Attachment 6 - PSA DASH Pre_submission AMA Briefing_29 May 2026.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Call 02 DASH - Joint All Domain Persistent Adaptive Collaborative Technologies II (JADPACT II)
- Solicitation number
- FA238426SB006
About this file
This document is a briefing presentation on the Posture and Sustain Assets Decision Advantage Sprint for Human-Machine-Teaming (PSA DASH), a collaborative initiative between the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL), ABMS CFT, and 805 CTS focused on developing decision advantage capabilities for command and control systems.
The PSA DASH 4 event is scheduled for July 13-23, with submissions due June 3 at 1700 ET and selection notifications expected approximately June 18. The initiative brings together battle management warfighters and software developers for a two-week intensive sprint to define and derive software requirements for decision advantage using the Transformational Model (TM). Deliverables include an outbrief during week two and service outputs using a government-provided scheme. The event will be hosted at the Howard Hughes Operations Center (H2O) in an unclassified environment. Participants should bring their own hardware, though some peripherals will be available; commercial Wi-Fi is accessible with pre-coordination required for external network requests. No visit access requests are required, but names of participants are needed. The briefing provides extensive academic context on PSA as a Tier-2 Decision Function in battle management, emphasizing resource positioning, readiness states, and decision-making that accounts for friendly-adversary environment dynamics. PSA is characterized as fundamentally different from scheduling or en route control, requiring probabilistic assessment of latent goals and resource trajectories while balancing decision quality against time-to-decision imperatives.
View the file
Other files
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Edit distribution statement in the slide master
POSTURE AND SUSTAIN ASSETS
DECISION ADVANTAGE SPRINT FOR HUMAN-MACHINE-TEAMING
(PSA DASH)
“ASK ME ANYTHING”
A F R L
A B M S C F T
8 0 5 T H C T S
This briefing is
UNCLASSIFIED
Edit distribution statement in the slide master 2
Overview
• Problem: Our C2 systems will not give us decision advantage. All decision-making is still left to the humans
• Collaboration between AFRL, ABMS CFT, and 805 CTS
• Battle management warfighters and software developers collaborate over two-weeks to:
• Use the Transformational Model (TM) to define, derive, and enrich software requirements for decision advantage
• Produce prototype/MVP-like services
• Validate TM decision function decomposition for service development for PSA
• Week 1: TM deep dive, baseline battle management scenario, software coding, warfighter feedback
• Week 2: Progress check, more software coding, HMT battle management scenarios
• Deliverables:
• Outbrief during week 2
• Service outputs using Government provided scheme
TM-framed DASH events will help us build machine teammates that arm our C2 enterprise with decision advantage capabilities.
Edit distribution statement in the slide master 3
DASH 4: PSA
Important Dates:
• 29 May: Pre-submission AMA
• 03 June @ 1700 ET: Submissions due
• ~18 June (approx.): selection notification
• 13-23 July: PSA DASH event
You are here
UNCLASSIFIED
Logistics:
• Howard Hughes Operations Center (H2O)
• No visit access requests required
• Names of participants needed
• Bring your own hardware (some peripherals available)
• Unclassified environment/No classified discussions
• Commercial Wi-Fi available
• Pre-coordination required for external network requests
Edit distribution statement in the slide master 4
PM/Contracting Comments
Edit distribution statement in the slide master 5Edit distribution statement in the slide master
PSA Academics
Edit distribution statement in the slide master𝔻ecision𝔸dvant𝔼dge - do not fear chaos … control it UNCLASSIFIED 6
• PSA – a Tier-2 Decision Function in the battle management decision domain:
• The yin to BattleCOA (ℂ ) Production’s yang
• If BattleCOA Production represents the kinetic energy of battle management…
…then PSA represents the potential energy of battle management
• The fundamental difference: non-overlapping degrees of freedom
• BattleGoal (𝕘 ) states:
• Under consideration ← BattlePlanning (TM-BP)
• Activated & enacted ← BattleCOA Production
• Latent: may be enacted sometime in the near future ← PSA
Posture & Sustain Assets: Big Picture – What is PSA?
TM-BM.PSA
Posture & Sustain Assets
“setting the chessboard for impending attacks”
Posture & Sustain Assets (PSA) chooses positions, modes of operation, and readiness states for units and weapon systems, along with resource commitments, that are optimized for impending, anticipated, and possible military actions, accounting for friendly-adversary environment moves and counter-moves.
𝕘 𝕘 𝕘 𝕘 𝕘 𝕘 𝕘
PSA is not a scheduler or en route controller…but it is a gambler
Edit distribution statement in the slide master𝔻ecision𝔸dvant𝔼dge - do not fear chaos … control it UNCLASSIFIED 7
• Posture & Sustain Assets: Close Air Support (CAS)
• What is “CAS” in terms of BattleResources (ℝ )?
• Weapons
• Sensors
• Comm paths
• A key measure of CAS utility is response time
• What is an ideal distribution of CAS resources? →
• Airborne on-call CAS with a 2-ship of F-15Es:
• Configuration = 2-ship with visual mutual support
• Operating Mode = max endurance
• Location = TBD…
Posture & Sustain Assets: Placing BattleResource (ℝ ) Bets
“Hydro, Gizmo 21 flight checking in as fragged”
15 [min] 10 [min] 15 [min]10 [min]
10 [min] 5 [min] 10 [min]5 [min]
10 [min] 5 [min] 10 [min]5 [min]
15 [min] 10 [min] 15 [min]10 [min]
• Execution support & leadership
• Information (presence)
What is a rational choice of location given that our resources are in discrete “clumps”? ↑
(potential)
BattleUtility (𝕌 ) ← maximal diminished→
Edit distribution statement in the slide master𝔻ecision𝔸dvant𝔼dge - do not fear chaos … control it UNCLASSIFIED 8
• What if…?
• The Ops Environment (OE) is no longer symmetrical
• Probability that CAS will be needed has changed →
• Would you change your bet? → Adjust location:
• Gain = rapid response if TF B-4 calls for CAS
• Loss = longer response times in the south & east
• What are the “latent” goals that may utilize CAS?
• Support ground forces x 16 areas of operations (AOs)
• PSA is a gamble: luck plays a significant role
• What about adjusting configuration? → 2 x Single-ships:
Posture & Sustain Assets: Broken Symmetries in the Ops Environment
9 [min] 7 [min] 15 [min]9 [min]
7 [min] 3 [min] 12 [min]7 [min]
9 [min] 7 [min] 15 [min]9 [min]
15 [min] 12 [min] 20 [min]15 [min]
Diminished
BattleUtility (𝕌 )
(potential use)
Maximal
BattleUtility (𝕌 )
(potential use)
A BattleResource (ℝ ): something that can do work in the OE …not just “damage” & “destroy”… “jam”, “hack”, “replenish”, “inform”, “influence”…
PSA ties BattleResource (ℝ ) usable EffectOperators (ê) to BattleUtility (𝕌 ) → taskforce_bravo-4:
@battalion_hq, request air weapons team asap
TASKFORCE_BRAVO-4:
@BATTALION_HQ, REQUEST
AIR WEAPONS TEAM ASAP
Edit distribution statement in the slide master𝔻ecision𝔸dvant𝔼dge - do not fear chaos … control it UNCLASSIFIED 9
• Resource Trajectories: how resources are changing in space & time
• BattleResource (ℝ ) quantity & utility change over time
• Burn rate
• Decay or improve
• Unexpected absence, presence, or change in usability
• Usability a of BattleResource (ℝ ):
• Unallocated
• Obligated
• Committed
• Reserved
• Battle Managers account for likely gains & losses to achieve new posture & sustainment
• “Checks we’ve already written / cashed”
• When available: cost of the posture transition itself (i.e., BattleCOA implementation)
Posture & Sustain Assets: BattleResource (ℝ ) Trajectories & Gain / Loss
Aerial Refueling (AR) Track
“Chargers”
“A/R Aft”
Pre-Mission
RTB
On-Call ?
BattleResource (ℝ )
+ BattleGoal (𝕘 )
BattleAsset (𝔸 )
“Ripit 71, Crusher, proceed direct Chargers, approved twenty-seven thousand, call when level”
Edit distribution statement in the slide master𝔻ecision𝔸dvant𝔼dge - do not fear chaos … control it UNCLASSIFIED 10
• Considering an opponent’s reaction to a move on the chessboard
• If you were the adversary, what would you do?
• What will likely change in the OE due to a new
PSA arrangement?
• Agent Reaction
• OE Reflex
• Does a particular PSA adjustment lead to:
• Quasi-stable state?
• Divergent states?
Posture & Sustain Assets: the Enemy Gets a Vote
Max range of enemy’s bomber-launched land-attack missiles
Air Defense Artillery (ADA)
Missile Engagement Zone (MEZ)
Indication of an attack vector
20+
As with most DecisionFunctions…
PSA must balance the need for quality
& the imperative for quick decision-making
Quality
Time to Decide
First
Approximations
Robust
Details
Edit distribution statement in the slide master𝔻ecision𝔸dvant𝔼dge - do not fear chaos … control it UNCLASSIFIED 11
• What are my enacted & latent goals?
• What resources do I have now & how are they changing?
• What options do I have for different resource arrangements?
• What utility could I achieve with an arrangement of resources?
• How well does an option fit my latent goals?
• How much would it cost to transition to a new resource arrangement?
• How will the adversary & OE likely respond to a new arrangement?
• Which, if any, new arrangement of resources as assets should I choose?
Posture & Sustain Assets: Putting it All Together
= weapons, sensors, comms, …
= fuel, comms, …
Some typical PSA cycles…
• Diffuse Inputs
• Acute Triggers
| Slide 1: Posture and Sustain Assets Decision Advantage Sprint for Human-machine-teaming (PSA DASH) “Ask Me Anything” |
| Slide 2: Overview |
| Slide 3: DASH 4: PSA |
| Slide 4: PM/Contracting Comments |
| Slide 5: PSA Academics |
| Slide 6 |
| Slide 7 |
| Slide 8 |
| Slide 9 |
| Slide 10 |
| Slide 11 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .