Past Performance Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 74 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Neuropsychologist Services at Sheppard AFB, TX
- Solicitation number
- F3V4A12055A001
About this file
The Past Performance Questionnaire should be used to proivde substantial evidence that you can provide the government with quality service that is recent and relevant to the service we would like your company to provide.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Price Exhibit.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Combined Synopsis Solicitation.docx | DOCX document | |
| Neuro PWS.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Contractor’s Name: _____________________________ Contract Number: _____________________________
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. General Information: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: ________________________________________________________________ Address: ________________________________ Telephone Number: ___________________
Fax Number: _________________________ Point of Contact: _______________________________________
Contract Number: ______________________________________ Contract Period or Dates of Performance and Dollar Amount (See Notes):
Basic Period of Performance: _______________________Amount: __$_______________
Option Period One of Performance: __________________Amount: __$_______________
Option Period Two of Performance: __________________Amount: __$_______________ Option Period Three of Performance: _________________Amount: __$_______________
Option Period Four of Performance: __________________Amount: __$_______________ Total Contract Amount: _$__________________________
Project Title: ____________________________________________________________
Description of Work (include approximate number of machines): ________________________________________________________________________________
Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel
Notes
(1) When assessing past performance, only performance that occurred within the last three (3) years prior to the issuance date of this solicitation (F3V3E12121A001 ) will be considered. As part of our evaluation, past performance information older than 3 years will not be considered. Most recent contracts must have been performed for at least 6 months prior to the issuance date of this solicitation to be considered.
(2) If offeror holds or has held other contracts for Washers and Dryers Maintenance, Repair and Lease services with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
(3) If the total dollar amount of the contract was/is for more than one year, indicate the dollar value for each year/option period and then give the total value of the contract.
B. Respondent Information:
Name of Respondent: _____________________________Title: __________________________________
Address: ______________________________________________________________________________
Telephone Number: ___________________________Fax Number: ________________________________
E-mail Address: ________________________________________ C. Mail, Electronically Mail, or Fax Completed Survey Form to the address below. The survey needs to be received no later than 4:00 pm Central Standard Time (CST) on Friday, August 03, 2012:
Address:
82d Contracting Squadron
Attn: Carrie E. Dilks 206 J Avenue, Bldg 1662 Sheppard AFB TX 76311-2743 E-Mail:
carrie.dilks@sheppard.af.mil or james.beeson@sheppard.af.mil Fax: 940-676-6709 D. Performance Information: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. Please provide a narrative explanation for any ratings that are Exceptional, Marginal or Unsatisfactory.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
Assign a Performance Rating by placing an “X” in the appropriate column
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1 |
| Contractor provided experienced key personnel that met or exceeded the qualifications of the position as described in the contract. |
Comments:
| 2 |
| Contractor delegated authority to project managers and supervisors. |
| 3 |
| Contractor supported actions taken by key personnel. |
| 4 |
| Contractor participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 5 |
| Contractor provided replacement of key personnel, when necessary, with personnel that met or exceeded the qualifications of the position as described in the contract. |
| 6 |
| Accuracy and timeliness of schedules, milestones and administrative requirements. |
| 7 |
| Met established schedules. |
| 8 |
| Accuracy and timeliness of invoices. |
| 9 |
| Contractor interaction with the Government. |
| 10 |
| Contractor’s behavior is reasonable and cooperative. |
| 11 |
| Contractor is customer oriented. |
| 12 |
| Contractor followed accepted Quality Control Plan to meet contract requirements. |
| 13 |
| Contractor corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and in accordance with Quality Control Plan. |
| 14 |
| Contractor identified and displayed initiative to resolve issues/problems in a timely manner. |
| 15 |
| Contractor suggested alternative approaches to issues/problems. |
| 16 |
| Contractor was responsive to contract changes. |
| 17 |
| Contractor cooperated with Government after contract award. |
| 18 |
| Has the contractor ever had financial difficulties (making payroll, payments to sub-contractors, employees, etc.)? |
If Yes, please provide comments:
Yes/No
| 19 |
| Has the contractor ever received a notice of noncompliance? (Law, Regulations, Environment, Safety, etc.)? |
If Yes, please provide comments:
Yes/No
| 20 |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure show notice? |
Yes/No
| 21 |
| Was the contractor ever issued a show cause notice? |
Yes/No
| 22 |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? |
If No, please provide comments:
Yes/No
| 23 |
| Is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
Yes/No
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
How would you rate contractor’s overall performance?
Additional Remarks: _______________________________________________________
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
ATTACHMENT III
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .