DRAFT RFP 70RTAC22R00000010 Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 281 KB Posted
- Attached to
- DRAFT Solicitation for Hack DHS: Crowdsourced Vulnerability Assessment Services (CVAS) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 70RTAC22R00000010
About this file
This document contains a draft past performance questionnaire for a federal solicitation. The solicitation is seeking proposals for Hack DHS: Crowdsourced Vulnerability Assessment Services and involves the Department of Homeland Security Office of Procurement Operations. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by references for offerors and addresses ratings for quality of product or service, timeliness of performance, management, and cost control, if applicable. It also includes questions on customer satisfaction and commitment. Ratings are on a scale of 1 to 5, with definitions provided. Additional comments are requested at the end. Completed questionnaires must be submitted directly to the identified individuals by the Phase 2 proposal deadline.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| DRAFT RFP 70RTAC22R00000010 Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement.pdf | ||
| DRAFT RFP 70RTAC22R00000010 Attachment 4 - Offeror Cert of Compliance with HSAR 3052.204-70 and Data Storage and Processing Req.pdf | ||
| DRAFT RFP 70RTAC22R00000010.pdf | ||
| DRAFT RFP 70RTAC22R00000010 Attachment 2 - Offeror Cert of IDIQ VCC Platform Compliance.pdf | ||
| DRAFT RFP 70RTAC22R00000010 Attachment 3 - Offeror Cert of Active Researcher Community.pdf | ||
| DRAFT RFP 70RTAC22R00000010 Attachment 6 - Pricing Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Request for Proposal for 70RTAC22R00000010 - Attachment 5 Past Performance Questionnaire
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
Please have your referenced client complete this survey and submit directly to Sohl Han, at Sohl.Han@hq.dhs.gov and LaKeisha Johnson, at LaKeisha.Johnson@hq.dhs.gov by the Phase 2 proposal deadline.
This survey pertains to Offeror (Contractor Name)
Your Name
Your Company/Agency
Your Title/ Your Role in this Contract
Your Email Address
Your Telephone Number
Your Role in this Contract Reference
Survey Period of Performance
General Description of Services Required under the Contract
Signature of Person Completing Survey mailto:Sohl.Han@hq.dhs.gov mailto:LaKeisha.Johnson@hq.dhs.gov
RATINGS
Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible. Assign each area a rating of either 5 (Exceptional), 4 (Very Good), 3 (Satisfactory), 2 (Marginal), or 1 (Unsatisfactory). Use the attached Rating Guidelines as guidance in making these evaluations. Circle the appropriate rating.
Annotate with N/A if not a rating consideration or inapplicable to the contract effort.
QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
1. Compliance with contract requirements:
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
2. Accuracy of reports:
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
3. Level of knowledge, experience, and training of personnel:
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
4. Capability of personnel to perform required services:
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
5. Effectiveness of personnel in performing required services:
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
6. Overall quality of product/service:
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
7. Effectiveness of maintaining continuity of mission support:
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
1. Reliability:
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
2. Responsive to technical direction:
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
3. Meets contract delivery schedules and/or task deadlines:
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
4. Response time to end-users:
MANAGEMENT:
1. Effective management, including subcontracts:
2. Reasonable/cooperative behavior:
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
3. Responsive to contract requirements:
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
4. Notification of problems:
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
5. Flexibility:
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
6. Pro-active vs. reactive:
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
7. Ability to transition resources and personnel:
COST CONTROL (not applicable to fixed-price contract type):
1. Current, accurate and complete billings:
2. Relationship of negotiated costs to actuals:
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
3. Cost efficiencies:
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
1. The contractor is committed to customer satisfaction:
a. Contractor Management Personnel
Yes No
b. Contractor Onsite Facility Personnel
Yes No
c. Overall technical solutions to provide a comprehensive managed service.
Yes No
d. Would you hire this vendor for the future requirement?
Yes No
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Rating Guidelines
Rating Definition
5-Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
4-Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
3-Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
2-Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
1-Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
| This survey pertains to Offeror Contractor Name: |
| Your Name: |
| Your CompanyAgency: |
| Your Title Your Role in this Contract: |
| Your Email Address: |
| Your Telephone Number: |
| Your Role in this Contract Reference: |
| Survey Period of Performance: |
| General Description of Services Required under the Contract: |
| Signature of Person Completing Survey: |
| 2 Accuracy of reports: Off |
| 3 Level of knowledge experience and training of personnel: Off |
| 4 Capability of personnel to perform required services: Off |
| 5 Effectiveness of personnel in performing required services: Off |
| 6 Overall quality of productservice: Off |
| 7 Effectiveness of maintaining continuity of mission support: Off |
| 1_7: Off |
| 2_7: Off |
| 3_7: Off |
| 4_7: Off |
| 5_7: Off |
| 2 Responsive to technical direction: Off |
| 3 Meets contract delivery schedules andor task deadlines: Off |
| 4 Response time to endusers: Off |
| NA: Off |
| NA_2: Off |
| NA_3: Off |
| NA_4: Off |
| NA_5: Off |
| NA_6: Off |
| NA_7: Off |
| NA_8: Off |
| NA_9: Off |
| NA_10: Off |
| NA_11: Off |
| 2_11: Off |
| 1 Effective management including subcontracts: Off |
| 1_12: Off |
| 2_13: Off |
| 3_12: Off |
| 2 Reasonablecooperative behavior: Off |
| 3 Responsive to contract requirements: Off |
| 1_14: Off |
| 4 Notification of problems: Off |
| 1_17: Off |
| 3_14: Off |
| 3_15: Off |
| 3_16: Off |
| 3_17: Off |
| 7 Ability to transition resources and personnel: Off |
| 5_12: Off |
| 5_13: Off |
| 5_14: Off |
| 5_15: Off |
| 5_16: Off |
| 5_17: Off |
| 5_18: Off |
| NA_12: Off |
| NA_13: Off |
| NA_14: Off |
| NA_15: Off |
| NA_16: Off |
| NA_17: Off |
| NA_18: Off |
| 1 Current accurate and complete billings: Off |
| 2 Relationship of negotiated costs to actuals: Off |
| 1_21: Off |
| 2_22: Off |
| 3_21: Off |
| 4_21: Off |
| 5_21: Off |
| NA_21: Off |
| Contractor Management Personnel: Off |
| Contractor Onsite Facility Personnel: Off |
| Overall technical solutions to provide a comprehensive managed service: Off |
| Would you hire this vendor for the future requirement: Off |
| undefined: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .