Evaluation Criteria (LPTA) W911QX24R0013.doc
DOC document 38 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W911QX24R0013
About this file
This document outlines the Evaluation Criteria for a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) federal contract solicitation, Solicitation Number W911QX24R0013.
The solicitation is for the procurement of commercial items, specifically: 4 Metal Inert Gas (MIG) Welders, 1 Tungsten Inert Gas (TIG) Welder, and 2 Truck Mounted Welders. The contract also requires monthly preventative maintenance and 24-hour real-time onsite repair and maintenance services for these 7 machines. The solicitation is set aside for small businesses, with a NAICS code of 333992 and a size standard of 1,250 employees. Offers are due by May 1, 2024, and the contract will be awarded to the lowest priced, technically acceptable offer, based on evaluation criteria including past performance and technical capability. The place of performance is the U.S. Army Research Laboratory in Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, and delivery is required within 2 weeks of contract award.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Section 889 NDAA Certification W911QX24R0013.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation W911QX24R0013.docx | DOCX document | |
| Provisions and Clauses Full-Text Attachment (for Combo Synopsis-Solicitation) W911QX24R0013.rtf | RTF text file |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Criteria
(Lowest Price Technically Acceptable)
The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation and has the lowest evaluated price of all offers meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors.
Technical Acceptability:
The technical acceptability element of the evaluation will be a determination as to whether the proposed product meets the performance characteristics and specifications in the solicitation. The Technical element of the evaluation shall be based solely on information furnished by the vendor. The Government is not responsible for locating or securing any information, which is not identified in the proposal. To ensure sufficient information is available, vendors must furnish as part of their proposal all descriptive material (such as cuts, illustrations, drawings, or other information) necessary for the Government to determine whether the product meets the performance characteristics and specifications of the requirement. If the offeror proposes to modify a product so as to conform to the requirement of this solicitation, the offeror shall include a clear description of such proposed modifications and clearly mark any descriptive materials to show modifications.
1.
Past Performance:
Past performance will be evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable rating basis. An “Acceptable” rating is defined as the Government having reasonable confidence that the offeror can complete all requirements under the contract and meet stated delivery dates. An “Unacceptable” rating is defined as the Government having minimal confidence that the the offeror can complete all requirements under the contract and meet stated delivery dates. The ratings will be based upon past performance information submitted by the offeror, as well as any other past performance information the Government obtains. The offeror shall submit one (1) records of past performance from the past 12 months with their offer. Only offerors rated “Acceptable” will be eligible for award. Award will be made to the lowest price technically acceptable offer out of all offers rated “Acceptable”.
2.
Price (include in all instances):
Price will be evaluated based on the total proposed price, including options, (if any).
Price
Technical Capabilities/Specification
Past Performance, performance must be included as an evaluation factor for these procurements.
Template last updated 7/23/2019
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .