Evaluation Criteria 190000000100.pdf
PDF 177 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Student Footwear for MCTI
- Solicitation number
- RFP-491-190000000100-1
- Issued by
- Michigan
About this file
This is a technical evaluation criteria document for a footwear contract that appears to be associated with MCTI (Michigan Career and Technical Institute). The evaluation framework assigns weights to various aspects of vendor proposals for providing shoes and boots, with a total possible score of 150 points. The criteria focus heavily on product quality (48 points), service capabilities (22 points), delivery capabilities (15 points), and company information/capabilities (37 points).
The evaluation criteria emphasize specific requirements including: leather or acceptable alternate materials, safety toe requirements, full size range availability including sizes 15+, 48-hour response time for complaints, 10-day delivery timeframes, and electronic ordering capabilities. Additional considerations include the vendor's experience with state contracts, financial stability, and ability to scale operations. The document outlines penalties for negative performance history (-5 points for terminated contracts or performance issues) and awards additional points (+10) for service-disabled veteran-owned businesses. Vendors must provide product samples and agree to standard contract terms or provide specific exceptions with redlined versions.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| schedule_a_statement of work RFP 190000000100.docx | DOCX document | |
| HOW to Respond to a Solicitation on Vendor Self Service (VSS)- SERVICE Job Aid.pdf | ||
| schedule_b_pricing RFP 190000000100.docx | DOCX document | |
| cover pg-proposal-instructions-confidential-treatment-vendor-questions-worksheet RFP 190000000100.docx | DOCX document | |
| standard_contract_terms RFP 190000000100.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Product Quality – Schedule A Section 1.1 Weight
The shoes/boots made of leather or acceptable alternate 6
The correct shoe color 6
The types of soles as indicated 6
Safety toes where indicated (boots) 4
High leather uppers (boots) 4
Have laces or approved type of closure 6
Brand name was included in the bid 6
Shoes in sizes 15+ (i.e., full range of sizes) and able to provide male and female shoes 10
Total: 48
Service Capabilities – Schedule A Sections 1.2/3.2/4.3/5.2/5.4 Weight If there are problems with the shoes/boots, the contractor will meet with the student at MCTI within
48 hours of receipt of complaint (1.2)
Shoes/Boots will be repaired or exchanged within five business days (1.2) 4
A toll free # was identified & a representative will be available 8 am to 5 pm EST (3.2) 6 If there are temporary, promotional or special pricing lower than the contract price, that pricing will be given to the state (4.3) 2
Capacity to order electronically, by phone, fax and by written order (5.2) 4
The number of shoes/boots ordered is determined by the number of students enrolled (5.4) 2
Total: 22
Delivery Capabilities – Schedule A Sections 2.2/2.3/6.1/8.1/8.2 Weight
Contractor can deliver footwear within 10 days of measurement (2.2) 4
The list of student names and sizes can be provided prior to delivery date (2.3) 4
The delivery and transportation method are explained (6.1) 4
The Contractor agrees to prepare the invoices as indicated (8.1) 2
The Contractor agrees to accept EFT (8.2) 1
Total: 15
Company Information/Capabilities – Vendor Questions Worksheet #1/2/4 Weight
The sole contact during the RFP process was identified (#1) 1
The authorized person to receive and sign any resulting contract was identified (#1) 1
Business name/address phone #, etc. identified (#2) 1 Is contractor a service disabled business owner/has required documentation been provided (Yes or
No) [If veteran, +10] (#2)
Organizational structure or a change of control described (#2) 1
A brief description of company background was provided (#2) 5
Three years of gross annual sales identified (#2) 3
Explanation of how Contractor will scale up to manage an increase, if over 25% of last year's sales (#2) 5
Three relevant experiences and supporting information provided (#5) 15
Experience of of representative fitting and measuring on-site (#5) 5
Total: 37
Prior Experience – Vendor Questions Worksheet #5 Weight
Experience working with the State (#5) 5
Technical Evaluation Criteria
A list of contracts was provided (#5) 5
A list of termination contracts was provided (#5) [if there are any -5]
Vendor Performance Issues (#5) [if there are any -5]
Total: 10
Vendor Performance – Vendor Questions Worksheet #6 Weight
The vendor has read and agrees with the Standard Contract Terms (#6) 3
If does not agree, the specific exceptions were listed and a redline version was provided (#6) 3
Total: 6
Timeframes and Staffing – Schedule A Section 2.1/3.1 Weight
A representative will be on campus on registration day or within 48 hours (2.1) 2
The key personnel was identified and their roles and responsibilities were identified (3.1) 2
The customer representative has been designated to service the account (3.1) 2
Total: 6
Samples – Proposal Instructions #1 Weight
Samples were provided as indicated in the proposal instructions 6
Total: 6
150Grand Total:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .