Draft SOW-2-5-21.pdf

STATEMENT OF WORK

Submarine High Data Rate (SubHDR) Titanium Mast Tube (Mechanical Inspection/Refurbishment/Repair/Fabrication)

PR No. 1300888573/N66604-21-RFPREQ-NPT-34-0011

1.0 BACKGROUND

The Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division, Newport (NUWCDIVNPT) Code 34 is designated as the National Maintenance Center (NMC) for the Submarine High Data Rate (SubHDR) Mast Group System, per the Naval Warfare Systems Command (NAVWAR) Program Executive Office Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (PEO C4I) Undersea Communications & Integration Program Office (PMW770), the Participating Acquisition Resource Manager (PARM). The SubHDR NMC conducts maintenance and repair of SubHDR Masts, establishes and maintains a rotatable pool of Ready for Issue (RFI) SubHDR Masts, and implements engineering changes into SubHDR Masts to enhance the life of the system.

1.1 Places of Performance

The work specified herein shall be performed at the contractor's facility.

1.2 Authorized Users

The NUWCDIVNPT Electromagnetic Systems Department, Code 34.

1.3 Sponsors

Code 34 Sponsors anticipated to fund Delivery Orders (DO) under this contract:

• Naval Warfare Systems Command (NAVWAR) PEO C4I, PMW 770/170

• US Submarine Fleet Maintenance Activity U.S. Fleet Forces Command (COMSUBFOR

N4)

• Foreign Military SubHDR partners

1.4 Types of Funding

• Operations and Maintenance, Navy (O&MN)

• Shipbuilding and Conversion (SCN)

• Other Procurement, Navy (OPN)

• Foreign Military Sales (FMS)

2.0 SCOPE

This Statement of Work (SOW) sets forth the contractor responsibilities for inspection, refurbishment, repair, and fabrication of the SubHDR Titanium Mast Tube (herein after referred to as the Mast Tube) in support of NUWCDIVNPT Code 34 Submarine High Data Rate (SubHDR) National Maintenance Center.

The contractor shall perform the following Mast Tube Tasks:

• Mast Tube mechanical evaluation, dimensional verification andtesting inspection

• Replacement of all external Mast Tube hardware components

• Removal and reapplication of Tiodized coating on all returned Mast Tubes

• Estimates for repair of any damaged Mast Tubes.

• Provide services to repair damaged Mast Tubes to original production drawing specifications

• Provide services to fabricate titanium Mast Tubes to original production drawing specifications

3.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

The contractor shall perform the tasking required in Section 4.0 in accordance with the below Applicable Documents.

NUMBER TITLE TASK

NUMBER

3.1 SubHDR Drawing G745259 All

3.2 SAE-AMS-2488-Type 2 Anodic treatment- Titanium

Alloys 4.2, 4.4

3.3 Titanium Fabrication Corporation (TiFAB) – SubHDR

Mast Tube Repair Checklist

4.1, 4.3

4.0 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS

As specific needs are identified, Delivery Orders (DO) will be issued to initiate work. DOs will be issued on a Firm Fixed Price basis.

In accordance with the Applicable Documents (ADs) listed in Section 3.0, the contractor shall provide the services below.

4.1 Task 1- (Mechanical Inspection and Evaluation)

The contractor shall conduct a mechanical inspection on returned Mast Tube’s. Evaluations shall include:

• Mast Tube dimensional verification and testing, evaluation, and inspection

• Provide a firm fixed price quote (excluding restoration costs) to repair damaged Mast

Tubes. Repairs are ordered at the government’s discretion under Task 4.3.

Mast Tube Serial Numbers are provided to the vendor by the government COR via e- mail prior to shipment to the vendor.

Deliverable: CDRL A001 – DI-MISC-80508B, Inspection & Evaluation Summary (IES) Report.

4.2 Task 2- (Restoration)

The contractor shall perform Mast Tube restoration on mast tubes. Services shall include the following:

• Removal, (Stripping) of external anodized (Tiodized) coating on all Mast Tubes.

• Reapplication or re-anodizing of (Tiodized) coating on all Mast Tubes

• Replacement of all external small hardware in accordance with SubHDR

DrawingG745259

Deliverable: CDRL A002 – DI-MISC-80508B, Restoration Services Summary (RSS) Report.

4.3 Task 3- (Repair of Structurally Damaged Mast Tubes)

Upon Government approval of the IES report and if any corrective actions are recommended, the Government will issue a separate DO for the repair of a damaged Mast Tube. In accordance with the contractor’s repair procedures, SubHDR Drawing G745259, and specifications current at the time of repair and upon receipt of the DO, the contractor shall repair the Mast Tube.

Deliverable: CDRL A003 – DI-MISC-80508B, Repair Activity Summary (RAS) Report.

4.4 Task 4- (Fabrication of Mast Tubes)

The contractor shall fabricate, test, and deliver new and conforming titanium Mast Tubes\ and internal contractor Acceptance Test data Sheets, drawings, specifications, processes, and procedures.

Deliverable: CDRL A004 – DI-MISC-80508B, Product Inspection & Acceptance (PIA) Report.

5.0 Progress Reports

The Contractor shall prepare a Contractor’s Status Report that provides the progress of work, status of the project(s), and existing or potential problem areas for all assigned tasks. The Contractor shall submit the Contract Status Report for the same timeframe as each invoice submitted in the Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) Module of the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment

(PIEE).

Deliverable: CDRL A005 – DI-MGMT-81991, Contract Status Report

6.0 Quality Surveillance & Performance Standards

The Government will conduct quality surveillance via various methods including formal and informal meetings, review of technical reports, review of monthly progress reports, and review of deliverables.

Contractor performance will be evaluated in the areas of technical quality, cost control, schedule/timeliness, management, utilization of small business, and regulatory compliance as follows:

• Technical Quality: The government will evaluate technical quality using the criteria defined in the Performance Requirements Summary Table (PRST), Attachment TBD;

• Cost Control: The government will evaluate the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling actual costs in comparison to negotiated costs;

• Schedule/Timeliness: The government will evaluate the contractor’s ability to meet negotiated milestones and delivery schedules;

• Management: The government will evaluate the contractor’s ability to integrate and coordinate all activities needed to execute the contract/delivery order;

• Compliance: The government will evaluate the contractor’s compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract/delivery order relating to applicable regulations and code.