Evaluation Criteria LPTA.docx
DOCX document 18 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W911QX-23-Q-0153
About this file
This document outlines the evaluation criteria for a lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) solicitation. The government will award a contract to the responsible offeror submitting the lowest priced conforming proposal meeting the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. Technical acceptability will be determined by whether the proposed products meet the performance characteristics and specifications in the solicitation. Past performance will be evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis, with acceptable defined as having reasonable confidence the offeror can meet requirements and delivery dates. Offerors must submit three past performance references from the past twelve months. Only acceptable proposals will be eligible for award, which will go to the lowest priced technically acceptable offer.
The related federal contract opportunity is solicitation number W911QX-23-Q-0153 from the Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command Aberdeen Proving Ground for one 8 feet by 12 feet and one 10 feet by 22 feet plasma cutting burn table machines.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Combination Synopsis--Solicitation for Commercial Purchases_Redacted.pdf | ||
| Salient Characteristics-Redacted.pdf | ||
| Provisions and Clauses Full-Text Attachment.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Criteria (Lowest Price Technically Acceptable)
1. Evaluation Criteria - The specific evaluation criteria to be used are as follows:
The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation and has the lowest evaluated price of all offers meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors.
The technical acceptability element of the evaluation will be a determination as to whether the proposed product meets the performance characteristics and specifications in the solicitation. The Technical element of the evaluation shall be based solely on information furnished by the vendor. The Government is not responsible for locating or securing any information, which is not identified in the proposal. To ensure sufficient information is available, vendors must furnish as part of their proposal all descriptive material (such as cuts, illustrations, drawings, or other information) necessary for the Government to determine whether the product meets the performance characteristics and specifications of the requirement. If the offeror proposes to modify a product so as to conform to the requirement of this solicitation, the offeror shall include a clear description of such proposed modifications and clearly mark any descriptive materials to show modifications.
Past performance will be evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable rating basis. An “Acceptable” rating is defined as the Government having reasonable confidence that the offeror can complete all requirements under the contract and meet stated delivery dates. An “Unacceptable” rating is defined as the Government having minimal confidence that the offeror can complete all requirements under the contract and meet stated delivery dates. The ratings will be based upon past performance information submitted by the offeror, as well as any other past performance information the Government obtains. The offeror shall submit three (3) records of past performance from the past twelve (12) months with their offer. Only offerors rated “Acceptable” will be eligible for award. Award will be made to the lowest price technically acceptable offer out of all offers rated “Acceptable”.
Template last updated 7/23/2019
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .