DRFP Atch 2 ITO.pdf

ADDENDUM TO

52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS (ITO)

- COMMERCIAL ITEMS

FOR

INTEGRATED BASE DEFENSE SECURITY SYSTEMS (IBDSS)

IDIQ

DRAFT SOLICITATION NO. FA564120R0008

1.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

This is a best value source selection conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation

(FAR) 15.3 as supplemented.

1.1 Proposal Compliance. To ensure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, each Offeror must follow these instructions and the Offeror's proposal shall include all data and information requested by this Instructions to Offerors (ITO) and shall be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offer shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the Request for Proposal (RFP) Letter, the

Performance Work Statement (PWS), Model Contract, and all other parts of this solicitation. If a proposal fails to conform to the instructions provided in this ITO, it may be deemed non-responsive and the Offeror may be deemed ineligible for award.

Offerors are NOT permitted to take exception to any terms and conditions within the RFP.

1.2 Proposal Clarity. The proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. Offerors shall assume that the

Government has no prior knowledge of their experience and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the Offeror's proposal.

Offerors shall not submit elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed artwork, or other embellishments.

1.3 RFP Discrepancies. If an Offeror believes that any portion of this solicitation contains a perceived error, omission, or is otherwise unclear, the Offeror shall immediately contact the Procuring

Contracting Officer (PCO) and Contract Specialist via e-mail, clearly describing the portion of the solicitation in question and the impact the discrepancy or ambiguity has on the Offeror’s ability to prepare their proposal. Questions pertaining to the proposal shall be submitted no later than the date and time identified in Paragraph 1.4 below.

1.4 Point of Contact. The PCO is the sole point of contact for this acquisition. Offerors shall address any questions and concerns to the PCO as soon as possible, but no later than 0900 Central European

Summer Time (CEST), (Insert Date). The subject of the email shall be “Questions – FA564120R0008”.

Questions shall include a reference to the specific solicitation element to which they pertain. The

Government will take into consideration all questions submitted by the deadline set forth above and will answer them via posting to beta.sam.gov. Written requests for clarification and questions shall be sent to the PCO, Mr. Tom Collins at thomas.collins.16.de@us.af.mil. A courtesy copy shall be sent to the Contract Specialist, Ms. Christin Grub at christin.grub.de@us.af.mil.

1.5 Communications. All exchanges of source selection information between the Government and the

Offerors will be controlled by the PCO. Source selection information will be transmitted to Offerors electronically (e.g via email, or DoD SAFE site (https://safe.apps.mil/)). If transmitted via email, the transmission shall be sent and received encrypted and must include “Source Selection Information –

See FAR 2.101& 3.104” in the Subject line.

1.6 Electronic Reference Documents. All referenced documents for this solicitation can be found on beta.sam.gov, the authoritative source for Government Contract Opportunities. Offerors are encouraged to subscribe for real-time email notifications when information has been posted to the website for this solicitation. Offerors may contact the PCO if they are unable to locate any of the referenced material.

mailto:thomas.collins.16.de@us.af.mil mailto:christin.grub.de@us.af.mil https://safe.apps.mil/

1.7 Proposal Records. In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.8 (Government Contract Files), the Government will retain one copy of all proposals.

1.8 Debriefings. The PCO will promptly notify Offerors of any decision to exclude them from the source selection; whereupon, the Offeror may request and receive a debriefing in accordance with FAR 15.505.

Offerors desiring a debriefing shall make their request in accordance with the requirements of FAR

15.505 or 15.506, as applicable. Offerors are entitled to no more than one debriefing.

1.9 Page Format.

1.9.1 Page Limitations. Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. If exceeded, the excess pages will not be read or considered the excess pages in the evaluation of the proposal. Each page shall be counted except the following: cover pages, tables of contents, tables or drawings, tabs, blank pages, glossaries, cross reference matrices, and document revision history tracking records. The

Government may place page limitations on responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs), if ENs are determined necessary.

1.9.2 Page Size and Format

1.9.2.1 General Page Instructions. A page is defined as each face of a sheet of paper containing information. Page size shall be 8.5 x 11 inches unless stated otherwise within this document. Pages shall be single spaced, and the text size shall be no less than 11 point Times New Roman or Arial

Font unless stated otherwise within this document. All proposal text shall be written in English.

Offerors shall use at least 1 inch margins on the top and bottom and ¾-inch side margins unless stated otherwise within this document. Pages shall be numbered sequentially by volume, with each volume starting at page one. Pages that do not count towards the page limitation shall be numbered in a manner that clearly identifies the page as a page that does not count toward the page limitation.

These page size and format restrictions shall apply to responses to ENs if clarifications are determined necessary.

1.9.2.2 Table and Chart Instructions. Legible tables and charts may be used. These displays shall be uncomplicated, legible, and shall not exceed 11 x 17 inches in size. 11 x 17 may only be used for large tables and charts; they shall not be used for pages of text. For tables and charts, the text shall be no less than 10 point Times New Roman or Arial Font, and margins shall be no less than ½ inch on all sides unless stated otherwise within this document. An 11 x 17 inch page, as authorized under this section, will count as one page.

1.9.2.3 Submission Format. The Offeror shall submit each volume in electronic format. The proposal shall be submitted in a format readable by Microsoft (MS) Office Word 2016, MS Office Excel

2016 or Adobe PDF. Offerors shall use separate folders for each proposal volume. Offerors shall also use separate electronic files for each proposal section listed in Table 1 to permit rapid location of all portions of the proposal. Exhibits, annexes, and attachments which are provided in support of a section shall be included in the electronic file for that section. Offerors shall provide each work sample as a single separate electronic file. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program shall be included.

1.9.2.4 Proposal Markings. Proposals shall be marked in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(e), Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data, and FAR 3.104-4, Disclosure, Protection, and Marking of

Contractor Bid or Proposal Information and Source Selection Information. Offerors shall not include proprietary markings on attachments and documents that will become a part of the contract

(i.e. Volume IV documents).

1.9.3 Cross-Referencing. To the greatest extent possible, each volume shall be written on a stand-alone basis so that its contents may be evaluated with no cross referencing to other volumes of the proposal.

Information required for proposal evaluation which is not found in its designated volume and/or section will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal. Cross-referencing within a proposal volume is permitted where its use would conserve space without impairing clarity.

1.9.4 Table of Content. Each volume shall contain a more detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume. Tables of content do not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.

1.9.5 Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms. Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, and with an explanation for each. Glossaries do not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.

1.10 Teaming Arrangements. Offerors submitting a proposal as the prime Offeror in response to this solicitation are not permitted to submit a separate proposal under which they would be a Subcontractor, or team member to another prime. Subcontractors are permitted to support multiple primes.

1.11 Use of Non-Government Advisors. Data submitted to the Government in response to this solicitation will not be released to individual(s) who work as non-Government advisors.

2.0 PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

2.1 Proposal Due Date. Proposal are due by 0900 Central European Summer Time, (insert date). Proposal submissions for this solicitation will be delivered electronically via email or the DoD SAFE site

(https://safe.apps.mil/); no paper copies are required or will be accepted. Timely receipt of proposals is the sole responsibility of the offeror.

All offerors intending to submit a proposal in response to this solicitation via email submissions need to be addressed to the PCO, Mr. Tom Collins at thomas.collins.16.de@us.af.mil, and the Contract

Specialist (CS), Ms. Christin Grub at christin.grub.de@us.af.mil. The email request shall include the name of the company, point of contact, phone number and email address. All volumes of a proposal shall be sent to the PCO and Contract Specialist as identified in this section. It is the offeror’s responsibility to follow up with the contracting officer if they do not receive a confirmation receipt.

Proposals received after the proposal due date will be considered late.

All offerors intending to submit a proposal in response to this solicitation via DoD SAFE shall request a DoD SAFE link no later than (insert date and time) via email addressed to the PCO, Mr. Tom Collins at thomas.collins.16.de@us.af.mil, and the CS, Ms. Christin Grub at christin.grub.de@us.af.mil. The email request shall include the name of the company, point of contact, phone number and email address.

It is the offeror’s responsibility to follow up with the contracting officer if they do not receive a DoD

SAFE link. The DoD SAFE link will be valid for 14 days after receipt. Proposals received after the proposal due date will be considered late.

2.2 Proposal Organization. The Offeror shall prepare the proposal as set forth in the Table 1, Proposal

Organization. The volume folders and section files shall be as defined in this table, all of which shall be within the required page limits specified in the table.

https://safe.apps.mil/ mailto:christin.grub.de@us.af.mil mailto:christin.grub.de@us.af.mil

Table 1 –Proposal Organization[GCDUU7C1]

VOL ITO SECTION VOLUME & SECTION TITLE PAGE LIMIT

I 2.3 Executive Summary

2.3.2 Offeror Company Information 2 Pages

2.3.3 Other Information

2.3.3.1 Financial/Other Resources No Page Limit

2.3.4 Organizational Conflict of Interest No Page Limit

II 2.4 Past Experience

2.4.1 Work Samples 60 Pages

2.4.2 Self-Scoring Matrix 1 Page

2.4.3 Cross Reference Matrix 20 Pages

2.4.4 Team Structure 2 Pages

2.4.4 Teaming Agreements 30 Pages

IV 2.6 Contract Documentation 90 Pages

NOTE: In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2305(a)(3)(C)(i), Cost/Price will be evaluated for each individual task order. As a result, Cost/Price information will not be requested within this proposal.

2.3 VOLUME I - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2.3.1 Volume 1 Organization. This volume shall be organized according to the Table 1 above.

2.3.2 Offeror Company Information. The Offeror shall complete Appendix A Offeror Company

Information Form. The Offeror shall provide all information on the form. The proposal validity statement shall be valid for 90 Days after proposal due date. The Offeror shall be registered in the

System for Award Management (SAM.gov) for the duration of the acquisition. If the Offeror’s

SAM.gov registration expires prior to the proposal validity date, the Offeror shall assert its intent to renew the registration.

2.3.3 Other Information. To assist the PCO in making the responsibility determination prior to contract award (in accordance with FAR 9.1, Responsible Prospective Contractors, as supplemented by the

DoD FAR Supplement (DFARS) 209.1), the Offer shall provide financial/other resource information.

2.3.3.1 Financial/Other Resources. In accordance with FAR 9.104-1(a), the Offeror shall provide a written statement explaining the Offeror’s ability to obtain required resources to perform the contract requirements. The Offeror shall also provide evidence to support the explanation.

Evidence may include official letter(s) from (a) financial institution(s) demonstrating that the

Offeror has the financial resources required to cover all financial commitment. In accordance with

FAR 9.104-1(e), the Offeror shall provide an explanation of the Offeror’s organizational controls and measures. At a minimum, the Offeror shall address their accounting controls, operational controls, quality assurance measures, and safety program. The Offeror shall also provide evidence to support the explanation. Evidence may include a list of organizational policies or Standard

Operating Procedures (SOPs) which demonstrates the organizational controls and measures of the

Offeror. If a list is provided, the Offeror shall include the title of each policy or SOP, the date of each document, and a brief description of each document. The Offeror shall also define which element of FAR 9.104-1(e) the policy or SOP applies to.

2.3.4 Organizational Conflict of Interest. Offerors shall submit an assessment of potential or actual

Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) issues, if any, as related to this contract vehicle and future work. Initial notification shall be made to the PCO and CS as soon as they become known. OCI issues include, but may not be limited to, the inability to render impartial assistance or advice to the

Government, the inability to objectively perform contract work, or the unfair competitive advantage created by current or previous contractual efforts with the Government. If an actual or potential OCI exists, the Offeror shall submit a mitigation plan with the proposal. The Contracting Officer will review the submitted mitigation plan and make a determination as to whether the plan adequately resolves the issues and provides adequate protection to both the Offeror and the Government.

Submission of mitigation plans are only required if the Offeror is aware of potential or actual OCI issues related to this procurement. If the Offeror believes no potential or actual OCI issues exist, this shall be so stated.

2.4 VOLUME II –PAST TECHNICAL EXPERIENCE

2.4.1 Work Samples. The Offeror shall submit a maximum of six (6) work samples (contracts/task orders) which demonstrate their past technical experience in the required elements, and which comply with the work sample qualifications established in 2.4.1.2 below. When referring to work samples, the terms “contract” and “task order” are interchangeable with “contract” often used as the all-encompassing term. IDIQ contracts, or other contract vehicles, are not acceptable proof of past experience, and shall not be provided as a work sample.

The work samples shall consist of only official contract documentation which may include

Performance Work Statements, Statements of Work, Contract Data Requirement Lists (CDRLs), Government Furnished Property Lists, Subcontracts, Invoices, etc. When contracts are used for work samples, the Offeror shall also include the signed cover page associated with the contract.

Work samples shall include sufficient information to substantiate each claim in the elements below.

If a work sample substantiates multiple elements, each element must be identified within the work sample. The Offeror shall not create any new documentation, such as project narratives, or project descriptions. Offerors shall only provide official contract documentation.

Offerors shall give each work samples an identifier (i.e. WS1-WS6). All pages within the work samples shall be numbered. Work samples shall be provided in their original format. Font, text size, and margin requirements established in Sections 1.9.2.1 and 1.9.2.2 do not apply to work sample submissions. Work samples shall be in English.

2.4.1.1 Work Sample Cover Sheet. A Work Sample Cover Sheet (Appendix B), shall be completed for each work sample submitted. Offerors shall follow the instructions provided within Appendix B.

Each work sample shall provide at least two (2) Government Points of Contact (POC). The

Government may contact the Government POC’s provided. The Government reserves the right to contact additional Government POCs if necessary.

2.4.1.2 Work Sample Qualifications. Work samples shall meet these minimum qualifications.

(1) Shall be a United States Government Department of Defense (DoD) contract, unless otherwise specified in Sections 2.4.2.1 – 2.4.2.8.

(2) Shall fall into one of the following categories as specified within each element:

a. Category 1: Prime Offeror work samples shall be used. In order to be used, the Offeror shall have acted as the Prime Contractor, which may include work performed as part of a joint venture. If a company establishes a joint venture for this contract, work of either prime company may be utilized. Primes may also include subsidiaries or legal entities which fall under the parent corporation. In order to use a subsidiary or legal entity as a prime work sample, (1) the acquisition of the subsidiary or legal entity shall have been finalized as of the date of the RFP Letter, and (2) objective evidence shall be included in the work sample to demonstrate that they are now a legal entity of the corporation. If the criteria above are met, subsidiary or legal entity work samples will be considered prime work samples even if the work occurred prior to the company being acquired.

b. Category 2: Subcontractor work samples may be used. In order to meet this qualification, the Subcontractor shall: (1) be identified as a Subcontractor on the Team

Structure Form as required in Section 2.4.4; (2) have acted as the Prime Contractor; (3) provide a signed Teaming Agreement as required in Section 2.4.4, stating that the

Subcontractor will perform at least 20% of the work in the applicable performance area or location. (3) At least six months of performance shall have been within the last five years, as of the date of this RFP.

(3) At least six months of performance shall have been within the last five years, as of the date of this RFP.

(4) For work samples, the primary scope of work shall be designing and installing security systems.

Primary scope is defined as 51% or more of the work on the contract.

(5) For purposes of this solicitation, a Man Year (MY) is defined as a single full-time employee working 1,880 work hours per year. A combination of multiple employees’ hours totaling 1,880 hours does not meet this definition.[OIJNUA7S2]

2.4.2 Self-Scoring Matrix. The Offeror shall complete the Self- Scoring Matrix (Appendix D). Self-scores shall be verifiable using the work samples provided in response to Section 2.4.1. Note that some elements contain category restrictions.

The Offeror shall fill in the Column D “Offeror Response” column on the Self-Scoring Matrix.

The Offeror’s Weighted Score will be auto-calculated. Unless stated otherwise, the Offeror shall not change, adjust, or manipulate any other cells within the matrix. The Prime Offeror shall accurately rate itself using the scoring instructions for each element, which is described in Sections

2.4.2.1 – 2.4.2.13.

The burden of proof to substantiate the Offeror’s self-score rests with the Offeror. The proposal shall include evidence supporting each proposed self-score.

2.4.2.1 Do you have a current facility clearance at the TS/SCI level?

DEFINITION: The Offeror shall answer yes or no to this question.

CATEGORY RESTRICTIONS: None; Category 1 and Category 2 contracts are authorized.

SCORING: This element is a pass/fail requirement. The Offeror must answer yes to be eligible for award.

2.4.2.2 Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems operations for OCONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts DEFINITION: Of the work samples submitted, the Offeror shall rate itself based on the sum of the number of MYs of technical personnel performing electronic systems operations for a DOD, MoD, or FMS service contract for each of the past five years. Offerors shall review PWS paragraph 2.2 for descriptions of systems operations. Offerors shall review paragraphs 2.4.2.6 and

2.4.2.7 below for the definitions of major electronic systems and minor electronic systems.

CATEGORY RESTRICTIONS: None; Category 1 and Category 2 contracts are authorized.

SCORING: In order to receive the maximum points, the Offeror’s work samples shall demonstrate more than 160 MYs of systems operations. Multiple years on a single contract may be counted, as well as multiple work samples.

2.4.2.3 Total number of primary US EUCOM countries supported at DoD Installations

DEFINITION: Of the work samples submitted, the Offeror shall rate itself based on the total number of primary US EUCOM countries where the Offeror or team members performed environmental services at DoD Installations. The primary US EUCOM countries are (1) Germany,

(2) United Kingdom (UK), (3) Italy, (4) Portugal, (5) Spain and (6) Turkey.

CATEGORY RESTRICTIONS: None; Category 1 and Category 2 contracts are authorized.

SCORING: In order to receive the maximum points, the Offeror’s work samples shall demonstrate environmental services experience at DoD Installations within in all six (6) primary US EUCOM countries. A maximum of one point may be received for each of the primary US EUCOM country where environmental services projects were performed at DoD Installations. Offerors shall not receive extra points for providing multiple work samples which demonstrate past experience within the same country.

2.4.2.4 Total number of other US EUCOM countries supported at DoD installations number of other US EUCOM countries where the Offeror or team members performed environmental services at DoD Installations within the US EUCOM Area of Responsibility

(AOR). The other US EUCOM countries are: (1) Albania, (2) Andorra, (3) Armenia, (4)

Austria, (5) Azerbaijan, (6) Belarus, (7) Belgium, (8) Bosnia and Herzegovina, (9) Bulgaria,

(10) Croatia, (11) Cyprus, (12) Czech Republic, (13) Denmark, (14) Estonia, (15) Finland,

(16) France, (17) Georgia, (18) Greece, (19) Holy See (Vatican City), (20) Hungary, (21)

Iceland, (22) Ireland, (23) Israel, (24) Kosovo, (25) Latvia, (26) Liechtenstein, (27) Lithuania,

(28) Luxembourg, (29) Malta, (30) Moldova, (31) Monaco, (32) Montenegro, (33)

Netherlands, (34) Norway, (35) Poland, (36) Republic of Macedonia, (37) Romania, (38)

Russia, (39) San Marino, (40) Serbia, (41) Slovakia, (42) Slovenia, (43) Sweden, (44)

Switzerland, (45) Ukraine.

CATEGORY RESTRICTIONS: None; Category 1 and Category 2 contracts are authorized.

SCORING: In order to receive the maximum points, the Offeror’s work samples shall demonstrate environmental services experience at DoD Installations within the 45 other US

EUCOM countries listed above. A maximum of one point may be received for each of the 45 other US EUCOM countries where environmental services were performed at DoD Installations.

Offerors shall not receive extra points for providing multiple work samples which demonstrate past experience within the same country.

2.4.2.5 Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems maintenance for OCONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts DEFINITION: Of the work samples submitted, the Offeror shall rate itself based on the sum of the number of MYs of technical personnel electronic systems maintenance for an OCONUS

DOD, MoD, or FMS service contract for each of the past five years. Offerors shall review PWS paragraph 2.3 for descriptions of electronic systems maintenance. Offerors shall review paragraphs 2.4.2.6 and 2.4.2.7 below for the definitions of major electronic systems and minor electronic systems.

CATEGORY RESTRICTIONS: None; Category 1 and Category 2 contracts are authorized.

SCORING: In order to receive the maximum points, the Offeror’s work samples shall demonstrate more than 160 MYs of electronic systems maintenance. Multiple years on a single contract may be counted, as well as multiple work samples.

2.4.2.6 Number of OCONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS service contracts supported without SOFA status

DEFINITION: Of the work samples submitted, the Offeror shall rate itself based on the sum of the DoD, MoD, or FMS service contracts without SOFA status within the past five years. SOFA status is defined as being granted privileges under the North Atlantic Treaty Organization

(NATO) Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) or any supplements thereto while performing on a

DoD, FMS, or MoD contract in an allied nation.

CATEGORY RESTRICTIONS: None; Category 1 and Category 2 contracts are authorized.

SCORING: In order to receive the maximum points, the Offeror’s work samples shall demonstrate more than 4 contracts (OCONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS service contracts) supported without SOFA Status.

2.4.2.7 Number of OCONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS service contracts supported with SOFA status DEFINITION: Of the work samples submitted, the Offeror shall rate itself based on the sum of the

DoD, MoD, or FMS service contracts with SOFA status within of the past five years. SOFA status is defined as being granted privileges under the NATO SOFA or any supplements thereto while performing on a DoD, FMS, or MoD contract in an allied nation.

CATEGORY RESTRICTIONS: None; Category 1 and Category 2 contracts are authorized.

SCORING: In order to receive the maximum points, the Offeror’s work samples shall demonstrate more than 4 contracts (OCONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS service contracts) supported with SOFA

Status.

2.4.2.8 Total number of countries supported as Prime at a single point in time number of US EUCOM countries supported at a single point in time. The Offeror shall select and identify the calendar date chosen as the single point in time. The selected single point in time shall be the same calendar date for all work samples, and this point in time shall be within five (5) years of this RFP release date. The US EUCOM countries are listed in paragraphs 2.4.2.3 (6 primary US

EUCOM countries), and 2.4.2.4 and 2.4.2.5 (45 other US EUCOM countries).

CATEGORY RESTRICTIONS: Yes; the Offeror shall only receive points for Category 1 work samples.

SCORING: In order to receive the maximum points, the Offeror’s work samples shall demonstrate experience in the 54 countries requested in paragraphs 2.4.2.3 (6 primary US EUCOM countries), and 2.4.2.4 and 2.4.2.5 (45 other US EUCOM countries). A maximum of one point may be received for each of the 54 countries listed in paragraphs 2.4.2.3 (6 primary US EUCOM countries), and 2.4.2.4 and 2.4.2.5 (45 other US EUCOM countries). Work performed at DoD

Installations and work performed at non-DoD work locations may be counted. Offerors shall not receive extra points for providing multiple work samples which demonstrate past experience within the same country.

2.4.2.9 Total number of environmental program areas supported as Prime at a single point in time number of environmental program areas supported at a single point in time. The Offeror shall select and identify the calendar date chosen as the single point in time. The selected single point in time shall be the same calendar date for all work samples, and this point in time shall be within five (5) years of this RFP release. The environmental program areas are listed in paragraphs

2.4.2.1 (10 primary environmental program areas) and 2.4.2.2 (18 secondary environmental program areas).

CATEGORY RESTRICTIONS: Yes; the Offeror shall only receive points for Category 1 work samples.

SCORING: In order to receive the maximum points, the Offeror’s work samples shall demonstrate experience in 28 environmental program areas listed in paragraphs 2.4.2.1 (10 primary environmental program areas) and 2.4.2.2 (18 secondary environmental program areas). A maximum of one point may be received for each environmental program area listed in paragraphs

2.4.2.1 (10 primary environmental program areas) and 2.4.2.2 (18 secondary environmental program areas). Work performed at DoD Installations and work performed at non-DoD work locations may be counted. Offerors shall not receive extra points for providing multiple work samples which demonstrate past experience within the same environmental program area.

2.4.3 Cross Reference Matrix. The Offeror shall provide a Cross Reference Matrix which clearly identifies the exact location of the substantiating data within the work samples. The Cross

Reference Matrix shall be completed using Appendix E – Cross Reference Matrix. The Offeror shall identify the type of document provided as a work sample in Column E. The Government has included a list of sample documents within column E; the Offeror is not limited to this list of documents. The Offeror shall include a work sample identifier (i.e., WS1-WS15), environmental program area or location, document title, document date, page(s), paragraph(s), table number(s) (if applicable), and block(s) (if applicable) within Column F. A reference shall be provided for each environmental program area or location in order to receive a point. Each environmental program area or location shall receive a separate reference. Multiple references may be included in a single row if an Offeror uses a subsidiary or legal entity as a prime work sample. If the Offeror uses a subsidiary or legal entity as a prime work sample the Offeror shall be sure to include a reference to the objective evidence which demonstrates that they are a legal entity of the parent corporation.

Offerors are encouraged to verify the accuracy of each reference

The Offeror shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of its capabilities, and experience.

2.4.3 Cross Reference Matrix. The Offeror shall provide a Cross Reference Matrix which clearly identifies the exact location of the substantiating data within the work samples. The Cross

Reference Matrix shall be completed using Appendix E - Cross Reference Matrix. The Offeror shall identify the type of document provided as a work sample in Column F. The Government has included a list of sample documents within column F; the Offeror is not limited to this list of documents. The Offeror shall include a work sample identifier (i.e., WS1-WS6), document title, document date, page(s), paragraph(s), table number(s) (if applicable), and block(s) (if applicable) within Column G. The Offerors shall identify the quantity of MYs, Systems, Operations, or

Contracts claimed for each Work Sample. Multiple references may be included in a single row if

(1) Multiple references related to the same work sample are necessary to substantiate the

Offeror’s claim, or;

(2) The Offeror uses the data of a subsidiary or legal entity as a prime work sample. If the

Offeror uses the data of a subsidiary or legal entity as a prime work sample, the Offeror shall be sure to include a reference to the objective evidence which demonstrates that they are a legal entity of the parent corporation.

Offerors are encouraged to verify the accuracy of each reference.

The Offeror shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of its capabilities and experience. Therefore, the Offeror shall include in column H, any clarifying facts necessary to improve the Government’s understanding and further substantiate the Offeror’s claim, such as coordinates of remotes sites named in the Reference Documents.[OIJNUA7S3]

2.4.4 Team Structure. The Offeror shall identify the team structure it will use to meet Government requirements in the Appendix I – Team Structure Format. The Offeror shall:

(1) Identify the team member’s company name, address, CAGE code, and DUNS number.

(2) Identify the relationship between the prime offeror and each team member.

(3) Identify the country(s) in which the prime intends on utilizing team member(s) for performance.

If multiple country(s) or region(s) are anticipated, list them all in a single cell.

(4) Identify the performance area(s) in which the prime intends on utilizing team member(s) for performance. If multiple performance areas are anticipated, list them all in a single cell. Performance areas shall be identified by listing the applicable PWS paragraph(s) and the PWS paragraph title(s).

The Offeror shall provide signed teaming agreements between the Prime Offeror and each team member. The teaming agreement shall identify the percentage of work to be performed in each program area, and shall identify the percentage of work to be performed in each location.

2.4.5 Burden of Proof. The burden of proof for substantiating points in the self-score system rests with the Offeror. The proposal shall contain sufficient data to substantiate the points claimed by the Offeror.

All proposal information is subject to verification by the Government. Falsification of any proposal submission, documents, or statements may be subject the Offeror to disqualification from this source selection.

Instruction to Offeror Section

Pass / Fail Questions Offeror Response

2.4.2.1 Do you have a current facility clearance at the TS/SCI level?

Instruction to Offeror Section

Element Offeror Response 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Weight Factor Max. Possible

Points Offeror’s Self- Score Points

Offeror's Weighted Score

Group 1A – Technical Staffing 20,000 0 0

2.4.2.2 Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems operations for CONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

Over 160 MY 121-160 MY 81-120 MY 41-80 MY 1-40 MY 0 MY 4 4,000 0 0

2.4.2.3 Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems operations for OCONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

Over 160 MY 121-160 MY 81-120 MY 41-80 MY 1-40 MY 0 MY 6 6,000 0 0

2.4.2.4 Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems maintenance for an CONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

Over 160 MY 121-160 MY 81-120 MY 41-80 MY 1-40 MY 0 MY 4 4,000 0 0

2.4.2.5 Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems maintenance for an OCONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

Over 160 MY 121-160 MY 81-120 MY 41-80 MY 1-40 MY 0 MY 6 6,000 0 0

Group 1B – Technical Expertise 20,000 0 0

2.4.2.6

Number of major electronic systems operated and maintained. A major electronic system is a multi-element electronic system with a higher level of complexity requiring specialized academic and hands on training for both operations and maintenance (e.g. AN/MST-T1A (MUTES), AN/MST- T1(V) (mini-MUTES), AN/VPQ-1 (TRTG), Multinational Aviation Live, Synthetic Blended Training System (MALTS), Joint Threat Emitter (JTE), Unmanned Threat Emitter (UMTE), Joint Deployable Electronic Warfare Range (JDEWR), other advanced emitter systems).

Greater than 20 16-20 11-15 6-10 1-5 0 12 12,000 0 0

2.4.2.7

Number of minor electronic systems operated and maintained. A minor electronic system is an electronic system with lower level of complexity that only requires on the job training for proper operational usage and minimal maintenance upkeep (e.g. Radar Warning Receiver (RWR), Radar Warning Transmitter (RWT), HARM Target Transmitter (HTT), Man-portable Aircraft Survivability Trainer (MAST), Mallina, Griffen, SMOKEY SAM, Weapons Effect Signature Simulator (WESS), metal decoys with rotating dish and heating elements, inflatable decoys, radios).

Greater than 100 76-100 51-75 26-50 1-25 0 8 8,000 0 0

Group 1C – Deployment / Remote Ops Expertise 7,000 0 0

2.4.2.8 Number of mobile operations supported Greater than 100 76-100 51-75 26-50 1-25 0 2 2,000 0 0

2.4.2.9 Number of contracts supporting geographically separated operating sites Greater than 4 4 3 2 1 0 3 3,000 0 0

2.4.2.10 Number of contracts that interface with other nations as part of the contract requirements

Greater than 4 4 3 2 1 0 2 2,000 0 0

Group 2 – Contract Transitions 7,000 0 0

2.4.2.11 Number of FTEs hired to support a DoD, MoD, or FMS service contract within the RFP allotted Phase-in Period

Greater than 100 76-100 51-75 26-50 1-25 0 3 3,000 0 0

2.4.2.12 Number of OCONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS service contracts supported without SOFA status

Greater than 4 4 3 2 1 0 2 2,000 0 0

2.4.2.13 Number of OCONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS service contracts supported with SOFA status

Greater than 4 4 3 2 1 0 2 2,000 0 0

Total 54,000 0 0

Appendix D

SELF-SCORING MATRIX

OFFEROR NAME: [FILL IN OFFEROR NAME HERE]

FA564120R0004

Appendix D

Self-Scoring Matrix

Instruction to Offeror Section Category

Maximum Self-Score

Points #

Quantity of MYs, Systems, Operations, or Contracts Claimed

Document Type ( Examples include: Contract Documentation (award document, Statement of Work, Performance Work Statement, CDRLs, GFP

List, Subcontract, Invoices, etc.)

2.4.2.2

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems operations for CONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

2.4.2.2

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems operations for CONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

2.4.2.2

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems operations for CONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

2.4.2.2

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems operations for CONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

2.4.2.2

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems operations for CONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

2.4.2.2

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems operations for CONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

2.4.2.3

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems operations for OCONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

2.4.2.3

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems operations for OCONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

Note: Below table includes one row per work sample. Multiple references may be included in a single row if multiple references related to the same work sample are necessary to substantiate the Offeror’s claim.

Appendix E

CROSS REFERENCE MATRIX

OFFEROR NAME: [FILL IN OFFEROR NAME HERE]

FA564120R0004

Appendix E

Cross Reference Matrix

Section Category

Maximum Self-Score

Points #

Quantity of MYs, Systems, Operations, or Contracts Claimed

Document Type ( Examples include: Contract Documentation (award document, Statement of Work, Performance Work Statement, CDRLs, GFP

List, Subcontract, Invoices, etc.)

2.4.2.3

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems operations for OCONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

2.4.2.3

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems operations for OCONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

2.4.2.3

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems operations for OCONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

2.4.2.3

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems operations for OCONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

2.4.2.4

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems maintenance for an CONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

2.4.2.4

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems maintenance for an CONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

2.4.2.4

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems maintenance for an CONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

2.4.2.4

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems maintenance for an CONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

2.4.2.4

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems maintenance for an CONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

2.4.2.4

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems maintenance for an CONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

FA564120R0004

Section Category

Maximum Self-Score

Points #

Quantity of MYs, Systems, Operations, or Contracts Claimed

Document Type ( Examples include: Contract Documentation (award document, Statement of Work, Performance Work Statement, CDRLs, GFP

List, Subcontract, Invoices, etc.)

2.4.2.5

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems maintenance for an OCONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

2.4.2.5

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems maintenance for an OCONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

2.4.2.5

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems maintenance for an OCONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

2.4.2.5

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems maintenance for an OCONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

2.4.2.5

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems maintenance for an OCONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

2.4.2.5

Number of MYs of technical personnel (technicians, field engineers, range specialists, engineers) providing electronic systems maintenance for an OCONUS DoD, MoD, or FMS contracts

2.4.2.6

Number of major electronic systems operated and maintained. A major electronic system is a multi-element electronic system with a higher level of complexity requiring specialized academic and hands on training for both operations and maintenance (e.g.

AN/MST-T1A (MUTES), AN/MST-T1(V)

(mini-MUTES), AN/VPQ-1 (TRTG), Multinational Aviation Live, Synthetic Blended Training System (MALTS), Joint Threat Emitter (JTE), Unmanned Threat Emitter (UMTE), Joint Deployable Electronic Warfare Range (JDEWR), other advanced emitter systems).

FA564120R0004

Section Category

Maximum Self-Score

Points #

Quantity of MYs, Systems, Operations, or Contracts Claimed

Document Type ( Examples include: Contract Documentation (award document, Statement of Work, Performance Work Statement, CDRLs, GFP

List, Subcontract, Invoices, etc.)

2.4.2.6

Number of major electronic systems operated and maintained. A major electronic system is a multi-element electronic system with a higher level of complexity requiring specialized academic and hands on training for both operations and maintenance (e.g.

AN/MST-T1A (MUTES), AN/MST-T1(V)

(mini-MUTES), AN/VPQ-1 (TRTG), Multinational Aviation Live, Synthetic Blended Training System (MALTS), Joint Threat Emitter (JTE), Unmanned Threat Emitter (UMTE), Joint Deployable Electronic Warfare Range (JDEWR), other advanced emitter systems).

2.4.2.6

Number of major electronic systems operated and maintained. A major electronic system is a multi-element electronic system with a higher level of complexity requiring specialized academic and hands on training for both operations and maintenance (e.g.

AN/MST-T1A (MUTES), AN/MST-T1(V)

(mini-MUTES), AN/VPQ-1 (TRTG), Multinational Aviation Live, Synthetic Blended Training System (MALTS), Joint Threat Emitter (JTE), Unmanned Threat Emitter (UMTE), Joint Deployable Electronic Warfare Range (JDEWR), other advanced emitter systems).

2.4.2.6

Number of major electronic systems operated and maintained. A major electronic system is a multi-element electronic system with a higher level of complexity requiring specialized academic and hands on training for both operations and maintenance (e.g.

AN/MST-T1A (MUTES), AN/MST-T1(V)

(mini-MUTES), AN/VPQ-1 (TRTG), Multinational Aviation Live, Synthetic Blended Training System (MALTS), Joint Threat Emitter (JTE), Unmanned Threat Emitter (UMTE), Joint Deployable Electronic Warfare Range (JDEWR), other advanced emitter systems).

12000

FA564120R0004

Section Category

Maximum Self-Score

Points #

Quantity of MYs, Systems, Operations, or Contracts Claimed

Document Type ( Examples include: Contract Documentation (award document, Statement of Work, Performance Work Statement, CDRLs, GFP

List, Subcontract, Invoices, etc.)

2.4.2.6

Number of major electronic systems operated and maintained. A major electronic system is a multi-element electronic system with a higher level of complexity requiring specialized academic and hands on training for both operations and maintenance (e.g.

AN/MST-T1A (MUTES), AN/MST-T1(V)

(mini-MUTES), AN/VPQ-1 (TRTG), Multinational Aviation Live, Synthetic Blended Training System (MALTS), Joint Threat Emitter (JTE), Unmanned Threat Emitter (UMTE), Joint Deployable Electronic Warfare Range (JDEWR), other advanced emitter systems).

2.4.2.6

Number of major electronic systems operated and maintained. A major electronic system is a multi-element electronic system with a higher level of complexity requiring specialized academic and hands on training for both operations and maintenance (e.g.

AN/MST-T1A (MUTES), AN/MST-T1(V)

(mini-MUTES), AN/VPQ-1 (TRTG), Multinational Aviation Live, Synthetic Blended Training System (MALTS), Joint Threat Emitter (JTE), Unmanned Threat Emitter (UMTE), Joint Deployable Electronic Warfare Range (JDEWR), other advanced emitter systems).

2.4.2.7

Number of minor electronic systems operated and maintained. A minor electronic system is an electronic system with lower level of complexity that only requires on the job training for proper operational usage and minimal maintenance upkeep (e.g. Radar Warning Receiver (RWR), Radar Warning Transmitter (RWT), HARM Target Transmitter (HTT), Man-portable Aircraft Survivability Trainer (MAST), Mallina, Griffen, SMOKEY SAM, Weapons Effect Signature Simulator (WESS), metal decoys with rotating dish and heating elements, inflatable decoys, radios).

FA564120R0004

Section Category

Maximum Self-Score

Points #

Quantity of MYs, Systems, Operations, or Contracts Claimed

Document Type ( Examples include: Contract Documentation (award document, Statement of Work, Performance Work Statement, CDRLs, GFP

List, Subcontract, Invoices, etc.)

2.4.2.7

Number of minor electronic systems operated and maintained. A minor electronic system is an electronic system with lower level of complexity that only requires on the job training for proper operational usage and minimal maintenance upkeep (e.g. Radar Warning Receiver (RWR), Radar Warning Transmitter (RWT), HARM Target Transmitter (HTT), Man-portable Aircraft Survivability Trainer (MAST), Mallina, Griffen, SMOKEY SAM, Weapons Effect Signature Simulator (WESS), metal decoys with rotating dish and heating elements, inflatable decoys, radios).

2.4.2.7

Number of minor electronic systems operated and maintained. A minor electronic system is an electronic system with lower level of complexity that only requires on the job training for proper operational usage and minimal maintenance upkeep (e.g. Radar Warning Receiver (RWR), Radar Warning Transmitter (RWT), HARM Target Transmitter (HTT), Man-portable Aircraft Survivability Trainer (MAST), Mallina, Griffen, SMOKEY SAM, Weapons Effect Signature Simulator (WESS), metal decoys with rotating dish and heating elements, inflatable decoys, radios).

2.4.2.7

Number of minor electronic systems operated and maintained. A minor electronic system is an electronic system with lower level of complexity that only requires on the job training for proper operational usage and minimal maintenance upkeep (e.g. Radar Warning Receiver (RWR), Radar Warning Transmitter (RWT), HARM Target Transmitter (HTT), Man-portable Aircraft Survivability Trainer (MAST), Mallina, Griffen, SMOKEY SAM, Weapons Effect Signature Simulator (WESS), metal decoys with rotating dish and heating elements, inflatable decoys, radios).

FA564120R0004

Section Category

Maximum Self-Score

Points #

Quantity of MYs, Systems, Operations, or Contracts Claimed

Document Type ( Examples include: Contract Documentation (award document, Statement of Work, Performance Work Statement, CDRLs, GFP

List, Subcontract, Invoices, etc.)

2.4.2.7

Number of minor electronic systems operated and maintained. A minor electronic system is an electronic system with lower level of complexity that only requires on the job training for proper operational usage and minimal maintenance upkeep (e.g. Radar Warning Receiver (RWR), Radar Warning Transmitter (RWT), HARM Target Transmitter (HTT), Man-portable Aircraft Survivability Trainer (MAST), Mallina, Griffen, SMOKEY SAM, Weapons Effect Signature Simulator (WESS), metal decoys with rotating dish and heating elements, inflatable decoys, radios).

2.4.2.7

Number of minor electronic systems operated and maintained. A minor electronic system is an electronic system with lower level of complexity that only requires on the job training for proper operational usage and minimal maintenance upkeep (e.g.