DRAFT RFP 70RTAC22R00000010 Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 281 KB Posted

Attached to
DRAFT Solicitation for Hack DHS: Crowdsourced Vulnerability Assessment Services (CVAS) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
70RTAC22R00000010
Issued by
Department of Homeland Security Office of Procurement Operations

About this file

This document contains a draft past performance questionnaire for a federal solicitation. The solicitation is seeking proposals for Hack DHS: Crowdsourced Vulnerability Assessment Services and involves the Department of Homeland Security Office of Procurement Operations. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by references for offerors and addresses ratings for quality of product or service, timeliness of performance, management, and cost control, if applicable. It also includes questions on customer satisfaction and commitment. Ratings are on a scale of 1 to 5, with definitions provided. Additional comments are requested at the end. Completed questionnaires must be submitted directly to the identified individuals by the Phase 2 proposal deadline.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Request for Proposal for 70RTAC22R00000010 - Attachment 5 Past Performance Questionnaire

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

Please have your referenced client complete this survey and submit directly to Sohl Han, at Sohl.Han@hq.dhs.gov and LaKeisha Johnson, at LaKeisha.Johnson@hq.dhs.gov by the Phase 2 proposal deadline.

This survey pertains to Offeror (Contractor Name)

Your Name

Your Company/Agency

Your Title/ Your Role in this Contract

Your Email Address

Your Telephone Number

Your Role in this Contract Reference

Survey Period of Performance

General Description of Services Required under the Contract

Signature of Person Completing Survey mailto:Sohl.Han@hq.dhs.gov mailto:LaKeisha.Johnson@hq.dhs.gov

RATINGS

Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible. Assign each area a rating of either 5 (Exceptional), 4 (Very Good), 3 (Satisfactory), 2 (Marginal), or 1 (Unsatisfactory). Use the attached Rating Guidelines as guidance in making these evaluations. Circle the appropriate rating.

Annotate with N/A if not a rating consideration or inapplicable to the contract effort.

QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:

1. Compliance with contract requirements:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

2. Accuracy of reports:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

3. Level of knowledge, experience, and training of personnel:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

4. Capability of personnel to perform required services:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

5. Effectiveness of personnel in performing required services:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

6. Overall quality of product/service:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

7. Effectiveness of maintaining continuity of mission support:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

1. Reliability:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

2. Responsive to technical direction:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

3. Meets contract delivery schedules and/or task deadlines:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

4. Response time to end-users:

MANAGEMENT:

1. Effective management, including subcontracts:

2. Reasonable/cooperative behavior:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

3. Responsive to contract requirements:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

4. Notification of problems:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

5. Flexibility:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

6. Pro-active vs. reactive:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

7. Ability to transition resources and personnel:

COST CONTROL (not applicable to fixed-price contract type):

1. Current, accurate and complete billings:

2. Relationship of negotiated costs to actuals:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

3. Cost efficiencies:

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

1. The contractor is committed to customer satisfaction:

a. Contractor Management Personnel

Yes No

b. Contractor Onsite Facility Personnel

Yes No

c. Overall technical solutions to provide a comprehensive managed service.

Yes No

d. Would you hire this vendor for the future requirement?

Yes No

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Rating Guidelines

Rating Definition

5-Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

4-Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

3-Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

2-Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

1-Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

This survey pertains to Offeror Contractor Name:
Your Name:
Your CompanyAgency:
Your Title Your Role in this Contract:
Your Email Address:
Your Telephone Number:
Your Role in this Contract Reference:
Survey Period of Performance:
General Description of Services Required under the Contract:
Signature of Person Completing Survey:
2 Accuracy of reports: Off
3 Level of knowledge experience and training of personnel: Off
4 Capability of personnel to perform required services: Off
5 Effectiveness of personnel in performing required services: Off
6 Overall quality of productservice: Off
7 Effectiveness of maintaining continuity of mission support: Off
1_7: Off
2_7: Off
3_7: Off
4_7: Off
5_7: Off
2 Responsive to technical direction: Off
3 Meets contract delivery schedules andor task deadlines: Off
4 Response time to endusers: Off
NA: Off
NA_2: Off
NA_3: Off
NA_4: Off
NA_5: Off
NA_6: Off
NA_7: Off
NA_8: Off
NA_9: Off
NA_10: Off
NA_11: Off
2_11: Off
1 Effective management including subcontracts: Off
1_12: Off
2_13: Off
3_12: Off
2 Reasonablecooperative behavior: Off
3 Responsive to contract requirements: Off
1_14: Off
4 Notification of problems: Off
1_17: Off
3_14: Off
3_15: Off
3_16: Off
3_17: Off
7 Ability to transition resources and personnel: Off
5_12: Off
5_13: Off
5_14: Off
5_15: Off
5_16: Off
5_17: Off
5_18: Off
NA_12: Off
NA_13: Off
NA_14: Off
NA_15: Off
NA_16: Off
NA_17: Off
NA_18: Off
1 Current accurate and complete billings: Off
2 Relationship of negotiated costs to actuals: Off
1_21: Off
2_22: Off
3_21: Off
4_21: Off
5_21: Off
NA_21: Off
Contractor Management Personnel: Off
Contractor Onsite Facility Personnel: Off
Overall technical solutions to provide a comprehensive managed service: Off
Would you hire this vendor for the future requirement: Off
undefined:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .