EVALUATION FACTORS - CHILD PSYCH (UMUHC).pdf
PDF 115 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 75H70723Q00098
About this file
This document provides evaluation factors for a solicitation seeking a part-time child and adolescent psychiatrist. The solicitation will be evaluated based on three factors in descending order of importance: technical capability at 40%, past performance at 40%, and cost/price at 20%. Technical capability and past performance are significantly more important than cost and price. Technical capability can be demonstrated through capability statements, brochures, resumes, and candidate profiles. Past performance should include a listing of previous government purchase orders and recent relevant experience. Cost should be submitted using the provided table or an alternative format. The solicitation number is 75H70723Q00098 and is being issued by the Department of Health and Human Services Indian Health Service for a part-time child and adolescent psychiatrist position located at the Ute Mountain Ute Health Center in Towaoc, Colorado.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SOLICITATION - 75H70723Q00098.pdf | ||
| Fillable Table - 75H70723Q00098.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOLICITATION NO. 75H70723Q00098
~~CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRIST NON-PERSONAL HEALTHCARE SERVICES~~
EVALUATION FACTORS
The Government will use the following three (3) factors to evaluate proposals and make a best value determination (factors are listed in descending order of importance):
1. Technical Capability 40%
2. Past Performance 40%
3. Cost/Price 20%
The Technical Capability and Past Performance are significantly more important than Cost/Price.
However, the Government will not make a task order award to an offeror whose evaluated price is disproportionate to the benefits associated with the evaluated superiority of one offeror's Technical and Past Performance proposal over another. Therefore, to the extent that offerors' Technical and Past Performance proposals are evaluated as similar in merit, then the offeror's Cost/Price is more likely to be the determining factor for award.
****Technical Capability can be demonstrated by submitting Capability Statements, brochures, and (perhaps most importantly) candidate profile(s), resume(s)/CV(s), etc. Past Performance can be demonstrated by submitting a listing of purchase orders awarded (especially to Federal Government), previous recent experience, past performance surveys, etc. Cost/Price can be listed on the provided fillable table included in the attachments or submitted on a form of your choice.
**If you have any questions, please contact Shandiin DeWolfe at Shandiin.DeWolfe@ihs.gov and reference Solicitation No. 75H70723Q00098** mailto:Shandiin.DeWolfe@ihs.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .