Engineering_Services_Evaluation_Criteria.pdf
PDF 80 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Professional Utility Engineering Services
- Solicitation number
- 25-SQ-145IF
- Issued by
- Volusia County, Florida
About this file
The document is an Evaluation Criteria for Professional Utility Engineering Services for Volusia County, Florida, detailing six scoring categories for vendor responses totaling 100 points. The solicitation seeks to select highly qualified firm(s) to provide utility engineering services through a three-year contract with potential two additional one-year renewal options. Vendors will be evaluated across six key criteria: Qualifications (25 points), Experience (20 points), Soundness of Approach (20 points), Regulatory Knowledge (15 points), Fiscal Responsibility (10 points), and Customer Focus (10 points).
Each evaluation category uses a 0-5 point scoring method, with vendors required to demonstrate specialized experience, technical competence, project references, problem-solving capabilities, regulatory expertise, cost control measures, and client-focused solutions. The evaluation emphasizes the firm's ability to provide comprehensive utility planning and engineering services, including understanding current federal and state regulatory programs, managing grant processes, delivering projects within budget and timeline constraints, and effectively communicating complex technical information in understandable terms.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Utility Engineering Services Evaluation Criteria
(6) Categories 100 Points The criteria used to score vendor responses during the evaluation process
1. Qualifications:
Demonstrate the firm’s specialized experience and technical competence to perform a variety of professional utility planning and engineering services. Describe established sub-consultant relationships. Include key personnel resumes, licenses, location of offices, years of experience of staff for both the prime and sub consultants and key personnel as presented by resumes, education and training, and number of years in which prime and sub consultants have worked together.
Scoring Method: 0-5 Points Weight (Points): 25 (25% of Total)
2. Experience:
Submit three (3) references illustrating utility projects that are similar in magnitude to this RSQ. Provide quality of performance on previous contracts or services and quality availability and adaptability of the contractual services to the particular use required.
Weight (Points): 20 (20% of Total)
3. Soundness of Approach:
Explain analysis techniques, comprehensive problem solving, accomplishing objectives, innovative solutions to project challenges. Provide various approaches utilized to support the needs and objectives of the project.
Weight (Points): 20 (20% of Total)
4. Regulatory Knowledge:
Possess considerable knowledge and experience with current and frequently changing federal and state regulatory programs involving utility system operations. Describe firm’s grant knowledge, support and management processes.
Weight (Points): 15 (15% of Total)
5. Fiscal Responsibility:
Demonstrate evidence of proactive cost control measures, budget constraint awareness. Provide examples of completed projects that show the ability of the firm to fulfil the contract within the required timeline and provide the services within the budget requirements promptly or within the time specified, without delay or interference.
Weight (Points): 10 (10% of Total)
6. Customer Focus
Ensure client needs are a primary focus. Understand client project needs, procedures and timelines. Provide operational and financially feasible solutions. Respond to questions in easily understandable terms.
Weight (Points): 10 (10% of Total)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .