ESBD_File_342695_Addendum C.pdf

ADDENDUM C: Q/A

RFQ783-23029 Energy Policy Act Coordinator

1. If the selected firm does not currently have audited financials, is there another method that would be acceptable by the University? – Documents or reports (like Dun & Bradstreet) or a report showing the financial health/stability of your company should be provided. See section 5.5.4 of the RFQ.

2. Do the each of the respondent’s team members need to include their personal resumes for review, or a bio/history of each member 179D experience be sufficient? -- Respondents will be rated on the qualifications/experience of their proposed team members. The information provided in a resume is typically sufficient to demonstrate a team members qualifications/experience. A respondent may use other documentation, but must be aware that the evaluation will only use the information provided in scoring.

3. Will a respondent be disqualified if they do not have 3 examples in which a rebate was administered to the building owner? -- No

4. The RFQ states, “Owner anticipates entering into a Continuing Service Agreement with multiple qualified Service Provider to provide services for projects of different sizes at any of the Owner’s system campuses and instructional sites.” How many providers are anticipated to be selected and will they be working together to successfully complete each project? -- The owner anticipates selecting two providers. Providers will work independently on separate projects.

5. If the respondent is not a selected provider, will there be feedback as to why they disqualified for future responses? -- Bid Evaluations will be posted here: https://www.uh.edu/office-of-finance/purchasing/purchase-contract-transparency/Bid%20Evaluations/fy-24/ https://www.uh.edu/office-of-finance/purchasing/purchase-contract-transparency/Bid%20Evaluations/fy-24/ https://www.uh.edu/office-of-finance/purchasing/purchase-contract-transparency/Bid%20Evaluations/fy-24/