Evaluation Criteria~16.pdf
PDF 38 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 24-DOC-1000-Containers
- Solicitation number
- BD-25-1025-DOCFS-FISCM-106831
- Issued by
- Norfolk County, Massachusetts
About this file
This document outlines the evaluation criteria for a state and local government contract opportunity. The contract is seeking the "best value" response that provides the greatest quantity of services at the highest quality. The evaluation criteria include pricing, company certifications, service and maintenance, warranties, diversity of available products, trade-ins, recalls, business references, and discounts available, for a total of 110 points. An additional 28 points are allocated to the Supplier Diversity Plan, which must have a minimum weight of 25% of the total evaluation. The evaluation may also include up to 5 additional points per "added value" item, which is determined at the discretion of the Strategic Sourcing Team. The government entity reserves the right to extend a Best and Final Offer opportunity to all or a select number of bidders.
The pricing terms, set-asides, incumbents, funding requirements, and other salient information are not provided in the document. The focus is on the evaluation criteria and the overall approach to selecting the "best value" response.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| BIDDERQA~4.PDF | ||
| BIDDERQA~3.PDF | ||
| Container RFR Final 6.7.24.docx | DOCX document | |
| FINAL EVALUATION SCORES SUMMARY.pdf | ||
| Intent-24-DOC-1000-Containers.pdf | ||
| SDP_Plan_Form~22.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Additional Forms.pdf | ||
| Container RFR new bid number 8.29.24.docx | DOCX document | |
| Response Form A~4.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Criteria Bidder scores will be used to rank Bidders and will determine which Bidders proceed to subsequent stages of the evaluation and/or enter into negotiations with the department to receive a Contract award.
The Department is looking for the “best value” response which provides the greatest quantity of services at the highest quality.
Below are the criteria and maximum points available:
Criteria: Maximum Points Available
Pricing 35
Company Certifications and Specialist Designation 20
Service and Maintenance 20
Warranties 5
Diversity of available products 10
Trade In 5
Recalls 5
Business References 5
Discounts available 5
Subtotal: 110
Supplier Diversity Plan: (minimum of 25% weight) 28
Total: 138
Added Value (Up to 5 possible points per each added value) Added Value is determined by the Strategic Sourcing Team (SST). Added Value is discretionary. Added Value could be anything in the proposal that the bidder includes, that in the view of the SST, is above and beyond the requirements of the RFR, and results in a “best value” to the Department and Commonwealth, which the SST determines to be an additional “plus”, and worthy of additional points. The SST determines the number of added value points, if any, on a case by case by basis.
Supplier Diversity Plan (Minimum of 25% Weight) Bidders responding to this RFR are required to submit a Supplier Diversity Plan. Requirements for the Supplier Diversity Plan are included in Section 3. At least 25% of the total available evaluation points for this bid solicitation shall be allocated to the evaluation of the SDP Plan submissions.
Best and Final Offer After the deadline for response submission, the Department reserves the right to extend a Best and Final Offer (“BAFO”) opportunity to all or a select number of bidders. Bidders may be asked to submit additional information specific to program specifications and cost.
| Evaluation Criteria |
| Added Value (Up to 5 possible points per each added value) |
| Supplier Diversity Plan (Minimum of 25% Weight) |
| Best and Final Offer |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .