Evalutation Criteria.pdf
PDF 415 KB Posted
- Attached to
- F-16 Mounting Bracket FA820325Q0005_0001
- Solicitation number
- FA820325Q0005_0001
About this file
The document is an Evaluation Criteria for Award for Solicitation FA8203-25-Q-0005, a 100% small business set-aside procurement using the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) method. The solicitation is for an F-16 Mounting Bracket with NSN 5340016435571LE, seeking production from pre-approved manufacturers including Machine Specialties LLC, SAF Industries LLC, Transaero Inc., and five other listed companies.
The evaluation will focus on two primary factors: (1) Price, which will be assessed based on the "Unit Price" for CLIN 0001 - Production, ensuring fairness by evaluating only the unit price regardless of First Article requirements, and (2) Technical Acceptability, consisting of two subfactors - (a) being listed as an approved source with engineering source approval, and (b) submitting a delivery schedule that meets or beats the required timeline. The solicitation notes that in the event of a post-award MICAP (Mission Critical Air Parts) upgrade, the delivery schedule may be expedited through a bilateral contract modification.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3379178_EDL_REPORT_Redacted.pdf | ||
| FA820325Q0005_______0001.pdf | ||
| CDRL FD20202500595.pdf.pdf | ||
| MQR.pdf | ||
| Bid Set.pdf | ||
| 4130578_PKGRQMT_REPORT.pdf | ||
| 4127391_TRNSPDATA_REPORT.pdf | ||
| 4130579_TRNSPDATA_REPORT.pdf | ||
| 4127388_PKGRQMT_REPORT.pdf | ||
| 3166283_FA_REPORT.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR AWARD
SOLICITATION: FA8203-25-Q-0005
This solicitation is a 100% small business set aside. For purposes of award, offers will be evaluated based on the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA).
Factor 1 - Price The “Unit Price” for “CLIN 0001 – Production” will be evaluated as the Total Evaluated Price (TEP).
Note, this DOES NOT include the extended price (i.e. unit price x quantity) – only the “Unit Price” for “CLIN 0001 – Production”. This is necessary to ensure integrity, balance and fairness in the competition considering some offerors may be required to complete a First Article and other offerors may have a First Article waiver approved. This process will neither penalize or favor a proposal based on whether a First Article is required or waived because ALL offerors are required to complete the “CLIN 0001 – Production” requirements. Therefore, the lowest “Unit Price” for “CLIN 0001 – Production” is determined to represent the best value to the Government. An example of the TEP evaluation is provided below for reference.
CLIN DESCRIPTION PROPOSED “UNIT PRICE”
0007 Basic Award – First Article $ N/A 0008 Basic Award – First Article Test Report $ N/A 0001 Basic Award – Production $ (unit price only)
TOTAL EVALUATED PRICE $
Note: In the event the priority of the basic award and/or option(s) is upgraded to a MICAP post-award, the Government may require the delivery schedule to be expedited. The expedited delivery schedule and any resulting price increase will be negotiated and established via a bi-lateral contract modification.
Factor 2 – Technical Acceptability Technical Acceptability will consist of three subfactors – (a) Approved Source, (b) Required Delivery Schedule
(a) Subfactor 1 - Approved Source:
Technical Acceptability will be evaluated by the offeror being listed as an approved source. This part requires engineering source approval by the design control activity in order to maintain the quality of the part. List of approved source(s) is provided below.
Approved Source(s) Cage Code
MACHINE SPECIALTIES LLC. 1DDX0
SAF INDUSTRIES LLC 26044
TRANSAERO, INC. 27541
NASSAU TOOL WORKS, INC. 2M490
YEAGER MANUFACTURING CORPORATION 31788
ARLINGTON PRECISION COMPONENTS, LLC 3TKZ9
HDI LANDING GEAR USA, INC. 5ZBP4
Alternate sources shall refer to the attached “Manufacturing Qualification Requirements (MQR)” for procedures that must be satisfied to become an approved source for this requirement. Award of the subject solicitation MAY NOT BE DELAYED due to alternate sources notifying the appropriate government contracting office of intent to qualify as an approved source for this requirement.
(b) Subfactor 2 - Required Delivery Schedule:
Technical Acceptability will be evaluated by the offeror submitting as part of their proposal a delivery schedule for the basic award (and options if applicable) that is “on or before the required delivery schedule” identified in the “Schedule” (i.e. CLINs) of the solicitation.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .