Evaluation Factors.docx
DOCX document 33 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- NRD142082-26-2MT3-1
About this file
This file contains evaluation factors for a Request for Quotation issued by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Weather Service (NWS), National Reconditioning Center (NRC) under Solicitation Number NRD142082-26-2MT3-1. The solicitation seeks painting services for 40 Sensor, Freezing Rain units (Rosemount PN: 0872C3, ASN: S100-2MT3-1) to restore equipment to like-new operating condition and appearance consistent with original manufacturer specifications and tolerances. This is a 100% small business set-aside with a NAICS code of 811210 (Electronic and Precision Equipment Repair and Maintenance) and a corresponding size standard of $34.0 million. The resultant award will be a firm-fixed price Purchase Order under simplified acquisition procedures utilizing commercial items standards.
The evaluation criteria detailed in this document establish the basis for assessing vendor proposals, focusing on factors such as technical capability, past performance, quality standards, scheduling, and pricing. Vendors must demonstrate their ability to complete the painting services requirement in accordance with the attached Statement of Work and meet all specifications outlined by the original equipment manufacturer. This solicitation was issued in accordance with FAR Parts 12 and 13, incorporating provisions and clauses effective through Federal Acquisition Circular 2023-05 and NOAA Acquisition Manual version 2023-3. No partial quotes or partial awards will be considered; prospective vendors must provide complete quotations addressing the full requirement of all 40 units.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| CAR 1352.209-74.docx | DOCX document | |
| S100-2MT3-1 Freezing Rain Sensor SOW 05-05-2026 Paint Only.pdf | ||
| 52.222-48 Exemption from Appl of the SC Labor Standards.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TRADE OFF EVALUATION SCORING TECHNIQUE
Rating of Offers: Quotes will be adjectivally rated against each of the technical evaluation factors set forth in the RFQ, and shall be given an overall adjectival rating. The adjectival ratings to be used are:
PAST PERFORMANCE RATING
| RATING |
| DESCRIPTION |
Outstanding (9,10) Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant past performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort with quality repairs and timely return of the repaired equipment.
Acceptable (7, 8) Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable positive expectation that the quoter will successfully perform the required effort.
Marginal (5, 6) Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a minimum expectation that the quoter will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Unacceptable (4, 3, 2, 1) Based on the quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a very low expectation that the quoter will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Neutral (0) No recent/relevant performance record is available or the quoter’s performance record is so sparse that a past performance rating cannot be assigned.
TECHNICAL FACTOR RATINGS
| RATING |
| DESCRIPTION |
| Unsatisfactory |
| The quote does not meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation or does not address the specific factor. The quoter’s interpretation of the Government's requirements is so superficial, incomplete, vague, incompatible, incomprehensible, or incorrect as to be unacceptable. The assignment of a rating of "Unacceptable" indicates that numerous weaknesses exist requiring a major revision, tantamount to a new offer to make acceptable. The quote exhibits no strengths. Project failure is probable. |
| Satisfactory |
| The quote meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation. The quote is compliant and provides assurance that the quoter will successfully accomplish the work. Any weakness is of a minor nature which poses little risk of adversely affecting the quoter’s performance. A rating of "Satisfactory" is used when there are no indications of strengths, features, or innovations which would enhance the specific requirements or otherwise be of benefit. The quote demonstrates an acceptable probability of successful execution of the work. |
| Very Good |
| The quote exceeds the requirements of the solicitation, is complete, organized, and detailed, and provides strong assurances that the quoter will successfully accomplish the work. A rating of "Very Good" means that this quote contains strengths, features, or innovations which would enhance the specific requirements or otherwise be of benefit. Any weaknesses are considered to be of such small consequence that their impact on the overall superiority of the quotation is insignificant. A high probability of success is demonstrated. |
2. Each rating will be based on facts provided in each quoter’s technical quotation. Specific narrative comments regarding each quote, both positive and negative, shall be made on individual rating sheets, which will include an assessment of the quoter’s strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies. A final rating is also required.
3. Reviewer recommendation: The reviewer shall make a recommendation of award based on consideration of their strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .