Draft PWS.docx
DOCX document 121 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- PANDHA-26-P-0000-037542
- Issued by
- Not on record
About this file
This is a Draft Performance Work Statement (PWS) for a Defense Health Agency (DHA) research and development contract focused on vector-borne disease surveillance in the Pacific Region. The contractor shall develop safe, validated external proficiency testing procedures for detecting pathogens in arthropods (primarily mosquitoes) using non-infectious agents, specifically partial nucleic acid constructs or synthetic materials rather than live or cultured pathogens. All work shall be performed at the contractor's laboratory facilities in the Continental United States (CONUS), with the Government providing limited virus-free mosquito samples for confirmation testing. The contract is non-personal services and includes a 12-month period of performance with monthly progress reporting requirements.
The PWS establishes four primary performance objectives: (1) develop a comprehensive written manual or standard operating procedure (SOP) for creating and using safe external quality assurance/proficiency test materials, with dengue virus detection via qRT-PCR as the acceptable model; (2) validate the proficiency testing protocol using standard laboratory validation processes for molecular diagnostic assays; (3) demonstrate proficiency test performance characteristics through testing of at least 60 samples to establish limit of detection (LOD), sensitivity, and specificity with appropriate statistical measures; and (4) provide analysis of field-expedient capability addressing stability, transportability, robustness to environmental variables, and practical applicability for Department of Defense preventive medicine operations in austere conditions. Deliverables include a draft manual (Month 3), final manual (Month 4), validation report (Month 7), proficiency test results package (Month 8), field-expedient capability analysis (Month 9), monthly progress reports, and a final comprehensive closeout report (Month 12). The Government intends to obtain unlimited data rights in all deliverables to support force health protection programs and potential transition to other contractors or Department of War activities. Quality assurance will be conducted through a Government-developed Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) with 100% compliance acceptance quality levels across all performance objectives.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Request for Information.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Defense Health Agency Performance Work Statement (PWS)
Pacific Region Force Health Protection Vector-borne Disease Agent Surveillance Research & Development (R&D) in External Proficiency Testing
Theater Preventive Medicine Flight
18th Medical Group, Kadena Air Force Base
Solicitation Number: Version:
Date: 14 April 2026
DHA PWS Template V13 November 16, 2021
PART 1
1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION
1.1 This is a non-personal services contract to provide Pacific Region Force Health Protection Vector-borne Disease Agent Surveillance R&D in External Proficiency Testing.
1.2 Description of services/introduction: The contractor shall develop safe and validated external proficiency testing procedures for the detection of pathogens in arthropods (mosquitoes). This effort supports reliable diagnostic capabilities through performance-based external quality assurance using non-infectious agents to minimize risk.
1.3 Background: Vector-borne diseases transmitted by arthropods, such as dengue and malaria, continue to pose significant threats to U.S. military forces, particularly in deployed and austere environments. The Theater Preventive Medicine Flight conducts surveillance of arthropods to detect human pathogens and supports quality assurance programs that ensure the accuracy and reliability of diagnostic testing.
Given the complexity of insect vectors and the pathogens they carry, a rigorous quality assurance program is essential for producing reliable results that inform public health decision-making. External Quality Assurance (EQA) programs—also known as proficiency testing—involve laboratories periodically testing unknown samples provided by a third party. This process independently verifies diagnostic capabilities and identifies areas for improvement.
There is a need to develop external quality tests that utilize non-infectious agents. This approach minimizes risk while enabling broader implementation as part of a multi-layered framework of good laboratory practices, standardized protocols, and external validation.
1.4 Objectives:
(1) Develop a Written Manual/Protocol for Safe External Proficiency Testing
(2) Validate the Proficiency Testing Protocol
(3) Demonstrate Proficiency Test Performance Characteristics
(4) Provide Analysis of Field-Expedient Capability
1.5 Scope: The scope of work is limited to the research, development, validation, and documentation of safe external proficiency testing procedures as described in the high-level objectives above. Work shall be performed exclusively at the contractor’s laboratory facilities. The Government will provide limited virus-free mosquito samples for use in confirmation testing; the contractor is not required to collect samples or perform testing of operational/field-collected arthropod pools.
1.6 Period of Performance (PoP): SEE SCHEDULE
1.7 Administrative specifications
1.7.1 Place of performance: All services shall be performed at contractor’s facility.
1.7.2 Recognized Federal holidays: The contractor is or is not required to perform services on holidays.
| New Year’s Day | Labor Day | |
| Martin Luther King Jr.’s Birthday | Columbus Day President’s Day | Veteran’s Day |
| Memorial Day | Thanksgiving Day | |
| Juneteenth Day | Christmas Day Independence Day |
1.7.3 Hours of operation: The contractor is responsible for conducting business Monday thru Friday except Federal holidays or when the Government facility is closed due to local or national emergencies, administrative closings, or similar Government directed facility closings. The contractor must at all times maintain an adequate workforce for the uninterrupted performance of all tasks defined within this PWS when the Government facility is not closed for the above reasons.
1.7.4 Emergency Services: RESERVED
1.8 Contractor travel: RESERVED
1.9 Other Direct Costs (ODC): RESERVED
1.10 Quality
1.10.1 Quality Control Plan (QCP): The contractor shall develop and maintain an effective QCP to ensure services are performed in accordance with this PWS. The contractor shall develop and implement procedures to identify, prevent, and ensure nonrecurrence of defective services. The contractor’s QCP is the means by which the work complies with stated requirements. (Deliverable 1)
1.10.2 Quality assurance (QA): The government will evaluate the contractor’s performance under this contract in accordance with the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP). This plan provides a systematic method for the Government to evaluate performance and to ensure that the contractor has performed in accordance with the performance standards. It defines how the performance standards will be applied, the frequency of surveillance, and the minimum acceptable defect rate(s).
1.11 Contractor personnel: RESERVED
1.12 Key personnel (Contractor): RESERVED
1.13 Data rights: All data, reports, manuals, procedures, validation documentation, test results, and other materials first produced or delivered under this contract shall be subject to the Rights in Data clause incorporated into the contract (FAR 52.227-14 or applicable DFARS clause). The Government intends to obtain unlimited rights in all deliverables and data developed under this effort to support force health protection programs, quality assurance implementation, and potential transition to other contractors or DoW activities. The contractor shall not assert restricted or limited rights in any deliverable unless pre-approved in writing by the Contracting Officer and properly marked in accordance with the clause. All deliverables shall be delivered free of proprietary restrictions that would prevent full Government use, reproduction, or disclosure as needed for public health, policy development, or follow-on efforts.
1.14 Reporting RESERVED
1.15 Contractor Identification RESERVED
1.16 Contractor Access to Health Affairs (HA)/DHA Network(s) RESERVED
1.17 Personnel Security RESERVED
PART 2
2.0 DEFINITIONS, ACRONYMS, AND APPLICABLE PUBLICATIONS/INSTRUCTIONS
2.1 Definitions.
2.1.1 Category D: Information Technology (IT) and Telecommunications Services (called D-Services)
2.1.2 Category R: Support (Professional/Administrative/Management) Services (called R-Services)
2.1.3 Contracting Officer (CO): A person with the authority to enter into, administer, and/or terminate contracts and make related determinations and findings.
2.1.4 Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR): An individual, including a contracting officer’s technical representative (COTR), designated and authorized in writing by the CO to perform specific technical or administrative functions. This individual does NOT have authority to change the terms and conditions of the contract.
2.1.5 Nonpersonal services contract: a contract under which the personnel rendering the services are not subject, either by the contract’s terms or by the manner of its administration, to the supervision and control usually prevailing in relationships between the Government and its employees.
2.1.6 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP): An organized written document specifying the surveillance methodology to be used for surveillance of contractor performance. The Government may either prepare the QASP or require the offerors to submit a proposed quality assurance surveillance plan for the Government’s consideration in development of the Government’s plan.
2.2 Acronyms:
| AIS | Automated Information System | |
| APL | Approved Products List APL | |
| AQL | Acceptable Quality Level | |
| ARRT | Acquisition Requirements Roadmap Tool | |
| ATO | Authority to Operate | |
| B2B | Business-2-Business | |
| CAC | Common Access Card | |
| CAP | Cloud Access Point | |
| CCEVS | Common Criteria Cybersecurity Evaluation and Validation Scheme CDI | Covered Defense Information |
| CE | Computer Environment | |
| CDRL | Contract Data Requirement List | |
| CIO | Chief Information Officer | |
| CJCSM | Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Manual | |
| CMMC | Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification | |
| CMR | Contractor Manpower Reporting | |
| CNSSI | Committee on National Security Systems Instruction | |
| CO | Contracting Officer(s) | |
| CONUS | Continental United States (excludes Alaska and Hawaii) COR | Contracting Officer Representative |
| COTR | Contracting Officer's Technical Representative | |
| CSP | Cloud Service Provider | |
| CSSP | Cyber Security Service Provider | |
| CUI | Controlled Unclassified Information | |
| DAD-A | Deputy Assistant Director for Acquisition | |
| DC3 | DoD Cyber Crime Center | |
| DD Form 254 | Department of Defense Contract Security Requirement List (if applicable) DB | Design-Build |
| DBB | Design-Bid-Build | |
| DFARS | Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement DHA | Defense Health Agency |
| DISA | Defense Information System Agency | |
| DoD | Department of Defense | |
| DoDD | Department of Defense Directive | |
| DoDI | Department of Defense Instruction | |
| DSAs | Data Sharing Agreements | |
| DSAA | Data Sharing Agreement Application | |
| DMZ | Demilitarized Zone | |
| DoDM | Department of Defense Manual | |
| DPCLO | DHA Privacy and Civil Liberties Office | |
| DUA | Data Use Agreement | |
| eMSM | Enhanced Multi-Service Markets | |
| EQA | External Quality Assurance | |
| EULA | End User License Agreement | |
| EVM | Earned Value Management | |
| FAR | Federal Acquisition Regulation | |
| FCI | Federal contract information | |
| FE | Facilities Enterprise | |
| FedRAMP | Federal Risk Authorization and Management Program FISMA | Federal Information Security Modernization Act |
| FRCS | Facility Related Control Systems | |
| FSO | Facilities Security Officer | |
| HA | Health Affairs | |
| HIPAA | Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act HCA | Head of the Contracting Activity |
| HIT | Health Information Technology | |
| IGCE | Independent Government Cost Estimate | |
| IA | Information Assurance | |
| IO | Initial Outfitting | |
| I/O | In/Out Processing Portal | |
| IPv | Internet Protocol Version | |
| IS | Information System | |
| ISP | Internet Service Provider | |
| IT | Information Technology | |
| ISCM | Information Security Continuous Monitoring | |
| IV&V | Independent Verification & Validation | |
| MedCOI | Medical Community of Interest | |
| MHS | Military Health System | |
| MIL-STD | Military Standard | |
| MTFs | Military Treatment Facilities | |
| NCR | National Capitol Region | |
| NDA | Non-Disclosure Agreement | |
| NIAP | National Information Assurance Partnership | |
| NIST | National Institute of Standards and Technology | |
| OCONUS | Outside Continental United States (includes Alaska and Hawaii) ODC | Other Direct Costs |
| OPM | Office of Personal Management | |
| OSD | Office of the Secretary of Defense | |
| P-ATO | Personal Authorization to Operate | |
| P&R | Personnel and Readiness | |
| PGI | Procedures, Guidance and Information | |
| PDT | Project Delivery Team | |
| PHI | Protected Health Information | |
| PII | Personally Identifiable Information | |
| PIT | Platform Information Technology | |
| PK | Public Key | |
| PKI | Public Key Infrastructure | |
| POA&M | Plan of Action and Milestones | |
| POC | Point of Contact | |
| PMO | Program Management Office | |
| PoP | Period of Performance | |
| PP | Personal Property | |
| PPSM | Ports, Protocols, and Services Management | |
| PRS | Performance Requirements Summary | |
| PSP | Personnel Security Program | |
| PWS | Performance Work Statement | |
| QA | Quality Assurance | |
| QAP | Quality Assurance Program | |
| QASP | Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan | |
| QC | Quality Control | |
| QCP | Quality Control Plan | |
| RFP | Request for Proposal | |
| RFQ | Request for Quotation | |
| RMF | Risk Management Framework | |
| SP | Special Publication | |
| SPRS | Supplier Performance Risk System | |
| SRM | Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization | |
| SRG | Security Requirements Guides | |
| STIG | Security Technical Implementation Guides | |
| TOS | Terms of Service | |
| US | United States | |
| UFC | Unified Facilities Criteria | |
| VPN | Virtual Private Network | |
| XML | Extensible Markup Language |
PART 3
3.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES
The Requiring Activity Authority has assessed the need for Government Furnished Property, Equipment, and Services and determined:
3.1 Services: The Government:
☒Will NOT provide Government Furnished Services in support of this contract/task order. As a result, this paragraph is Not Applicable.
☐WILL provide Government Furnished Services required in support of this contract/task orders. These Services are described below:
3.2 Facilities: The Government:
☒Will NOT provide Facilities in support of this contract/task order. As a result, this paragraph is Not Applicable.
☐WILL provide Facilities in support of this contract/task orders. The Government provided Facilities are described below
3.3 Utilities: The Government:
☒Will NOT provide Utilities in support of this contract/task order. As a result, this paragraph is Not Applicable.
☐WILL provide Utilities in support of this contract/task orders. The Government provided Utilities are described below:
3.4 Equipment: The Government:
☒Will NOT provide Equipment in support of this contract/task order. As a result, this paragraph is Not Applicable.
☐WILL provide Equipment in support of this contract/task orders. The Government provided Equipment is described below:
3.4.1 Procurement Integrated Enterprise (PIEE), GFP Module Application The contractor shall be responsible for obtaining and maintaining access, training and successful operation of the PIEE/GFP Module application for the entirety of the contract/task order PoP. The PIEE GFP Module application is located at the following website: https://wawf.eb.mil/piee-landing/. Access to PIEE/GFP Module application training materials and in-depth information applicable to the contractor’s responsibilities regarding GFP can be found at the following website: https://dodprocurementtoolbox.com/.
Contracting Office Responsibilities:
The Contracting Office shall ensure close coordination and validation of the GFP items with the COR and DHA Accountable Property Officer prior to uploading the GFP Attachment into the PIEE/GFP Module. At the time GFP is anticipated and identified, the Government will upload the GFP Attachment into the PIEE/GFP Module. It is the Contracting Office’s responsibility to prepare, upload and maintain the GFP Attachment in the PIEE/GFP Module in accordance with the GFP Attachment instructions provided at the DoD Procurement Toolbox. The CO and COR shall manage and keep an inventory of any GFP associated with contract/task orders awarded through DHA, in accordance with applicable FAR Part 45, DoD FAR Supplement (DFARS) 245 with respective clauses, DHA AI 095 and PD 45-01 following the change in disposition of items listed on that PIEE/GFP Module Attachment.
The contracting office will also review, acknowledge, reject and/or approve shipment orders provided by the contractor as appropriate. Functional roles can be determined within the Contracting Office, and requested within the PIEE/GFP Module system.
Contractor Responsibilities:
A key contractor responsibility is to work with the CO and COR to ensure the PIEE/GFP Module data, to include the PIEE/GFP Attachment, provides a timely, complete and accurate accounting of the GFP applicable to the contract/task order. Contractors are required to report the receipt of any GFP shipped to them, regardless of whether it is listed on the GFP Attachment for their contract. Similarly, contractors are required to utilize the GFP Module application in conjunction with the shipment of GFP to the Government, or in reporting Property Loss of GFP issued (such as destruction or loss). Discrepancies or disputes regarding property shipped to or shipped from the contractor must be reported via the GFP Module application, with the CO having authority over final designation of status.
The contractor shall report semi-annually 100% inventories, reconciliations, and final disposition of GFP provided by the government. Final invoices will not be paid pending GFP reconciliation. Contractors shall be aware of and ensure compliance with applicable FAR Part 45, DFARS 245 and 252.245, Defense Pricing and Contracting Policies, Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment Standards, DHA Administrative Instruction 094 and DHA Guidance.
3.5 Materials: The Government:
☐Will NOT provide Materials in support of this contract/task order. As a result, this paragraph is Not Applicable.
☒IS providing Materials in support of this contract/task orders. The Government-provided Materials are described below: The Government will provide limited virus-free mosquito samples for use in confirmation testing. The contractor shall coordinate with the Government for receipt of any limited virus-free mosquito samples needed for confirmation testing.
PART 4
4.0 CONTRACTOR FURNISHED ITEMS AND SERVICES
4.1 Services: The Contractor:
☒Will NOT provide Contractor Furnished Services in support of this contract/task order. As a result, this paragraph is Not Applicable.
☐WILL provide Contractor Furnished Services required in support of this contract/task orders. These Services are described below: provide
4.2 General: RESERVED
4.3 Secret Facility Clearance: RESERVED
4.4 Materials: RESERVED
4.5 Equipment: RESERVED
4.6 Facilities: RESERVED
PART 5
5.0 SPECIFIC TASKS
5.1 Performance Objective 1: Develop a Written Manual/Protocol for Safe External Proficiency Testing. The contractor shall develop a comprehensive, standalone written manual or standard operating procedure (SOP) that describes how to create, prepare, and use safe, transportable external quality assurance/proficiency test materials for the detection of human pathogens in arthropods (mosquitoes), without the use of live or cultured pathogenic organisms.
Sub-objectives:
(1) The manual shall focus on the use of partial nucleic acid constructs or synthetic/non-infectious materials as the proficiency test analyte.
(2) Dengue virus detection via qRT-PCR shall serve as an acceptable model, with the protocol adaptable to other relevant arthropod-borne pathogens.
(3) The manual shall include detailed procedures for: preparation of proficiency test materials, safe handling and transport, integration into a laboratory quality assurance program, and steps to minimize biosafety risks.
(4) The manual shall be submitted in Word or PDF format via email and shall be clear, technically accurate, and suitable for use by DoW preventive medicine laboratories.
5.2 Performance Objective 2: Validate the Proficiency Testing Protocol. The contractor shall rigorously validate the developed protocol using standard laboratory protocol validation processes for molecular diagnostic assays to ensure it is "fit for purpose."
Sub-objectives:
(1) Validation shall establish performance specifications for accuracy, precision, analytical sensitivity, analytical specificity, and any other relevant parameters per accepted guidelines for laboratory-developed molecular assays.
(2) The contractor shall perform internal validation testing using constructed proficiency test materials.
(3) All validation activities shall be documented in a validation report, including methods, raw data, statistical analysis, and conclusions.
5.3 Performance Objective 3: Demonstrate Proficiency Test Performance Characteristics. The contractor shall provide statistically valid proficiency testing results that demonstrate the limit of detection (LOD), sensitivity, and specificity of the developed external proficiency test materials and associated detection methods.
Sub-objectives:
(1) Testing shall include a minimum of 60 samples (as referenced in the requirement) containing the constructed proficiency test analytes, using verified virus-free mosquitoes or arthropod matrices provided in part by the Theater Preventive Medicine Flight.
(2) Results shall include quantitative or qualitative data (as applicable) showing LOD, sensitivity (true positive rate), and specificity (true negative rate), with appropriate statistical measures (e.g., confidence intervals, reproducibility data).
(3) Testing shall confirm the protocol's ability to support reliable detection without infectious materials.
5.4 Performance Objective 4: Provide Analysis of Field-Expedient Capability. The contractor shall conduct and report an initial analysis of the proficiency test analyte's and protocol's capability for use in field-expedient conditions.
Sub-objectives:
(1) The analysis shall evaluate factors such as: stability/transportability of the partial nucleic acid constructs, ease of use with portable or minimal equipment (e.g., field-adaptable qRT-PCR platforms), robustness to environmental variables (temperature, humidity, dust), and overall practicality for DoD preventive medicine teams.
(2) The report shall identify any limitations, recommended mitigations, and potential adaptations for austere use.
5.5 Performance Objective 5: Monthly Progress Reporting. The contractor shall provide regular progress updates to ensure timely delivery of all required deliverables.
Sub-objectives:
(1) Submit monthly progress reports (via email) summarizing accomplishments, issues, risks, and upcoming activities throughout the period of performance.
(2) All reports shall be prepared in Microsoft Word or PDF format.
(3)
PART 6
6.0 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & SECURITY
6.1 All work under this contract is unclassified.
6.2 Personally Identifiable Information (PII)/Protected Health Information (PHI), Procurement, and Federal information requirements are not applicable for this requirement.
6.3 Training - RESERVED
6.4 Cybersecurity Requirements for Non-DoD IT or Covered Contractor IS:
6.5 Risk Management Framework (RMF) for DoD IT: RESERVED
6.6 Facility Related Control Systems: RESERVED
6.7 System Communications – RESERVED
6.8 MHS Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) Medical Community of Interest (MedCOI) Business-to-Business (B2B) Gateway - RESERVED
6.9 Contractor Provided IT Infrastructure – RESERVED
6.10 System Authorization Access Request (SAAR), Defense Department (DD) Form 2875 - RESERVED
6.11 MHS Systems Telecommunications – RESERVED
6.12 Establishment of Telecommunications – RESERVED
6.13 Contractors Located On Military Installations – RESERVED
PART 7
7.0 ATTACHMENTS/TECHNICAL EXHIBIT LISTING
7.1 Attachment and Technical Exhibit List:
7.2 Technical Exhibit A – Performance Requirements Summary
7.3 Technical Exhibit B – Deliverables Schedule
PART 7.2, TECHNICAL EXHIBIT A
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
| Performance Objectives |
| PWS Reference |
| Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) |
| Method of Surveillance |
| Develop a Written Manual/Protocol for Safe External Proficiency Testing (Draft) |
| 5.2, Deliverable #2 |
| 100% compliance: The draft SOP/manual is complete, technically accurate, clearly written, and fully addresses safe preparation/handling/transport of non-infectious partial nucleic acid construct proficiency tests. No critical omissions in required procedures. |
| 100% Government review by COR and technical subject matter experts (SMEs). Written feedback provided within 15 business days of receipt. |
| Develop a Written Manual/Protocol for Safe External Proficiency Testing (Final) |
| 5.2, Deliverable #3 |
| 100% compliance: Final SOP/manual incorporates all Government comments, is ready for immediate use by DoD laboratories, and contains no unresolved technical deficiencies. |
| 100% Government review by COR and SMEs. Concurrence or rejection documented in writing. |
| Validate the Proficiency Testing Protocol |
| 5.2, Deliverable #4 |
| 100% compliance: Validation report is scientifically sound, documents all required performance parameters (accuracy, precision, analytical sensitivity, specificity, etc.), includes methods/raw data summary/statistical analysis, and demonstrates the protocol is "fit for purpose" per standard molecular assay validation guidelines. |
| 100% Government technical review by COR and SMEs. Evaluation against accepted validation standards. |
| Demonstrate Proficiency Test Performance Characteristics |
| 5.2, Deliverable #5 |
| 100% compliance: Results package provides statistically valid data from at least 60 samples showing limit of detection (LOD), sensitivity, and specificity with appropriate statistical measures (e.g., confidence intervals). Data supports reliable detection without infectious materials. |
| 100% Government review by COR and SMEs, including verification of sample count, statistical validity, and technical soundness of results. |
| Provide Analysis of Field-Expedient Capability in Austere Conditions |
| 5.3, Deliverable #6 |
| 100% compliance: Report comprehensively addresses stability, transportability, robustness to environmental variables, ease of use in austere settings, limitations, and mitigations. Analysis is realistic and relevant to DoD force health protection operations |
| 100% Government review by COR and operational SMEs. Assessment of operational relevance and completeness. |
PART 7.3, TECHNICAL EXHIBIT B
DELIVERABLES SCHEDULE
| Deliverable # |
| PWS Reference |
| Deliverable Description |
| Due Date (After Award) |
| Format |
| Acceptance Criteria |
| 1 |
| 5.1 |
| Kickoff Meeting |
| Within 15 calendar days of contract award |
| Virtual (Microsoft Teams or equivalent) |
| Contractor shall schedule and lead a kickoff meeting with the COR, Contracting Specialist, and other Government stakeholders. Agenda shall include: project overview, technical approach, roles and responsibilities, schedule review, communication plan, risk identification, and initial coordination for any Government-provided virus-free mosquito samples. Meeting minutes shall be provided within 5 business days after the meeting. |
| 2 |
| 5.2 |
| Draft Safe External Proficiency Testing Manual / SOP |
| End of Month 3 |
| Microsoft Word or PDF |
| Clear, technically accurate procedures for creating and using safe (non-infectious partial nucleic acid construct) proficiency tests for pathogen detection in arthropods. Includes preparation, handling, transport, and QA integration. Government review and comment period: 15 business days. |
| 3 |
| 5.2 |
| Final Safe External Proficiency Testing Manual / SOP |
| End of Month 4 |
| Microsoft Word or PDF |
| Incorporate Government comments. Ready for use by DoD preventive medicine laboratories. Government concurrence is required. |
| 4 |
| 5.2 |
| Protocol Validation Report |
| End of Month 7 |
| Microsoft Word or PDF |
| Documents validation of accuracy, precision, analytical sensitivity, specificity, and other relevant parameters using standard molecular assay validation processes. Includes methods, raw data summary, statistical analysis, and conclusions. Scientifically sound and “fit for purpose.” |
| 5 |
| 5.3 |
| Proficiency Test Performance Results Package |
| End of Month 8 |
| Microsoft Word, Excel, or PDF |
| Statistically valid results from testing of at least 60 samples demonstrating limit of detection (LOD), sensitivity, and specificity. Includes data tables, statistical measures, and supporting documentation using constructed proficiency test analytes and Government-provided virus-free mosquitoes where applicable. |
| 6 |
| 5.4 |
| Field-Expedient Capability Analysis Report |
| End of Month 9 |
| Microsoft Word or PDF |
| Initial analysis of the proficiency test materials and protocol for use in field conditions. Addresses stability, transportability, robustness to environmental factors, ease of use with minimal equipment, limitations, and recommended mitigations. Relevant to force health protection operations. |
| 7 |
| 5.5 |
| Monthly Progress Reports |
| 15th of each month (Months 1–12) |
| Microsoft Word or PDF |
| Concise summary of technical accomplishments, issues encountered, risks and mitigation actions, schedule status, and planned activities for the next reporting period. Shall include status of all active deliverables. |
| 8 |
| 5.5 |
| Final Comprehensive Closeout Report |
| End of Month 12 |
| Microsoft Word or PDF |
| High-level summary of all work performed, final versions or references to key deliverables, lessons learned, recommendations for DoD implementation/transition, and any residual risks. |
image3.png image4.png image1.png image2.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .