EXHIBIT V - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 26 KB Posted

Attached to
X1DZ--Norristown Veteran Center Lease
Solicitation number
36C24424R0034
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity to provide leased space for a Vet Center in Norristown, PA. The questionnaire is to be completed by assessors who are knowledgeable about the contractor's past performance on similar contracts. The assessors are asked to provide ratings and comments on the contractor's quality of service, schedule, and business relations. The questionnaire also includes a section for the assessor to indicate their overall recommendation about awarding another contract to the contractor. The related federal contract opportunity is Solicitation Number 36C24424R0034 for the "X1DZ--Norristown Veteran Center Lease" issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 4. Past performance information will be used to evaluate proposals received for this contract opportunity.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
EXHIBIT R - FAR 52.204-25.docx DOCX document
EXHIBIT I - Security Unit Price List FSL II Jun. 2022.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
EXHIBIT J - Tenant Improvement Cost Summary FILLABLE.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
EXHIBIT F - Form 1364 Proposal to Lease Space.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT S - Attachment 1 LA-23-04 FAR Clause 52.204-27.docx DOCX document
EXHIBIT D - 3516A Solicitation Provisions Simplified Oct. 2023.docx DOCX document
EXHIBIT P - SOW ASR-R Interior Signage_Norristown Vet Center Lease.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT E - GSA Form 3517A.docx DOCX document
EXHIBIT M - FAR 52.204-24 Representation Digital Nov. 2021.docx DOCX document
EXHIBIT A - 36C24424L0004.docx DOCX document
36C24424R0034_2.docx DOCX document
EXHIBIT H - Prelease FPLS Evaluation Form 12000 - Part A and Part B.docx DOCX document
EXHIBIT G -Form 1217 - Lessor_s Annual Cost Statement.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT L - DOL Wage Determination - Davis-Bacon Act WD PA20240099.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT C - Security Requirements FSL Level II 1.12.24.docx DOCX document
EXHIBIT O -SOW ASR-Q Brand Signage_Norristown Vet Center Lease.pdf PDF
36C24424R0034.docx DOCX document
EXHIBIT Q - Conceptual Space Plan_Norristown Vet Center Lease.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT K - Contract Submittal Schedule.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT B - SOW ASR-A New Replacing Vet Center Lease Norristown.docx DOCX document
EXHIBIT X.VA Provision Addendum Alternate Protest Procedure - Real Property Lease Procurements.pdf PDF
Show all 21

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

EXHIBIT V

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE

Subject: Past Performance Questionnaire for Norristown Vet Center, PA

PAST PERFORMANCE INSTRUCTIONS

The NCO4 Network Contracting Office, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania has issued a solicitation to provide leased space for a Vet Center lease in Norristown, PA.

Past performance information will be used to evaluate proposals received. Section A is to be completed by the Offeror. Section A of the enclosed questionnaire lists the contractor who has identified your office as a source to evaluate their past performance. Section A also authorizes release of this information to NCO4 Network Contracting Office, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

The Offeror must provide this entire document to each of its assessors. The Offeror shall only submit with this proposal (by the closing date of the Solicitation) copies of Section A of the questionnaire as provided to the assessors.

Section B in its entirely is to be completed by the assessor(s). An individual assessor knowledgeable of the contractor’s quality of supplies and services rendered is requested to verify, complete the questionnaire and submit to the Contracting Office. If evaluating more than one contract for the same contractor, use a separate questionnaire for each contract being evaluated.

Because this information is critical to the evaluation process, your time and effort in providing your assessment is greatly appreciated. The questionnaire should be completed as soon as possible but not later than (DATE). Assessor is requested to send electronically to Trevor.Seiling@va.gov. Assessor: Please do not send this information to the Offeror being evaluated.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation and expeditious response to this request.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE

SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for who past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors)

Solicitation Number

Project/Requirement

Agency

1. Prospective Government Contractor’s __________________________________________________

Names and Address:__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
2. Contractor Point of Contact__________________________________________________
3. Phone Number (with area code):__________________________________________________
4. Assessor Contract Award number:__________________________________________________

5. Description of Services provided under contract:

6. Contract award date: ___________________ Contract Amount: Initial ________ Final ___________

7. Period of Performance: ______________________________________________________________

ASSESSOR INFORMATION:

Assessor Name

Title

Phone Number & Email Address

8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information request in this questionnaire to NCO4 Network Contracting Office, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

(Signature)

_______________________________________________________________________________
(Name and Title of Authorizing Official)(Date)

SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors).

Past Performance Evaluation Ratings

E – Exceptional/Very Low Risk
Offer’s past performance record provides essentially no doubt that the offeror will successfully perform the require effort.
S – Satisfactory/Low Risk
Offer’s past performance record provides little doubt that the offeror will successfully perform the require effort.
M – Marginal/Moderate Risk
Offer’s past performance record, although satisfactory, provides some doubt that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
U – Unsatisfactory/High Risk
Offer’s past performance record provides substantial doubt that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
N – Neutral/Unknown Risk
The offeror has no relevant past performance record. A thorough search was unable to identify any past performance. Will not rate favorably or unfavorably.

The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.

QUALITY OF SERVICE

1. Rate the contractor’s compliance with contractual requirements. E S M U N

2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service. E S M U N

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

SCHEDULE

1. Delivery of service was within required time period specified by E S M U N contract requirements.

3. Rate the contractor’s ability to control cost and submit invoices. E S M U N Are invoices complete, accurate, and timely?

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

BUSUNESS RELATIONS

1. Overall rating of contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining A positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively Resolution of any problems, etc.) E S M U N

2. Rate the working relationship between contractor’s management, and your company (i.e. contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment of customer satisfaction; concern for the interest of the customer). E S M U N

3. Rate the contractor’s ability to submit required reports and/ or invoices in a timely manner.

E S M U N

4. Rate the contractor’s responsiveness to customer complaint resolution. E S M U N

5. Overall rating of contractor’s business relations. E S M U N

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

How would you feel about another contract to this contractor?

___________Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor.

___________Would mostly likely award another contract to this contractor.

___________Would think twice about awarding another contract to this contractor, but would do so if there was no alternative existed.

___________Do not wish to award another contract to this contractor.

___________Would not award another contract to this contractor.

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (quality, schedule, business relations) on contract being assessed.

Exceptional
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

VII. General Comments:

ASSESSOR:

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

Role
Period of Involvement

Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

OTHERS

_______________________________________________________________________________
(Signature)(Date)
_______________________________________________________________________________
(Typed or Printed/Name)(Organization)

(Phone Number)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .