Engineering_Architect Scoring Sheet.pdf
PDF 134 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFP ENGINEERING/ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES State and local contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- PE-66397-NONST-2026-000000014
- Issued by
- Seminole County, Georgia
About this file
This document is an Engineering/Architectural Ratings Criterion form used to evaluate and score potential architectural or engineering firms for a project. The form provides a structured method for assessing firms across six key criteria: ability to provide necessary project disciplines, firm's construction experience, key personnel experience, reference quality, previous Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) project experience, and price competitiveness. Each criterion can be rated from 0 (Poor) to 2 (Excellent), with a total possible score of 12 points.
Additional evaluation elements include determining whether the firm can meet PER/PAR deadlines and carries Errors and Omissions insurance. The form allows for a comprehensive review of a firm's qualifications, with space for specific comments explaining why a particular firm should be selected. The document appears designed to provide an objective, standardized method for selecting architectural or engineering firms for potential project work, with a focus on technical capabilities, past performance, and cost-effectiveness.
View the file
Other files for this state and local contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Section 3 Solicitation Package.pdf | ||
| Engineering_Architectural statement of qualif.pdf | ||
| Engineering RFP.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ENGINEERING/ARCHITECTURAL
RATINGS CRITERION
CONTACT:
NAME OF FIRM:
FIRM ADDRESS:
Evaluate the Architectural and/or Engineering Firm based on the points assigned to each of the following selection criterion
CIRCLE POINTS
CRITERION
POOR
GOOD
EXCELLENT
POINTS
ASSIGNED
1. Ability to provide the disciplines necessary for this project.
0 1 2 _________
2.
Firm’s experience with this type of construction.
0 1 2 _________
3. Key personnel experience with this type of construction 0 1 2 _________
4. Quality of reference information. 0 1 2 _________
5. Has Firm had experience with Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) projects?
0 1 2
6. Is price competitive? 0 1 2 _________
TOTAL POINTS
Firm can meet PER/PAR deadline? ____ Yes ____ No
Firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance? ____ Yes ____ No
COMMENTS ON WHY FIRM SHOULD BE SELECTED:
NAME:
DATE OF REVIEW:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .