DRAFT_Sections LM - CSOF SBIR Phase III_DRAFT.docx
DOCX document 99 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Combat System of the Future (CSoF)
- Solicitation number
- N66604-26-R-0494
About this file
This is a draft solicitation document (Section L - Instructions and Section M - Evaluation) for a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) and Cost Only Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract to be awarded on a sole source basis to Mikel, Inc. by the Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division, Newport (NUWCDIVNPT). The requirement is to further develop, assess, integrate, and enhance the submarine Combat System of the Future (CSoF) across current and future submarine platforms, applying advanced system engineering, software and hardware development, modeling and simulation, testing and evaluation, cyber and integrated logistics support. The contract is anticipated to require 537,600 labor hours over a five-year period of performance, with an estimated award date of January 31, 2027. The NAICS code is 541715 with a 1,000-employee size standard. The solicitation will be posted by the end of September 2026 under RFP # N66604-26-R-0494.
Proposals must be submitted through the PIEE Solicitation Module by the specified closing date and organized into four volumes: Cover Letter/Fill-Ins, Pass/Fail Requirements (facility clearances, personnel clearance plans, OCI mitigation, GFP management, software development plan, and CMMC UIDs), Cost/Price, and Key Personnel. Offerors must provide detailed cost proposals including labor rates substantiated by payroll documentation, a material estimate of $7,504,205 and travel estimate of $1,271,170, and complete cost narratives addressing subcontractors, labor categories per Government-specified eCRAFT standards, indirect rates, and other direct costs. Pass/Fail evaluation criteria include facility and safeguarding clearances per DD Form 254, personnel clearance acquisition plans, organizational conflict of interest mitigation, government property management systems, software development approach and experience, and CMMC certification UIDs. The Government will conduct cost realism analysis per FAR 15.404-3 and may use independent cost estimates, historical data, and other sources to establish fair and reasonable pricing. Proposals failing any pass/fail criteria or submitted after the closing date will be rejected.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| DRAFT_CSoF PWS_DRAFT.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SECTION L - INSTRUCTION, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT
L-204-H003 NOTIFICATION OF USE OF NAVY SUPPORT CONTRACTORS FOR OFFICIAL CONTRACT FILES (NAVSEA) (APR 2019)
(a) NAVSEA may use a contractor to manage official contract files hereinafter referred to as "the support contractor", including the official file supporting this procurement. These official files may contain information that is considered a trade secret, proprietary, business sensitive or otherwise protected pursuant to law or regulation, hereinafter referred to as “protected information”. File management services consist of any of the following: secretarial or clerical support; data entry; document reproduction, scanning, imaging, or destruction; operation, management, or maintenance of paper-based or electronic mail rooms, file rooms, or libraries; and supervision in connection with functions listed herein.
(b) The cognizant Contracting Officer will ensure that any NAVSEA contract under which these file management services are acquired will contain a requirement that
(1) The support contractor not disclose any information,
(2) Individual employees are to be instructed by the support contractor regarding the sensitivity of the official contract files,
(3) The support contractor performing these services be barred from providing any other supplies and/or services, or competing to do so, to NAVSEA for the period of performance of its contract and for an additional three years thereafter unless otherwise provided by law or regulation; and,
(4) In addition to any other rights the Offeror may have, it is a third party beneficiary who has the right of direct action against the support contractor, or any person to whom the support contractor has released or disclosed Protected Information, for the unauthorized duplication, release, or disclosure of such Protected Information.
(c) Submission of a proposal will be considered as consent to NAVSEA's permitting access to any information, irrespective of restrictive markings or the nature of the information submitted, by its file management support contractor for the limited purpose of executing its file support contract responsibilities.
(d) NAVSEA may, without further notice, enter into contracts with other contractors for these services. Offerors are free to enter into separate non-disclosure agreements with the file support contractor. Contact the Procuring Contracting Officer for contractor specifics. However, any such agreement will not be considered a prerequisite before information submitted is stored in the files or otherwise encumber the Government.
*Note: For the purposes of SeaPort-NxG, Octo Consulting, the software provider/portal maintainer, is the sole contractor who, in the course of trouble-shooting, could have access to the official contract files maintained within the portal.
L-209-H009 NOTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL ORGANIZATIONAL OR PERSONAL CONFLICT(S) OF INTEREST (NAVSEA) (APR 2022)
(a) Offerors are reminded that certain existing contractual arrangements may preclude, restrict or limit participation, in whole or in part, either as a subcontractor or as a prime contractor under this competitive procurement. Of primary concern are those contractual arrangements in which the Offeror provides support to NUWCDIVNPT Code 25 Combat Control System (CCS) and Weapon Launch System (WLS) development which include sub systems integrated with BYG-1 for Payload Control System (PCS) and Tactical Control System (TCS); the Submarine Warfare Federated Tactical Systems (SWFTS) and specifically the Common Infrastructure Service (CIS) development, in support of operation of the office or any of its programs. General guidance may be found in FAR 9.505; however, this guidance is not all-inclusive. The Offeror's attention is directed to the "Organizational Conflict of Interest" (OCI) or similar requirement which may be contained in current or completed contract(s) which prohibits the prime or subcontractor from providing certain supplies or services to the Government as described above during the period of the current "support" contract(s) or for a period after completion of the "support" contract(s). Notwithstanding the existence or non-existence of an OCI or similar requirement in current or completed contract(s), the Offeror shall comply with FAR subpart 9.5 and identify whether an OCI exists and not rely solely on the presence of an OCI or similar requirement.
(b) Offerors also are reminded that certain potential conflicts of interest may arise where an Offeror has unequal access to nonpublic information about a competitor that may provide the Offeror with an unfair competitive advantage and preclude, restrict or limit participation, in whole or in part, either of the individual, subcontractor or prime contractor under this competitive procurement. For example, a potential conflict may arise if former Department of Navy employee(s), subcontractors, or teaming partners of the Offeror may have gained access to nonpublic information about a competitor through participation in previous or ongoing performance or during the solicitation development/source selection process associated with this competitive procurement, and then participates in the formation of the Offeror’s proposal. Other potential conflicts of interest may arise where either the former Department of Navy employee(s), subcontractors, or teaming partners of the Offeror under this competitive procurement set the ground rules for competition; for example, by drafting specifications or assisting in the drafting of the statement of work. General guidance may be found in FAR 3.101 and 9.505; however, this guidance is not all-inclusive.
(c) If an Offeror identifies a potential conflict of interest that exists at any tier, that Offeror is requested to notify the Contracting Officer within 14 days of the date of this solicitation. The Offeror shall provide: (1) the contract or previous source selection’s solicitation number and name and phone number of the Contracting Officer for the contract which gives rise to a potential conflict of interest; (2) a copy of the requirement; (3) the statement of work and technical instruction from the existing contract, as applicable; (4) a brief description of the type of work to be performed by each subcontractor under the competitive procurement; (5) a brief description of the individual’s, subcontractor’s, or teaming partner’s unequal access to nonpublic information about a competitor, which may lead to a conflict of interest in the formation of the Offeror’s proposal, or establishment of ground rules for this competitive procurement, as applicable; (6) an OCI mitigation plan, as applicable; and (7) any additional information the Contracting Officer should consider in making a determination of whether a conflict of interest exists. The Government may independently verify the information received from the Offeror. The requirement to identify potential conflicts of interest as outlined herein continues until contract award. Notwithstanding the above, the Government reserves the right to determine whether a conflict of interest exists based on any information received from any source.
(d) The Government will notify an Offeror of any conflict of interest within 14 days of receipt of all required information. Those Offerors deemed to have a conflict of interest may be ineligible for award. Failure to provide the information in a timely manner does not waive the Government's rights to make a conflict of interest determination. The Offeror is notified that if it expends time and money on proposal preparation, such expenditure is at its own risk regardless of whether the Government determines a personal or organizational conflict of interest does or does not exist.
(e) Any potential prime contractor which proposes an individual, subcontractor, or teaming partner later determined to have a conflict of interest and deemed ineligible to participate in the current competition, may not be granted the opportunity to revise its proposal to remove the ineligible individual, subcontractor or teaming partner. The Government reserves the right to determine which Offerors remain in the competitive range through the normal source selection process.
(f) If the Offeror determines that a potential organizational and/or personal conflict of interest does not exist at any tier, the Offeror shall include a statement to that effect in its response to this solicitation.
L-211-H001 UPDATES TO PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE AND DELIVERY DATES (NAVSEA) (JUN 2022) For proposal purposes the estimated date of contract, task order, or delivery order award is 31 January 2027. The government reserves the right to award sooner or later if necessary. The delivery dates and/or period of performance start and end dates in Section F will be updated at award based upon actual contract, task order, or delivery order award date.
L-215-H004 INSTRUCTIONS FOR PRICING OF CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)
(a) The Offeror shall complete the “Price Group” (Block 17) and “Estimated Total Price” (Block 18) of each data item on the Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) of this solicitation using the following instructions:
(1) Block 17. Use the specified price group defined below in developing estimated prices for each data item on the DD Form 1423:
(a) Group I. Definition – Data which is not otherwise essential to the Offeror’s performance of the primary contracted effort (production, development, testing, and administration) but which is required by DD Form 1423.
(i) Estimated Price – Costs to be included under Group I are those applicable to preparing and assembling the data item in conformance with Government requirements, and the administration and other expenses related to reproducing and delivering such data items to the Government.
(b) Group II. Definition – Data which is essential to the performance of the primary contracted effort but the Offeror is required to perform additional work to conform to Government requirements with regard to depth of content, format, frequency of submittal, preparation, control, or quality of the data item.
(i) Estimated Price – Costs to be included under Group II are those incurred over and above the cost of the essential data item without conforming to Government requirements, and the administration and other expenses related to reproducing and delivering such data items to the Government.
(c) Group III. Definition – Data which the Offeror must develop for his internal use in performance of the primary contracted effort and does not require any substantial change to conform to Government requirements with regard to depth of content, format, frequency of submittal, preparation, control, or quality of the data item.
(i) Estimated Price – Costs to be included under Group III are the administrative and other expenses related to reproducing and delivering such data items to the Government.
(d) Group IV. Definition – Data which is developed by the contractor as part of his normal operating procedures and his effort in supplying these data to the Government is minimal.
(i) Estimated Price – Group IV items should normally be shown on the DD Form 1423 at no cost.
(2) Block 18. For each data item, enter an amount equal to that portion of the total price which is estimated to be attributable to the production or development for the Government of that item of data. The estimated data prices shall be developed only from those costs which will be incurred as a direct result of the requirement to supply the data, over and above those costs which would otherwise be incurred in performance of the contract if no data were required. The entry “N/C” for “no charge” will be acceptable. The estimated price shall not include any amount for rights in data. The Government’s rights to use the data shall be governed by the pertinent provisions of the contract.
L-215-H006 SUBMISSION OF QUESTIONS BY OFFERORS--BASIC (NAVSEA) (JUL 2026)
(a) Offerors may submit questions or request clarification of any aspect of this solicitation. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to bring to the attention of the Contracting Officer at the earliest possible time, but prior to the closing date, any ambiguities, discrepancies, inconsistencies, or conflicts between the SOW or PWS (as applicable) and other solicitation documents attached hereto or incorporated by reference. Each question should identify solicitation number, document, page number, paragraph number or other identifier relating to the question. Questions without this information may not be answered. Acknowledgment of questions received will not be made.
(b) The deadline for receipt of questions is [FILL-IN]. Although every effort will be made, the Government makes no guarantee that questions received after the date above will be answered.
(c) All questions shall be submitted via the PIEE Solicitation Module Q&A Function. Responses will be posted within the PIEE Solicitation Module.
L-245-H001 AVAILABILITY OF GOVERNMENT PROPERTY (NAVSEA) (JUL 2024)
Government property is offered for use under this solicitation. The contractor is responsible for all costs related to making the property available for use, including (but not limited to) payment of all transportation, installation, and rehabilitation costs.
L-245-H002 INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING GOVERNMENT PROPERTY (NAVSEA) (JUL 2024)
All offerors shall submit the following information in their proposal:
(1) A list or description of all Government property that the offeror or its subcontractors propose to use on a rent-free basis. The list shall identify the accountable contract under which the property is held and the authorization for its use (from the contracting officer having cognizance of the property);
(2) The dates during which the property will be available for use (including the first, last, and all intervening months) and, for any property that will be used concurrently in performing two or more contracts, the amounts of the respective uses in sufficient detail to support prorating the rent;
(3) The amount of rent that would otherwise be charged in accordance with FAR 52.245-9, Use and Charges; and
(4) A description of the offeror's property management system, plan, and any customary commercial practices, voluntary consensus standards, or industry-leading practices and standards to be used by the offeror in managing Government property.
1.0 INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMISSION OF OFFERS
General Notes:
Note 1: For pricing purposes, the anticipated ordering period start date of this contract is 31 January 2027.
Note 2: This requirement is solicited on a sole source basis to Mikel, Inc.
Note 3: The Product Service Code (PSC) for this requirement is AC33.
Note 4: There are various places within this solicitation that require the offeror to fill in information.
1.1 SUBMISSION REQUIRMENTS
Offeror shall comply with the detailed instructions for the format and content of the proposal. Proposals shall be clear and unambiguous. Proposals that do not comply with the detailed instructions for the format and content of the proposal may render the Offeror ineligible for award. The Government reserves the right to reject any proposal that does not comply with these proposal submission instructions.
Proposals shall be submitted through the PIEE Solicitation Module by the solicitation closing date and time specified on the cover page of this solicitation, block (9). Offers must be received via the PIEE Solicitation Module by the closing date and time in order to be considered for award. It is not permissible to upload a link to an internet-based data center (e.g. Google cloud or Dropbox). Offeror shall submit all required proposal information as files uploaded directly in the PIEE Solicitation Module. In the rare event the PIEE system is down or inaccessible, Offeror shall immediately notify the cognizant Contracting Officer for the solicitation via e-mail prior to the solicitation closing date and time. In the rare event of a PIEE system malfunction, arrangements must be made with the Contracting Officer cognizant for the solicitation prior to the solicitation closing date and time in order to submit a proposal electronically outside the PIEE Solicitation Module. Failure to submit a complete proposal prior to the solicitation closing date and time will render the proposal late and unacceptable.
Offerors are responsible for submitting proposals and any proposal modifications in the PIEE Solicitation Module by the time specified in the solicitation. Any proposal modification not submitted in the PIEE Solicitation Module by the exact time specified for receipt of offers is “late” and will not be considered. The solicitation will close at the exact date and time specified in the solicitation and Offerors will be unable to submit its proposal after that time. Each proposal submitted in the PIEE Solicitation Module is time/date stamp recorded by the system at time of proposal upload. Proposals may be withdrawn by written notice to the cognizant Contracting Officer for the solicitation provided such notice is received prior to Task Order award.
Resources on how to navigate the PIEE Solicitation Module are available at https://dodprocurementtoolbox.com/site-pages/solicitation-module.
2.0 Proposal Format
In order to maximize efficiency and minimize the time for proposal evaluation, all Offerors shall submit their proposals in accordance with the format and content specified below. The requirements below apply equally to subcontractors. Proposals that do not meet the below requirements may be deemed unresponsive and may not be eligible for award. The electronic proposal shall be prepared so that if printed, the proposal meets the following format requirements:
· 8.5 x 11 inch paper
· Single-spaced typed lines
· 1 inch margins
· Font text shall be 12-point Times New Roman, except for:
· Graphs, graphics, tables, or charts used to supplement the proposal text shall use Times New Roman that is no smaller than 9-point font size.
· Microsoft Office Excel spreadsheets shall use Times New Roman that is no smaller than 9-point font size. These Excel spreadsheets shall be formatted for printing in landscape orientation such that all row and column headings appear on each printed page. All spreadsheets shall include calculations in the cells showing all formulas. Do not enter hard data where formulas were used to calculate the entered value.
· No hyperlinks
· Proposals shall be in English and in U.S. dollars.
· Proposals shall be Microsoft Office (Word, Excel, PowerPoint) 2010 and newer versions or Adobe Acrobat (PDF) compatible. PDF files shall be searchable when reviewed electronically.
2.1 Cover Page and Table of Contents
Offeror shall include a cover page and table of contents for each proposal volume. The cover page shall identify the solicitation number, proposal volume and title, and the Offeror’s name. The cover page and table of contents will not count against page limitations.
2.2 Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms
Offer shall include a glossary of abbreviations and acronyms for each proposal volume that provides corresponding definitions. Glossaries will not count against page limitations.
2.3 Page Numbering System
Offeror shall use a standard page numbering system to facilitate proposal references. All pages shall be numbered consecutively for each section within a volume. Charts, graphs, and other inserted materials shall be included in the page numbering system.
2.4 Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data
Offerors that include in their proposals data that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, shall mark the title page with the following legend:
"This proposal includes data that shall not be disclosed outside the Government and shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed in whole or in part for any purpose other than to evaluate this proposal. If, however, a contract is awarded to this Offeror as a result of, or in connection with, the submission of this data, the Government shall have the right to duplicate, use, or disclose the data to the extent provided in the resulting contract. This restriction does not limit the Government’s right to use information contained in this data if it is obtained from another source without restriction. The data subject to this restriction are contained in sheets [insert numbers or other identification of sheets]";
Offerors shall also mark each sheet of data it wishes to restrict with the following legend:
"Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal."
2.5 File Naming Convention
All proposal files shall include the Offeror's company name, volume #, document name, and other useful identifying information. For example:
· Company_Volume_I _Technical Approach
· Company_Volume_I_Key Personnel Resume for Jane Doe
· Company_Volume_II _Past Performance Reference for N00178-##-X-####
· Company_Volume_III _Cost Proposal Narrative
· Company_Volume_IV_Cover Letter
3.0 PROPOSAL ORGANIZATION AND CONTENT
Offeror shall organize its proposal and include all proposal content exactly as described herein. Offeror shall organize its proposal into separate volumes and adhere to page limitations as delineated in the Proposal Organization Table below. Page limitations will be treated as maximums. If exceeded, excess pages may not be read or considered in proposal evaluation. When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two pages.
| Volume |
| Volume Title |
| Maximum Number of Pages |
| I |
| Cover Letter/Fill-Ins |
| No Page Limit |
| II |
| Pass/Fails |
| Facility and Safeguarding Clearance |
| No Page Limit |
| Plan for Obtaining Personnel Clearances |
| Two (2) Pages |
| Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) Mitigation Plan |
| No Page Limit |
| Government Furnished Property (GFP) |
| No Page Limit |
| Software Development Plan |
| No Page Limit for actual SDP |
Six (6) Pages Total for Elements 1-3
| Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Unique Identifier(s) (UIDs) |
| No Page Limit |
| III |
| Cost/Price |
| No Page Limit |
| IV |
| Key Personnel |
| Two (2) Pages Per Resume |
Important: Offeror shall NOT include classified material in the volumes. Offeror shall NOT include cost/price information in volumes I, II and IV.
3.1 VOLUME I – Cover Letter/Fill-Ins
(a) Offeror and subcontractors shall provide a cover letter with the following information:
· Solicitation number;
· Company name, address, email address, telephone numbers, CAGE Code, Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Number, and Tax Identification Number (TIN) of the offeror;
· A statement confirming agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item;
· A statement that the proposal is valid through 240 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of proposals;
· Names, titles, telephone numbers, and e-mail addresses of persons authorized to negotiate on the offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation;
· DCAA and DCMA office points of contact, including branch location, contact name, telephone number, and email address;
· Name, title, and signature of a person authorized to sign the proposal; Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent's authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office. The Offeror’s signature on their proposal indicates the company will meet all requirements of the PWS/SOW, without exception; and
· Identify all enclosures being transmitted as part of the offeror’s proposal;
· If an Offeror believes no organizational conflict(s) of interest exists, an affirmative statement that no such conflict exists shall be included in the cover letter.
· If the offeror (prime and/or subcontractor) is proposing on other than a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) type basis (e.g., Cost Plus Fixed Fee), include the status of the offeror’s accounting system and provide supporting documentation (e.g. DCMA letter confirming adequacy of accounting system). Offeror is advised that the Government will perform a Business Systems status review of all proposed subcontractors. If a proposed subcontractor does not have an approved accounting system, and is proposed on other than FFP type basis, the Government requires the prime offeror to detail in its proposal what analysis it performed to determine the subcontractor’s approach to accounting for costs as acceptable.
(b) Offerors shall provide fill-in information for all clauses/provisions that require it, using the latest amended solicitation version.
3.2 VOLUME II – Pass Fail Requirements
The offeror shall submit the following information with its proposal which will be evaluated as a pass or fail in relation to the solicitation requirements:
(a) Facility and Safeguarding Clearance – Performance under this contract requires that the offeror hold a facility clearance and safeguarding clearance as specified in the DD Form 254 attached to this solicitation, at the time of proposal submission. As such, the offeror shall provide CAGE codes and addresses for all locations where work will be performed that require classified facilities and safeguarding capabilities as defined in the DD Form 254 and associated references.
(b) Plan for Obtaining Personnel Clearances – The offeror shall provide, a plan for obtaining personnel clearances within 30 days of the start of the period of performance at the required level specified in the DD Form 254, Contract Security Classification Specification attached to this solicitation. The plan shall include confirmation of existing personnel clearances, detail the offeror’s process for obtaining new clearances to perform the full requirement by the time full operational tempo is reached within 30 days of the period of performance start date, and outline the schedule for obtaining any required new clearances during the life of the contract.
(c) Organization Conflict Of Interest Mitigation Plan – In accordance with H-209-H004 Restrictions Resulting From Potential Organizational Conflict Of Interest, and L-209-H009 Notification Of Potential Organizational Or Personal Conflict(S) Of Interest, the offeror shall identify any and all conflicts of interest or potential conflicts of interest related to this solicitation. The offeror shall follow the below described two-step process for identifying known or potential OCI issues to the Government for this solicitation.
Step 1: If it is believed that conflicts of interest are real, possible, or perceived, the contractor shall submit a letter within fourteen (14) days of the release of the solicitation identifying those OCI issues and the strategy that the Offeror intends to use for mitigation. This letter will be for notification purposes only, for the Government to conduct any research, and no determination will be made by the Government at that time. If no OCI issues are present or anticipated, no action is required of the Offeror within this window.
Step 2: Offerors shall submit a statement in affirmation or negation whether they have an OCI conflict regarding this solicitation. If OCI issues are present or anticipated, Offerors shall provide details and submit an OCI mitigation plan and its corporate policy for resolving as part of their proposal submission. If it is believed that no conflicts of interest exist, then the Offeror shall clearly state this, in addition to providing their corporate policy for resolving OCIs. Organizational charts and/or corporate policy are authorized to be submitted in addition to the OCI Mitigation Plan and do not count toward any page limitation.
If no conflicts of interest or potential conflicts of interest exist, the offeror is required to provide a written statement certifying as such.
(d) Government Furnished Property (GFP) – GFP associated with this effort has been identified in Attachment – 2 GFP. Offeror shall describe its plan for managing this GFP in accordance with FAR 52.245-1 ‘Government Property’ and DFARS 252.245-7005 ‘Management and Reporting of Government Property’. Alternatively, Offeror may provide proof that its Property Management System is currently approved by DCMA. Offeror shall address L-245-H001 “AVAILABILITY OF GOVERNMENT PROPERTY” and L-245-H002 “INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING GOVERNMENT PROPERTY” requirements, if applicable.
(e) Software Development Plan – The offeror shall provide a Software Development Plan (SDP), including Rationale and Experience as detailed in the three elements below.
SDP Element 1 - Offerors shall submit an SDP rationale that addresses the requirement of Section C. The SDP does not have a page limitation. Offerors shall also submit an SDP rationale which describes why their specific approach is appropriate for the system to be procured, developed, or maintained and how their proposed processes are equivalent to those articulated by CMMI® capability level 3.
SDP Element 2 - Offerors shall submit a description of previous relevant experience, within the past 36 months in developing software of the similar size and complexity as that required under the Performance Work Statement. As a part of this description, the offerors shall describe the extent to which personnel who contributed to these previous efforts will be supporting this resultant task order.
SDP Element 3 - Offerors shall also describe any previous relevant CMMI® or equivalent model-based process maturity appraisals performed within the past 36 months. As a part of this description, offerors shall identify the organizational entity and location where the appraisal was performed, the type of evaluation, the organization performing the evaluation, and the level earned.
(f) Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Unique Identifier(s) (UIDs)
The Offeror shall provide the CMMC UIDs issued by the Supplier Performance Risk system (SPRS), in accordance with DFARS 252.204-7025 ‘NOTICE OF CYBERSECURITY MATURITY MODEL CERTIFICATION LEVEL REQUIREMENTS (NOV 2025) ‘ paragraph (d), for each contractor information system that will process, store, or transmit Federal Contract Information (FCI) or Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) during performance of a contract, task order, or delivery order resulting from this solicitation.
3.3 VOLUME III – Cost/Price
3.3.1 Section B Pricing
Offeror shall submit Section B pricing for each priced CLIN/SLIN in the cost proposal spreadsheet (Attachment 7 – Cost Proposal Spreadsheet). The Section B pricing will take precedence should there be any discrepancies with any other pricing information submitted. As such, the resulting task order award will be made to the successful Offeror using their proposed Section B pricing.
3.3.2 Cost Proposal Spreadsheet
Offeror and their subcontractors shall each separately submit a cost proposal spreadsheet using the format set forth in Attachment 7 – NUWCDIVNPT Cost Proposal Spreadsheet. The cost proposal spreadsheet shall provide a detailed breakout of every single cost element proposed across each ordering year as applicable. The cost proposal spreadsheet shall include calculations in the cells showing all formulas used to calculate the values. Do not enter hard data where formulas were used to calculate the entered value.
The Offeror’s cost proposal spreadsheet shall be overarching, encompassing all proposed costs inclusive of sanitized subcontractor costs, and it shall fully align with and support the proposed Section B pricing. Subcontractor’s unsanitized cost proposal spreadsheets shall be submitted separately through the PIEE Solicitation Module in order to protect their proprietary information. Subcontractor cost proposals shall be received by the time and date specified for receipt of proposals specified in this solicitation.
Offeror shall provide a clear crosswalk of all company-specific labor categories to corresponding Government Standard eCRAFT Labor Categories. Unless specified already by the Government, Offeror shall propose Standard eCRAFT Labor Categories based on the descriptions listed at: http://www.navsea.navy.mil/Home/Warfare-Centers/NUWC-Newport/Partnerships/Commercial-Contracts/Labor-Categories/. For labor categories that provide for various levels (I, II, III, IV), Offeror shall select the level that best matches the proposed individual and company-specific labor category. For Service Contract Act (SCA) labor categories (if applicable), Offerors may propose an SCA labor category listed in the SCA Directory of Occupations at http://www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts/sca.htm.
3.3.3 Cost Proposal Narrative
Offeror shall provide a cost proposal narrative that fully substantiates the reasonableness and realism of the proposed costs. The cost proposal narrative shall fully align with and support the proposed Section B pricing. The cost proposal narrative shall fully corroborate every cost element that is proposed. Providing insufficient information to substantiate the reasonableness and realism of the proposed costs may result in the identification of a risk, an upward cost adjustment, and/or in the offer no longer being considered eligible for award.
Offeror shall propose realistic costs within its proposal. Offeror bears the sole responsibility to demonstrate that its proposed costs are realistic within its proposal. Offeror is advised that proposing unrealistically lower costs without substantial justification will be an indication that the Offeror does not have a clear understanding of the requirements or does not have the requisite capability to support the effort.
The cost proposal narrative shall address:
Subcontractors. Offeror shall describe the contract type proposed for each subcontractor and rationale for why the chosen contract type is most appropriate. In particular, Offeror shall demonstrate the suitability of any Time-and-Materials or fixed price contract types (e.g. FFP, FFP LOE, etc.) and describe the Government will be billed throughout the performance of this requirement. Offeror shall demonstrate that their subcontractors have the necessary business systems to perform the contract types being proposed. Offeror shall conduct appropriate cost or price analysis to establish the reasonableness of the proposed subcontract prices and include the results of these analyses within its cost proposal narrative, in accordance with FAR Overhaul 15.404-8(a).
All subcontractors shall submit cost proposal narratives in order to fully substantiate the reasonableness and realism of their proposed costs. Subcontractors that are proposed on cost reimbursement basis shall provide the same level of information as required from the Offeror to substantiate their own costs within their cost proposal narratives. Subcontractors that are proposed on a Time-and-Materials or fixed price basis (e.g. FFP, FFP LOE, etc.) are not required to provide the same level details as required under cost reimbursable proposals, but shall still provide an itemized breakout of pricing that is customary with the contract type proposed. Subcontractor unsanitized cost proposal narratives shall be submitted separately through the PIEE Solicitation Module in order to protect their proprietary information. Subcontractor cost proposals shall be received by the time and date specified for receipt of proposals specified in this solicitation.
Labor hours and categories. The offeror shall include a labor mix in excel format showing eCRAFT and SCLS labor categories and total hours proposed for CLIN 0001. The Government’s estimate of the labor mix necessary to perform the tasking is provided below, which includes all Key Personnel:
| Labor Category |
| eCRAFT Code |
| SOW 4.1 |
| SOW 4.2 |
| SOW 4.3 |
| SOW 4.4 |
| SOW 4.5 |
| SOW 4.6 |
| SOW 4.7 |
| SOW 4.8 |
| SOW 4.9 |
| SOW4.10 |
| SOW 4.11 |
| Total hours per year |
| Total hours for five (5) years |
| ENGINEER, SYSTEMS I |
| ESY1 |
| 1,920 |
| 3,840 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 5,760 |
| 28,800 |
| ENGINEER, SYSTEMS II |
| ESY2 |
| 3,840 |
| 1,920 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 5,760 |
| 28,800 |
| ENGINEER, SYSTEMS III |
| ESY3 |
| 1,920 |
| 1,920 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 3,840 |
| 19,200 |
| ENGINEER, SYSTEMS IV |
| ESY4 |
| 3,840 |
| 3,840 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 7,680 |
| 38,400 |
| Computer Engineer I |
| EC2 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 3,840 |
| 1,920 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 5,760 |
| 28,800 |
| Computer Engineer III |
| EC3 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 3,840 |
| 1,920 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 5,760 |
| 28,800 |
| Electrical Engineer I |
| EE1 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1,920 |
| 1,920 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 3,840 |
| 19,200 |
| Program Manager |
| MANP3 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 3,840 |
| 3,840 |
| 19,200 |
| ENGINEER, Technician IV |
| 30086 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1,920 |
| 1,920 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 3,840 |
| 19,200 |
| Engineer Technician II |
| 30083 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1,920 |
| 1,920 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1,920 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 5,760 |
| 28,800 |
| Engineer Technician I |
| 30082 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1,920 |
| 1,920 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1,920 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 5,760 |
| 28,800 |
| Engineer Design I |
| ED1 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 3,840 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 3,840 |
| 19,200 |
| Configuration Management |
| SCM |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1,920 |
| 1,920 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 3,840 |
| 19,200 |
| SPECIALIST, Quality Control II |
| SQC2 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 3,840 |
| 0 |
| 3,840 |
| 19,200 |
| SPECIALIST, Quality Control III |
| SQC3 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 3,840 |
| 0 |
| 3,840 |
| 19,200 |
| Tech Writer |
| TECW |
| 0 |
| 1,920 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1,920 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 3,840 |
| 19,200 |
| Logistician |
| LGT2 |
| 0 |
| 1,920 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1,920 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 3,840 |
| 19,200 |
| Specialist, IA Compliance II |
| SIAC2 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1,920 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1,920 |
| 9,600 |
| Specialist, IA Compliance III |
| SIAC3 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1,920 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1,920 |
| 9,600 |
| Specialist, Information System Security |
| SISS3 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1,920 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1,920 |
| 9,600 |
| Specialist, Information System Security II |
| SISS2 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1,920 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1,920 |
| 9,600 |
| Specialist, Configuration Management II |
| SCM2 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1,920 |
| 1,920 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 3,840 |
| 19,200 |
| Specialist, Configuration Management III |
| SCM3 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1,920 |
| 1,920 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 3,840 |
| 19,200 |
| Analyst, Management III |
| ANM3 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 3,840 |
| 3,840 |
| 19,200 |
| Engineer, Human System Integration II |
| EHS2 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 3,840 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 3,840 |
| 19,200 |
| Financial Analysts |
| ANFS |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 3,840 |
| 3,840 |
| 19,200 |
| TOTAL |
| ___ |
| 11,520 |
| 15,360 |
| 15,360 |
| 11,520 |
| 3,840 |
| 3,840 |
| 9,600 |
| 9,600 |
| 7,680 |
| 7,680 |
| 11,520 |
| 107,520 |
| 537,600 |
*Note: Due to the nature of SOW Task 4.12 Cyberspace/Cyber Workforce (CWF), all hours associated with Task 4.12 are included within the other applicable SOW tasks where CWF tasking is required.
Direct labor rates. Offeror and cost reimbursement subcontractors shall describe the basis of estimate for each direct labor rate proposed and provide substantiating information that fully corroborates each direct labor rate proposed. The basis of estimate must state the current geographical location of the personnel associated with each direct labor rate at the time of proposal submission. The Government reserves the right, at its discretion, to adjust direct labor rates upward in its cost realism evaluation to reflect prevailing rates in the performance location, regardless of personnel's intent to relocate, telework, or [other circumstances].
For each current employee named in the cost proposal spreadsheet, Offeror and cost reimbursement subcontractors shall provide a screenshot that captures pertinent information from the employer's payroll system, incurred within the last three months preceding release of this solicitation. Payroll screenshots shall not contain any personally identifiable information, such as, social security numbers, date and place of birth, etc. Cost proposal narratives shall fully explain all pertinent data on a screenshot. The Government must be able to derive the individual’s direct rate (both inclusive and exclusive of the impact of uncompensated overtime, if proposed) from the payroll screenshot. Alternatively, Offeror and cost reimbursement subcontractors may provide payroll verification instead of payroll screenshots. Payroll verification shall consist of a form containing the named personnel, proposed labor category, direct labor rate, description of current position, and a signed certification by an authorized representative of the company that the information contained in the form is correct and current within the last three months preceding release of this solicitation. This supporting direct labor rate information shall clearly map to individual direct labor rates included within the cost proposal spreadsheet.
For each contingent hire in the cost proposal spreadsheet, Offeror and cost reimbursement subcontractors shall clearly indicate named contingent hires and shall provide a signed letter of intent that explicitly lists the agreed upon annual salary for the named individual and the amount of uncompensated work required. The cost proposal narrative shall fully explain all pertinent data about the letter of intent. The Government must be able to derive the individual’s direct rate (both inclusive and exclusive of the impact of uncompensated overtime, if proposed) from the letter of intent information.
For any proposed position for which a specific candidate has not been identified, Offerors and cost-reimbursement subcontractors must provide supporting documentation to justify the estimated cost. If a comparable position with available payroll data exists, provide that data and a detailed analysis explaining how the comparable position aligns with the proposed position. If no comparable position exists, provide alternative cost data and a detailed basis of estimate that supports the proposed cost estimate for the position.
Service Contract Act (SCA) Wage Determinations. Offeror shall propose rates no lower than the minimums listed in SCA Wage Determinations current as of the date of the proposal. Current SCA Wage Determinations can be found at https://sam.gov/content/wage-determinations.
Uncompensated Overtime. Any uncompensated overtime proposed shall be in accordance with FAR 52.237-10, IDENTIFICATION OF UNCOMPENSATED OVERTIME. For any Offeror and/or subcontractors that proposes uncompensated overtime, Offeror and/or subcontractor shall ensure compliance with the following. Describe the company’s uncompensated overtime policies and include a copy of its policy addressing uncompensated overtime. Describe the uncompensated overtime being proposed along with an explanation of how it will be used in performance of this requirement and why it is necessary. Describe how the adjusted hourly rate was derived while clearly demonstrating the reasonableness and realism. Describe the company’s historical levels of uncompensated overtime incurred previously and provide substantiating historical data that corroborates the adjusted hourly rates proposed.
Forward Pricing Rate Agreement (FPRA) or Forward Pricing Rate Recommendation (FPRR). Offeror and cost reimbursement subcontractors shall indicate whether an FPRA or FPRR has been established for their company and the extent it was used in establishing proposed costs. If an FPRA/FPRR exists, a copy shall be provided within the cost proposal narrative.
Escalation. The below table reflects minimum escalation rates. Offeror may propose escalation that deviates from these minimum escalation rates; however, the Government reserves the right to make upward cost realism adjustments using these minimum escalation rates, unless proposed escalation rates are fully supported by an approved FPRA.
| Minimum Escalation Rate |
| 3.10% |
Indirect Rates. Offeror and cost reimbursement subcontractors shall describe its proposed indirect rates, basis of estimate, and calculation methodologies. Offeror and cost reimbursement subcontractors shall provide the three most recent years of incurred actuals for each proposed indirect rate, any provisional billing rates available, also indicating the beginning and end dates for each fiscal year. NOTE: Offerors shall not rely on any Forward Pricing Rate Proposal to provide any form of cost realism substantiation. Additionally, Provisional Billing Rates (PBRs) are for billing purposes only and should not be used for cost /price proposals. Offerors are cautioned not to rely on these submissions (FPRPs & PBRs), which lack meaningful Government review, as sufficient to demonstrate the realism of its proposed rates.
This history shall include the most recently completed fiscal year even if the rates are considered preliminary and have not been submitted to DCAA for audit. The Offeror shall note whether the actual rates have been audited by DCAA or any other independent organization; specifically state which indirect rates have been finalized by DCAA/DCMA. If proposed rates are below historical rates, the cost narrative shall include an explanation along with supporting information to corroborate why the proposed indirect rates that are lower than historical rates. If a cap on any of the indirect rates is being proposed, the cost narrative shall identify each capped rate and shall propose legally binding verbiage, which can be included in the resultant task order award subject to Government acceptance.
Other Direct Costs (ODCs). Offerors shall use the following estimates (and add any applicable indirect costs) for material and travel costs. These are total cost estimates for the entire contract. Offerors are required to distribute these sums among subcontractors consistent with their technical proposal(s). If a subcontractor proposes material costs, the subcontractor must fully burden such costs and these costs must be included in the below Government-specified material estimate. Prime and subcontractor proposals shall include a complete listing of all costs other than labor which are charged direct by the company exclusive of travel costs and purchased material which is incorporated into a deliverable item.
(a) Offerors shall include a Material estimate of $7,504,205 (figure does not include burdens) that includes only those items of purchased material which are incorporated into a deliverable product. Offerors shall provide with its cost proposal a complete listing of all materials charged direct other than labor.
Each offeror shall provide an estimate of the costs applicable to this procurement for each of the materials charged direct and a rationale for each. Any category of direct charge which is listed but for which no costs are estimated must include a scenario under which those costs might be incurred under the proposed contract as well as the rationale for not estimating a cost.
(b) Offerors shall include a Travel estimate of $1,271,170 (figure does not include burdens) that includes travel and subsistence for work at alternative work sites as designated in individual orders under the contract and for allowable local travel per the Joint Travel Regulations.
Fee: Offeror shall complete the fill-in information in clause B-232-H003 of the solicitation. The Contracting Officer is required to use the Weighted Guidelines Method described in DFARS Overhaul 215.404-970 for performing a fee analysis for this requirement. The offeror is encouraged to present the details of its proposed fee amount in the format (DD Form 1547) and detail described in DFARS Overhaul 215.404-970. The offeror may provide factual and substantive information for the Government's consideration in assigning weights and values. The offeror is advised, however, that unsupported assertions of merit will be disregarded. Specific agreement on the applied weights or values for individual fee factors shall not be attempted. The contractor agrees that the maximum fixed fee and profit rate that shall be charged against all Task Orders under this contract shall not exceed the values as stated in clause B-232-H003. At the task order level prime contractors may propose a fee rate less than the maximum fee rate identified in clause B-232-H003. In addition, subcontractors may not propose a fee rate that exceeds the prime’s fee rate. If the offeror proposes Facilities Capital Cost of Money, full supporting data on DD Form 1861 must also be provided.
Facilities Capital Cost of Money (FCCOM): The Offeror shall submit form CASB-CMF if proposing FCCOM and show the calculation of the proposed amount. Additional narrative may be submitted as a separate document, if necessary to describe derivation of labor rates, use of uncompensated overtime pools to which indirect rates are applied, etc.
3.3.4 Certified Cost or Pricing Data
Cost or pricing data provided shall be certified prior to award.
3.4 VOLUME IV – Key Personnel
(a) Identify one (1) Key Person certified as an Information Assurance Technical (IAT) workforce member level II (IAT II). The Key Person must be an individual that will be charged directly to the task orders issued under the contract and not as part of any indirect cost. The offeror shall provide a resume and a certificate for the Key Person.
(b) Identify the Senior Technical Representative (STR) designated to manage the overall effort as a Key Person and serve as the primary point of contact with the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR). Address the STR's authority, ability to independently commit company resources to performance under the contract, the STR's line of communication to senior company management. Describe the STR's previous experience managing similar efforts. The STR does not need to be proposed as a part of the Level of Effort, directly charging to the contract. If the STR is not proposed as part of the level of effort performed on-site at NUWCDIVNPT, the contractor’s facility, or a location within local commuting distance of NUWCDIVNPT or the contractor’s facility, the offeror shall demonstrate that the STR can effectively and efficiently manage day-to-day tasks from a remote location.
(c) Identify and provide resumes for a minimum of three (3) Key Personnel, covering the below areas of expertise (if the resumes are included elsewhere in the proposal, e.g. the STR, identify their locations and do not resubmit). The Key Personnel must be personnel that will be charged directly to the task orders issued under the contract and not as a part of any indirect cost. Each resume shall demonstrate the Key Personnel’s qualifications to complete the tasking for which the person has been proposed to perform.
| PWS Task |
| Number of Key Personnel |
| Required Qualifications |
| Desired Qualifications |
| 4.1, 4.2 |
| 2 |
| · (5 years) Experience generating and analyzing system requirement, system design, concept of operation and system specification documentation and system development processes. |
· (5 years) Experience executing specification, design and test document peer review, system requirement traceability and trade study review processes.
· (5 years) Experience with requirement management and analysis, the tools for requirement management and generating System Requirements Verification Matrixes (SRVM)
· (7+ years) Experience generating and…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .