E21 Redacted SSJ.pdf

PDF 128 KB Posted

Attached to
Sole Source to Teledyne Inc. for Cables per attachments
Solicitation number
N61331-26-Q-MS02
Issued by

About this file

This is a Sole Source Justification Memorandum for a firm fixed price contract award to Teledyne D.G. O'Brien (CAGE 17476) by the Naval Surface Warfare Center Panama City Division (NSWC-PCD), located at 110 Vernon Ave., Panama City, FL 32407. The acquisition will be conducted using simplified acquisition procedures and will be synopsized on sam.gov.

The government requires three cable assemblies: three units of NAVSEA 45720-1 ITAR C/A W-100 cable (150 feet, 9#20/4-FO with 8#16/4-FO); one unit of 1530010-104 RCPT 4F/O MM 8#16 120KEY receptacle; and six units of 1535154-103 RCPT ASSY 9#20 AWG/4FO receptacle assemblies. All items are U.S. origin products. The justification for sole source procurement is based on 10 U.S.C. 2304(c) and FAR 6.302-1, citing that the cables are proprietary to Teledyne DGO, part of a TEMPALT configuration, and SUBSAFE-certified by NAVSEA with no other approved suppliers. The government lacks a Technical Data Package and sufficient rights for competition, and Teledyne DGO has declined to sell such rights. No market research was conducted because only Teledyne DGO can meet the requirements without causing unacceptable project delays and compatibility issues. The Contracting Officer determined this award represents best value and the lowest overall cost alternative to meet government needs.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
C07 Clauses-Supply Cables SSJ.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Subj: SOLE SOURCE JUSTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR TELEDYNE CABLES

1. Identification of the agency and the contracting activity, and specific identification of the document as a “Sole Source Justification.”

This is a sole source justification. Contracting activity is NSWC-PCD, 110 Vernon Ave., Panama City, FL, 32407.

2. Nature and/or description of the action being approved.

This action will award a firm fixed price to Teledyne D.G. O’Brien, CAGE 17476, for the items listed in Paragraph 3 of this document.

3. A description of the supplies or services required to meet the agency’s needs (including the estimated value).

Line Part Number Description Qty

1 NAVSEA 45720-1 ITAR C/A W-100, 150 FT 9#20/4-FO

W/8#16/4-FO

(NAVSEA 45720-1)

Country of Origin: US Schedule B: 8544.20.0000 ECCN: XX(c)

HTS: 8544.20.0000

2 1530010-104 RCPT 4F/O MM 8#16 120KEY

Country of Origin: US Schedule B: 8536.70.0000 ECCN: 8A992.e

HTS: 8536700000

3 1535154-103 RCPT ASSY 9#20 AWG/ 4FO

Country of Origin: US Schedule B: 8544700000 ECCN: XX(c)

HTS: 8544700000

This acquisition will be conducted using simplified acquisition procedures. The Government's minimum needs have been verified by the certifying technical and requirements personnel. This memo does not authorize acquisition for other requirements.

4. Identification of the justification rationale and, if applicable, a demonstration of the proposed contractor’s unique qualifications to provide the required supply or service. 10 U.S.C. 2304(c) - Only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements, FAR 6.302-1.

The Naval Surface Warfare Center Panama City Division (NSWC PCD) currently has a requirement for the item(s) listed in Paragraph 3 of this document. The cables listed in Paragraph 3 are part of a TEMPALT and are SUBSAFE. The cables are proprietary to Teledyne D.G. O’Beiren (DGO); the government does not have a Technical Data Package (TDP) or rights sufficient for competition and Teledyne DGO has not been willing to sell the rights in the past.

These cables have certified by NAVSEA to be SUBSAFE and only Teledyne DGO is approved to supply. If another source for the cable were to be selected, those cables would have to be approved through another TEMPALT and be SUBSAFE certified, resulting in unacceptable project delay and potential compatibility issues.

As such, the government does not expect significant savings through competition and it is more advantageous to the Government to award on a sole source basis to the Teledyne DGO for the item(s) listed in Paragraph 3 of this document.

5. A determination by the ordering activity contracting officer that the order represents the best value consistent with FAR 13.106-1(b).

The Contracting Officer has determined that the order represents the best value and results in the lowest overall cost alternative (considering price, special features, administrative costs, etc.) to meet the Government’s needs.

6. A description of the market research conducted among schedule holders and the results or a statement of the reason market research was not conducted.

For the reasons specified in paragraph 4 above, Teledyne DGO is the only source that can meet the Government’s needs. This requirement will be synopsized in the government point of entry sam.gov.

7. Any other facts supporting the justification.

None.

8. A statement of the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers that led to the restricted consideration before any subsequent acquisition for the supplies or services is made.

As stated in paragraph 4 above, Teledyne DGO is the only source that can meet this requirement.

1. Identification of the agency and the contracting activity, and specific identification of the document as a “Sole Source Justification.”
2. Nature and/or description of the action being approved.
3. A description of the supplies or services required to meet the agency’s needs (including the estimated value).
4. Identification of the justification rationale and, if applicable, a demonstration of the proposed contractor’s unique qualifications to provide the required supply or service. 10
5. A determination by the ordering activity contracting officer that the order represents the best value consistent with FAR 13.106-1(b).
6. A description of the market research conducted among schedule holders and the results or a statement of the reason market research was not conducted.
7. Any other facts supporting the justification.
8. A statement of the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers that led to the restricted consideration before any subsequent acquisition for the supplies or services is made.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .