Evalutation Criteria.pdf

PDF 415 KB Posted

Attached to
F-16 Mounting Bracket FA820325Q0005_0001
Solicitation number
FA820325Q0005_0001
Issued by

About this file

The document is an Evaluation Criteria for Award for Solicitation FA8203-25-Q-0005, a 100% small business set-aside procurement using the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) method. The solicitation is for an F-16 Mounting Bracket with NSN 5340016435571LE, seeking production from pre-approved manufacturers including Machine Specialties LLC, SAF Industries LLC, Transaero Inc., and five other listed companies.

The evaluation will focus on two primary factors: (1) Price, which will be assessed based on the "Unit Price" for CLIN 0001 - Production, ensuring fairness by evaluating only the unit price regardless of First Article requirements, and (2) Technical Acceptability, consisting of two subfactors - (a) being listed as an approved source with engineering source approval, and (b) submitting a delivery schedule that meets or beats the required timeline. The solicitation notes that in the event of a post-award MICAP (Mission Critical Air Parts) upgrade, the delivery schedule may be expedited through a bilateral contract modification.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
3379178_EDL_REPORT_Redacted.pdf PDF
FA820325Q0005_______0001.pdf PDF
CDRL FD20202500595.pdf.pdf PDF
MQR.pdf PDF
Bid Set.pdf PDF
4130578_PKGRQMT_REPORT.pdf PDF
4127391_TRNSPDATA_REPORT.pdf PDF
4130579_TRNSPDATA_REPORT.pdf PDF
4127388_PKGRQMT_REPORT.pdf PDF
3166283_FA_REPORT.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR AWARD

SOLICITATION: FA8203-25-Q-0005

This solicitation is a 100% small business set aside. For purposes of award, offers will be evaluated based on the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA).

Factor 1 - Price The “Unit Price” for “CLIN 0001 – Production” will be evaluated as the Total Evaluated Price (TEP).

Note, this DOES NOT include the extended price (i.e. unit price x quantity) – only the “Unit Price” for “CLIN 0001 – Production”. This is necessary to ensure integrity, balance and fairness in the competition considering some offerors may be required to complete a First Article and other offerors may have a First Article waiver approved. This process will neither penalize or favor a proposal based on whether a First Article is required or waived because ALL offerors are required to complete the “CLIN 0001 – Production” requirements. Therefore, the lowest “Unit Price” for “CLIN 0001 – Production” is determined to represent the best value to the Government. An example of the TEP evaluation is provided below for reference.

CLIN DESCRIPTION PROPOSED “UNIT PRICE”

0007 Basic Award – First Article $ N/A 0008 Basic Award – First Article Test Report $ N/A 0001 Basic Award – Production $ (unit price only)

TOTAL EVALUATED PRICE $

Note: In the event the priority of the basic award and/or option(s) is upgraded to a MICAP post-award, the Government may require the delivery schedule to be expedited. The expedited delivery schedule and any resulting price increase will be negotiated and established via a bi-lateral contract modification.

Factor 2 – Technical Acceptability Technical Acceptability will consist of three subfactors – (a) Approved Source, (b) Required Delivery Schedule

(a) Subfactor 1 - Approved Source:

Technical Acceptability will be evaluated by the offeror being listed as an approved source. This part requires engineering source approval by the design control activity in order to maintain the quality of the part. List of approved source(s) is provided below.

Approved Source(s) Cage Code

MACHINE SPECIALTIES LLC. 1DDX0

SAF INDUSTRIES LLC 26044

TRANSAERO, INC. 27541

NASSAU TOOL WORKS, INC. 2M490

YEAGER MANUFACTURING CORPORATION 31788

ARLINGTON PRECISION COMPONENTS, LLC 3TKZ9

HDI LANDING GEAR USA, INC. 5ZBP4

Alternate sources shall refer to the attached “Manufacturing Qualification Requirements (MQR)” for procedures that must be satisfied to become an approved source for this requirement. Award of the subject solicitation MAY NOT BE DELAYED due to alternate sources notifying the appropriate government contracting office of intent to qualify as an approved source for this requirement.

(b) Subfactor 2 - Required Delivery Schedule:

Technical Acceptability will be evaluated by the offeror submitting as part of their proposal a delivery schedule for the basic award (and options if applicable) that is “on or before the required delivery schedule” identified in the “Schedule” (i.e. CLINs) of the solicitation.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .