Exhibit_1_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 69 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CASTNER GLACIER RECREATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140L6323Q0029
About this file
This document is a past performance questionnaire for a contractor bidding on Solicitation Number 140L6323Q0029 from the Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management. The solicitation is for management plan services for the Castner Glacier Recreation Area. The questionnaire asks the reference to rate the contractor's past performance on a previous contract in areas such as meeting requirements, timeliness, quality of shipments, and overall performance. It provides evaluation definitions for exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, and unsatisfactory performance. The completed questionnaire must be returned to the Contract Specialist at the BLM no later than July 23, 2023 from a corporate email address.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140L6323Q0029_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| Sol_140L6323Q0029_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Castner_SOW_Final_8_2023_0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Sol_140L6323Q0029.pdf | ||
| B08_Attachment_1_0_Castner_SOW_Final_3_2023.docx | DOCX document | |
| B08_Attachment_2_0_Award_Basis_Factors.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Exhibit 1
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation# 140L6323Q0029 Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to Contract Specialist, E-mail peuler@blm.gov
We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for the Bureau of Land Management - Alaska, Solicitation Number 140L6323Q0029. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to Contract Specialist, e-mail peuler@blm.gov.
Questionnaire is due to Patrick Euler no later than 3:00 PM AK on 23 July 2023. Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contract Specialist emailed from a corporate email account.
If you will not be available for verification of this past performance evaluation, please indicate another POC for the contacting officer to contact.
Alternate POC name: ________________________________________
Alternate POC phone number: _________________________________
Alternate POC e-mail address: _________________________________
Thank you.
NAME OF OFFEROR:
Phone:
Fax:
E-Mail:
I. Current or Historical Contract Information
CONTRACT REFERENCED:
1. Contract or Identifying Number: _____________________________________
2. Contract Value: ______________________________________________________
3. Period of Performance: _________________________________________
4. Brief description of items provided:
5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire:
Agency/Company:
Title:
II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Evaluation Definitions – The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment. |
Past Performance Evaluation
Question 1. Performance What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Performance
Comments, if any.
Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Timeliness
Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems
Question 4. Quality of Shipments What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet requirements of shipping (including packing, marking, etc) and the overall quality of the delivery?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Quality of Shipments
Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
General Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .