EXHIBIT B Past and Present Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 238 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C25621R0093
About this file
This document contains a past and present performance questionnaire for a federal contractor bidding on a construction project, as well as details of the related federal solicitation.
The past and present performance questionnaire is a form for references to evaluate a contractor's previous work. It asks references to rate the contractor's performance on a scale of 1 to 6 in various areas such as managing staff, quality control, scheduling, and responsiveness. The references are also prompted to provide narrative explanations for any ratings of 1 or 2.
The federal solicitation is for the construction of a new main entrance at the John L. McClellan Memorial Veterans Hospital in Little Rock, Arkansas. The solicitation will require a general contractor to improve patient entry, drop-off, parking, and provide covered walkways at the new main entrance. Additional tasks outlined in the statement of work include assessing existing conditions, demolishing the existing canopy, and ensuring compliance with accessibility standards. The estimated value of the project is between $5-10 million. The solicitation is projected to be posted on May 5, 2021. It is a total 100% set-aside for verified Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attch C Wage Determination AR20210027.txt | TXT text file | |
| EXHIBIT D - EMR Form.pdf | ||
| EXHIBIT C CONTRACTOR EVALUATION FORM CONSTRUCTION SAFETY.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attch B Construction Drawings.pdf | ||
| 36C25621R0093.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attch A Construction Specifications.pdf | ||
| EXHIBIT A PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY SURVEY.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRACTOR
Complete the CONTRACTOR INFORMATION section, below (type answers into light blue shaded boxes).
Save the document. Send an electronic or hard copy print of the form to each of your reference contacts, asking them to please complete the form and submit it according to the instructions, below. It is preferred that these are the same clients/projects that you provided with Exhibit A for ease of evaluation and comparison. Projects should be relevant (within the same magnitude of construction) and recent (within 3 years).
INSTRUCTIONS TO REFERENCE CONTACT
The contractor named below is submitting an offer for a United States Department of Veterans Affairs contract requirement, and has sent this form to you, in your role as a past performance reference contact.
Please complete this form in full (all areas shaded in light yellow, below). Once completed, please send the form to the Contract Specialist via email directly to:
Department of Veterans Affairs
NCO 16 Contracting Office
TO: Renardo Hollowell, Contract Specialist REF: 36C25621R0093
Email Address: renardo.hollowell@va.gov
Please return the completed form no later than May 15, 2021. If you have any questions, please contact Mr.
Hollowell via email. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
GENERAL INFORMATION [completed by Contractor]
Contractor Company Name Street Address
Contractor Point of Contact Name City
Point of Contact
Phone Number State
Reference Project
Title Zip Code
Contract Period of
Performance (start to finish): Email
Contract Number
Contract
Dollar Value
Description of
Work mailto:renardo.hollowell@va.gov
JLM Main Front Entrance Network Contracting Office (NCO) 16 Solicitation No. 36C25621R0093
Source Selection Information--See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
Role of Contractor on This Project
(check appropriate box) ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Sub-contractor ☐ Key Personnel
RESPONDENT INFORMATION [completed by Reference Contact]
Company Name Street Address
POC Name City
Phone Number State
Fax Number Zip Code
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION
FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2 in the applicable text box OR in the Remarks section, below (text box will expand to whatever extent is necessary).
1 2 3 4 5 6
UNSATISFACTORY MARGINAL SATISFACTORY VERY GOOD EXCEPTIONAL NEUTRAL
Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements.
There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.
Performance met contractual requirements.
There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit.
Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.
No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.i
The Contractor … 1 2 3 4 5 6
1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
Narrative:
2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
Narrative:
3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
Narrative:
Solicitation No. 36C25621R0093
4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
Narrative:
5. Followed approved quality control plan.
Narrative:
6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
Narrative:
7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
Narrative:
8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies
Narrative:
9. Identified problems as they occurred.
Narrative:
10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
Narrative:
11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.
Narrative
12. Developed realistic progress schedules.
Narrative:
13. Met established project schedules.
Narrative:
14. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
Narrative:
15. Was responsive to contract changes.
Narrative:
16. Provided adequate project supervision.
Narrative:
17. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.
Narrative:
18. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
Narrative:
19. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
Narrative:
20. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
Narrative:
21. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
Narrative:
22. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
☐ YES ☐ NO
23 Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, please explain in “remarks.”
☐ YES ☐ NO
24 To the best of your knowledge, is the contractor rated in CPARS? ☐ YES ☐ NO
Solicitation No. 36C25621R0093
REMARKS (Please use as much space as is needed – the box will expand as you type).
Printed Name
Title
Signature
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .