Evaluation Criteria_NFS Disposables.pdf

Nutrition & Food Services Disposable Contract

Technical Evaluation Factors

Each offeror’s technical proposals shall be evaluated based on the subfactors below to determine if the offeror provides a sound, compliant approach that meets the requirements of the previously issued Performance Work Statement. The responses must demonstrate a thorough knowledge and understanding of each requirement. For each subfactor, the offeror shall provide the requested information/ documentation, identify risks, if any, associated with the proposed approach and actions the offeror will take to mitigate the identified risks. If no risks/mitigations are identified in the offeror’s proposal, it indicates the offeror does not consider there to be any risk associated with their proposed approach and risks to do not need to be addressed.

The below factors are required to decide award. Should the offeror not be able to respond to a requested factor, the technical reviewer(s) will be unable to make a determination. The technical reviewer(s) will assign one of the ratings described below, which focuses on the strengths and deficiencies of the offeror's proposal. The rating depicts how well the offeror’s proposal meets the technical factor requirements. In arriving at a best value decision, the

Government reserves the right to give positive consideration for performance in excess of threshold requirements, up to the objective requirements. No further positive considerations will be given for performance in excess of the objective requirements.

Rating Description

Outstanding

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal contains multiple strengths and no deficiencies.

Good

Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains at least one strength and no deficiencies.

Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal has no strengths or deficiencies.

Marginal Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies and is un-awardable.

EVALUATION FACTORS

1. Please provide a Statement of Capability that demonstrates the past performance in providing this type of service. Please include the following:

a. Staff expertise including their availability, experience, formal and other training.

b. Current in-house capability and capacity to perform the work.

c. Prior completed projects of similar nature.

d. Corporate experience and management capability.

e. Examples of prior completed Government contracts, references, and other related information.

2. Offeror must produce a valid and current business registration in the state of

Georgia.

3. Offeror must provide pricing list which does not include shipping as a separate line item.

4. Offeror must identify a minimum of one available alternative that meets the technical criteria for each line item.

5. Offeror must provide an emergency preparedness plan that will allow for delivery during inclement weather.

6. Offeror must provide transportation vehicle registration/proof of insurance or delivery plan if being shipped by a third party.