EWAAC Proposal Response Guide__draft 23 Jun 2021.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Eglin Wide Agile Acquisition Contract (EWAAC) Draft Proposal Response Guide Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8656-21-D-0095
About this file
This draft proposal response guide outlines the requirements for responding to solicitation FA8656-21-D-0095, the Eglin Wide Agile Acquisition Contract. Offerors must use the provided template to demonstrate experience in digital engineering, agile processes, open architecture, armament development, and enterprise analytics. The technical proposal is limited to seven pages for each digital trinity element and four pages for the digital trinity roadmap. The cost proposal requires proposing up to four personnel to attend a one-hour post-award conference for a total price of $1,000. The guide provides instructions and categories for offerors to populate with experiences, capabilities, and pricing to respond to the factors outlined in the solicitation.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Draft Proposal Guide Responses.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
INSTRUCTIONS
FOR USING THE
PROPOSAL RESPONSE GUIDE
GENERAL PURPOSE AND INSTRUCTIONS
The purpose of the proposal response guide is to aid offerors in responding to the EWAAC IDIQ Technical and Cost/Price solicitation using the below template.
Offerors shall not deviate from the format provided. Offerors shall not exceed page counts as described in
Section L, table L-1.3.
FACTOR I INSTRUCTIONS
Offerors shall use the attached guide to assist in demonstrating recent and relevant experience in FACTOR
I: SUBFACTOR A: DIGITAL TRINITY elements (Section M, paragraph 3.1) and SUBFACTOR B:
TECHINCAL (Section M, paragraph 3.2).
Offerors shall use the space provided under each section to explain technical approaches, recent/relevant expertise, direct (organic or in-house) capabilities, qualifications, key personnel and facilities, or other examples which demonstrate competence in each identified area of interest. Additional pages within each subfactor are available to use at the offeror’s discretion.
Offerors shall describe proficiencies in each of the DIGITAL TRINITY elements: Digital Engineering and
Management, Agile Processes, and Open Architecture. Offerors shall use the areas provided in the roadmap to identify capability shortfalls, risks, strategies, and timeline to achieving full DIGITAL TRINITY proficiency within two (2) years of contract award. Offerors shall not exceed 7 pages total for DIGITAL
TRINITY elements and shall not exceed 4 pages for the DIGITAL TRINITY roadmap.
Offerors shall use the space provided to demonstrate management approach to meeting the TECHNICAL requirements by providing examples which show knowledge and ability to deliver or support technical requirements. Offerors shall not exceed 7 pages total for the TECHNICAL description and supporting examples.
FACTOR II INSTRUCTIONS
Offerors shall use the attached guide to indicate proposed staffing for the Post-Award Conference. Offerors shall not deviate from the provided format, duration, or total proposed price.
Instructions
Document is DRAFT and subject to change before release of RFP
OFFEROR’S COMPANY INFORMATION AND NARRATIVE SUMMARY
Company Information and Narrative Summary will not be evaluated.
COMPANY INFORMATION
Company Name:
Proposal Number:
Proposal Date:
Primary Point of Contact (POC):
Primary POC Title:
Primary POC Email:
Primary POC Phone Number:
Authorized Contract Signee (if different than primary):
Signee Title:
Signee POC Email:
Signee POC Phone Number:
CAGE Code:
DUNS Code:
Other Information:
NARRATIVE SUMMARY:
PROPOSAL RESPONSE GUIDE
FOR THE
EGLIN WIDE AGILE ACQUISITION CONTRACT (EWAAC)
FACTOR I – SECTION M-3.0
SUBFACTOR A: DIGITAL TRINITY ELEMENTS
Offerors shall use space provided below to demonstrate proficiency in each Digital Trinity element in accordance with Section M, paragraph 3.1 and/or complete a roadmap outlining the offeror’s plan for achieving Digital Trinity proficiency in accordance with Section M, paragraph 3.1.
Offerors shall provide evidence of technical approaches, recent/relevant expertise, direct (organic or in-house) capabilities, qualifications, key personnel and facilities, or other examples which demonstrate proficiency of each Digital Trinity element.
DIGITAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT (Reference Section M, paragraph 3.1.1 for example activities)
AGILE PROCESSES (Reference Section M, paragraph 3.1.2 for example activities)
OPEN ARCHITECTURE (Reference Section M, paragraph 3.1.3 for example activities)
Additional Page for elaborating on ANY of the DIGITAL TRINITY elements:
DIGITAL TRINITY ROADMAP (as needed)
Offerors shall use pages 8 through 11 of this guide if needed to supplement their current capabilities listed above and establish a roadmap for gaining Digital Trinity competence within two (2) years or less in accordance with Section M, paragraph 3.1.
IDENTIFY CURRENT SHORTFALLS
Briefly describe Digital Trinity elements which your firm has little or no capability.
Briefly describe Digital Trinity elements for which your current capabilities require additional maturation.
EXPLAIN STRATEGY
Describe your firm’s plan for developing future Digital Engineering and Management competence.
(Sec M, paragraph 3.1.1)
Describe your firm’s plan for developing future Agile Processes competence. (Sec M, paragraph 3.1.2)
Describe your firm’s plan for developing future Open Architecture competence. (Sec M, paragraph 3.1.3)
IDENTIFY RISKS
Characterize potential barriers to your firm’s ability to achieve Digital Trinity proficiency within two (2) years and explain mitigation strategies in place to eventually achieve full competence.
SCHEDULE
Briefly explain your firm’s anticipated timeline for achieving full competence in each Digital Trinity
Element.
Additional space provided for the DIGITAL TRINITY roadmap as needed:
SUBFACTOR B: TECHNICAL
Offerors shall use space provided below to demonstrate management approach to meeting the technical requirements of the Statement of Objectives and in accordance with Section M, paragraph 3.2.
Offerors shall provide evidence of technical approaches, recent/relevant expertise, direct (organic or in-house) capabilities, qualifications, key personnel and facilities, or other examples which show knowledge and ability to deliver or support technical requirements.
ARMAMENT/WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT (Reference Section M, paragraph 3.2.1 for example activities)
Offeror must demonstrate competence in three (3) of the five (5) categories listed in Section M, paragraphs
3.2.1.1 – 3.2.1.5.
ENTERPRISE ANALYTICS (Reference Section M, paragraph 3.2.2 for example activities)
Offeror has met the minimum requirements for this category by demonstrating competence in two (2) of the three (3) categories listed in Section M, paragraphs 3.2.2.1 – 3.2.2.3.
Additional Page for elaborating on EITHER ARMAMENT/WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT AND/
OR ENTERPRISE ANALYTICS:
COST/PRICE PROPOSAL
FOR THE
EGLIN WIDE AGILE ACQUISITION CONTRACT (EWAAC)
FACTOR II – SECTION M-4.0
STAFFING PROPOSAL
Offerors shall use space provided below to indicate proposed staffing of the Post-Award Conference.
Offerors shall not deviate from the 1-hour duration or total proposed price of $1,000 provided below and exceptions to the proposed staffing must be adequately justified through supporting documentation using a narrative or chart. Offerors shall identify and propose for up to four (4) personnel to attend the post-award conference (in-person or virtually), for a duration not exceed 1-hour, and the proposed Fully Burdened
Labor Rates (FBLR) should be calculated accordingly.
Proposal for Post-Award Conference
Personnel Labor Category FBLR Hours Subtotal
1. Attendee 1 X 1 = $
2. Attendee 2 X 1 = $
3. Attendee 3 X 1 = $
4. Attendee 4 X 1 = $
Total Labor Price $
Proposal Preparation Price $
Total Proposed Price $ 1,000.00
**To be eligible for award, total proposed price must equal $1,000.**
Additional space provided for the COST/PRICE justification as needed:
| Proposal Narrative Summary and Instructions__draft__23 Jun |
| DT and Techical proposal template__draft__23 Jun |
| Cost-Price proposal template__draft__23 Jun |
| Untitled |
| Untitled |
| Company Name: |
| Proposal Number: |
| Proposal Date: |
| Primary POC: |
| POC Title: |
| POC Email: |
| POC Phone: |
| Signee Name: |
| Signee Title: |
| Signee Email: |
| Signee Phone: |
| CAGE Code: |
| DUNS Code: |
| Other: |
| Narrative 1: |
| Narrative 2: |
| Dig Eng 1: |
| Dig Eng 2: |
| Agile 1: |
| Agile 2: |
| Open Arch 1: |
| Open Arch 2: |
| Additional DT: |
| Roadmap 1: |
| Roadmap 2: |
| Roadmap 3: |
| Roadmap 4: |
| Roadmap 5: |
| Roadmap 6: |
| Roadmap 7: |
| Roadmap 8: |
| Weapons 1: |
| Weapons 2: |
| Weapons 3: |
| Weapons 4: |
| En Ana 1: |
| En Ana 2: |
| Additional Technical: |
| Labor Cat 1: |
| Labor Cat 2: |
| Labor Cat 3: |
| Labor Cat 4: |
| FBLR 1: |
| FBLR 2: |
| FBLR 3: |
| FBLR 4: |
| $$ 1: |
| $$ 2: |
| $$ 3: |
| $$ 4: |
| $$ 5: |
| $$ 6: |
| Additional Cost/Price: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .