Evaluation Factors.docx
DOCX document 33 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 142082-26-0462
About this file
This is an Evaluation Factors document outlining the scoring methodology for a Request for Quotation (RFQ) for repair and calibration services. The Government will use a trade-off evaluation technique with adjectival ratings for both past performance and technical factors. Past performance will be rated on a scale from Outstanding (9-10) through Acceptable (7-8), Marginal (5-6), Unacceptable (1-4), or Neutral (0) based on the quoter's recent and relevant performance history and the Government's expectation of successful task execution. Technical factors will be evaluated as Unsatisfactory, Satisfactory, or Very Good, with Unsatisfactory indicating failure to meet minimum requirements or addressing solicitation factors, Satisfactory indicating compliance with minimum requirements and acceptable probability of success, and Very Good indicating the quote exceeds requirements with strengths and innovations that enhance performance.
Evaluations will be documented through individual rating sheets that include specific narrative comments addressing each quoter's strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies, supported by facts from the technical quotation. Reviewers are required to provide a final rating and make an award recommendation based on the comprehensive assessment of these factors. This evaluation approach applies to the repair and calibration requirement for three types of equipment: 12 units of IFR Model 1200 Super S FM/AM Communication Monitor/Spectrum Analyzers, 2 Fluke Model 189 Digital True RMS Multimeters, and 2 HP Model 8648C Synthesized RF Signal Generators. The solicitation is set-aside 100% for small businesses under NAICS code 811210 (Electronic and Precision Equipment Repair and Maintenance).
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 52.222-48 Exemption from Appl of the SC Labor Standards.docx | DOCX document | |
| CAR 1352.209-74.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TRADE OFF EVALUATION SCORING TECHNIQUE
Rating of Offers: Quotes will be adjectivally rated against each of the technical evaluation factors set forth in the RFQ, and shall be given an overall adjectival rating. The adjectival ratings to be used are:
PAST PERFORMANCE RATING
| RATING |
| DESCRIPTION |
Outstanding (9,10) Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant past performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort with quality repairs and timely return of the repaired equipment.
Acceptable (7, 8) Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable positive expectation that the quoter will successfully perform the required effort.
Marginal (5, 6) Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a minimum expectation that the quoter will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Unacceptable (4, 3, 2, 1) Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a very low expectation that the quoter will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Neutral (0) No recent/relevant performance record is available or the quoter’s performance record is so sparse that a past performance rating cannot be assigned.
TECHNICAL FACTOR RATINGS
| RATING |
| DESCRIPTION |
| Unsatisfactory |
| The quote does not meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation or does not address the specific factor. The quoter’s interpretation of the Government's requirements is so superficial, incomplete, vague, incompatible, incomprehensible, or incorrect as to be unacceptable. The assignment of a rating of "Unacceptable" indicates that numerous weaknesses exist requiring a major revision, tantamount to a new offer to make acceptable. The quote exhibits no strengths. Project failure is probable. |
| Satisfactory |
| The quote meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation. The quote is compliant and provides assurance that the quoter will successfully accomplish the work. Any weakness is of a minor nature which poses little risk of adversely affecting the quoter’s performance. A rating of "Satisfactory" is used when there are no indications of strengths, features, or innovations which would enhance the specific requirements or otherwise be of benefit. The quote demonstrates an acceptable probability of successful execution of the work. |
| Very Good |
| The quote exceeds the requirements of the solicitation, is complete, organized, and detailed, and provides strong assurances that the quoter will successfully accomplish the work. A rating of "Very Good" means that this quote contains strengths, features, or innovations which would enhance the specific requirements or otherwise be of benefit. Any weaknesses are considered to be of such small consequence that their impact on the overall superiority of the quotation is insignificant. A high probability of success is demonstrated. |
2. Each rating will be based on facts provided in each quoter’s technical quotation. Specific narrative comments regarding each quote, both positive and negative, shall be made on individual rating sheets, which will include an assessment of the quoter’s strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies. A final rating is also required.
3. Reviewer recommendation: The reviewer shall make a recommendation of award based on consideration of their strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .