ESBD_File_341600_RFP#754-TXST-2024-RFP-344-VPGOI-Medical Administration Clinical Disciplines Through Continuing Education.pdf

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

FOR

TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY

SAN MARCOS, TEXAS

MEDICAL ADMINISTRATION & CLINICAL DISCIPLINE TRAINING

THROUGH CONTINUING EDUCATION

RFP NO.: 754-TXST-2024-RFP-344-VPGOI

ALL PROPOSALS MUST BE RECEIVED BY:

November 21, 2023, 5:00 PM. (Central time/Central Daylight Time)

Section TABLE OF CONTENTS Page

Cover Page

Table of Contents

I General Information & Requirements

1.1 General Information

1.2 Performance Period/Option to Extend Term

1.3 Type of Contract

1.4 Submission Deadline

1.5 Parking Permit Requirements

1.6 Clarifications and Interpretations

1.7 Validity Period

1.8 Contract Award Process

1.9 Evaluation Criteria Weighted Values

1.10 Award Notification

1.11 Proposal Evaluation

1.12 Payment Terms

1.13 Sales and Use Tax

1.14 Historically Underutilized Business Submittal Requirements

1.15 Withdrawal

1.16 Tie Proposals

1.17 Execution of Offer

1.18 Respondent Questions

1.19 Conditional Clauses

1.20 Unacceptable Proposal Delivery Methods

II Proposal Components

III Requirements for Statement Qualifications

3.1 Criterion One: Respondent’s Ability to Provide the Services

3.2 Criterions Two: Respondent’s Past Performance on Representative Projects

3.3 Criterion Three: Respondent’s Methodology and Understanding of the Scope of Work

3.4 Criterion Four: Project Specific Information

IV Scope of Services

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR

MEDICAL ADMINISTRATION & CLINICAL DISCIPLINE TRAINING

THROUGH CONTINUING EDUCATION

TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY

RFP NO.: 754-TXST-2024-RFP-344-VPGOI

SECTION I – GENERAL INFORMATION & REQUIREMENTS

1.1. GENERAL INFORMATION: Texas State University (“TXST”, “University”) is requesting competitive proposals for selection of one or more responsive and responsible individuals or firms to provide Medical

Administration & Clinical Discipline Training through Continuing Education as further described in section IV. This Request for Proposal (RFP) sets forth, at a minimum, the specifications, terms, conditions, and requirements to be considered for this solicitation. TXST will select the Proposal(s) that offers the

“best value” based on the published selection criteria and on its ranking evaluation of submitted proposals.

Prospective entities submitting their proposals in response to this solicitation are called “Respondents” herein.

1.1.1. Texas Law authorizes Institutions of Higher Education (defined by Section 61.003, Education

Code) to use group purchasing procurement methods (Section 51.9335, Education Code).

Other Institutions of Higher Education may enter into a Contract with the successful

Respondent(s) for the purchase of the services described herein based on the terms, conditions, and prices, offered by the successful Respondent for the duration of the Contract. These

Institutions of Higher Education will issue their own purchase orders, will directly receive goods or services at their place of business, and will be directly billed by the successful Respondent.

1.2. PERFORMANCE PERIOD/OPTION TO EXTEND TERM: The initial contract term shall be for 3 year(s), beginning on or before Jan 8, 2024. TXST may renew the contract: for up to 2 additional one-year terms. Notice of renewal to be issued in writing at least thirty (30) days prior to the end of the current performance period. The total duration of the contract, including the exercise of renewals, shall not exceed five consecutive years.

1.3. TYPE OF CONTRACT: Any Agreement or Contractual arrangement resulting from this Solicitation will be in the form of the University’s Standard Contract, a sample copy of which is attached. AFTER

REVIEW OF THE ATTACHED SAMPLE CONTRACT BY ALL INTERESTED PARTIES, ANY

EXCEPTIONS TO ANY OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ANY AGREEMENT OR

CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENT RESULTING FROM THIS SOLICITATION, SHALL BE

COMMUNICATED AT THE TIME OF THE RESPONSE SUBMISSION CITING THE

EXCEPTION(S). NO EXCEPTIONS TO ANY TERMS AND CONDITIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED

AFTER THE SUBMITTAL DUE DATE AND TIME.

1.4. SUBMISSION DEADLINE: Responses to this RFP shall be submitted on or before November 21, 2023 at 5:00 PM (C.S.T./C.D.T.).

1.5. PARKING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS: There is no free parking on any Texas State University campus. The successful Respondent(s) will be required to purchase a parking pass for each vehicle that is parked on campus. Vehicles illegally parked on campus may be subject to ticketing, immobilization

(booting), and towing at the vehicle owner’s expense. Parking permit fees may be viewed at https://www.parking.txstate.edu/construction.html.

https://www.parking.txstate.edu/construction.html

1.6. CLARIFICATIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS: Any clarifications or interpretations of this RFP that materially affect or change its requirements will be issued formally by TXST as a written addendum.

Addenda, if required, will be issued by TXST via the e-Procurement System. It is the responsibility of all

Respondents to check the status of formal addenda before the submission deadline and to obtain this information in a timely manner. All such addenda issued by TXST before the submittals are due shall be acknowledged by Respondents via the Execution of Offer, and incorporated into their response to this RFP.

1.7. VALIDITY PERIOD: Each proposal will state that it will remain valid for a minimum of 120 days after the submittal deadline to allow time for evaluation of proposals, award determination, and any unforeseen delays.

1.8. CONTRACT AWARD PROCESS: The University will evaluate and rank each Proposal with respect to the “Best Value” selection criteria contained in this Solicitation. After reviewing and evaluations, an award(s) may be made based on the Proposals initially submitted, without discussion, clarification, or modification; or, the University may negotiate with the selected Respondent, offers for cost reduction and other elements of the Proposal. If the University determines that it is unable to reach an agreement satisfactory to the University with the selected Respondent(s), then the University will terminate discussions with the selected Respondent(s) and proceed to the next Respondent in order of selection ranking until an agreement is reached or the University has rejected all Proposals.

1.8.1 The University reserves the right to divide the Project into multiple parts, reject or accept any and all responses, temporarily or permanently abandon the Project, make no award, waive minor process irregularities, or minor technical inconsistencies, and delete any requirement or specification from this RFP or the Agreement when deemed to be in University’s best interest.

The University makes no representations, written or oral, that it will enter into any form of

Agreement or Contract for any Project with any Respondent to this Solicitation and no such representation is intended or should be construed by the issuance of this Solicitation.

1.8.2 The award document will be an agreement incorporating by reference all the requirements, terms and conditions of the solicitation and the RESPONDENT's proposal as negotiated.

1.8.3 Respondent acknowledges and accepts that any costs incurred from the Respondent’s participation in this Solicitation process shall be at the sole risk and responsibility of the Respondent.

Respondents submit Proposals at their own risk and expense.

1.9. EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHTED VALUES: Criteria upon which Proposals will be evaluated for best value” are the following:

• Qualifications and references 75%

25% Respondent’s Ability to Provide Services

25% Respondent’s References and Qualifications of Professional Experience

25% Respondent's Methodology Including Understanding of the Scope of Work

25% Project Specific Information

• Pricing and Delivery Proposal 25%

1.10. AWARD NOTIFICATION: All Respondents will be notified of the award to include the awardee, via the e-Procurement System and posted to the university web site at https://bids.sciquest.com/apps/Router/PublicEvent?CustomerOrg=TexasState.

https://bids.sciquest.com/apps/Router/PublicEvent?CustomerOrg=TexasState

1.11. PROPOSAL EVALUATION: By submitting a Proposal in response to this Solicitation, Respondent accepts the evaluation criteria and methodology, process and acknowledges and accepts that determination of the “best value” proposal(s) will require some subjective judgments by the University.

The process for evaluating and ranking responses to this Solicitation is as follows:

1.11.1 Initial Evaluation

• Administrative Review

The University will review responses to determine if mandatory requirements are met and to verify that the Proposals meet administrative requirements. Compliant responses will be approved for subsequent evaluation steps.

• Qualifications Evaluation

The Evaluation Committee members will review and rank qualifications responses, without consideration of cost, from best to least qualified. The Evaluation Committee will use detailed evaluation and pre-determined weighting guidelines to carefully review and assign a score to each section of each response. Upon completion of the qualifications evaluation and scoring, the next step of this evaluation will be performed.

• Pricing and Delivery Proposal Evaluation

Pricing and Delivery Proposals will be reviewed by Evaluation Committee members.

Scores for cost will be based on pre-determined guidelines and weightings. These scores will be added to those assigned in the Initial Ranking process.

• Reference Checks, Clarification, and Product Demonstration and Presentation

The University may perform reference checks and seek further information, as needed, from all Respondents whose responses TXST, at its discretion, considers viable, based on the Initial Evaluation and scoring. Respondents may be asked to discuss their responses or provide written clarification. The University reserves the right to conduct independent investigations and reference checks in its effort to select the Respondent(s), which is best qualified, responsible, and responsive to this

Solicitation’s requirements.

All Respondents selected for further consideration may be asked to present their responses. The conduct, content and extent of such discussions and demonstrations are a matter of the University’s “Best Value” determination, based on the particulars of the selected Respondents.

• In the course of seeking additional information, the University will:

a. Control all discussions;

b. Attempt to resolve any uncertainties concerning a Respondent's submittal;

c. Attempt to resolve any suspected mistakes by calling them to a Respondent’s attention as specifically as possible without disclosing information concerning other Respondent’s responses or confidential aspects of the evaluation process;

d. Provide the Respondents a reasonable opportunity to submit any technical, cost, or other revisions to its response that may result from discussions.

1.11.2 Best and Final Offers (BAFO)

• The University may choose to request a written “Best and Final Offer” to one or more

Respondents determined, in the sole opinion of the University, as a potential “best value”. The request will also include general instructions to, and questions for, all

BAFO participants, as well as a list of issues, concerns and/or requests for additional clarification including, but not limited to functional capabilities, cost, contractual gaps, and other Respondent-specific issues unique to each BAFO participant.

The objectives of the Request for BAFO include obtaining:

a. The best price for requested Work;

b. Changes to Proposals to better align them with university requirements for the

Work;

c. Clarifications where initial Proposals were deemed ambiguous or confusing by the Evaluation Committee;

d. Changes to the proposed approach or timing to the extent deemed necessary by the University; and

e. Changes to or more information about proposed project personnel.

1.11.3 Final Evaluation

The University intends to make the contract award to the Respondent(s) whose response best meets the evaluation criteria and reflects the “best value” to the University.

In determining “best value”, the Evaluation Committee will be instructed to consider all information contained in the initial responses; the initial evaluation; BAFO responses (if necessary); and information obtained from references, site visits, Respondent presentations and or demonstrations, and any other information obtained during this procurement solicitation process.

1.12. PAYMENT TERMS: University will pay for Work performed under any Agreement or Contractual arrangement resulting from the Solicitation “net 30” days in accordance with Texas Government Code, Section §2251.021. Alternate payment terms may be proposed by a Respondent, but the University reserves the right to reject the terms if determined not to be in its best interests.

• The amount due to the successful Respondent(s) will be paid upon receipt of a valid invoice.

• The purchase order number must be on the invoice(s), or the invoice(s) will be returned to your company for revision, which will delay payment.

1.13. SALES AND USE TAXES: Purchases made for State use are exempt from the State of Texas Sales tax and Federal Excise tax, per Texas Tax Code, Section §151.309. Do not include tax in the proposal.

1.14. HISTORICALLY UNDERUTILIZED BUSINESSES SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: All agencies of the State of Texas are required to make a "good faith effort" to assist Historically Underutilized

Businesses (HUB) in receiving their fair share of Contract or Subcontract awards. The goal of the HUB program is to promote full and equal business opportunity for all businesses in contracting with state agencies. If under the terms of any Agreement or Contractual arrangement resulting from this Solicitation, Respondent subcontracts any of the Services then, Respondent must make a good faith effort to utilize

State of Texas certified HUBs.

1.14.1 Proposals that fail to comply with the subcontracting requirements contained in this Solicitation will constitute a material failure to comply with RFP Specifications and may be rejected by the

University as non-responsive. Additionally, compliance with good faith effort guidelines is a condition precedent to awarding any Agreement or Contractual arrangement resulting from this

Solicitation. Respondent acknowledges that, if selected by the University, its obligation to make a good faith effort to utilize HUBs when subcontracting any of the Services will continue throughout the term of all Agreements or Contractual arrangements resulting from this

Solicitation. Furthermore, any subcontracting of the Services by the successful Respondent(s) is subject to review by the University to ensure compliance with the HUB program requirements.

1.14.2 If the University determines that subcontracting opportunities are probable, then a HUB

Subcontracting Plan (HSP) is a required element of the response to this Solicitation. Respondents that fail to do so may be considered non-responsive to this Solicitation in accordance with Section

§2161.252, Government Code.

1.14.3 The University has determined that subcontracting opportunities are not probable in connection with this Procurement Solicitation. Therefore, a HUB Subcontracting Plan (HSP) is not required as a part of the Respondent's Proposal.

For additional information on the State of Texas HUB program, visit https://comptroller.texas.gov/purchasing/

1.15. WITHDRAWAL: Any proposal may be withdrawn prior to the date and time set for receipt of proposals.

Any proposal not withdrawn shall constitute an irrevocable offer, for a period of 120 days, to provide the services set forth in the specifications, or until a selection has been made by TXST.

1.16. TIE PROPOSALS: Awards will be made in accordance with Title 34, Part 1, Chapter 20, Subchapter D, Division 2, §20.306 (preferences).

1.17. EXECUTION OF OFFER: Complete, sign, and return the Execution of Offer as part of the proposal. The

Execution of Offer must be signed by a representative of Proposer duly authorized to bind the Proposer to its proposal. Failure to sign and upload the Execution of Offer may result in the rejection of the proposal.

