Evaluation criteria~1.docx
DOCX document 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 2025-DOC-1000-Illicit Substances
- Solicitation number
- BD-25-1025-DOCFS-FISCM-114481
- Issued by
- Massachusetts
About this file
This document is an Evaluation Worksheet for a Request for Response (RFR) issued by the Department of Corrections (DOC) for Illicit Substances Field-Testing Devices/Materials and Outside Laboratory Testing Services, listed under COMMBUYS BID# BD-25-1025-DOCFS-FISCM-114481. The RFR encompasses two primary categories: Category 1 focuses on Field-Testing Devices/Materials, and Category 2 covers Outside Laboratory Testing Services. The evaluation process is structured to assess bidders across multiple criteria, with a total of 100 points available for Category 1 and 70 points for Category 2, including potential added value points.
The evaluation criteria for both categories emphasize key performance aspects such as pricing, clinical test accuracy, ease of use, training, technical support, and result provision time. A unique feature of this evaluation is the "Added Value" component, where the Strategic Sourcing Team (SST) can discretionarily award up to 5 additional points per category for proposals that exceed the basic requirements. The SST will determine these added value points on a case-by-case basis, considering elements in the proposal that are deemed to be above and beyond the standard RFR requirements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| CASL_Corporations~13.pdf | ||
| RFR_Illicit Substances.docx | DOCX document | |
| Response Form A~15.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFR# 2025-DOC-1000-Illicit Substances Field-Testing Devices/Materials and Outside Laboratory Testing Services
COMMBUYS BID# BD-25-1025-DOCFS-FISCM-114481
EVALUATION WORKSHEET
Name of Bidder: ______________________________________________________________________
SST Reviewer(s):
Date: ___________ Final Score_______________________
Category 1 Field-Testing Devices/Materials Criteria Maximum Points Available Point Award
Price List 30 Points _________
Clinical Test Accuracy 20 Points _________
Ease of Use 20 Points __________
Training 20 Points __________
Tech Service/Support 10 Points __ ______
Total: 100 Points __________
*Added Value: (5 possible points each)
Category 2 Outside Laboratory Testing Criteria Maximum Points Available Point Award
Pricing 30 Points _________
Clinical Test Accuracy 20 Points _________
Time for Provision of Result 20 Points __________
Total: 70 Points __________
*Added Value: (5 possible points each)
*Added Value is determined solely by the Strategic Sourcing Team (SST). Added Value is discretionary. Added Value could be anything in their proposal that the bidder includes, that in the view of the SST, is above and beyond the requirements of the RFR, which the SST determines to be an additional “plus”, and worthy of additional points.
The SST determines the number of added value points on a case by case basis.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .