Evaluation Factors.pdf

EVALUATION FACTORS

The Government will select the quote that represents the best value to the Government at a price that can be determined fair and reasonable.

Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price quote meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors.

The Government will evaluate offers based on the procedures authorized in FAR Part 13.106-2 using the evaluation criteria:

Volume I Technical Capability – The evaluation process will consider whether the quote demonstrates a clear understanding of the technical features involved in meeting the requirements of the solicitation.

I. Personnel Experience:

Submit a summary identifying project supervision to include Project Manager, Site Supervisor/SSHO, and General Contracting Team.

Summary must address the following:

• Each individual’s name, title, duty, years of experience, and their experience level related to similar contracts in size and scope.

II. Performance Schedule:

Submit a performance schedule starting from when the NTP is issued until the number of days listed in the period of performance that shall not be exceeded.

The performance schedule must provide a summary that must address the following:

• Definable features of work under each phase of this project and address methods with coordinating with the subcontractors and COR.

Volume II Past Performance - Past performance information will be utilized to determine the quality of the contractor’s past performance as it relates to the probability of success of the required effort. The Government will evaluate customer satisfaction, responsiveness to customer needs, and past demonstration of meeting performance schedules and the delivery of quality services. Emphasis will be on recent, relevant past performance in the previous 3 years. Recent is defined a work defined performed within the last 3 years. Relevant is defined as work similar in size and scope of the work described in the Scope of Work (SOW).

Past performance information is one indicator of an offeror’s ability to perform the contract successfully. Current and relevant information, source of information, context of data, and general trends in Contractor’s performance shall be considered as it pertains to the performance of work described in this solicitation. Offerors may provide information on problems encountered on identified contracts and the offeror’ s corrective action. The Government shall consider this information as well as information obtained from any other sources when evaluating the offeror’s past performance.

Since the Government may not necessarily interview all the sources provided by the offerors, it is incumbent upon the offeror to explain the relevance of the data provided. Offerors are reminded that the Government may elect to consider data obtained from other sources.

Volume III Price - The Government will evaluate offers by adding all line item prices – the total of all CLINS will be that sum. The Government will evaluate price to determine whether or not it is considered fair and reasonable.