1.18. RESPONDENT QUESTIONS: Questions regarding the RFP must be submitted by November 13, 2023 at 5:00 p.m. (C.S.T./C.D.T.), to submit written questions for clarification of the proposal. Questions will be asked and answered via the Q&A section in the e-Procurement System.

• Questions regarding the e-Procurement System and how to submit a response, contact the e-

Procurement help desk (Jaggaer) at 800.233.1121

• For all other questions, email purchasing@txstate.edu or 512.245.2521.

• The Respondent is solely responsible to ensure that all Pre-requisites, Supplier Attachments, and any other instructions as directed/required have been completed and uploaded into the e-Procurement

System. The proposal may be viewed, changed, or withdrawn at any time prior to the closing date and time. After the submittal due date and time has closed you may not withdraw or change your submission.

https://comptroller.texas.gov/purchasing/ mailto:purchasing@txstate.edu

1.19. CONDITIONAL CLAUSES: Proposals that are qualified with conditional clauses; alter, modify, or revise this RFP in any way; or contain irregularities of any kind; are subject to disqualification by TXST, at its option.

1.20. UNACCEPTABLE PROPOSAL DELIVERY METHODS: The University will not accept proposals submitted by telephone, facsimile (fax) transmission, hand delivered, mailed, electronic submission (e-mail disk, CD-ROM, etc.), or any other method, other than through the e-Procurement System.

SECTION II –PROPOSAL COMPONENTS

2.1 The following documents are required as part of your proposal response. Failure to provide these documents will be basis for response disqualification.

Qualification Criteria Responses

Pricing Proposal

Signed Execution of Offer

Non-Collusion Affidavit

2.2 If it is later determined after award that this procurement includes any kind of software, desktop application or cloud storage, the below documents may become a requirement of contracting:

Information Security and Accessibility Standards Exhibit (TX Ramp)

HECVAT

VPAT

Data Diagram

2.3 All electronic documents must be in either Microsoft Office software or Adobe portable Document (PDF) format. All image files must be in one of the following formats: .jpg, .gif, .bmp, or .tif.

2.4 Only Proposals submitted through the electronic bidding system will be reviewed.

2.5 The Proposal must be complete and signed in the firm's name or corporate name of the Respondent and must be properly and fully executed and signed by an authorized representative of the Respondent who has the authority to obligate the Firm in the event of an award.

SECTION III –REQUIREMENTS FOR STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

Do not include any pricing information in any of your responses to the criterion below. The pricing and delivery proposal must be separate from the qualification responses.

INCLUDING ANY PRICING INFORMATION IN YOUR QUALIFICATIONS PACKAGE MAY

RESULT IN THE DISQUALIFICATION OF YOUR PROPOSAL.

Address the following questions and upload your qualifications proposal.

3.1. CRITERION ONE: RESPONDENT’S ABILITY TO PROVIDE THE SERVICES:

3.1.1 How will the vendor provide a seamless registration process to Texas State Students?

3.2. CRITERION TWO: RESPONDENT’S REFERENCES AND QUALIFICATION OF PROFESSIONAL

EXPERIENCE:

References shall be considered relevant based on specific project participation and experience with the

Respondent. The University may contact references during any part of this process. The University reserves the right to contact any other references at any time during the Solicitation process.

3.2.1 Respondents are asked to provide a minimum of two (2) references that use their services.

3.3. CRITERION THREE: RESPONDENT'S METHODOLOGY AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE

SCOPE OF WORK:

a. Provide a brief statement of the service approach for each of the required services identified in Section

IV and any unique benefits the University will gain from contracting with successful Respondents' firm.

b. Describe how your company will address any noted deficiencies in the service performance and your problem escalation policy.

c. Provide information as to the services that your company will provide to support student success.

d. Provide information on how your company monitors course/program rigor and alignment with industry standards.

3.4. CRITERION FOUR: PROJECT SPECIFIC INFORMATION:

a. Provide the number of medical administrative courses/programs your company provides

b. Provide a list of employers that students may “practice” their skills that you currently are in partnership with.

c. Provide a compliance plan with all regulatory requirements whether they are federal, state, or local regulations.

d. Describe your quality control processes

e. List any state or national professional organizations the firm is a member of or actively involved with as well as any pertinent licenses.

SECTION IV –SCOPE OF WORK/SPECIFICATIONS

Texas State University (Texas State) is seeking proposals from qualified vendors to provide training in medical administration and medical clinical disciplines through continuing education (CE) at Texas State University. CE courses will consist of courses in billing, coding, healthcare administration and courses in medical clinical concentrations of technology, patient care, medical intervention, and physical care.

Texas State will select the vendor or vendors based on Texas State’s sole judgement regarding what provides the most advantage to the University.