Evaluation Factors - Copy.pdf
PDF 63 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 70Z02324Q91240003
About this file
This document is the Evaluation Factors Basis of Award section for a federal solicitation. It outlines the criteria the Government will use to evaluate offers and award a contract resulting from this solicitation on a Best Value Tradeoff basis. The primary evaluation factors are Technical Approach, Past Performance, and Price. The Technical Approach factor will assess the offeror's understanding of the requirement and proposed approach, with ratings of High Confidence, Some Confidence, or Low Confidence. The Past Performance factor will evaluate the relevance and quality of the offeror's prior work. Price will be evaluated for reasonableness. The resultant contract will be a Firm Fixed Price, Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity contract under NAICS code 611519.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 70Z02324Q91240003_0_US-updated.pdf | ||
| Solicitation General Info.pdf | ||
| 70Z02324Q91240003_0_US.pdf | ||
| PWS-Paint Application.pdf | ||
| Submission Instructions to Vendors.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Factors
Basis of Award
The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. Award is on a Best Value Tradeoff basis where, when combined, all non-price factors are significantly more important than price. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
Factor 1- Technical Approach
The Government will assess its level of confidence for each Offeror based on the Offeror's demonstrated approach and willingness to provide services in accordance with Sections 2.0 through 4.0 of the PWS.
The following ratings will be used to rate each Offeror's Technical Approach.
High Confidence The Government has high confidence that the Offeror understands the requirement, proposes a sound approach, and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention.
Some Confidence The Government has some confidence that the Offeror understands the requirement,proposes a sound approach, and will be successful in performing the contract with someGovernment intervention.
Low Confidence The Government has low confidence that the Offeror understands the requirement, proposes a sound approach, and will be successful in performing the contact even with Government intervention.
Factor 2 – Past Performance
The Government will evaluate the Offeror's past performance information and determine the adjectival confidence rating. The currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data and general trends in contractor performance will be considered in the comparative assessment. The Government will review the Offeror's submitted past performance information for work that was performed within the last three years or is ongoing.
The Government will also consider information provided by the Offeror on problems encountered on the contracts identified and the corrective actions taken. The Government reserves the right to utilize past performance information from sources other than those provided by the contractor—including, but not limited to, data contained in the Past Performance
Information Retrieval System (PPIRS). A contractor without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably, but will receive a confidence rating of neutral.
Factor 2 Price
The Government will evaluate price to determine whether or not it is reasonable in accordance with 13.106-3. Price evaluation will include (1) comparing proposed price with prices found reasonable on previous purchases and (2) comparison to an independent Government estimate
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .