YOSE_C6_RipReport.pdf
PDF 30 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- DTFH7017R00014
About this file
Road Inventory and Condition Assessment
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Q&A_9-7-18.pdf | ||
| Q&A_9-6-18.pdf | ||
| A002.pdf | ||
| A001_Yosemite.pdf | ||
| Q&A_8-29-18.pdf | ||
| Q&A_8-24-18.pdf | ||
| RFP_Yosemite.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
YOSE
Cycle 6
Federal Highway Administration Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division Road Inventory Program (RIP)
Prepared By:
Road Inventory and Condition Assessment of Paved Routes Yosemite National Park
Report Date: April 2016
Final Report in California
Ely
Bend
Reno
Yuma
Ogden
Butte
Eugene
Fresno
Kingman
Medford
Oakland
Redding
San Jose
Portland
Pocatello
Las Vegas
Flagstaff
San Diego
St. George
Twin Falls
Idaho Falls
Bakersfield
Los Angeles
San Francisco
Boise
Salem
Phoenix
Sacramento
Carson City
Salt Lake City
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Esri, DeLorme, GEBCO, NOAA NGDC, and other contributors ±
Yosemite National Park
Table of Contents
4 - 1 4 - 2 4 - 16 4 - 17
SECTION PAGE NO.
1. INTRODUCTION 1 - 1
2. PARK ROUTE INVENTORY
2 - 1
3.
3 - 1
4.
APPENDIX
8 - 1
Route ID Report, Subcomponent Report, and Changes Report (As Applicable)
PAVED PARKING AREA CONDITION RATING SHEETS
Paved Parking Area Pages
PARK SUMMARY INFORMATION
Parkwide Paved Route Condition Summary
PARK ROUTE LOCATION MAPS
Route Location Key Map Route Location Area Map(s) Route Condition Key Map – PCR Mile by Mile Route Condition Area Map(s) – PCR Mile by Mile
PAVED ROAD CONDITION RATING SHEETS
Paved Road Pages 5 - 1
6 - 1
5.
6.
7. ROAD MILEPOST INFORMATION
Road Milepost Information and Logs 7 - 1
8.
Appendix A: Methodology for Determining Condition Ratings with the Data Collection Vehicle (DCV)
8 - 5
Appendix B: Methodology for Determining Condition Ratings Using Manual Rating Procedures Appendix C: Description of Cycle 6 Deliverables 8 - 29
8 - 20
Appendix D: Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations 8 - 33
Improvements to the RIP Index Equations and Determination of PCR 8 - 1 Description of the Rating System 8 - 2 Explanation of the Condition Descriptions 8 - 3 Description of Pavement Treatment Types 8 - 4
Explanation of Condition Descriptions Route-Level Condition Summary Reports for Data Collection Vehicle, Manually Rated, and Parking Area Routes (As Applicable)
3 - 2 3 - 3
Section 1 Introduction
1-1
Introduction
The Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA), Road Inventory Program (RIP) inventories all roads and parking areas in the National Park System, and performs condition inspections on all paved roads and parking areas for the National Park Service (NPS). This report contains the results of the Cycle 6 condition assessment of paved roads and parking lots for this park unit. This assessment was done using an automated, state-of-the-art pavement inspection vehicle as well as manual ratings. This information represents the condition of the paved assets at the time of the inspection. The pavement management system utilized by FHWA and the NPS uses these assessments to estimate future conditions and help prioritize pavement maintenance and rehabilitation projects. Further information about RIP data and its role in managing paved roads and bridges can be obtained by contacting the NPS Regional Transportation Program Manager.
A History of the Road Inventory Program:
The FHWA, in the mid-1970s, was charged with the task of identifying surface condition deficiencies and corrective priorities on NPS roads and parkways. Additionally, FHWA was tasked with establishing an integrated maintenance features inventory, locating features such as culverts, guardrails, and signs, among others, along NPS roads and parkways. As a result, in 1976 the NPS and FHWA entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) which established the RIP. This MOA was revised in 1980 to update RIP data collection standards and develop a long-range program to improve and maintain NPS roads to designated condition standards and establish a pavement management program.
The FHWA completed the initial phase of inventory in the early 1980s. As a result of this effort, each NPS unit included in the collection received a RIP Report known as the “Brown Book” which contained information that was inventoried during this first RIP phase. In the 1990s, a cyclical program was developed, and since then five cycles of collection have been completed. Cycle 6 is currently in progress.
A summary of the RIP collection cycles is shown in the table below.
Cycle Years Parks Collected
Cycle 1 1994 - 1997 44 Large Parks
Cycle 2 1997 - 2001 79 Large Parks 5 Small Parks
Cycle 3 2001 - 2004 All Large Parks All Small Parks
Cycle 4 2006 - 2010 86 Large Parks Several Small Parks
Cycle 5 2010 - 2014 All Large Parks (Only functional class 1, 2, 7, and new/modified routes collected) All Small Parks (all roads and parking areas collected)
Cycle 6 2014 – 2020 (±) All roads and parking areas collected at all Parks Additional partial collections of functional class 1, 2, and 7 roads at Large Parks Cycle 6 is expected to last 6 years
Note: Large Parks have ≥ 10 Paved Miles; Small Parks have < 10 Paved Miles
1-2
Since 1984, the Road Inventory Program has been funded through the Federal Lands Highway Park Roads and Parkways (PRP) Program. Currently, coordination of the RIP with Federal Lands Highway (FLH) is under the NPS Washington Headquarters Park Facility Management Division. The FLH Washington office coordinates policy and prepares national reports and needs assessment studies for Congress.
In 1998, the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) amended Title 23 U.S.C., and inserted Section 204(a)(6) requiring the FHWA and NPS, to develop by rule, a Pavement Management System (PMS) applied to park roads and parkways serving the National Park System.
In 2012, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) amended Title 23 U.S.C., and under Section 203(c)(1-2) stated that the National Park Service in cooperation with the DOT/FHWA, shall maintain a comprehensive national inventory of their transportation facilities, with the goal of quantifying transportation infrastructure needs within the National Park System.
A History of the Pavement Management System:
In 2005, the FHWA began implementing the use of a pavement management system to assist the NPS in prioritizing Pavement Maintenance and Rehabilitation activities. The system used by FHWA is the Highway Pavement Management Application (HPMA), which has the ability to store inventory and condition data from RIP and forecast future performance using prediction models. Outputs include performance and condition reports at the National, Regional, Park, or Route level. Regional prioritized lists and optimizations have been produced for most regions, and the Service’s overall roadway Deferred Maintenance is calculated via the HPMA.
Overview of Cycle 6:
Cycle 6 launched in the spring of 2014 and will again comprise all NPS park units that are served by paved roads and/or parking areas. For Cycle 6, all paved roads (approximately 5,700 miles) and parking areas will be collected in all parks at least once, while the primary routes (functional class 1, 2, and 7 roads) at Large Parks will have additional collections. These multiple collections will provide updated condition data on a majority of the NPS’s primary road network and help build a better pavement management system, allowing for more accurate pavement performance prediction models.
FLH is responsible for the accuracy of all data presented in this report. Any questions or comments concerning the contents of this report should be directed to the national RIP Coordinator located in Sterling, Virginia.
Respectfully, FHWA RIP Team
FHWA/Eastern Federal Lands FHWA/Central Federal Lands 21400 Ridgetop Circle 12300 West Dakota Ave Sterling, VA 20166 Lakewood, CO 80228
(703) 404-6371 (720) 963-3556
Section 2 Park Route Inventory
Section 3 Park Summary Information
3-1
3-2
3-3
3-4
3-5
3-6
3-7
3-8
3-9
3-10
3-11
3-12
3-13
3-14
3-15
3-16
3-17
3-18
NOTE: Route 0981AZ could not be rated because it was covered with pine needles.
Section 4 Park Route Location Maps
ROUTE LOCATION MAP
Key Map
Yosemite National Park
±0 10 20
Miles
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
NPS Collected Routes
4-1
Area Map 1
Yosemite National Park
±0 4 8
Miles
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Note: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads
Rte. 0911
1A
Rte. 0910
Rte. 1041
Rte. 0909 Rte. 0971
Rte. 1038 Rte. 0219
Rte. 1039
Rte. 0222ZZ
Rte. 0014
Rt e.
4-2
Area Map 1A
Yosemite National Park
±0 0.2 0.4
Miles
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Note: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads
Rte. 0014
Rte. 0913
Rte. 0987ZZ
Rte. 0914
Rte. 0915
Rte. 0998
Rte. 0221
Rte. 0912
Rte. 1040
Rte . 0
0Rte. 0235
Rte. 0990ZZ R
te. 0414
Rte. 0989ZZ
Rte. 0413
Rte.
4-3
Area Map 2
Yosemite National Park
±0 4 8
Miles
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Note: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads
2A
Rte. 0922 2B Rte. 0419
Rte. 0921
Rte. 0920
Rte. 0402
Rte. 0962
Rte. 0239
Rte. 0918 Rte. 0917B
Rte. 0917A
Rte. 0901ZZ
Rte. 0977
Rte. 0975
Rte. 0963
Rte. 1019
Rte. 0919 Rte. 0223ZZ
Rte. 0976B
Rte. 0994
Rte. 0916 Rte. 1001
Rte.
Rt e.
Rte. 0976A
Rte. 0016
Rte. 0 013
Rte. 0011
Rte. 0500
4-4
Area Map 2A
Yosemite National Park
±0 0.5 1
Miles
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Note: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads
Rte.
Rte. 0500
Rte. 0500
Rte. 0900
Rte. 0951
Rte. 0012
Rte. 1036ZZ
Rte. 0984ZZ
Rte. 0953
Rte. 1042
Rte. 0955
Rte. 0203ZZ
Rte. 1033
Rte. 1034
Rte. 1035ZZ
Rte. 0429
Rte. 0214 Rte. 0986
Rte. 0213
Rte. 0206 Rte. 0952
Rte. 1014A
Rte. 1014BZZ R te.0431
Rte. 1014DZZ
Rte. 1014EZZ
Rte. 1014H
Rte. 1016
Rte. 0247
Rte. 0600ZZ
Rte. 0442 Rte. 0443
Rte. 1022ZZ
Rte. 0104ZZ
Rte. 0207
Rte. 1023 Rte. 1026 Rte. 1024 Rte. 1025
Rte. 1027
Rte. 1020ZZ
Rte. 0956
Rte. 0960
Rte. 0992
Rte. 0958B
Rte. 0958A
R te
.0
Rte. 0241 Rte. 0957 Rte. 0969C
Rte. 0969A
Rte. 0969B Rte. 1037
Rte. 1028 Rte. 1029
Rte. 0409ZZ
Rte. 0439ZZ
4-5
Area Map 2B
Yosemite National Park
±0 0.5 1
Miles
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Note: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads
Rte. 0980
R te
. 0
Rte. 0968
Rte. 0967
Rte. 0407
Rte. 0210Z Z
Rte. 1021
Rte. 0966
Rte. 0215
Rte. 0212ZZ
Rte. 0211ZZRte. 0206
Rte. 0213 Rte. 0954A
Rte. 0954B
R
te. 0408
4-6
Area Map 3
Yosemite National Park
±0 4 8
Miles
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Note: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads
Rt e.
3A
Rte. 0903
Rte. 0982
3C3B
Rte. 0902
Rte .0
Rte. 0
Rte. 0013
Rte. 0232
Rte. 0248
Rte. 0974 Rte. 1043
Rte. 0924 Rte. 0444
Rte. 0999 Rte. 0923
Rte. 1009
Rte. 0404
Rte. 0226ZZ
Rte. 0904
Rte. 0905
Rte. 0421
4-7
Area Map 3A
Yosemite National Park
±0 0.5 1
Miles
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Note: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads
Rte. 0415C
Rte. 0908
Rte. 1032ZZ Rte. 0421
Rte. 0906
Rte. 0907
Rt e.
1 3
Rte. 0224 Rte. 0415A
R te
. 0
5Z Z
Rte. 0415B
4-8
Area Map 3B
Yosemite National Park
±0 0.5 1
Miles
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Note: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads
Rt e.
Rte. 0991ZZ Rt e.
0Z Z
Rte. 0993
Rte. 0964
Rte. 1017 Rte. 0412ZZRte. 0406
4-9
Area Map 3C
Yosemite National Park
±0 0.2 0.4
Miles
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Note: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads
Rte. 0422
Rte. 0985
Rte. 0603
Rt e.
Rte. 0406
Rte. 0441
Rte. 01
Rte. 1018
Rte. 1015
Rte. 0983
Rte. 1010
Rte. 1008
Rte. 0602ZZ
4-10
Area Map 4
Yosemite National Park
±0 4 8
Miles
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Note: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads
Rte. 0929
4A
Rte. 0930
Rte. 0931
Rte. 0933
Rte. 0932
Rte. 0240
Rte. 0928
Rte. 0927
Rte. 0926
Rte. 0233
Rte. 0017
4-11
Area Map 4A
Yosemite National Park
±0 0.5 1
Miles
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Note: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads
Rte. 0925A
Rte. 1044
Rt e.
Rte. 0925B Rte. 0242
Rte. 0233
Rt e.
Rte. 0231ZZ
4-12
Area Map 5
Yosemite National Park
±0 5 10
Miles
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Note: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads
Rte. 0972
Rt e.
5A
Rte. 0949 Rte. 0948
Rte. 0947
Rte. 0946
Rte. 0940
Rte. 0939 Rte. 0938
Rte. 0937
Rte. 0934
Rte.
ZZ
Rte. 0935
Rte. 0936
4-13
Area Map 5A
Yosemite National Park
±0 0.5 1
Miles
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Note: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads
Rte. 0416
Rte. 0017
Rte. 0944
Rte. 0945
Rte. 0997
Rte. 0941B Rte. 0941A
Rte. 0942
Rte. 0973 Rte. 0996
Rte. 0995
Rte. 0943
Rte. 0230
Rte. 0229ZZ
4-14
Area Map 6
Yosemite National Park
±0 2 4
Miles
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Note: Unique colors are used to differentiate roads
Rte. 0981ZZ
Rte. 0978
Rte. 0420
Rt e.
4-15
ROUTE CONDITION MAP
PCR - MILE BY MILE
Key Map
Yosemite National Park
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±0 20 40
Miles
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed
Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
4-16
Area Map 1
Yosemite National Park
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±0 2 4
Miles
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed
Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
1A Rte. 0222ZZ
Rte. 0014
Rt e.
Rte. 0219
4-17
Area Map 1A
Yosemite National Park
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±0 0.4 0.8
Miles
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed
Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0014
Rte. 0221
Rte . 0
R
te. 0414
Rte. 0413
Rte. 0235
4-18
Area Map 2
Yosemite National Park
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±0 4 8
Miles
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed
Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
2A
2B Rte. 0419
Rte. 0402
Rte. 0223ZZ
Rt e.
Rt e.
Rte. 0016
Rte. 0 013
Rte. 0011
Rte. 0500
Rte. 0239 Rte. 0500
4-19
Area Map 2A
Yosemite National Park
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±0 0.5 1
Miles
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed
Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0439ZZ
Rte. 0500
Rte. 0500
Rte. 0012
Rte. 0429 Rte. 0214
Rte. 0213
Rte. 0206
R
te. 0431
Rte.
Rte. 0104ZZ
Rte. 0207
R te
.0
Rte. 0241
Rte. 0203ZZ
Rte. 0442 Rte. 0443 Rte. 0409ZZ
Rte. 0600ZZ Rte. 0400
Rt e.
4-20
Area Map 2B
Yosemite National Park
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±0 0.55 1.1
Miles
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed
Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
R te
. 0
Rte. 0210Z Z
Rte. 0215
Rte. 0212ZZ
Rte. 0211ZZRte. 0206
Rte. 0213 R
te. 0408
Rte. 0407
4-21
Area Map 3
Yosemite National Park
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±0 4 8
Miles
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed
Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rt e.
3A
3C3B Rte
.0
Rte. 0
Rte. 0013
Rte. 0232
Rte. 0248
Rte. 0404
Rte. 0226ZZ
Rte. 0421
Rte. 0013
4-22
Area Map 3A
Yosemite National Park
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±0 0.5 1
Miles
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed
Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0415C
Rte. 0421
Rt e.
1 3
Rte. 0224 Rte. 0415A
R te
. 0
5Z Z
Rte. 0415B
4-23
Area Map 3B
Yosemite National Park
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±0 0.5 1
Miles
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed
Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0410ZZ
Rt e.
Rte. 0412ZZRte. 0406
4-24
Area Map 3C
Yosemite National Park
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±0 0.4 0.8
Miles
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed
Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0422
Rte. 0603
Rt e.
Rte. 0406
Rte. 0441
Rte. 01
Rte. 0602ZZ
4-25
Area Map 4
Yosemite National Park
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±0 4 8
Miles
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed
Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
4A
Rte. 0240
Rte. 0233
4-26
Area Map 4A
Yosemite National Park
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±0 0.5 1
Miles
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed
Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rt e.
Rte. 0242
Rte. 0233
Rt e.
Rte. 0231ZZ
4-27
Area Map 5
Yosemite National Park
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±0 5 10
Miles
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed
Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rt e.
5A
Rte.
ZZ
4-28
Area Map 5A
Yosemite National Park
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±0 1 2
Miles
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed
Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0416
Rte. 0017
Rte. 0230
Rte. 0229ZZ
4-29
Area Map 6
Yosemite National Park
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±0 2 4
Miles
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed
Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0420
Rt e.
4-30
Section 5 Paved Road Condition Rating Sheets
Surface Type:
Inspection Date:
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0011: EL CAPITAN CROSSOVER (EL CAPITAN BRIDGE ROAD)
2 2
0.39
6/24/2015 0.39
ASPHALT
24.4 9.9
24.4 9.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
100100 100100
Data Collection Vehicle (DCV) Rating
5-1
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0012: SENTINEL DRIVE (SENTINEL BRIDGE ROAD)
2 2
0.31
6/25/2015 0.31
ASPHALT
23.4 9.8
23.4 9.8
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5-2
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0013: BIG OAK FLAT ROAD
2 2
1 2 3 4 1 1 1 1
6/26/2015 18.04
ASPHALT
24.2 10.6
22.5 10.3
23.1 10.8
22.4 10.3
22.9 10.8
23.7 10.1
100100100100100100 95989910010096
5-3
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0013: BIG OAK FLAT ROAD
2 2
6 7 8 9 1 1 1 1
6/26/2015 18.04
ASPHALT
24.2 10.6
23.7 9.8
23.7 10.2
24.7 9.5
23.5 9.8
27.5 11.8
1009999100100100 958581979496
5-4
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0013: BIG OAK FLAT ROAD
2 2
11 12 13 14 1 1 1 1
6/26/2015 18.04
ASPHALT
24.2 10.6
24.3 11.2
23.6 10.9
24.3 11.2
24.5 10.9
10.7
100100100100100100 100991001009996
5-5
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0013: BIG OAK FLAT ROAD
2 2
16 17 18 1 1 0.04
6/26/2015 18.04
ASPHALT
24.2 10.6
10.8
29.4 11.4
23.8 10.7
100100100100100 10098989896
5-6
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0014: WAWONA ROAD
2 2
