Market_Research_Vendor_Survey_15_May_13.pdf

PDF 35 KB Posted

Attached to
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL for GROUND-BASED ELECTRO-OPTICAL DEEP SPACE SURVEILLANCE (GEODSS)
Solicitation number
FA2517-13-R-8001
Issued by

About this file

Market Research Vendor Survey (RFI No1)

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
GEODSS_RFP_Questions_3.pdf PDF
WD_CBA-2009-2470 _Rev_4_(Socorro).pdf PDF
FA2517-13-R-8001-0002_Conformed.pdf PDF
FA2517-13-R-8001-0002.pdf PDF
4._Attch_4 _REVISED_Socorro_CBA.pdf PDF
GEODSS_RFP_Questions_Round_2.pdf PDF
FA2517-13-R-8001-0001.pdf PDF
FA2517-13-R-8001-0001_Conformed.pdf PDF
OCI_Answer.pdf PDF
CBA_WD_2009-2470_Rev_3 _Socorro_NM.pdf PDF
WD_CBA-2009-2741 _Rev_4_(Maui).pdf PDF
GEODSS_RFP_Questions_1.pdf PDF
GEODSS_Site_Visit_Questions.pdf PDF
Site_Visit_Minutes.pdf PDF
Site_Visit_Attendees.pdf PDF
9._Attch_9 _L-4_PP_Client_Authorization_Letter_(Commercial)_GEODSS.doc DOC document
0._Request_for_Proposal_FA2517-13-R-8001.pdf PDF
1a._Attch_1 _DD_254_Continuation.docx DOCX document
11._Attch_11 _L-6_Staffing_Matrix_GEODSS.doc DOC document
3._Attch_3 _Maui_CBA.pdf PDF
12._Attch_12 _L-7_Site_Visit__Visit_Access_Request_(ESL_Form_100).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
8._Attch_8 _L-3_PP_Consent_Letter_GEODSS.doc DOC document
6._Attch_6 _L-1_PP_Relevancy_Matrix_GEODSS.xls XLS spreadsheet
4._Attch_4 _Socorro_CBA.pdf PDF
7._Attch_7 _L-2_PP_Questionnaire_GEODSS.doc DOC document
10._Attch_10 _L-5_PP_Transmittal_Letter_(Govt_Kt)_GEODSS.doc DOC document
1._Attch_1 _DD_254.pdf PDF
5._Attch_5 _Quality_Assurance_Surveillance_Plan.doc DOC document
2._Attch_2 _Performance_Work_Statement.pdf PDF
4a._Attch_4 _Socorro_CBA_Addendum.pdf PDF
Diego_Garcia_Energy_Management_Program.pdf PDF
GEODSS_FY13_Workload_Data.pdf PDF
3. Attch 3 Det 1 Site Map.pdf PDF
1. Attch 1 Site Visit Schedule.pdf PDF
2. Attch 2 Site Visit Visit Access Request —
0. FA2517-13-R-8001 GEODSS REVISED Notice of Site Visit.pdf PDF
1. Attch 1 Site Visit Schedule.pdf PDF
3. Attch 3 Det 1 Site Map.pdf PDF
0. FA2517-13-R-8001 GEODSS Notice of Site Visit.pdf PDF
2. Attch 2 Site Visit Visit Access Request —
Oct Nov and Dec Facilities PMIs.pdf PDF
Det 1-Equipment Repair PM Log.pdf PDF
Det 1-Work Orders.pdf PDF
Sep Facilities and CAS PMI's.pdf PDF
Det 1-PMI INDEX.PDF PDF
Socorro CBA.pdf PDF
Socorro CBA Addendum.pdf PDF
Maui CBA.pdf PDF
Maui Wage Determination.pdf PDF
Socorro Wage Determination.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 80 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

MARKET RESEARCH

GEODSS – SOLICITATION NO: FA2517-13-R-8001

Vendor Survey

In accordance with FAR 52.215-3, Request for Information or Solicitation for Planning Purposes; this is a request for information and not a request for proposals.

The following questions are for market research purposes only to assist the United States Air Force (USAF) in development of the acquisition strategy for the new contract. Your responses will not be shared with anyone outside the USAF.

The Department of Defense is committed to continuous improvement and is working on new initiatives to achieve affordable programs, control costs and incentivize innovation. The goal of these initiatives is to successfully accomplish the mission within the constraints of a declining defense budget. To achieve these goals it will be essential to partner with industry and realize savings from contractor controlled costs and innovations.

1. For the next GEODSS contract, the USAF is exploring a Firm-fixed-price contract type. In conjunction with this approach, a prerequisite for contract award would be a decrease in contract price in each successive option year of the contract. Would this approach make a difference for your firm in deciding whether to bid on this contract? What challenges or opportunities would your firm see with this approach and why?

2. Based upon the current requirement, what contract type would be most appropriate? And Why?

3. Based upon the requirement, what length of contract would be most advantageous considering the O&M of a legacy system with periodic upgrades and the fact that the current workforce has a significant level of seniority? What correlation do you anticipate between contract length and training/retention of key personnel?

4. Based upon the requirement, what small business subcontracting opportunities might be available?

5. What workload estimates are necessary to adequately scope the workload associated with this contract? Is there other data the Air Force could provide that would be useful in determining level of service required? What type of data?

6. Would a performance incentive encourage superior performance? If so, what type?

7. What discounts and payment terms are customarily offered/negotiated on similar contracts?

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

8. What on-site phase-in is necessary to prepare for a 01 Oct 15 performance start date? In order to be ready to take over full contract responsibilities on 01 Oct 15, what is the deadline date for award notification?

9. What quality assurance methods do service receivers primarily rely on under similar contracts? What quality standards would be able to measure performance?

10. Describe evaluation factors you believe could be used as discriminators in this acquisition (Performance based –Performance Work statement)

11. Would a site visit be beneficial to your company? Would you be interested in seeing the current operation?

12. What type of meaningful metrics would most fully capture performance requirements considering a performance-based PWS? How would you measure success on this program?

12. Should there be a page limitation for the cost proposal? What is a reasonable limit?

14. What kind of commercial available systems are you aware that would meet the Air Force needs for tracking hazardous materials, civil engineering, logistics and procurement?

15. Are you aware of any contracts for similar services in the commercial marketplace?

16. FAR 52.245-1, Alternate 1, which states, “The Contractor assumes the risk of, and shall be responsible for, any loss of Government property upon its delivery to the Contractor as Government-furnished property. However, the Contractor is not responsible for reasonable wear and tear to Government property or for Government property properly consumed in performing this contract.” Are there any concerns that your firm has with the unlimited liability? If the USAF were to include a monetary cap for liability, what would you recommend that it be?

17. Do you currently have any contracts with the Department of Defense? Are you working on any type of weapon system contracts? If so, what type?

18. What percentage of your contracts are with the Department of Defense? What percentages of your contracts are with other commercial contractors?

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .