 Hangar Road

City: Scott AFB

B. Certification

County: St. Clair

The release from the underground storage tank system(s) identified by the above referenced incident number at the above referenced site has been remediated in accordance with 35 Ill. Adm.

Code, Part D 731 or l8J 732 and other applicable rules and regulations. The remedial activities are described in the Corrective Action Completion Report dated June 23 1997 The remediation has achieved the objectives set forth by the Agency in:

35 Ill. Adm. Code Part 742 X

Site Specific Cleanup Objectives approved by the Agency in the letter dated ________ _

Other (specify)------------

1 certify under penalty of law that the Corrective Action Completion Report, supporting documents and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision or were reviewed by me. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the attached Corrective Action Completion Report, supporting documents and all attachments are true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of the fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.

Professional Engineer

N ame:_~S=an""'j..,,.iv"--=P-=il=la=i~--------

Firm: _ ___,,S..._A ...... F._.IN......,...A........,I=n=c.,_. _ _____ _

Address: 1722 Sable Lane #101

Mt. Prospect, IL 60056

Phone :_ ....... (8"'""4""'"7 ....... ) _,_7-18""""-=-18"""'1..:.,9 _ ____ _

Ill. Registration No. 062-049501

L_icense Exp~ation ?,ate: November 30, 1997

Signature: ~o~ Date: , ;;.:-it ()(l

P. E. Seal

IL 532 2289

LPC 515 Rev. Dec-96

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

GEOLOGY/HYDROLOGY

2.1 Regional Geology

2.2 Site Observations

SITE INVESTIGATION

3.1 Physical Site Conditions

3.2 UST Removal, Decontamination and Disposal

3.3 Environmental Soils Screening

SAMPLING AND LABORATORY ANALYSIS

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

QUALIFICATIONS

APPENDICES

Appendix A: Project Documentation Appendix B: Laboratory Analysis Appendix C: Photographic Documentation

PAGE

l

Tank 87 Removal Report

UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REMOVAL PROJECT

U.S. AffiMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS CONT!u\.CT NUMBER DACA27-92-D-0027

Tank 87 /Bldg 500 Scott AFB, Illinois

Delivery Order Number S004 ATEC Project Number 21-04-92-00089

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The U.S. Army Corps ()If Engineers (USARCOE) contracted ATEC Environment.al

Construction (A TEC) to n!move and dispose of the following underground storage tank

(UST) at Building 500 in Scott AFB, Illinois.

UST,I.D. ·# C�ACITY _(gall�ns) ·1. :MATERIAL I

87 1,500 T

#2 Fuel Oil I Steel I

Upon accepting ATEC's work plan, the USARCOE provided ATEC with notice to proceed, via Delivery Order S004. ATEC filed the required thirty (30) day notification with the Illinois Office of the State Fire Marshall on December 22, 1992 and received authorization to remove the vessel on December 29, 1992. Copies of the 30-day notification and authorization are located in Appendix A of this report. Work was scheduled in accordance with the 30-day notification period and overall project logistics.

Operations commenced on January 29, 1993 and were completed on the same day.

Information provided by the USARCOE indicated the vessel contracted for removal had been used for bulk storage of products used for the operation of an on-site heating system. The age of the vessel or date of installation were not available.

Regulations pertaining to USTs were promulgated on the federal level in 1988, and codified in 40 CFR 280 Underground Storage Tank Regulations. These regulations stipulate that the owners/operators of UST systems must either upgrade or remove their storage tanks in accordan,ce with a pre-determined time table based upon the age of the system. All UST remov:als (with the exception of deferred systems) must undergo an environmental site assessmt�nt to determine if the operation has negatively impacted the surrounding environment. The burden of monitoring regulatory compliance and establishing environmental ;procedures is placed upon the state regulatory agency, which in this case is the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA).

IEPA guidelines require each UST removal or abandonment in place to undergo a detailed soil sampling program. The number of samples is based upon the size of the vessel and is specified in the work plan for this site. The required analytical method for evaluation of petroleum products is Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylene (BTEX), via U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8020 and Polynuclear

Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PNAs), via EPA Method 81()0. Further discussion of analytical methods and field techniques are included in Section 4.0 of this report.

2.0 GEOLOGY/HYDROLOGY

A basic understanding of the geology, surface water; and groundwater characteristics is essential to estabJjsh if the UST system operation has negatively affected the surrounding environment. In the event of a petroleum release into the subsurface, this general and site specific information can be utilized to develop contaminant migration and fate models in addition to performing ri:;k assessment studies. ATEC has collected and collated data available through public data bases, such as the United States Geologic Survey, the local

Soil Conservation Service and from ATEC's in-house data base to establish these parameters.

2.1 Regional Geology

Located in southwest Illino:is, immediately east of the St. Louis area, St. Clair County is bordered on the west by the Mississippi River and encompasses an area of 673 square miles. Ten percent of the !land area is in the Mississippian flood plain (Jacobs, 1971);

the balance of the county is glacial till, wind blown deposits (loess) and fluvial deposits limited to surface water sheds.

Mississippian age carbonates Qimestones) unconformably underlie the county, at depths of varying from ten (10) to two hundred (200) feet. (Odom, 1971). These bedrock carbonates outcrop at the western edge of the county alone the Mississippi River floodplain. Typically these formations are interbeded shales, limestones or dolomites and minor sandstone lenses .

Till plains, are associated with glacial sedimentation, in this case the tiUs are a result of the advance of continental scale glaciation in Wisconsin advance. Generali y, till plains are flat and have a surface Jphysiographic expression of upland areas. By definition, tills are comprised of an unsorted, unstratifed mixture of rock particles in a clay, silt and sand matrix. Particle size distribution is typically bi- or tri-modal, indicating the multiple provenance of the sediments.

Conversely, flood plain deposits tend to be well sorted, single-modal sediments.

Typically, the deposits are stratified and can be correlated in time and space.

2.2 Site Observations

Observations of the strata exposed at the site confirmed the regional analysis of the geologic setting.

This report serves as documentation of ATEC's field activities, removal methods and laboratory analysis relative to the USARCOE's UST program.

3.0 SITE INVESTIGATION

Documented below are ATEC's field observations and work procedures concerning this

UST removal operation. Nlr. James Nance, ATEC's on-site Contractor Quality Control

(CQC) Manager, performed the investigation under the dire.ct supervision of the authors.

3.1 Physical Site Conditions

A TEC' s UST removal crew, under the supervision of Mr. Nance, performed the UST removal operations. Prior to commencing UST removal operations, EnviroSolve

Environmental Managemeint, Inc. (EnviroSolve) of Indianapolis, Indiana, an Illinois licensed special waste transporter removed the remaining product from the vessel.

Figure 1 is a topographic vicinity map indicating elevation and area location. Figure 2 illustrates the layout of the project site, UST location and ATEC's work plan.

3.2 UST Removal, Decontamination and Disposal

Upon exposing the UST, ATEC monitored the internal atmosphere of the vessel for both the Lower Explosive Limit (LEL) and percent oxygen. If necessary,the vessel was purged using a venturi eductor. Once LEL readings were less than 5 percent, the atmosphere allowed for the safe removal of the vessel from the excavation. The UST was extracted with a JCB ·Model 417 backhoe. Inspection revealed the vessel was sound structural condition. Cutti111g of the vessel's walls for decontamination proceeded after the visual examination, usiing a pneumatic chisel. ATEC personnel then cleaned the interior of the vessel.

Once the gross sludge removal was complete, the interior of the vessel was washed using high pressure water. Rinsate generated by cleaning operations was secured in 17H DOT approved 55-gallon drums, which were labeled with the appropriate waste identifiers.

All liquid wastes were removed off-site by EnviroSolve and disposed of within State and

Federal guidelines. Liquid:s, including product, rinsate and sludge were either recycled via fuel blending at a permitted facility or solidified and landfilled at Danville Sanitary

Landfill located in Danville, Indiana, a Waste Management

Inc., facility. Copies of the liquid waste disposal documentation are located in Appendix A of this report.

Once decontaminated, ATEC transported and disposed of the tank at the H & S Salvage

Scrap Yard located in O'Faillon, Illinois. Certification of the UST destruction is

V

I

Un"it.A Sch

AIR �ORCE BA ,E

SOvT ERN

L

0 H V A L L E

• • �-:,2

LOCATIQ_

7,9

Figure 1

Topographic Vicinity Map

Scott AFB, utinois 1" = 2000' y ,·f t?S

North

Driveway

Product Pipe 7 l'ank87

Plumb Hill Road

Figure 2 Site Plan

'Tank 87/Bldg 500 Not To Scale contained in Appendix A of this document which indemnifies the USARCOE of any further liability associated with the tank.

3.3 Environmental Soils Screening

Soils surrounding the vessel did not exhibit signs of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination (i.e., staining, petroleum odors). ATEC field screened the soils utilizing a Photoinoizing Detector (PID) in order to qualitatively establish the level of Total

Photoionizable Product Vapors (TPPVs). Elevated TPPV levels were not recorded at this site. However, analys:is performed on samples collected from the excavation did indicate negatively impacted soils surrounding the UST. ATEC notified the 375th Airlift

Wing, Environmental Management Office (EMO) of the soil conditions. This prompted the EMO to notify the Illinois Emergency Services and Disaster Agency of the release.

Incident Number 930373 was assigned to this facility.

4.0 SA1\1PLING AND LABORATORY ANALYSIS

As noted in Section 1.0 of this report, the amount and location of the soil samples collected during a UST removal are governed by the IEPA. General guidelines are based upon the size of the vessel and local environmental receptors. Concerning closure of vessels containing petroleu1m products, the state stipulates that surrounding soils be analyzed for BTEX and PNAs. ATEC submitted seven (7) samples to the

Environ metrics, Inc. laboratory, located in Maryland Heights, Missouri. All quality control and quality assurance procedures were strictly followed.

Figure 3 illustrates the location of the soil samples. Each sample was collected by removing .an area of soil with the backhoe bucket and collecting the sample with a decontaminated spoon. This method allowed for the safe execution of the sampling plan with no trench entry required by ATEC personnel.

All samples were collected in accordance with SW 846 Test Methods for Evaluating

Solid Waste - Physical/Chemical Methods. This includes sample preservation and chain-of-custody tracking. Hard copy of all laboratory results and chain�of-custody documentation are in Appendix B of. this report.

5.0 ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Laboratory results from the soil sampling does indicate the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons currently sunrounding the former UST installation. Table 1 illustrates the laboratory results and documents the sample locations.

•5.0 QUALIFICATIONS

Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained and our recommendations prepared in accordance with customary principles and practices in the fields of environmental science and engineering, and all work procedures were conducted in accordance with NFPA, JEPA and API guidelines. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either express or implied. This company is not responsible for the independent conclusions, opinions or recommendations made by others based on the field exploration and laboratory test data presented in this report.

Air Conditioner

North

Product Pipe � 1

4 3 e

T

Excavation Perimeter

Figure 3 Excavation Sampling Plan

T'ank 87/Bldg 500 1"•4'

Bldg .500

Table I Sample Analytical Rc1ulu U.S. Army Corp, of Engineers Scott AFB. DHno(o ATEC Project Number 21.--04-92-00089

Tank II Facility II

No, Sunpl1111

Pu.met.en

Benzene Toluene

Elbylbc�cnc Xylene

ToulBTEX t,WN-CARCINOGENfC (NC) l'NA, Naphthalene Accnaphlhene

Anlhraeeoe Fluora.othcoe

Fluorcne Pyrcoc

OTHER NC PNAt (TOTAL)

Acenapblbylcoc &ozo(g,b,i)perylcne

PbcnaDlbrcoe

TOTAL

CARCINOGE!-ilC PNA•

Benzo(a)anlhracenc Benzo(a )pyrcnc

Benzo(b)flouranlheno &ozo(k)floura.othcnc

Chry1cnc Oibcnzo(a,b)a.othraceoc lndooo( I , 23, -cd)pyreoc

• RcauJt in mg/kg.

U = Undet,:cted

RCIUlt" (l)N. Wall u

0.001 0.011 u u u u u u u u u u u u u

,u

·u u u u

RclUlt •

(2) s. Wall u

0.002 u u

0.002 u u u u u

0.125 u u u

0.041 0.018

0.04 0.018 0.051 u u

Rcault • Reaull * Rc:.ult• Rc,uit * Ruult *

(3) E. Wall (4) W. Wail (5) N. Bloc (6) S. Bue (7) Piping u u u u u

0.002 0.002 u u 0.001 u u u u u u u u u u

0.002 0.002 0 0 0.001 u u I) u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u 0.278 u u u u u u u u u 0.062 u u u u u u

0 0 0 0.062 0 u u u 0.073 u u 0 u 0.042 u u u u 0.067 u

11 u u 0.032 u u u u 0.09 u u u u u u u u u u u

Contents:

APPENDIX A

PROTIECT DOCUMENTATION

-30 Day Notification of Intent to Close

-All Permits or Letters of Authorization

-Tank Disposal Certification

-Liquid Waste Disposal Manifest

I llMOTS S7ATE FIRE MARSKAL and CIHl!I i cal S.a f • ty· DEC2,., 92

-r f'-i .-

Facflity # <;'.c-� D� S· i ) 1035 Stevenscn Orfve Spr-inifield, Illjnoi.s 6270.3-4259

OIY. OF PE'TROlEUM & CHEMICAL SAFE1Y Permit M

Appl.ic:ation for Penait to lE>iOVE Underground Storaie T.ank.s for Petroleum and Ha�ardcu$ Sul:1$�anc:es be c:0111pleted and f!ted wi d, the Division of Petrole1.1m and Chemical S.ifety, 1035 Stevenson Drive, Springfield !ll inois 62703-4259 C217/7BS-5878) or CZ17/78S-102�) it�eet Acdress

?411 A-FG. !Lb &2222-

2) (Facility) - name and addr•s• where t.inks are locatec

Name

B.i..LJb

- ::;,,-Street Address 5U7T AG'. /:L.,L.. C,.z...z,2S- �'

-:y St a t e · i p

?Ef0w mt,1U- (k9;J2.5'(�33 .ntac� Person �one

City State Zip County

�£MIJ2 1,zb'AL-&�)256-473� Jf (Contractor) - person, firm or company perf�rming

/ wor�:

lA"T"F( Ac::c::nci;:,t-oc:: T.,-,c .,.me

5150 E. 65th St-eet reet i'dcress

.. Indian2.oolis, IN :ity State

17-849-4990 Jone l6220 ��.z.:.i.o.n Zip Ccunty

"3 5 /- 12--2-828 Registration Mo, � must notify ESOA 1-800•7a2-7'86lJ within 24 hc�r-s of .e.ak.s or �cntaainated soil. Re9Clval au.st be in accard• ln:e with acceptable closure requireaerits and pr�edur� ""ch .is AP! Bulletin 160-4. A site assessaent ai:st be c&Jcted to d.eter-aine if a release has occurred.-

Removal of T.inks:

Number and size of tanl:s being removed:

Total number of all tanks removed:

Reason for removal of tanks:

a) b) c)

d) If tank is leaking, gfve Eso• incident number:

Contact Person Phone

Facility Registration r.o. Number

FOR OFFICE USE OWLY

Penmssicn to remove �a st� tank(e) la hereby '1'1:lted. 81.lch remMl &Mli cot commence witil a 1-2 1 -9 3 A seventy-two hour (S war1dnl day) not:lcl to this office ls required to conflrm !mAl d1t� of� for our mspectcn.: to be on lite

12-29-92 4/�£i _ _z;-£�Q, A p proval Date Approved

06-29-93

Permit Explrcs

I- ;5c,o

e) "ti z_ 6)/L-fl If tanks c�ntain produc:s other than p�trcleum products, please indicate here:

g) Cate each tank was Last used1 ___ "'A�:.,v ... �:....,c;._,_ ________________________ :._ _____ _'/

h) A wricten nctice of removal of tanks shall be gl�en to the Office of the State fire Marshal at lease 30 days prior to t!ie removal, giving location, number and size of tanks. This ;,p;:,lication will constir.uu that 30 day written notice. The 30 day pe,riod eo111111ences with this applica:icn aFpropriately campleted and the fee receive,;! in our office.

(Ov�r)

,• CERTIFICATION OF DISPOSAL

USED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS

The undersigned hereby certifies that the below listed underground storage tank (UST), has been rendered unable to be further used as a storage vessel and disposed of in a manner consistent with all current applicable federal, state and local laws governing such disposal. Additionally, the undersigned agrees to assume all risk and indemnify and save the tank owner harmless from all claims and liability with respect to the disposal.

UST DA'J'A

Removal Site: Tank 87 /Bldg 500 Scott AFB, IL

A TEC Project Number: 21-04--92-00089

I Recycler: H & S Salvage Recycler Location: O'Fallon, IL

Tank Capacity Dimension Material Product Date Cleaning stored Removed Method

1,500 64" X 9' Steel #2 Fuel Oil 29 Jan 93 High Pressure Water

The above data is provided for information only and is believed to be accurate to the best knowledge of the signatory.

Data provided by: ATEC Associates, Inc.

Kevin B. Hopkins Division Manager l-14-53 ·;---9.35.4.i'i ;

'- _ R T I F I CAT E O F Ah -· L Y S 1 S krvice .,�

"".ion

JTORIES, HER IT �E LA&' A

··7901 W. MORP!t

! INDIW.POLIS, ST.

� (:3I7)243-830t :.� 46231

INC.

," I------

-j

"'I i-Pc,rt o

,Jr M N.Aw ;, ( 1411 ) !TEC ���.t:IATES, INC.

:slSO LJ.�� 65th STREET r,mIANN--,l JS, IN 46220

PROJECT •JMBER: 21-04-92-00089l".NK/BUt .. ; 59/4900 rAHK COtctrNrs: DIESEL FUEL

Received

06-JAN-93

Coq,lete

14-JAN-93

Print9d

14-JAN-93

lill To

ACCOUl'fTS PAYABLE

ATEC ASSOCIATES, INC.

5150 EAST 65TH STREET

INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46220

,roject

I Lob ID

2052 A270265 PO NYl'Cer

21-04-085665 s.�Led

Page 1 (continued on next page)

.:,::.t-- 1, ":

t• .,::·

BDL HG/l � DENSITY CORRECTED RESULT

0.98 MG/L • DENSITY CORRECTED DETECTION LIMIT

PArMJeter

INITIAL WEIGHT OR VOLUME

Jtt"NAL:JilEIG-HT:'"OR:}i.OdJME-.· 0"·: • :-·"·

P•r�ur-

I TOTAL HALOGEN (TX) BDL

lleaul t Dtt, Limit

Del:. Llalt

0. 25

Reaul t Det". Li111ft

Vnita

Grams ··m-c ·.: ::-:: ..·.

Units mg/k.g

P1tr1111wt•r Result Oet. L i1111 t Uni ta

SULFUR < 0 . 02 0. 02 Percent

Page 2 {continued on next page) l

C l T I F I C A T E O F A N A ¥ S I S prvfce Location

�GE LABORATORIES, INC.

i w. MORRIS ST.

IANAPOLIS, IN 46231

(317) 243-8305

Report TCI

JIM NANCE

ATEC ASSOCIATES, INC.

5150 EAST 65th STREET

INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46220

PROJECT NUMBER: 21-04-92-00089

TANK/BLOG.: 87/500

Received

06-JAN-93

C�lete

08-JAN-93

Printed

09-JAN-93

Bill To

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

ATEC…