Evaluation Criteria.pdf
PDF 105 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE FOR Five (5) Stainless-Steel Grade 304L Hot Rolled and Pickled (HRAP) plate
- Solicitation number
- W911QX-24-Q-0004
About this file
This document outlines the evaluation criteria for a small business set-aside solicitation from the Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command Aberdeen Proving Ground. The solicitation seeks five stainless steel grade 304L hot rolled and pickled plates. Price, technical capabilities, specification compliance, and delivery schedule will be evaluated, with no single factor given relative importance over the others. To be eligible for award, offers must meet the minimum technical requirements specified in the solicitation. The comparative evaluation process will compare all offers received against each other to determine which provides the most benefit to the government, with award going to the offer deemed most advantageous regardless of price.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Provisions and Clauses Document Steel Plates (002).docx | DOCX document | |
| Combination Synopsis-Solicitation for Commercial Purchases (Under SAT) - Signed.docx | DOCX document | |
| Salient Characteristics Steel Plates.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Template last updated 4/13/2016
Evaluation Criteria – Comparative Evaluation
Evaluation Criteria - The specific evaluation criteria to be used are as follows:
In accordance with FAR 13.106-2(b)(3), comparative evaluation procedures will be utilized. Comparative evaluation is the comparison of all offers received in response to this solicitation against each other. An item-by-item comparison of each offer to one another will be performed to determine which offer provides the most benefit to the Government.
Award will be made to the offer that is most advantageous to the Government. The Government may award to the lowest priced offeror that meets the Government’s minimum requirements; however, the Government reserves the right to award to a higher priced offeror exceeding the minimum requirements if it is most advantageous to the Government. In order to be considered for award, an offer must meet the Government’s minimum technical requirement contained in this solicitation. The below evaluation factors will be utilized during evaluation (in no order of relative importance):
Price Technical Capabilities/Specification Delivery Schedule
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .