e Attachment 9 - Customer Satisfaction Survey.pdf
PDF 108 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 697DCK-22-R-00075
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SF-30.AMEND 1.pdf | ||
| 1442 697DCK-22-R-00075.pdf | ||
| ZUA 1803386 Final Design Drawings (1).pdf | ||
| 1303386 Specifications Final (1).pdf | ||
| WAGE RATES.pdf | ||
| Sol_697DCK-22-R-00075.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY INSTRUCTIONS
SOLICITATION NO. 697DCK-22-R-00075
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ACQUISITION ACTIVITY
Guam
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is considering a contractor for the CRAC units at Guam, ATCT. As part of the contracting process, we are collecting past performance information on contractors and their key personnel. This information will be used to assist the FAA in the selection of a contractor to complete the project. You have been listed as a past performance reference.
Please rate each of the criteria according to the following scale:
1 0 – 25% of the time Strongly Disagree PLEASE RETURN COMPLETED RESPONSE
TO:
Federal Aviation Administration
ATTN: Deana Galloway E-MAIL: deana.galloway@faa.gov
2 26 – 40% of the time Disagree 3 41 – 55% of the time Somewhat Disagree 4 56 – 70% of the time Somewhat Agree 5 71 – 85% of the time Agree 6 86 – 100% of the time Strongly Agree
NA No Knowledge of This Element
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY
RATER’S NAME & TITLE
RATER’S ORGANIZATION / AGENCY
RATER’S TEL NO.
RATER’S E-MAIL ADDRESS:
CONTRACTOR’S NAME & ADDRESS
PROJECT TITLE OR DESCRIPTION OF
REQUIREMENT:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
CONTRACT VALUE (INCLUDING OPTIONS):
CONTRACT TYPE:
FIXED PRICE COST + FEE
COMPETITIVE NON-COMPETITIVE
SET-ASIDE
SEALED BID NEGOTIATED
CONTRACT AWARD & COMPLETION DATE:
PAST PERFORMANCE ELEMENT
RATING
1 2 3 4 5 6 NA
1. Contractor was able to manage project cost (minimize change orders)
2. Contractor was able to maintain project schedule (completed on time or early)
3. Contractor adhered to all safety standards and/or requirements
4. Contractor was efficient in project coordination and scheduling of different trades
5. Contractor utilized problem solving skills effectively when problems arose during the project
6. Closeout Process (Did contractor submit as-builts, warranties, etc., promptly?)
7. Contractor was able to follow specifications, regulations, and requirements (building codes, customer specific policy, etc.)
8. Overall customer satisfaction
Comments or additional information:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED
| CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY INSTRUCTIONS |
| FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ACQUISITION ACTIVITY |
| The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is considering a contractor for the CRAC units at Guam, ATCT. As part of the contracting process, we are collecting past performance information on contractors and their key personnel. This information will b... |
| Please rate each of the criteria according to the following scale: |
| FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED |
| FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .