Evaluation Criteria (Comparative).docx
DOCX document 13 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE FOR: One (1) CNC Router
- Solicitation number
- W911QX25QA060
About this file
This document is an Evaluation Criteria document for a small business set-aside solicitation for one (1) CNC Router, issued by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command Aberdeen Proving Ground. The solicitation (W911QX25QA060) will utilize comparative evaluation procedures, comparing all offers against each other to determine the most advantageous proposal to the government. Evaluation factors include Price, Technical Capabilities/Specification, and Past Performance, with no specified order of importance.
The solicitation is specifically targeted as a small business set-aside, which will convert to full and open competition if no acceptable offers are received from responsible small business concerns. Offers must meet all technical requirements and be competitive in market prices, quality, and delivery. The place of delivery/performance is the Adelphi Lab Center (ALC) Army Research Laboratory located at 2800 Powder Mill Road, Adelphi, MD 20783. Responses are due five business days after posting, to be submitted via email to the primary point of contact listed in the SAM.gov webpage for this solicitation.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Salient Characteristics.doc | DOC document | |
| Combination Synopsis-Solicitation for Commercial Purchases (CNC).docx | DOCX document | |
| Provisions and Clauses Full-Text Attachment (for Combo Synopsis-Solicitation).docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Criteria (Comparative)
In accordance with FAR 13.106-2(b)(3), comparative evaluation procedures will be utilized. Comparative evaluation is the comparison of all offers received in response to this solicitation against each other. An item-by-item comparison of each offer to one another will be performed to determine which offer provides the most benefit to the Government. Award will be made to the offer that is most advantageous to the Government. The Government may award to the lowest priced offeror that meets the Government’s minimum requirements; however, the Government reserves the right to award to a higher priced offeror exceeding the minimum requirements if it is most advantageous to the Government. In order to be considered for award, an offer must meet the Government’s minimum technical requirement contained in this solicitation. The below evaluation factors will be utilized during evaluation (in no order of relative importance):
Price Technical Capabilities/Specification Past Performance
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .