Evaluation Criteria (Comparative Evaluation) (4).docx
DOCX document 14 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W911QX25R0008
About this file
This is an evaluation criteria document outlining the comparative evaluation approach that will be used to assess proposals for one CNC five-axis grinder machine to be delivered to Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. The evaluation will compare all received offers against each other using three factors: Technical, Past Performance, and Price (with no specified order of importance).
The solicitation (W911QX25R0008) is being issued as an RFQ by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command at Aberdeen Proving Ground, with proposals due by December 13, 2024 at 11:59 AM ET. The contract requires delivery within 6 months after receipt of order, with FOB point at U.S. Army Research Laboratory, APG, MD 21005. While the government may award to the lowest priced technically acceptable offer, they reserve the right to award to a higher-priced offeror if deemed most advantageous. The NAICS code is 333517 with a size standard of 500 employees, and there are no set-asides specified.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Salient Characteristics.doc | DOC document | |
| Solicitation (4).docx | DOCX document | |
| Provisions and Clauses Full-Text Attachment (for Combo Synopsis-Solicitation) (4).rtf | RTF text file |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Comparative Evaluation
In accordance with FAR 13.106-2(b)(3), comparative evaluation procedures will be utilized. Comparative evaluation is the comparison of all offers received in response to this solicitation against each other. An item-by-item comparison of each offer to one another will be performed to determine which offer provides the most benefit to the Government. Award will be made to the offer that is most advantageous to the Government. The Government may award to the lowest priced offeror that meets the Government’s minimum requirements; however, the Government reserves the right to award to a higher priced offeror exceeding the minimum requirements if it is most advantageous to the Government. In order to be considered for award, an offer must meet the Government’s minimum technical requirement contained in this solicitation. The below evaluation factors will be utilized during evaluation (in no order of relative importance):
Technical Past Performance Price
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .