Exhibit O - Past Perf Questionnaire - Portland Oregon - 36C24W22R0062.docx
DOCX document 46 KB Posted
- Attached to
- OREGON - PORTLAND - CRRC - NEW REPLACING
- Solicitation number
- 36C24W22R0062
About this file
This document is a past performance questionnaire for a federal solicitation to provide leased space for a Community Resource and Referral Center in Portland, Oregon. The Regional Procurement Office West is soliciting proposals for the leased space, with solicitation number 36C24W22R0062. Offerors must provide completed Section A of the questionnaire to their assessors by January 26, 2024. Assessors will then complete Section B to provide feedback on the offerors' past performance as it relates to quality of service, schedule, and business relations. Assessors are asked to rate performance in these categories as exceptional, satisfactory, marginal, unsatisfactory or neutral. The completed questionnaires must be submitted electronically to the identified contracting officer by the response date.
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
12/30/20 Exhibit O - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE – 36C24W22R0062
SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for a Community Resource and Referral Center, Portland, OR
PAST PERFORMANCE INSTRUCTIONS
The Regional Procurement Office West has issued a solicitation to provide leased space for a Community Resource and Referral Center (CRRC). Past performance information will be used to evaluate proposals received. Section A is to be completed by the Offeror.
Section A of the enclosed questionnaire lists the contractor who has identified your office as a source to evaluate their past performance. Section A also authorizes release of this information to Regional Procurement Office West. The Offeror must provide this entire document to each of its assessors. The Offeror shall only submit with its proposal (by the closing date of the Solicitation) copies of Section A of the questionnaire as provided to the assessors.
Section B in its entirety is to be completed by the assessor (s). An individual assessor knowledgeable of the contractor’s quality of supplies and services rendered is requested to verify, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. If evaluating more than one contract for the same contractor, use a separate questionnaire for each contract being evaluated.
Because this information is critical to the evaluation process, your time and effort in providing your assessment is greatly appreciated. The questionnaire should be completed as soon as possible but not later than 1/26/2024. Assessor is requested to send electronically to garry.alexander@va.gov. Comment by Timothy Pavek: Update at Issuance
Assessor: Please do not send this information to the Offeror being evaluated.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation and expeditious response to this request.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for whom past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors)
| Solicitation Number |
| 36C24W22R0062 |
| Project/Requirement |
| VA/CRRC in Portland, OR |
Customer/Agency Comment by Timothy Pavek: Need input
1. Prospective Government Contractor’s ______________________________________
| Name and Address: | ______________________________________ | |
| ______________________________________ | ||
| ______________________________________ |
2. Contractor Point of Contact: ___________________________________________
3. Phone number (with area code): ___________________________________________
4. Assessor Contract Award number: _________________________________________
5. Description of Services provided under contract: ________________________________________________________________________
6. Contract award date: ___________ Contract Amount: Initial ___________Final ____
7. Period of Performance or Delivery Date: _________________________
ASSESSOR INFORMATION:
Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this questionnaire to Regional Procurement Office West Comment by Timothy Pavek: Need info
(Signature)
| _____________________________________________ | __________________________ | |
| (Name and Title of Authorizing Official) | (Date) |
SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors).
RATING SCALE Definitions Past Performance Ratings and Definitions
| E |
| Exceptional/Very Low Risk |
| Offer’s past performance record provides essentially no doubt that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| S |
| Satisfactory/Low Risk |
| Offer’s past performance record provides little doubt that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| M |
| Marginal/Moderate Risk |
| Offer’s past performance record, although satisfactory, provides some doubt that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| U |
| Unsatisfactory/High Risk |
| Offer’s past performance record provides substantial doubt that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| N |
| Neutral/Unknown Risk |
| The offeror has no relevant past performance record. A thorough search was unable to identify any past performance. Will not rate favorably or unfavorably. |
The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.
QUALITY OF SERVICE
1. Rate the contractor’s compliance with contractual requirements. E S M U N
2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service. E S M U N
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
SCHEDULE
1. Delivery of service was within required time period specified by contract requirements. E S M U N
2. Rate the contractor’s ability to control cost and submit invoices.
Are invoices complete, accurate, and timely? E S M U N
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
BUSINESS RELATIONS
1. Overall rating of contractor’s business practices (e.g., maintaining A positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively Resolution of any problems, etc.) E S M U N
2. Rate the working relationship between contractor’s management, and your company (i.e., contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment of customer satisfaction; concern for the interest of the customer). E S M U N
3. Rate the contractor's ability to submit required reports and/or invoices in a timely manner. E S M U N
4. Rate the contractor’s responsiveness to customer complaint resolution. E S M U N
5. Overall rating of contractor’s business relations. E S M U N
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
How would you feel about awarding another contract to this contractor?
| ______ | Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor. |
| ______ | Would most likely award another contract to this contractor. |
| ______ | Would think twice about awarding another contract to this contractor but would do so if no better alternative existed. |
| ______ | Do not wish to award another contract to this contractor. |
| ______ | Would not award another contract to this contractor. |
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (quality, schedule, business relations,) on contract being assessed.
| Exceptional |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
VII. General Comments:
ASSESSOR:
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
| Role |
| Period of Involvement |
Contract Specialist/LEASE CONTRACTING OFFICER
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
OTHERS
| ________________________________________ | ____________________________ | |
| (Signature) | (Date) |
(Typed or Printed Name) (Organization Name)
(Phone Number)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .