Evaluation Criteria (Comparative).docx

DOCX document 13 KB Posted

Attached to
SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE FOR LABORATORY EQUIPMENT RELOCATION SERVICES FOR 14 PIECES OF LARGE MACHINERY - AMENDMENT 1
Solicitation number
W911QX24Q0239
Issued by

About this file

This document is the Evaluation Criteria (Comparative Evaluation) for a federal contract opportunity. The key details are:

This is a small business set-aside solicitation for laboratory equipment relocation services for 14 pieces of large machinery. The evaluation criteria include price, technical capabilities/specifications, and past performance. Award will be made to the offer that is most advantageous to the Government, which may not be the lowest priced offeror if the higher priced offeror exceeds the minimum requirements. The solicitation closes on August 19, 2024 at noon EDT. The contract type is expected to be a firm fixed-price commercial item contract. The contracting agency is the Department of the Army Materiel Command, Army Contracting Command Aberdeen Proving Ground.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Evaluation Criteria (Comparative Evaluation)

The specific evaluation criteria to be used are as follows:

In accordance with FAR 13.106-2(b)(3), comparative evaluation procedures will be utilized. Comparative evaluation is the comparison of all offers received in response to this solicitation against each other. An item-by-item comparison of each offer to one another will be performed to determine which offer provides the most benefit to the Government. Award will be made to the offer that is most advantageous to the Government. The Government may award to the lowest priced offeror that meets the Government’s minimum requirements; however, the Government reserves the right to award to a higher priced offeror exceeding the minimum requirements if it is most advantageous to the Government. To be considered for award, an offer must meet the Government’s minimum technical requirement contained in this solicitation.

The below evaluation factors will be utilized during evaluation (in no order of relative importance):

Price Technical Capabilities/Specification Past Performance

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .