Evaluation_Criteria.docx

Taos Field Office F-150 Pickup Upfitting Evaluation Criteria 140L2222Q0027 52.212-2 Evaluation - Commercial Products and Commercial Services. (NOV 2021) The Government intends to award a firm fixed price contract to a responsible party whose proposal is responsive to the solicitation process for the Taos Field Office, F-150 Pickup Upfitting and provides “Best Value to the Government” on a Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) basis.

A Technical Evaluation Panel consisting of no less than three members will conduct the initial evaluation. Upon completion of the evaluation period, the panel will review each proposal and make their final award recommendation to the Contracting Officer.

Provide your bid in two separate volumes (attachments):

Volume 1 – Pricing.

Volume 2 – Non-pricing, which includes information of evaluation factors.

To be eligible for award, offerors must receive a rating of “acceptable” in every non-price factor/subfactor

Acceptable/Unacceptable Factors – Non-Price

The following factors and sub-factors will be used to determine technical acceptability:

Factor #1 – Technical Excellence

· Sub Factor #1 – Ability of Item to Meet Required Specifications - To receive a rating of “acceptable” for this subfactor, offer must at a minimum, demonstrate adequate technical capability of the item offered to meet or exceed the item specifications.

· Sub Factor #2 – Ability of Offeror to Meet Delivery Schedule - To receive a rating of “acceptable” for this subfactor, offeror shall provide a schedule for delivery that meets the desired delivery date.

Factor #2- Past Performance

· Sub Factor # 1- Currency/Relevance - To receive a rating of “acceptable” for this subfactor, offeror must, at a minimum provide past experience on similar type contract(s). The past experience should indicate successes of the contractor in completing/meeting delivery dates and customer satisfaction. The Government considers “recent” present/past performance to be within the past 3 years. The Government considers “relevant” present/past performance to be present/past performance effort involved in similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

All non-price factors, when combined, are approximately equal in importance to cost or price.

(End of provision) image1.wmf