1 2 3 4 1 1 1 1
6/25/2015 27.05
ASPHALT
24.1 10.4
24.9 10.7
23.4 10.6
23.7 10.3
23.9 10.6
23.8 10.5
100100100958899 1001001009694100
5-7
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0014: WAWONA ROAD
2 2
6 7 8 9 1 1 1 1
6/25/2015 27.05
ASPHALT
24.1 10.4
26.7 10.9
24.3
23.8 9.7
23.8 10.2
24.5
10010010010010099 100100100100100100
5-8
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0014: WAWONA ROAD
2 2
11 12 13 14 1 1 1 1
6/25/2015 27.05
ASPHALT
24.1 10.4
24.2 10.4
23.7
23.4
10.4
23.9 10.7
10010010010010099 100100100100100100
5-9
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0014: WAWONA ROAD
2 2
16 17 18 19 1 1 1 1
6/25/2015 27.05
ASPHALT
24.1 10.4
23.7 10.5
24.4 10.7
24.2 10.3
23.5 10.3
10.1
10010010010010099 100100100100100100
5-10
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0014: WAWONA ROAD
2 2
21 22 23 24 1 1 1 1
6/25/2015 27.05
ASPHALT
24.1 10.4
23.8 10.5
23.5 9.8
23.2
23.9 10.2
24.7 10.1
10010010010010099 100100100100100100
5-11
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0014: WAWONA ROAD
2 2
26 27 1 0.05
6/25/2015 27.05
ASPHALT
24.1 10.4
24.5 10.6
23.3 9.8
36.5 11.1
10010010099 100100100100
5-12
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0015: GLACIER POINT ROAD
2 2
1 2 3 4 1 1 1 1
6/25/2015 15.72
ASPHALT
21.2 8.8
22.1 9.3
21.7 9.2
21.3 8.8
21.7
21.1 8.8
10010010010010095 1009910010010075
5-13
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0015: GLACIER POINT ROAD
2 2
6 7 8 9 1 1 1 1
6/25/2015 15.72
ASPHALT
21.2 8.8
20.7 8.9
21.3 8.9
21.1 8.9
21.3 9.1
20.6 8.6
999810010010095 556978819475
5-14
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0015: GLACIER POINT ROAD
2 2
11 12 13 14 1 1 1 1
6/25/2015 15.72
ASPHALT
21.2 8.8
20.8 8.5
8.1
22.7 8.9
22.4 9.2
19.9 8.7
1009692855595 923359441275
5-15
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0015: GLACIER POINT ROAD
2 2
0.72
6/25/2015 15.72
ASPHALT
21.2 8.8
19.7 8.2
10095
5-16
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0016: EL PORTAL ROAD
2 2
1 2 3 4 1 1 1 1
6/24/2015 7.64
ASPHALT
25.6 10.4
25.8 10.3
25.9 10.2
28.1 10.9
25.8 10.3
24.9 10.2
100100100100100100 1001009999100100
5-17
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0016: EL PORTAL ROAD
2 2
6 7 1 0.64
6/24/2015 7.64
ASPHALT
25.6 10.4
25.2 10.3
26.5 10.7
21.4 9.9
100100100100 10099100100
5-18
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0017: TIOGA ROAD
2 2
1 2 3 4 1 1 1 1
6/29/2015 46.71
ASPHALT
8.9
22.3 10.2
22.3 9.3
22.5 9.3
22.2 9.3
20.8 8.9
100100100100100100 10010010010010097
5-19
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0017: TIOGA ROAD
2 2
6 7 8 9 1 1 1 1
6/29/2015 46.71
ASPHALT
8.9
20.8 8.9
20.5 8.4
8.8
20.9 8.3
20.7 8.4
100100100100100100 10010010010010097
5-20
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0017: TIOGA ROAD
2 2
11 12 13 14 1 1 1 1
6/29/2015 46.71
ASPHALT
8.9
21.6
21.6 8.9
21.1
20.7 8.5
20.9
100100100100100100 10010010010010097
5-21
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0017: TIOGA ROAD
2 2
16 17 18 19 1 1 1 1
6/29/2015 46.71
ASPHALT
8.9
8.7
9.3
24.3 9.2
24.9 9.1
24.2 9.4
1009910010098100 949898969397
5-22
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0017: TIOGA ROAD
2 2
21 22 23 24 1 1 1 1
6/29/2015 46.71
ASPHALT
8.9
23.4 8.9
22.5 8.6
8.9
21.9
10010099100100100 988998979297
5-23
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Yosemite National Park
ROUTE 0017: TIOGA ROAD
2 2
26 27 28 29 1 1 1 1
6/29/2015 46.71
ASPHALT
8.9
21.4 9.2
20.6 8.5
8.7
21.4
23.4 9.1
100100100100100100 979795989497
5-24
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it.