Evaluation Criteria~10.pdf
PDF 192 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 19-DOC-9004-Health Care Consultants
- Solicitation number
- BD-18-1025-DOCFS-FISCM-25532
- Issued by
- Massachusetts
About this file
This document is an Evaluation Criteria for a Request for Response (RFR) issued by the Massachusetts Department of Correction, Health Services Division, for Health Care Consultants. The RFR seeks to establish a qualified list of contractors with clinical and/or correctional health care expertise to provide consultation, peer review, and quality review of medical, mental health, forensic mental health, and dental services for the state inmate population. The evaluation criteria include rate of compensation, demonstrated correctional health care experience, credentials and specialty designations, required forms, and a supplier diversity plan, with a total of 150 points available. The Department is seeking the "best value" response that provides the greatest quantity of services at the highest quality. The Department reserves the right to extend a Best and Final Offer opportunity to all or a select number of bidders.
The pricing terms include a supplier diversity plan requirement, which must be evaluated for a minimum of 10% of the total evaluation. The contract opportunity is open to new and incumbent bidders, with no specific funding requirements or sources mentioned. The contract term and any renewal options are not specified in the provided information.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| busreffm~4.docx | DOCX document | |
| FinalEvaluationScores~4.pdf | ||
| PREA Clearance_acknowledgement~7.pdf | ||
| Bid Response Checklist~2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| prompt-pay-frm.doc | DOC document | |
| CommonwealthTermsAndConditions~2.pdf | ||
| sdp-rplan-form-2-declaration~2.docx | DOCX document | |
| Bidder Q A~2.pdf | ||
| WTO _Intent to Post Annoucement-Health_1.doc | DOC document | |
| StandardContractForm Health Care Consultants.docx | DOCX document | |
| EFT_FORM~56.pdf | ||
| sdp-rplan-form-3-reporting.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| newmass-w9.doc | DOC document | |
| RFR Correctional Health Care Consultants final.doc | DOC document | |
| Contractor Authorized Signatory~1.docx | DOCX document | |
| sdp-plan-form-1-commitment~6.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFR # 19-DOC-9004 Health Care Consultants / COMMBUYS Bid # 18-1025-DOCFS-FISCM-25532
Document Sensitivity Level: High during development; Low once published.
5 EVALUATION CRITERIA
Bidder scores will be used to rank Bidders and will determine which Bidders will proceed to subsequent stages of the evaluation and/or enter into negotiations with the Department to receive a Contract award.
The Department is looking for the “best value” response which provides the greatest quantify of services at the highest quality.
Below are the criteria and maximum points available:
Criteria; Maximum Points Available
Rate of compensation 50
Demonstrated correctional health care experience 50
Credentials and specialty designation 25
Required Forms 15
Subtotal:
Supplier Diversity Plan: (minimum of 10% weight) 10
Total: 150
Added Value: (Up to 5 possible points each added value)
Added Value is determined solely by the Strategic Sourcing Team (SST). Added Value is discretionary. Added Value could be anything in their proposal that the bidder includes, that in the view of the SST, is above and beyond the requirements of the RFR, which the SST determines to be an additional “plus”, and worthy of additional points.
The SST determines the number of added value points on a case by case basis.
5.1.1 Supplier Diversity Plan (minimum of 10% weight)
Bidders responding to this RFR are required to submit a Supplier Diversity Plan. Requirements for the Supplier Diversity Plan are included in Section 9. Pursuant to Operational Services Division policy, the Bidders SDP must be evaluated at least a minimum of 10% of the total evaluation.
5.1.2 Best and Final Offer (BAFO)
After the deadline for response submission, the department reserves the right to extend a Best and Final Offer opportunity to all or a select number of bidders. Bidders may be asked to submit additional information specific to program specifications and cost.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .