AE_Q As_Round_2.doc

1. Q: Is a cover, cover letter, TOC, and/or Acronym List permissible? How does the inclusion of these affect the page count?

A: These are all permissible, and will count against the total page count.

2. Q: Is double sided printing acceptable and how does this affect the page count?

A: double sided printing is both acceptable and encouraged. Each side will count as a page.

3. Q: For spacing efficiencies, can any portion of the SF330 be presented in landscape format?

A: Certainly, however you wish to format the pages is acceptable within the established page limits.

4. Q: Can 11 x 17 sized paper be used? If so, are there any limitations?

A: 8.5 x 11 is considered the standard paper size. Please stick with 8.5 x 11.

5. Q: Is there a specific binding method preferred? (i.e. 3-hole punch, GBC)?

A: No specific binding method is required, please use whatever you prefer.

6. Q: Are there any font size limitations/requirements?

A: 11 point font, times new roman is considered standard, and page limits will be judged by that standard.

7. Q: Related to RFP Section 1.3.8, Title 1A Fees. Statement of Work states that the work will be performed under fixed price delivery orders and that the contractor will be paid upon completion and acceptance of the services. Is milestone or submittal-based invoicing permitted under these delivery orders?

A: Progress payments based on work performed and completed will be allowed.

8. Q: Are we required to include a resume in the SF330 Section E for all the disciplines outlines in the Statement of Work (Section 2.5.1) – i.e., specifically, the Typist, CADD and Draftsperson categories?

A: Please provide the qualification of the people you feel best meets the needs of this requirement whatever their job classification may be.

9. Q: In the Solicitation, Item 3 under the Evaluation Factors (Capacity to Accomplish Work)…states to provide current workload and total workload capability of individuals listed in item “B” of the SF330. Should this “B” be item “E”?

A: Yes, that’s a typo it should read item “E” for that evaluation factor.