Evaluation Criteria- Attachment 5.pdf

Evaluation Criteria A Source Selection Evaluation Board and Source Selection Evaluation Criteria are required. In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(1)- (3), price, past performance, and technical evaluation factors and sub-factors will be used as the source selection evaluation criteria. Trade-Offs will be used as the basis for award. In accordance with FAR Clause 52.212-2 Evaluation— Commercial Items, Technical and Past Performance, when combined, will be approximately equal to price for this acquisition. The Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) will assess the technical sub-factors utilizing a Combined Technical/Risk Rating Method. All technical sub-factors and past performance sub-factors are listed below.

1. Technical Factors:

Intro to open source tools

Psychology of social networking users

Criminals and social media

Using YouTube to your advantage

Active open-source investigations techniques

Setting up your own covert undercover accounts

Maintaining covert accounts

This course shall include a pre-test and a post-test to assess students’ understanding and to ensure all learning objectives were met.

Time of Search Warrant Execution

Proper Documentation and completion of Search Warrants

New Technology- Cameras Inside and Out

Society’s view of officer involved shootings during the course of executing a search warrant- justifiable vs needed.

Alternatives to conducting dynamic entries on search warrants.

No knock search warrants.

Conducting surveillance prior to executing search warrants

Case officer’s responsibilities

Supervisor’s responsibilities

Extensive case study on search warrants that have resulted in officer involved shooting.

This course shall include a pre-test and a post-test to assess students’ understanding and to ensure all learning objectives were met.

Train officers to identify certain identifiers associated with illegal parcels.

Locating parcel hubs and also small retail stores that are located in most rural cities.

Advise officers the advantages of obtaining cooperation with these various shipping companies.

The need for quick response once a parcel has been identified.

Obtaining search warrants on the parcel to identify the controlled substance location inside.

The advantage of using electronic tracking and package intrusion alarms.

The use of undercover officers to conduct a controlled delivery of the package.

The reality that a parcel may be delivered to an abandoned location.

The need for surveillance of those packages and the possibility of the package being relocated.

Training on writing and execution of an anticipatory search warrant once the package has been delivered to a location.

Identify the dangers and risk to conduct a controlled delivery and how to overcome the risk.

This course shall include a pre-test and a post-test to assess students’ understanding and to ensure all learning objectives were met.

If a slide presentation is used, all slides must display the RCTA logo.

2. Past Performance Factors:

a. Past Performance Factor A: Recency

Past performance is considered recent if the training occurred within three (3) years prior to the date of the solicitation and includes present past performance. However, references for training conducted more recently may receive more consideration. For example, a reference for training conducted within the last 12 months may receive more consideration than a reference for training conducted 30 months ago. Recency will be expressed using the Past Performance Relevancy Ratings. (VR- Very Relevant; R- Relevant; SR- Somewhat Relevant; NR- Not Relevant)

b. Past Performance Factor B: Relevancy

In establishing what is relevant to this acquisition, consideration will be given to similarity of training, contract duration (one-time training or multiple iterations, single or multiple years), dollar value, and extent of subcontracting/teaming. Relevance will be expressed using the Past Performance Relevancy Ratings. (VR- Very Relevant; R- Relevant; SR- Somewhat Relevant;

NR- Not Relevant).