FA286018R00100002.pdf

F1D1048031AW01-2

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this ammendment is to:

1. Add FAR clauses 52.219-8, 52.219-9 and 52.219-16.

2. Revise Addendum to Provisions 52.212-1 and 52.212-2.

3. Revise Period of Performance.

4. Revise Attachments 1 (Performance Work Statement) and 2 (Pricing Matrix).

5. Revise Exhibits 3 (TE-2 Memorandum of Agreement Index) and 9 (TE-6 Instructions & Technical Order Summary).

6. Provide Question and Answ er from 13 June 2018 site visit.

POC: Mr. Craig L. McClain; Email: craig.l.mcclain.civ@mail.mil; Phone: 240-612-5660

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

Y 1 29

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 06-Jul-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA286018R0010

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

30-May-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

06-Jul-2018

CODE

11TH CONTRACTING SQUADRON

1349 LUTMAN DRIVE

JOINT BASE ANDREWS MD 20762-6501

FA2860 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA286018R0010

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by reference:

52.219-8 52.219-9 52.219-16

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 0001

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

The contractor shall provide all management, personnel equipment and services necessary to perform rotary wing aircraft maintenance operations for Joint Base Andrews-Naval Air Facility Washington's rotary wing aircraft fleet as specified in the Performance Work Statement (Attachment 1). See Technical Exhibit 4 and 4b for Government history and estimates of future annual flying hours by Model Design Series. The potential offeror shall propose a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) per month for services to support all rotary wing aircraft maintenance requirements.

Transition Price - $X.XX @ 4 Months = $X.XX; Base Price - $X.XX @ 5 Months = $X.XX;

Total Transition and Base Price = $X.XX.

To:

The contractor shall provide all management, personnel equipment and services necessary to perform rotary wing aircraft maintenance operations for Joint Base Andrews-Naval Air Facility Washington's rotary wing aircraft fleet as specified in the Performance Work Statement (Attachment 1). See Technical Exhibit 4 and 4b for Government history and estimates of future annual flying hours by Model Design Series. The potential offeror shall propose a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) per month for services to support all rotary wing aircraft maintenance requirements.

Transition Price - $X.XX @ 4 Months = $X.XX; Base Price - $X.XX @ 8 Months = $X.XX;

Total Transition and Base Price = $X.XX.

The pricing detail quantity has increased by 3.00 from 9.00 to 12.00.

CLIN 0002

The contractor shall establish and perform a Functional Check Flight (FCF) and rotary wing operations program that is responsible for all FCF requirements as specified in paragraph 5.0 of the PWS. The potential offeror shall propose a Firm Fixed Price per month for services to support all FCF requirements. Transition Price - $X.XX @ 4 Months = $X.XX; Base Price - $X.XX @ 5 Months = $X.XX; Total Transition and Base Price = $X.XX.

The contractor shall establish and perform a Functional Check Flight (FCF) and rotary wing operations program that is responsible for all FCF requirements as specified in paragraph 5.0 of the PWS. The potential offeror shall propose a Firm Fixed Price per month for services to support all FCF requirements. Transition Price - $X.XX @ 4 Months = $X.XX; Base Price - $X.XX @ 8 Months = $X.XX; Total Transition and Base Price = $X.XX.

The pricing detail quantity has increased by 3.00 from 9.00 to 12.00.

CLIN 0003

The Government has pre-established this CLIN to be estimated at $123,750.00. The contractor shall provide contingency support, emergency services, consumables, training and travel when directed and authorized by the Contracting Officer or Contracting Officer Representative as specified in the Performance Work Statement paragraphs 3.0, 11.4.3 and 11.11.5. Potential offerors are not to propose to this CLIN. *Note: This CLIN is a Time and Material (T&M) Line Item

The Government has pre-established this CLIN to be estimated at $165,000.00. The contractor shall provide contingency support, emergency services, consumables, training and travel when directed and authorized by the Contracting Officer or Contracting Officer Representative as specified in the Performance Work Statement paragraphs 3.0, 11.4.3 and 11.11.5. Potential offerors are not to propose to this CLIN. *Note: This CLIN is a Time and Material (T&M) Line

CLIN 1003

The Government has pre-established this CLIN to be estimated at $123,750.00. The contractor shall provide contingency support, emergency services, consumables, training and travel when directed and authorized by the Contracting Officer or Contracting Officer Representative as specified in the Performance Work Statement paragraphs 3.0, 11.4.3 and 11.11.5. Potential shall provide contingency support, emergency services, consumables, training and travel when directed and authorized by the Contracting Officer or Contracting Officer Representative as specified in the Performance Work Statement paragraphs 3.0, 11.4.3 and 11.11.5. Potential offerors are not to propose to this CLIN. *Note: This CLIN is a Time and Material (T&M) Line

CLIN 2003

The Government has pre-established this CLIN to be estimated at $123,750.00. The contractor shall provide contingency support, emergency services, consumables, training and travel when directed and authorized by the Contracting Officer or Contracting Officer Representative as specified in the Performance Work Statement paragraphs 3.0, 11.4.3 and 11.11.5. Potential shall provide contingency support, emergency services, consumables, training and travel when directed and authorized by the Contracting Officer or Contracting Officer Representative as specified in the Performance Work Statement paragraphs 3.0, 11.4.3 and 11.11.5. Potential offerors are not to propose to this CLIN. *Note: This CLIN is a Time and Material (T&M) Line

CLIN 3003

The Government has pre-established this CLIN to be estimated at $123,750.00. The contractor shall provide contingency support, emergency services, consumables, training and travel when directed and authorized by the Contracting Officer or Contracting Officer Representative as specified in the Performance Work Statement paragraphs 3.0, 11.4.3 and 11.11.5. Potential shall provide contingency support, emergency services, consumables, training and travel when directed and authorized by the Contracting Officer or Contracting Officer Representative as specified in the Performance Work Statement paragraphs 3.0, 11.4.3 and 11.11.5. Potential offerors are not to propose to this CLIN. *Note: This CLIN is a Time and Material (T&M) Line

CLIN 4003

The Government has pre-established this CLIN to be estimated at $123,750.00. The contractor shall provide contingency support, emergency services, consumables, training and travel when directed and authorized by the Contracting Officer or Contracting Officer Representative as specified in the Performance Work Statement paragraphs 3.0, 11.4.3 and 11.11.5. Potential shall provide contingency support, emergency services, consumables, training and travel when directed and authorized by the Contracting Officer or Contracting Officer Representative as specified in the Performance Work Statement paragraphs 3.0, 11.4.3 and 11.11.5. Potential offerors are not to propose to this CLIN. *Note: This CLIN is a Time and Material (T&M) Line

DELIVERIES AND PERFORMANCE

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0001 has been changed from:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

POP 10-SEP-2018 TO

09-JUN-2019

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057 FOB: Destination

F1D104

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

POP 01-JAN-2019 TO

31-DEC-2019

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0002 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 10-SEP-2018 TO

09-JUN-2019

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

CAGE

POP 01-JAN-2019 TO

31-DEC-2019

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0003 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 10-SEP-2018 TO

09-JUN-2019

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

CAGE

POP 01-JAN-2019 TO

31-DEC-2019

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 1001 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 10-JUN-2019 TO

09-JUN-2020

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

CAGE

POP 01-JAN-2020 TO

31-DEC-2020

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 1002 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 10-JUN-2019 TO

09-JUN-2020

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

CAGE

POP 01-JAN-2020 TO

31-DEC-2020

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 1003 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 10-JUN-2019 TO

09-JUN-2020

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

CAGE

POP 01-JAN-2020 TO

31-DEC-2020

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 2001 has been changed from:

POP 10-JUN-2020 TO

09-JUN-2021

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

CAGE

POP 01-JAN-2021 TO

31-DEC-2021

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 2002 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 10-JUN-2020 TO

09-JUN-2021

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

CAGE

POP 01-JAN-2021 TO

31-DEC-2021

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 2003 has been changed from:

POP 10-JUN-2020 TO

09-JUN-2021

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

CAGE

POP 01-JAN-2021 TO

31-DEC-2021

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 3001 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 10-JUN-2021 TO

09-JUN-2022

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

CAGE

POP 01-JAN-2022 TO

31-DEC-2022

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 3002 has been changed from:

POP 10-JUN-2021 TO

09-JUN-2022

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

CAGE

POP 01-JAN-2022 TO

31-DEC-2022

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 3003 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 10-JUN-2021 TO

09-JUN-2022

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

CAGE

POP 01-JAN-2022 TO

31-DEC-2022

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 4001 has been changed from:

POP 10-JUN-2022 TO

09-JUN-2023

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

CAGE

POP 01-JAN-2023 TO

31-DEC-2023

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 4002 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 10-JUN-2022 TO

09-JUN-2023

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

CAGE

POP 01-JAN-2023 TO

31-DEC-2023

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 4003 has been changed from:

POP 10-JUN-2022 TO

09-JUN-2023

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

CAGE

POP 01-JAN-2023 TO

31-DEC-2023

N/A 811 OSS

KRISTINE CARTER

1190 MENOHER DRIVE

ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-5001

301-981-5057

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2

a. Basis for Contract Award This is a FAR Part 12 and FAR 15.3 competitive selection using Performance Price Tradeoff (PPT), in which competing offeror’s present and past performance when combined with technical factors are significantly more important than cost or price. By submission of its offer, the offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or sections. All technically acceptable offers shall be treated equally except for their prices and performance records. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined technically unacceptable. Offeror must have a minimum past performance confidence rating of Satisfactory. The government reserves the right to award a contract to a higher priced offeror. This may result in an award being made to a higher priced offeror where the Decision Authority (DA) determines that the higher confidence past performance record of the higher priced offeror outweighs the price difference. The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:

The Government will rank all offers by price from the lowest Total Evaluated Price (TEP) to the highest TEP. If the lowest TEP offer is judged to be Technically Acceptable, is determined responsible in accordance with FAR 9.104-1, and has the highest past performance rating of “Substantial Confidence”, that offer represents the best value for the Government and the evaluation process stops at this point. An award shall be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers.

If the lowest priced offeror is not judged to be Technically Acceptable and have a “Substantial Confidence” past performance assessment, the next lowest priced offeror will be evaluated and the process will continue (in order by price) until an offeror is judged to be Technically Acceptable and have a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment or until all offerors are evaluated. The Decision Authority (DA) shall then make an integrated best value award decision from the listing of offerors established. The DA may trade-off price for higher performance (Substantial Confidence vs. Satisfactory Confidence). Offerors must have a minimum of a Satisfactory Confidence assessment rating for award.

The Decision Authority shall then make a best value award decision based on an integrated assessment. While the Government will strive for maximum objectivity, the selection process, by its nature, is subjective; and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process.

b. Number of Contracts to be Awarded The Government intends to award one (1) contract for the 11th Wing UH-1N Helicopter Maintenance, Functional Check Flight, and Aircrew Scheduling functions located at Joint Base Andrews Naval Air Facility, Maryland.

c. Discussions The Government intends to award a contract without discussions. Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal (e.g., the relevance of past performance information) or respond to adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Exchanges conducted with regard to adverse past performance or to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions, and the Contracting Officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision.

Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in the proposal preparation instructions to permit a meaningful assessment of past performance. Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system. Communication conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision.

If, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, offeror responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs) and the Final Proposal Revision (FPR) will be considered in making the selection decision. If the offeror’s proposal has been evaluated as acceptable at the time discussions are closed, any changes or exceptions in the Final Proposal Revision are subject to evaluation and may introduce risk that the offeror’s proposal be determined unacceptable and ineligible for award.

d. Solicitation Requirements, Terms and Conditions Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as factors or sections. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and must provide complete supporting rationale. The Government reserves the right to determine any such exceptions unacceptable.

2. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following evaluation factors and sections will be used to evaluate each proposal. Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation factors and sections described below:

Factor 1 – Technical Maintenance Strategy Section 1 – Phase-In Plan Section 2 – Maintenance Strategy Section 3 – Small Business Participation Plan/Subcontracting Plan

Factor 2 – Price

Factor 3 – Past Performance

3. Factor 1 – Technical Maintenance Strategy (Acceptable, Unacceptable) Initially, the government technical evaluation team shall evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable /unacceptable basis assigning one of the ratings described below for the technical factor. A rating of unacceptable in one or more technical factors will constitute an overall rating of Unacceptable for the Technical Approach evaluation. If the technical factor is evaluated as “Unacceptable,” it will render the entire proposal unacceptable, the proposal will not receive further consideration for award and will not proceed to Factor 2 for evaluation. Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award. However, the offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion. The term “technical” as used herein, refers to non-price factors other than past performance. The purpose of the technical factor is to assess whether the offeror’s proposal will satisfy the government’s minimum requirements. The Government will use the following table to assess the offeror’s Technical Maintenance Strategy:

TECHNICAL RATINGS

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

a. Phase-In Plan. The Phase-In Plan is technically acceptable when it demonstrates the proposed methodology/plan to meet requirements of the PWS as described in paragraph 2.32.1 through 2.32.1.1.1.1.

b. Maintenance Strategy. The proposal is technically acceptable when it demonstrates a sound strategy and approach to provide the services in sections 3, 4, 5, and 6 of the PWS. Additionally, the following technical areas will be evaluated as described:

1. Plans & Scheduling: the proposal is technically acceptable when it demonstrates the offeror’s understanding and ability to balance maintenance and operational requirements through careful planning and execution to meet operational requirements and performance standards.

2. Phase Management: the proposal is technically acceptable when it demonstrates the offeror’s understanding of the requirements to manage the phase flow and process as described in the PWS in maintaining a healthy time distribution interval.

3. Staffing Plan: the proposal is technically acceptable when it demonstrates the offeror’s understanding and ability to manage aircraft availability in support of Functional Check Flight requirements.

The maintenance strategy also will include responses to the 9 questions listed in Addendum To Provision 52.212-1 (paragraph 3.2.4), illustrating an understanding of Government’s requirements and ability to provide convincing rationale how their approach will meet requirements.

Responses are technically acceptable when the criteria below has been satisfied:

(a) Response 1: Response demonstrates the offeror’s ability to analyze and correct substandard performance in regards to key metrics. (Pass/Fail).

(b) Response 2: Response demonstrates the offeror’s understanding of managing key fleet health metrics.

(Pass/Fail).

(c) Response 3: Response demonstrates the offer’s understanding of operational turbulence cause/effect on maintenance operations. (Pass/Fail).

(d) Response 4: Response demonstrates the offeror’s understanding of balancing operational and maintenance requirements to support the flying hour program and fleet health. (Pass/Fail).

(e) Response 5: Response demonstrates the offeror’s understanding of the maintenance scheduling process.

(Pass/Fail).

(f) Response 6: Response demonstrates the offeror’s understanding of how to comprehensively manage a phase flow. (Pass/Fail).

(g) Response 7: Response demonstrates the offeror’s understanding of all the requirements of the functional check flight program. (Pass/Fail).

(h) Response 8: Response demonstrates the offeror’s strategy to prevent complacency and encourage/promote continuous focus on improving processes. (Pass/Fail).

(i) Response 9: Response demonstrates the offeror’s understanding and ability to analyze, identify, correct, and prevent negative trends. (Pass/Fail).

c. Subcontracting Plan. Subcontracting Plans will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 19.705-4(d). Large business Offeror’s proposal must meet the minimum mandatory Total Small Business Participation goal of 20% (through collective small business participation from any type of small business or sub-category small business). In accordance with FAR 19.704(c) this represents 20% of total subcontracted dollars. The Small Business Subcontracting Plan is technically acceptable when it demonstrates the proposed methodology/plan to meet the minimum mandatory Total Small Business Participation goal of 20% (through collective small business participation from any type of small business or sub-category small business).

4. Factor 2 – Price Evaluation Offerors Total Evaluated Price (TEP) as outlined in FAR 52.212-1 Addendum shall be evaluated. All offerors are required to complete the attached Pricing Matrix (Attachment 2). An offerors TEP will be determined by multiplying the quantities identified by the unit price proposed by the offeror for each item to confirm the extended amount for each. The Total Evaluated Price (TEP) is the sum of the base period (excluding transition and Over and Above CLIN), all four option years and the potential six month extension of services under FAR 52.217-8.

Transition and Over and Above CLINs are not part of the TEP.

Offerors are specifically advised that under this evaluation, the Government may determine an offeror ineligible for award if the prices are not complete, fair, reasonable or balanced between the base and each option year. Prices are unbalanced if they are significantly overstated or understated in relation to the actual cost of the work. An offer may be removed from competition either on the basis that the offeror does not understand the requirement or the offeror has made an unrealistic proposal. By signing its offer, the offeror certifies that each price stated on each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) includes an appropriate apportionment of all costs, direct and indirect, overhead, and profit. Price Analysis to determine a fair and reasonable price may include the following techniques:

• Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation.

• Comparison to historical price information.

• Comparison to same or similar items.

• Comparison with competitive published price lists, published market prices of commodities, similar indexes, and discount or rebate arrangements.

• Comparison of proposed prices with Independent Government Estimates (IGE).

5. Factor 3 – Past Performance The contracting officer shall seek recent and relevant performance information on all offerors based on (1) the references provided by the offeror and (2) data independently obtained from other government and commercial sources.

Recency. As outlined in FAR 52.212-1 Addendum, offeror shall provide a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) references for the Prime offeror and a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) reference for critical subcontractors, teaming partners, and/or joint venture partners considered critical to overall successful performance of the resulting contract and are performing 30 percent or more of the overall effort.

References should be of the most relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies and commercial customers within five (5) years from issuance of this solicitation that demonstrate customer satisfaction with overall job performance and quality of completed service. References for contracts in which performance started prior to five

(5) years from the issuance of this solicitation but performance is still on-going during the issuance of this solicitation are considered recent and acceptable. Questionnaires received must also meet recency criteria to be evaluated. Past performance information that fails these conditions will not be evaluated.

Relevancy. This information is required for the offeror and all subcontractors, teaming partners, and/or joint venture partners considered critical to overall successful performance. Relevant performance includes performance of efforts involving requirements that are similar or greater in scope, complexity and magnitude than the effort described in this solicitation. Questionnaires received must also meet recency criteria to be evaluated.

Past performance information that fails these conditions will not be evaluated.

Performance Confidence Assessments. In order to be considered for award, an offeror’s performance confidence rating must be “Satisfactory” or “Substantial”. Offerors with no recent/relevant performance history or if the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned shall receive the rating "Unknown Confidence," meaning the rating is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably (neutral). However, since the Government has stated that past performance receives greater consideration than price, a strong record of relevant past performance may be considered more advantageous to the Government than a neutral/unknown confidence past performance rating. As such, in order for an offeror to be considered for award they must have been assessed a past performance confidence rating of “Substantial” or a minimum of “Satisfactory”.

Performance Confidence will be evaluated in accordance with the following Table:

PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENTS

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Past Performance Relevancy. In evaluating past performance, the government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in this solicitation.

Relevancy will be evaluated in accordance with the following table:

PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

NOTE: Offerors are cautioned to submit information and in the format specified in FAR 52.212-1 Addendum.

Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal (for example, the relevance of past performance) or respond to adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Exchanges conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the Contracting Officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision.

In accordance with FAR 15.306(c), the Government reserves the right to establish a competitive range of the most highly rated proposals but is not required to do so. The Government may enter into communications with offerors before establishment of the competitive range. These communications may be conducted to enhance Government understanding of proposals; allow reasonable interpretation of the proposal; or facilitate the Government’s evaluation process. Such communications shall not be used to cure proposal deficiencies or material omissions, materially alter the technical or cost elements of the proposal, and/or otherwise revise the proposal.

(End of Addendum)

ADDENDUM TO PROVISION 52.212-1

- INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS (ITO)

1.0 Program Structure and Objectives

(a) The Government plans to award a Firm Fixed Price contract for the 11th Wing UH-1N Helicopter Maintenance, Functional Check Flight, and Aircrew Scheduling functions located at Joint Base Andrews Naval Air Facility, Maryland. Requirements may also include the support of exercises and responses to real world events such as natural disasters.

(b) This is a FAR Part 12 competitive selection using Performance Price Tradeoff (PPT), in which competing offeror’s present and past performance when combined with technical factors are significantly more important than cost or price.

(c) IAW AFFARS 5315.209, Facility Clearance, the offeror must possess or acquire prior to award of a contract a facility clearance equal to the highest classification stated on the Contract Security Classification Specification (DD Form 254), attached to this RFP as Attachment 4.

2.0 Proposal Format Instructions

Paragraph 52.212-1(c), Period for Acceptance of Offers: “The CO requests offerors to hold the prices in its offer firm for 180 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers. Offerors may specify a longer acceptance period than the Government’s minimum requirement.”

Paragraph 52.212-1(e), Multiple Offers: “Multiple offers will not be accepted.”

Paragraph 52-212-1(m), Proposal Preparation Instructions, is added as follows:

The offeror's proposal must include all data and information requested by this Request for Proposal (RFP) and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offer shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Non-conformance with the instructions provided in this RFP may result in an offer being ineligible for award.

The proposal shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements, but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Offerors shall assume the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities or experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror's proposal.

A proposal that is orderly and sufficiently documented will enable the Government to easily understand and perform a thorough and fair evaluation. The Government may incorporate into this contract, by reference or full text, portions of the successful offeror’s proposal submitted in response to this solicitation as revised and supplemented through the final proposal revision, if applicable. Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed art work, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired.

In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.8 (Government Contract Files,) the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. Unless the offeror requests otherwise, the Government will destroy extra copies of such unsuccessful proposals.

The proposal shall consist of four (4) separate volumes:

Table 2.1 - Proposal Organization VOLUME Paragraph

Number

VOLUME TITLE HARD

COPIES

/ DISK

PAGE

LIMIT

I 3.0 Technical Maintenance Strategy (includes 3 sections)

2/1 75

Section 1 – Phase-In Plan * Section 2 – Maintenance Strategy * Section 3 – Small Business Participation

Plan/Subcontracting Plan

II 4.0 Price 2/1 Unlimited III 5.0 Past Performance 2/1 75

Table of Contents Unlimited

Summary Page 5

Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms Unlimited

Past Performance Information 5 pages per contract max

Organization Structure Change History/Roadmap

Unlimited

Subcontractor Letters of Consent Unlimited Client Authorization Letters Unlimited

Relevant Contract Narrative 5 pages per contract max

IV 6.0 Contract Documentation 2/1 Unlimited Solicitation /Contract Form N/A Representation and Certifications Unlimited Exceptions to Solicitation Requirements Unlimited Authorized Offeror Personnel/Contact

Information Unlimited

*The page limit for the entire technical volume is 75 including all sections

Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. If exceeded, the excess pages will not be read or considered in the evaluation of the proposal and excess paper copies will be destroyed. Each page shall be counted except the following: blank pages, title pages, tables of contents, tabs, indexes, and glossaries, if utilized.

Mark original hard copy as “Original” (for contract file), and all others as “Copy.” The “Original” for each volume shall be unbound and also include a standard (5 ½ inch-spaced) two-hole punch applied to the top of each page when viewed in Portrait orientation (for Government filing). Each hard-copy volume (other than the “Original”) of the proposal shall be separately bound in a three-ring, loose leaf binder permitting the volume to lie flat when open.

Staples shall not be used. Volumes I through IV shall not be submitted together within the same binding. A cover sheet should be bound in each book, clearly marked as to volume number, title, copy number, solicitation identification, and the offeror's name. The same identifying data should be placed on the spine of each binder. All unclassified document binders shall have a color other than red. Be sure to apply all appropriate markings including those prescribed in accordance with FAR 3.104-4, Disclosure, Protection, and Marking of Contractor Bid or Proposal Information and Source Selection Information.

*It is acceptable to at least place a two pronged clip through the standard 2.75” two-hole punch.

The proposals will be on 8 1/2” x 11” paper, except for fold-outs used for charts, tables, or diagrams, which may not exceed 11” x 17”.

A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information.

All printing shall be single-spaced. Spacing characteristics are applicable to charts and graphs.

Text shall not be less than Microsoft Word Times New Roman, 10 point. Size of print is applicable to charts and graphs.

Text for charts, tables, graphs, and figures shall be no smaller than Microsoft Word Times New Roman, 8 point, and used only when absolutely necessary.

Page margins shall be a minimum of 1 inch top, bottom, and each side.

Each volume shall contain a detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume. Tab indexing shall be used to identify sections.

Each volume shall be written on a stand-alone basis so that its contents may be evaluated with a minimum of cross referencing to other volumes of the proposal. Information required for proposal evaluation, which is not found in its designated volume, will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal. Cross-referencing within a proposal volume is permitted where its use would conserve space without impairing clarity. The offeror shall provide a Solicitation Cross Reference Matrix indicating by ITO, PWS, paragraph number, the corresponding proposal paragraph in that section which addresses the referenced item.

Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, and an explanation for each.

Glossaries do not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.

Electronic Copies - The content and page size of electronic copies must be identical to the hard copies. When discrepancies exist between the written hard copies and those provided in electronic format, the written hard copies will take precedence in all cases. Compact Disc(s) are the only acceptable electronic method. Ensure the electronic documents stored on the CD can be opened. Indicate on each Compact Disc Read Only Memory (CD-ROM)(or CD- DVD) the volume number and title. Use separate files to permit rapid location of all portions, required plans, exhibits, appendices, and attachments, if any. The offeror shall submit volumes I through IV in electronic format.

Each volume shall be provided on a separate CD. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included. The electronic copies of the proposal shall be submitted in a format readable by Adobe PDF or Microsoft (MS) Word 2007 or 2010, MS Excel 2007 or 2010, MS-Project 2007 or 2010, and MS-Power Point 2007 or 2010. Replacement CDs will be required to update the final proposal resulting from any discussions and updates, if applicable.

3.0 – Volume I - Technical Maintenance Strategy (Factor 1)

3.1 General

Each offeror shall submit a Technical Volume with its proposal. In the technical volume, address your technical solution for meeting the Government’s minimum performance or capability requirements of each technical section detailed in paragraphs 3.2.2, 3.2.3 and 3.2.4 below.. The Technical Volume should be specific and complete.

Provide as specifically as possible the actual methodology you would use for accomplishing/satisfying these sections. Legibility, clarity, and coherence are very important. All the requirements specified in the solicitation are mandatory. By your proposal submission, you are representing that your firm will perform all the requirements specified in the solicitation. It is neither necessary nor desirable for you to tell us so in your proposal. Do not merely reiterate the objectives or reformulate the requirements specified in the solicitation.

3.2 Volume Organization

The Technical volume shall be organized according to the following general outline:

(1) Table of Contents

(2) Summary Page

(3) Glossary

(4) Cross Reference Matrix

(5) Section One (Phase-In Plan)

(6) Section Two (Maintenance Strategy)

(7) Section Three (Small Business Participation Plan/Subcontracting Plan)

3.2.1 Table of Contents, Summary Page, Glossary and Cross Reference Matrix There is no page limitation for TOC, Summary Page and Glossary. All pages under this section will not be considered part of the page limitation listed in Table 2.1.

3.2.2 Section One (Phase-In Plan)

The offeror shall provide a response to the following:

3.2.2.1 Phase-In Plan – Provide a plan as described in PWS paragraph 2.32 to assume all the responsibilities to perform the requirements of the PWS.

3.2.3 Section Two (Maintenance Strategy)

This section assesses the offeror’s overarching strategy to execute the helicopter maintenance, functional check flight, and aircrew scheduling requirements. Provide a response describing your approach to provide the services described in sections 3, 4, 5, and 6 of the PWS. Additionally, through responses to scenarios and questions, illustrate understanding of the Government’s requirements and ability to provide technical capabilities to successfully provide mission support and meet the quality standards in Technical Exhibit 3. Within the overarching strategy for helicopter maintenance, place emphasis on the following technical areas:

1. Plans & Scheduling

a. Provide strategy to plan and forecast scheduled maintenance while balancing operations and maintenance requirements to support the flying hour program.

2. Phase Management

a. Provide strategy to manage a phase flow that meets the standards in TE-3 with a healthy Time Distribution Interval (TDI) and prevent more than one phase being due at a time.

3. Staffing Plan

a. Provide strategy to manage aircraft availability in support of Functional Check Flight requirements.

Provide your best answer to all scenarios and questions listed below:

(a) Question 1: What analytical approach would you utilize to determine root cause for a substandard Mission Capability rate?

(b) Question 2: What are likely causes and corrective actions for exceeding the TNMCM rate described in TE-3?

(c) Question 3: How would you indicate/communicate to the Government when flying deviations negatively impact maintenance?

(d). Question 4: What factors would you review for consideration for approving aircraft and/or sortie additions to the weekly maintenance and flying schedule?

(e) Question 5: What factors do you consider as the priority when building the maintenance schedule?

(f) Question 6: What corrective action would you implement when the fleet phase average is above the standard, however the Time Distribution Interval (TDI) is uneven, and the next phase due time is greater than 10% of the phase cycle?

(g) Question 7: How will you staff to provide the functional check flight requirements?

(h) Question 8: How will you influence/encourage employees to seek opportunities for process improvement?

(i) Question 9: How will you monitor for and identify negative performance trends?

3.2.4 Section Three (Subcontracting Plan)

Large business offerors must submit a Subcontracting Plan (Individual Contract Plan) as required by FAR 52.219-

9. The individual plan can incorporate a masterplan. Large businesses will not be eligible for award if they fail to submit an acceptable Subcontracting Plan. Subcontracting Plans will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 19.705- 4(d). Offeror’s proposal must meet the minimum mandatory Total Small Business Participation goal of 20% (through collective small business participation from any type of small business or sub-category small business). In accordance with FAR 19.704(c) this represents 20% of total subcontracted dollars. The Government will evaluate the proposals to determine which offeror(s) propose the best value in terms of meeting Small Business Participation goals .

4.0 Volume II – Price (Factor 2)

4.1 General Instructions

All cost or pricing information shall be addressed ONLY in the Price and Contract Documentation Volume.

Information beyond that required by this instruction shall not be submitted, unless you consider it essential to document or support your pricing position. All information relating to the proposed price including all required supporting documentation must be included in the section of the proposal designated as the Price Volume.

Compliance with these requirements is mandatory and failure to comply may result in rejection of your proposal.

4.2 Volume Organization

The Price volume shall be organized according to the following general outline:

(1) Table of Contents

(2) Summary Page

(3) Glossary

(4) Price Data

(5) Statement of Compliance with SCA WD

(6) Statement of Compliance with CBA

(7) Responsibility Determination Supporting Documentation

(8) Teaming Arrangement(s) and/or Letters of Intent (if applicable)

4.2.1 Summary Page

Provide a summary page of total proposed price for the base period, and each option period. Provide a summary of total proposed price for each CLIN, in the order listed for the base period, and each option period. For fixed priced CLINS, list the CLIN number (item number), the unit price, and the max amount. Please provide a total amount for the entire proposal at the bottom of the CLIN schedule which identifies total proposed price for all FFP CLINs.

There is no page limitation for this summary page.

4.2.2 Price Fair and Reasonableness

(a) These instructions are to assist you in submitting information (i.e., data other than certified cost or pricing data) that is required to evaluate the reasonableness of your proposed prices. Compliance with these instructions is mandatory and failure to comply may result in rejection of your proposal.

(b) The award decision will be conducted with the expectation of adequate price competition for this acquisition;

therefore, certified cost or pricing data are not required. If at any time during this competition the Contracting Officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists or if price reasonableness cannot be determined, offerors may be required to submit certified cost or pricing data or additional data other than certified cost or pricing data, as appropriate, for the Contracting Officer to determine price reasonableness.

(c) Offeror’s proposal will be evaluated for completeness, fairness, reasonableness and balance. Unbalanced pricing may pose an unacceptable risk to the Government and may be a reason to reject an offeror’s proposal. Balanced pricing is determined with respect to separately priced CLINs or significant unexplained variance in pricing from year to year. Offers should be sufficiently detailed to demonstrate their reasonableness and balance. The burden of proof for credibility of proposed prices rests with the offeror.

4.2.3 Price Data

(a) Offeror shall complete the Pricing Matrix located in Attachment 2. The electronic Pricing Matrix shall be submitted in Microsoft Excel format and include all cell formulas. All unit pricing provided must be at the fully burdened rate including overhead, General and Administrative expenses, profit, etc. Offerors are required to submit pricing for the base period (including transition), all option years and the six month extension of services.

(b) A completed…