About this file

This document is an Evaluation Criteria document for a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) procurement solicitation. The U.S. Army Research Laboratory is seeking one (1) automatic precision sectioning saw, with contract award to be made to the lowest-priced technically acceptable offer. The technical evaluation will assess vendor proposals based on two primary factors: (1) Technical Acceptability, which requires vendors to demonstrate that their proposed product meets all performance specifications, and (2) Past Performance, which will be rated as either "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" based on the offeror's submitted performance records from the past 12 months.

Key procurement details include a response deadline of five business days after posting, with proposals due by 5:00 PM Eastern Standard Time via email. The delivery requirement is within 12 weeks After Receipt of Order (ARO) to Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. The solicitation is not set aside for any specific business category, and the associated NAICS code is 334516 with a small business size standard of 1,000 employees. The final award will be made to the lowest-priced offer from vendors rated as "Acceptable" in past performance, with the contracting agency being the Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command at Aberdeen Proving Ground.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to COMBO SYNOPSIS SOLICITATION FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS for one (1) automatic precision sectioning saw, newest first.
File Type Posted
Provisions and Clauses Full-Text Attachment (for Combo Synopsis-Solicitation).doc DOC document
Solicitation.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Evaluation Criteria

(Lowest Price Technically Acceptable)

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation and has the lowest evaluated price of all offers meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors.

Technical Acceptability:

The technical acceptability element of the evaluation will be a determination as to whether the proposed product meets the performance characteristics and specifications in the solicitation. The Technical element of the evaluation shall be based solely on information furnished by the vendor. The Government is not responsible for locating or securing any information, which is not identified in the proposal. To ensure sufficient information is available, vendors must furnish as part of their proposal all descriptive material (such as cuts, illustrations, drawings, or other information) necessary for the Government to determine whether the product meets the performance characteristics and specifications of the requirement. If the offeror proposes to modify a product so as to conform to the requirement of this solicitation, the offeror shall include a clear description of such proposed modifications and clearly mark any descriptive materials to show modifications.

1.

Past Performance:

Past performance will be evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable rating basis. An “Acceptable” rating is defined as the Government having reasonable confidence that the offeror can complete all requirements under the contract and meet stated delivery dates. An “Unacceptable” rating is defined as the Government having minimal confidence that the the offeror can complete all requirements under the contract and meet stated delivery dates. The ratings will be based upon past performance information submitted by the offeror, as well as any other past performance information the Government obtains. The offeror shall submit one (1) records of past performance from the past 12 months with their offer. Only offerors rated “Acceptable” will be eligible for award. Award will be made to the lowest price technically acceptable offer out of all offers rated “Acceptable”.

2.

Price (include in all instances):

Price will be evaluated based on the total proposed price, including options, (if any).

Price

Technical Capabilities/Specification

Past Performance, performance must be included as an evaluation factor for these procurements.

Template last updated 7/23/2019

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .