EVALUATION FACTORS - SPECIALTY SERVICES (UMUHC).pdf
PDF 116 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Monthly Day-Clinics - Nephrologist, RN, Rheumatologist - Ute Mountain Ute Health Center - Towaoc, CO
- Solicitation number
- 75H70723Q00115
About this file
This document provides evaluation factors for a federal contract solicitation seeking monthly day clinics staffed by a nephrologist, registered nurse, and rheumatologist. The solicitation will be evaluated based on three factors in descending order of importance: technical capability, past performance, and cost/price. Technical capability and past performance together are significantly more important than cost alone. The solicitation is being issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Indian Health Service for services to be provided at the Ute Mountain Ute Health Center in Towaoc, Colorado. Offerors should demonstrate technical capability through capability statements, brochures, or candidate profiles. Past performance should be evidenced by past federal government purchase orders, recent relevant experience, and past performance surveys. Cost/price quotes can use an attached fillable table or own format.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FILLABLE TABLE - 75H70723Q00115.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFQ 75H70723Q00115.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOLICITATION NO. 75H70723Q00115
~~Monthly Day Clinics – Nephrologist, RN, & Rheumatologist~~
EVALUATION FACTORS
The Government will use the following three (3) factors to evaluate proposals and make a best value determination (factors are listed in descending order of importance):
1. Technical Capability 40%
2. Past Performance 40%
3. Cost/Price 20%
The Technical Capability and Past Performance are significantly more important than Cost/Price.
However, the Government will not make a task order award to an offeror whose evaluated price is disproportionate to the benefits associated with the evaluated superiority of one offeror's Technical and Past Performance proposal over another. Therefore, to the extent that offerors' Technical and Past Performance proposals are evaluated as similar in merit, then the offeror's Cost/Price is more likely to be the determining factor for award.
****Technical Capability can be demonstrated by submitting Capability Statements or brochures, and/or (perhaps most importantly) a candidate profiles. Past Performance can be demonstrated by submitting a listing of purchase orders awarded (especially to Federal Government), previous recent experience, past performance surveys, etc. Cost/Price can be provided in a quote of your own format or utilizing the attached “Fillable Table”.
**If you have any questions, please contact Shandiin DeWolfe at Shandiin.DeWolfe@ihs.gov and reference Solicitation No. 75H70723Q00115** mailto:Shandiin.DeWolfe@ihs.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .