Questionnaire Template A.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 31 KB Posted

Attached to
USCG Waterways Commerce Cutter (WCC) Inland Buoy Tender
Solicitation number
F2019047737
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Request for Information (RFI) issued by the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) for the procurement of three Waterways Commerce Cutter (WCC) Inland Buoy Tenders (WLI). The purpose of this RFI is to identify potential sources, gauge small business interest and capability, and obtain industry feedback on the draft Request for Proposal (RFP) and associated technical requirements prior to its release.

The RFI requests information on the respondent's production capacity, experience with federal agencies, cybersecurity certifications, and design development expertise. It also provides details on the technical products the government anticipates providing as part of the unwarranted design, and seeks feedback on any additional or deleted products. Other requested details include the respondent's production facility, cutter delivery logistics, rough order of magnitude pricing, and small business designations. Finally, the RFI asks respondents to identify their biggest concerns with the potential contract and how they would address them.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Questionnaire Template B.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Responses to Questions

Company Name:
POC:
NumberQuestionResponses to Questions
1How long does your firm anticipate it will take to produce all three (3) WLI cutters?
2Specifically, what do you expect the production duration will be for the lead cutter and each cutter thereafter? What is your firm’s recommended ordering frequency (i.e., X number of cutters every X months) and what is your ideal rate of production (i.e. one cutter delivered every X months)?
3WLI cutters are expected to be 120 feet long, have a 35 foot beam and 10.5 foot hull depth with a lightship weight of approximately 400 long tons. What dimensional and weight constraints apply to your facility? What is the maximum capacity of your facility to produce vessels of similar size and scope as the WLI?
4Does your company have experience working with Federal agencies? If so, what agencies? What products/services did you provide?
5Does your company have a Department of Defense (DoD) Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC), and if so, to what level are you certified?
6What experience does your company have developing detail designs for ship construction?
7The Government anticipates providing the following technical products with this contract solicitation to identify the unwarranted Government-Led Design. What additional products (or deletion of planned products) would be recommended by your firm to be included in (or removed from) the solicitation?
7aDesign & Construction Statement of Work, Test & Trials Statement of Work, System Specification, and a Contract Deliverable Requirements List.
7bContract drawings:
i.Hull Lines Plan and Offsets Drawing
ii.Superstructure Lines Plan and Offsets
iii.Structural General Arrangements
iv.Working Deck Layout Plan
7cGuidance drawings, & analysis:
i.List of Drawings and Reports
ii.Baseline Weight Estimate
iii.Hydrostatics, Intact & Damage Stability
iv.Speed Power Analysis w/ Propeller Sizing
v.Structural Design Report and FEA (ABS AIP)
vi.HVAC Load Calculations – Report
vii.EPLA – w/ Directed SSDG and EDG
viii.Transformer Sizing Calculations
ix.Endurance Calculations – Tank Sizing
x.Tank Capacity Tables
xi.Area/Volume Report
xii.General Arrangement w/ Inboard & Outboard Profiles
xiii.Space Arrangements – Pilothouse and Galley among others
xiv.Major Equipment Removal Routes Drawing(s) - Z-Drive, MDE, SSDG
xv.Midship Section
xvi.Bottom Construction, Girders, Pillers, etc.
xvii.Framing Plan (Uses ABS Term - MDC uses Transverse Structure Drawing)
xviii.Scantling Profile & Deck
xix.Watertight and Tank Bulkheads
xx.Deckhouse Structure
xxi.Machinery Arrangement Drawings
xxii.Shafting Arrangement Drawing
xxiii.Propeller Drawing and Details
xxiv.Exhaust System Diagram
xxv.Electrical One-Line Diagram
xxvi.Machinery Controls and C5I Schematic Block Diagrams
xxvii.Topside Antenna Arrangement
xxviii.HVAC System Schematic
xxix.Firemain System Schematic
xxx.Machinery Cooling System Schematic
xxxi.Drainage System Schematic
xxxii.Chilled Water System Schematic
xxxiii.Fuel System Diagram
xxxiv.Potable Water System
xxxv.AFFF System Design Report
xxxvi.Water Mist and Related Extinguishing Systems
xxxvii.Sewage System Diagram
8Where is your production/manufacturing facility located? Is this site owned by your company?
9Does your manufacturing facility currently have the ability to produce both a steel hull and an aluminum deckhouse?
10The WLI homeports are expected to be in the Great Lakes Region, Southeast Alaska, and the Pacific Northwest. How would you deliver the ships to their final destinations, and what is the estimated delivery duration?
11What is the rough order of magnitude (ROM) price to build the lead and follow-on cutters based on your experience building similarly sized vessels? What is the ROM price for the design and engineering effort?
12Regarding your company profile, the following information is requested:
12aIs your company a qualified small business for the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 336611 (i.e., shipbuilding with size standard of 1,250 employees).
12bIs your company a small business under the 8(a) Program (15U.S.C. 637)?
12cIs your company a Historically Underutilized Business Zones (HUBZone) business (15 U.S.C. 657a)?
12dIs your company a Veteran-owned business (U.S.C. 657f)?
12eIs your company a Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB) (15 U.S.C. 637(m))?
13From a big picture perspective, what are your company’s biggest concerns with this potential contract and how would you address those concerns?

Support Data

Comment Types
Admin
Alternative/Preference
Design Enhancement
Conflict
Other

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .