Attachment_2_EXIM_Contractor_Past_Perf_Eval_Doc1.docx

Attachment 2

CONTRACTOR PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION DOCUMENT

Name of Evaluator(s): Evaluator’s Phone No(s).:

Evaluator’s Association with Contract (e.g., Contracting Officer, Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative):

Offer Evaluated:

RATINGS

Using the rating guidelines on the last page of this Contractor Past Performance Evaluation Document, circle the appropriate number (either 0 (Unacceptable), 1 (Acceptable), 2 (Good), 3 (Outstanding)) which corresponds to the rating that best summarizes the Contractor’s performance under the above-referenced contract for each rating category below. Please limit comments to 2000 characters or less.

QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE Rating: 0 1 2 3

Comments on Strengths and Weaknesses:

TIMELINESS OF CONTRACT PERFORMANCE Rating: 0 1 2 3

BUSINESS RELATIONS Rating: 0 1 2 3

SUBCONTRACTS

Are subcontracts involved in the above-referenced contract? YES NO (Circle one)

Comments (Please comment on those subcontractors that have provided a significant contribution to overall contract performance under the above-referenced contract.)

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Is/was the Contractor committed to customer satisfaction? YES NO (Circle one)

Comments:

Would you recommend that EXIM Bank select this Contractor? YES NO (Circle one)

Comments:

OVERALL

RATING

OF

CONTRACTOR

(Includes

Comments on Customer Satisfaction) Rating:

RATING GUIDELINES

Criterion:

- Considerations:

Quality of Product or Service

· Compliance with contract requirements

· Accuracy of reports

· Effectiveness of personnel

· Technical excellence Timeliness of Performance

· Met interim milestones

· Reliability

· Responsive to technical direction

· Completed on time including wrap-up and contract administration

· Met delivery schedules

· No liquidated damages assessed Business Relations

· Effective management, including subcontracts

· Reasonable/cooperative behavior

· Responsive to contract requirements

· Notification of problems

· Flexibility

· Pro-active vs. Reactive

· Effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program