Evaluation Tool-Tower Services---Maintenance 12-7.xls
XLS spreadsheet 119 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Master Agreement AZ|CTR053007
- Contract number
- CTR053007
- Issued by
- Arizona
About this file
This document is an evaluation summary for a solicitation (No. BPM002972) for Tower Services Maintenance, involving four offerors: ADW Communications, Enertech Resources, NB Construction, and TEP Design and Build. The evaluation process assessed the companies across multiple criteria including methodology, written narrative, cost/pricing, experience and capacity, qualified personnel, training and certifications, maintenance and repair capabilities, emergency response, task order management, site service provision, and warranty processes.
The contract appears to be for telecommunications site maintenance services, with hourly rates ranging from $75-$95 for maintenance labor and $95-$125 for foreman rates. Emergency call-out fees varied between $187.50-$210.00. Material markup percentages differed among offerors, from 2-12%. ADW Communications achieved the highest total score of 851 points out of 1000, followed by Enertech Resources at 814 points, NB Construction at 801 points, and TEP Design at 696 points. The scoring considered technical capabilities, cost competitiveness, and overall service delivery potential for maintaining state-owned telecommunications infrastructure.
View the file
Other files
Show all 30
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Summary
| EVALUATION | ||||||||||
| Solicitation No. BPM002972 Tower Services-----Maintenance | ADW Communications | Enertech Resources | NB Construction | TEP Design and Build | ||||||
| 1000 | Combined Total Score | 850 | 813 | 800 | 696 | |||||
| 125 | Methodology Total | 88 | 88 | 88 | 0 | |||||
| 125 | Written Narrative | Meets | 88 | Meets | 88 | Meets | 88 | Does Not Meet | 0 | |
| Offeror to provide sufficient information on how they will perform the construction, engineering services, maintenance, installation, repair and parts availability as outlined in the Scope. Please respond to the service/services that the Offeror will be providing. | Does not meet: Does not provide enough detail of the services provided for maintance and repair. | |||||||||
| 350 | Cost/Pricing Total | 350 | 313 | 345 | 328 | |||||
| 525 | Experience and Capacity Total | 413 | 413 | 368 | 368 | |||||
| 75 | Qualified Personnel, labor, services | Meets | 53 | Meets | 53 | Meets | 53 | Meets | 53 | |
| Please provide details on your company’s ability to provide all qualified personnel, labor, services, safety and general use equipment, tools, all materials (including civil construction and equipment installation materials), insurance, certifications, transportation, applicable taxes and all other items of expense required for execution and completion of the work in a quality manner for the price(s) offered/awarded in the Task Order. (Scope 2.2) | ||||||||||
| 75 | Training and Certifications | Meets | 53 | Exceeds | 75 | Meets | 53 | Meets | 53 | |
| Please describe the process that your company will be utilizing to ensure that training and certificates are completed and available as required. As an Example: Personnel assigned to climb must have current tower climbing and rescue certifications that meet the requirements of ANSI/OSHA standards and regulations for wireless communication sites. (Scope 2) | Exceeds: Comprehensive and all areas are covered. Clearly a priority with this company | |||||||||
| 0 | Exceeds | 0 | Exceeds | 0 | Exceeds | 0 | Exceeds | 0 | ||
| 75 | Maintenance & Repair | Exceeds | 75 | Exceeds | 75 | Meets | 53 | Meets | 53 | |
| If providing maintenance and repair services, please describe your company’s ability and experience (Scope 3.4) Provide in detail: experience in the Telecommunications industry, the jobs that your company has completed in the last 1-3 years that are similar to the Scope items listed in 3.4, details of the preventative maintenance tower requirement your company has performed, the size of your company, current capacity and ability to perform concurrent multiple jobs. (Scope 3.4) | Exceeds: Demonstrated experience with DPS sites and procedures. | Exceeds: Provided clear understanding and examples of multiple requirements for maintenance and repair situations | ||||||||
| 75 | Emergency Requests | Meets | 53 | Meets | 53 | Meets | 53 | Meets | 53 | |
| Please describe the process your company has in place for responding to emergency requests for on call and onsite maintenance support within the timeframes specified. (Scope 3.5) | ||||||||||
| 75 | Task Orders | Meets | 53 | Meets | 53 | Meets | 53 | Meets | 53 | |
| Please describe your company’s ability to respond and adhere to the requirements of a Task Order. Provide several detail/examples of: final invoices vs estimates. (Scope 4.0) | ||||||||||
| 75 | Providing materials/services to all sites | Exceeds | 75 | Meets | 53 | Meets | 53 | Meets | 53 | |
| Please describe your company’s ability to provide materials/service to “all” state owned telecommunications sites. Provide details for rugged terrain site access and large equipment transportation. (Scope 5.0) | Exceeds: Multiple availability of equipment to get materials and personnel to all sites. Have an excellent understanding of what will be required for each site. | |||||||||
| 75 | Warranty | Meets | 53 | Meets | 53 | Meets | 53 | Meets | 53 | |
| Please describe your company’s warranty process for both labor and materials/equipment. (Scope 6.0) | ||||||||||
| Meets | 0 | Meets | 0 | Meets | 0 | Meets | 0 | |||
| Meets | 0 | Meets | 0 | Meets | 0 | Meets | 0 | |||
| Meets | 0 | Meets | 0 | Meets | 0 | Meets | 0 | |||
| Financial Stability | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Exceeds = The response fully addresses the requirement(s) of the RFP but also provides superior experience, a creative/innovative approach, or an exceptional solution. | ||||||||||
| Meets = The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the RFP. | ||||||||||
| Does Not Meet = The response fails to address the requirement(s) of the RFP or fails to provide any experience related to the requirement(s) of the RFP or elements of the proposal are unacceptable to the state. | ||||||||||
| Exceeds | ||||||||||
| Meets | ||||||||||
| No Adm Actions | ||||||||||
| One Adm Issue | ||||||||||
| Two Adm Issues | ||||||||||
| Three Adm Issues | ||||||||||
| Four Issues or Term. | ||||||||||
| No Referral Reassigned | ||||||||||
| <2 Referrals Reassigned | ||||||||||
| >2 Referrals Reassigned |
Rates
| Bids | |||||
| Offerors | Maintenance Hrly Rate Labor | Maintenance Hrly Rate Forman | Emergency Call Out Fee | Total Cost | Total Points |
| ADW Communications | $75.00 | $112.50 | $187.50 | 350 | |
| Enertech Resources | $85.00 | $125.00 | $210.00 | 313 | |
| NB Construction | $95.00 | $95.00 | $190.00 | 345 | |
| TEP Design | $75.00 | $125.00 | $200.00 | 328 | |
| Percent Discount off of Materials | |||||
| ADW Communications | Mark up of 12% | ||||
| Enertech Resources | 4% | ||||
| NB Construction | 2% | ||||
| TEP Design | 5% | ||||
| Lowest Bid | |||||
| Scoring Formula = Lowest Bid/Proposed Bid x 350 |
Total Score
| Offeror | Method | Cost | Experience | Total Score |
| Possible Points | 125 | 350 | 525 | 1000 |
| ADW Communications | 88 | 350 | 413 | 851 |
| Enertech Resources | 88 | 313 | 413 | 814 |
| NB Construction | 88 | 345 | 368 | 801 |
| TEP Design | 0 | 328 | 368 | 696 |
| Note: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .