DRAFT Performance Work Statement.docx

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

MOUTH OF THE COLUMBIA RIVER STAKEHOLDER MEETING FACILITATION, WASHINGTON AND OREGON

1. PROJECT BACKGROUND. This is a non-personal services contract for the Mouth of the Columbia River (MCR) federal navigation project. Services to be provided include stakeholder meeting organization, meeting facilitation, and public outreach for the Lower Columbia Solutions Group (LCSG).

The 6-mile long MCR federal navigation channel is the gateway to the Columbia-Snake River navigation system, which extends 470 river miles inland to Lewiston, ID (Figure 1). The 43-ft. deep channel between the Pacific Ocean and Portland, Oregon/Vancouver, Washington, supports deep-draft navigation. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) annually dredges around 3 million cubic yards (Mcy) of sand from the MCR. The MCR dredged material is placed in the Pacific Ocean at three nearshore sites and one offshore site jointly managed by the USACE and the Environmental Protection Agency – Region 10 (EPA).

The Lower Columbia Solutions Group (LCSG) was formed by the Governors of Washington and Oregon in July 2002. The LCSG is a work group of federal, state, local, and other stakeholders formed to ensure interested parties have a voice in the ongoing management of the MCR and the lower Columbia River estuary. Regular participants include USACE, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency – Region 10 (EPA), National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology), Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR), Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD), Oregon Department of State Lands (DSL), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ), Port of Ilwaco, Columbia River Pilots Association, Columbia River Bar Pilots, Columbia River Crab Fisherman’s Association (CRCFA), and many others. The LCSG focuses on finding sustainable solutions to address policy issues, research gaps, operational constraints, and potential conflicts with environmental resources in consideration of economic, social, and environmental objectives.

The LCSG is composed of a Technical Team and a Management Team, with some individuals participating in both roles. As the team names suggest, the Technical Team deals with mostly scientific and engineering issues at the MCR project; the Management Team directs the group and provides input on regional policy and socioeconomic issues. The LCSG meets up to 4 times per year: via teleconference 2 to 3 times per year and in person 1 to 2 times per year. The LCSG’s most ambitious meeting is the Science and Policy Workshop, typically held after the New Year.

2. THE GOVERNMENT WILL FURNISH:

The following information will be furnished by USACE for this contract upon award:

· Example Quality Control Plan

· 2022 and 2023 MCR Annual Use Plans

· LCSG Meeting Minutes from 2016 to present Any additional government-furnished information and/or equipment required for completion of the identified tasks shall be requested in writing as part of the contractor’s (KTR’s) proposal and mutually agreed to as part of the contract award.

3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH:

Meetings and regular communication with USACE Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) and MCR Navigation Project Manager (Nav PM) are critical to the success of this contract. The KTR must furnish webmeeting and teleconference services to support up to 40 participants. There are no special supplies for the KTR to furnish beyond those required for preparation of the listed documents (computers, internet and email access, printers, office space, office supplies, etc.).

Detailed requirements appear in section 4 of this solicitation.

4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS

a. General Requirements. The KTR must have familiarity with USACE’s navigation program and experience facilitating meetings with multiple stakeholders. Meeting facilitation experience with federal and state agencies is preferred. Experience working with stakeholders in the Lower Columbia River estuary is also preferred.

b. Mandatory Task 1 (CLIN 0001), FY23 Project Management.

i. Subtask 1.1. Project Management

· Work Plan/ Quality Control Plan (QCP) – See also Sections 5.b and 5.c, below. The KTR shall prepare a QCP for the project within 10 calendar days of the notice to proceed (NTP). The QCP may be combined with the Work Plan in a single document. The QCP is a management plan for executing a quality product or service, on schedule and within budget. The QCP shall be in accordance with USACE Engineering Regulation 1110-1-12, “Quality Management”. An example QCP can be provided upon request. USACE Engineering Regulation 1110-1-12 can be viewed at the following website: http://www.usace.army.mil/inet/usace-docs/eng-regs/er1110-1-12/toc.htm

· Matrix of all KTR and subcontractor personnel working on this project, their roles and responsibilities, including all review personnel

· Project objectives and a plan on how to meet those objectives

· Information on project organization, and

· Project schedule based on completion date requirements. The schedule shall include all work items, milestones, durations, predecessors, source materials and study requirements, data delivery dates, completion dates, deliverables, review processes including all during requirements for responses, and all coordination activities.

The Government shall provide comments within five calendar days after receipt. The KTR shall submit a final Work Plan/QCP within five calendar days after receipt of Government review comments.

· Contract Administration – As part of routine contract administration, the COR will check-in with the KTR project manager on a quarterly basis; these check-in meetings should take no longer than one-half hour.

The KTR shall submit the documents required to support contract administration and accounting requirements. This shall include:

· Quarterly Invoices on ENG 93 or as needed

· Quarterly Progress Reports

· Quarterly Expenditure Reports (as necessary)

· Final Invoice and Release of Claims

ii. Subtask 1.2. Kickoff Meeting and LCSG Management Team Quarterly Meetings and Minutes

· One, 1-hr kickoff meeting is to be held with the COR and USACE Technical Points of Contact is required at the beginning of the contract.

· Two, 1-hr conference calls with USACE staff and the LCSG Management Team will be scheduled (one per quarter). Meetings will be held remotely via a USACE-accessible web meeting platform (either Cisco WebEx or Microsoft Teams). The contractor shall take notes during meetings and provide meeting minutes no later than 3 calendar days after the meeting date.

c. Mandatory Task 2 (CLIN 0002) – Organization and Facilitation of LCSG Meetings During the last half of FY24 (April 1 to September 30, 2024), one, joint Management and Technical Team conference call will be held. Additionally, one Science and Policy Workshop Hybrid Meeting will be held.

The KTR will work with the Nav PM and COR to schedule the meetings for this task. In collaboration with the Nav PM and COR, the KTR will prepare meeting agendas at least 10 calendar days before each meeting. Meeting materials, including the agenda will be submitted to LCSG participants at least three business days prior to a scheduled meeting.

The KTR will take notes during meetings and assist the PDT in adhering to the meeting agenda. The KTR will prepare meeting minutes and provide the minutes for review and comment no later than three calendar days after the meeting. PDT comments and edits to meeting minutes must be addressed no later than five calendar days after receipt.

i. Management and Technical Team Conference Calls – Organize and provide neutral facilitation of Technical and Management Team teleconference calls to plan for beneficial use site disposal, monitoring, scientific studies, and data analysis. Prepare and distribute summaries. Provide in-between meeting coordination with team members. Teleconference calls will be held via a USACE-accessible web meeting platform (either Cisco WebEx or Microsoft Teams). To view documents and presentations, presenters must be able to share their computer screen remotely with other meeting participants. Teleconference calls will last no longer than 2 hours.

ii. Science-Policy Workshop (Hybrid Meeting) – Via USACE’s COR and Nav PM, consult with Management Team, and organize the LCSG’s Science-Policy Workshop. Meeting format is hybrid, meaning that people may attend in person or call into the meeting. The meeting will last no longer than 7 hours. During this meeting, LCSG members are invited to present a summary of the prior year’s dredging and disposal activities (USACE), scientific studies performed in the prior year (USACE, USGS, NMFS, Ecology), and dredging and scientific studies planned for the next dredging season.

This meeting is typically held near the MCR project in Astoria, Oregon. The KTR will provide meeting facilities for up to 40 attendees. The KTR will also provide a means to project PowerPoint presentations prepared by multiple agencies and stakeholders; the meeting facility tables/chairs will be oriented such that participants can see the presentation (use of round tables is discouraged). The meeting room must also be sufficiently dark such that the projected presentations may be seen by meeting participants. The meeting facility must also have free WiFi available for meeting participants to use.

The KTR will provide a means for remote participants to view the meeting presentations, listen to in-person presenters and meeting participants, and audibly ask questions during post-presentation Q&A. The selected remote meeting application should allow remote participants to see presentations as they appear on the presenter’s computer screen and provide comments/ ask questions via chat. The KTR will take notes and monitor questions and comments in the meeting chat.

The KTR will provide modest items of food (light snacks such as fruit, pastries, donuts, etc.) and non-alcoholic refreshments (soft drinks, coffee, and tea) offered other than as part of a meal [see 5 CFR § 2635.203(b)(1) for federal employee limitations on food and drinks at meetings]. Sufficient time will be allowed for a lunch break (lunch on your own).

In light of the COVID-19 pandemic (or other future unforeseen pandemic), this meeting may be held as a teleconference if state/federal restrictions concerning gatherings are in-place.

d. Optional Tasks 3-10 (CLINs 1001, 1002 thru 4001, 4002) – Individual Option Years: Organization and Facilitation of LCSG Meetings (FYs 2025, 2026, 2027, and 2028) The process to award the next Option Year should be initiated no later than 01 AUG of the preceding year (e.g., the process for awarding the FY 2025 option would be initiated no later than August 1, 2024).

i. Project Management (Optional Tasks 3, 5, 7, and 9 [CLINs 1001, 2001, 3001, and 4001]). In follow-on option years, contract administration, and USACE-contractor meetings subtasks described under Mandatory Task 1 (see section 4.b.) will continue through each option year. The contractor should plan on up to 4 teleconference calls (quarterly) with USACE staff and the LCSG Management Team, as described in section 4.b.ii. The contractor should also plan on up to 4 check-in calls with the COR (quarterly, not to exceed 30 minutes).

ii. Organization and Facilitation of LCSG Meetings (Optional Tasks 4, 6, 8, and 10 [CLINs 1002, 2002, 3002, and 4002]). Option Year meeting facilitation tasks and requirements are the same as described under Mandatory Task 2 (see section 4.c.i-ii). In follow-on option years, assume two (2) Management and Technical Team conference calls (biannually, no longer than 2 hrs). Assume one Science-Policy Workshop per option year, as described in section 4.c.ii.

Summary of Required Meetings by Task, Contract No. W9127N-2X-X-XXXX

(1001, 2001, 3001, 4001)

OPT 4, 6, 8, 10

(1002, 2002, 3002, 4002)

5. TASK ORDER MANAGEMENT.

a. Workflow Management. The KTR shall provide product management and coordination for work tasks during production of the report. The KTR shall assign a project manager (PM) to act as a primary point of contact (POC). The PM shall be responsible for the coordination of work developed under this task order. Within three calendar days of Notice to Proceed (NTP) for this task order, the KTR shall advise the USACE Technical POC in writing of the individual so designated.

The KTR shall be responsible for the professional and technical competence of the personnel it assigns to perform work under this task order and will select individuals who will be able to perform the obligations under the task order. Changes to personnel assigned to this task order shall not occur without prior notification to the Government. Replacement of personnel shall be carried out as quickly as possible and in a manner that will not adversely affect the performance obligations under the task order.

b. Work Plan. Within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of NTP for this task order, the KTR shall develop a Work Plan that includes, but is not limited to, the following:

· Matrix of all KTR and subcontractor personnel working on this project, their roles and responsibilities, including all review personnel

· Project objectives and a plan on how to meet those objectives

· Information on project organization, and

· Project schedule based on completion date requirements. The schedule shall include all work items, milestones, durations, predecessors, source materials and study requirements, data delivery dates, completion dates, deliverables, review processes including all during requirements for responses, and all coordination activities.

The Work Plan may be combined with the QCP as long as it meets the requirements stipulated above, and in Section 5.c, below. USACE shall review the Work Plan and provide comments within five calendar days after receipt. The KTR shall submit a final schedule within five calendar days after receipt of Government review comments.

c. Quality Control Plan. The KTR shall prepare a Quality Control Plan (QCP) for the project within 10 calendar days from notice to proceed. The QCP is a management plan for executing a quality product or service, on schedule and within budget. The QCP shall be in accordance with USACE Engineering Regulation 1110-1-12, “Quality Management”. An example QCP can be provided upon request. USACE Engineering Regulation 1110-1-12 can be viewed at the following website: http://www.usace.army.mil/inet/usace-docs/eng-regs/er1110-1-12/toc.htm

The QCP may be combined with the Work Plan as long as it meets the requirements stipulated in Section 5.b, above.

6. SUBMITTALS. The KTR shall provide the following submittals in accordance with the work schedule in this task order.

a. Task Order Management.

Work Plan, Quality Control Plan, Meeting Agendas, and Meeting Minutes The KTR shall submit electronic copies of these deliverables in PDF format.

b. Contract Administration and Accounting. The KTR shall submit the documents required to support contract administration and accounting requirements. This shall include:

7. QUALITY MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT. The Government will perform quality monitoring and measurement of the services performed under this task order. Please reference the following:

· Appendix A: Performance Metrics

· Appendix B: Performance Requirements Summary

· Appendix C: Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

8. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE. Interim milestones are expected target dates and changes to these dates may be negotiated during progress review meetings without a modification to the task order. The scheduled completion date for all work is a firm performance target, requiring modification to the task order if adjustments to that date are required. All services required under this task order shall be completed no later than 30 Sept 2028. The anticipated NTP will be issued on or around February 2024.

TASK 1 (OPT Tasks 3, 5, 7, and 9)

TASK 2 (OPT Tasks 4, 6, 8, and 10)

9. COORDINATION REQUIREMENTS.

a. General. Coordination of these activities is critical to the successful completion of this task order. Every effort shall be made to resolve critical issues in a timely manner before they become problems. Communication by telephone and email is strongly encouraged. Regularly scheduled meetings are described below. Other meetings, including additional site visits and telephone conference calls, required to exchange information may be scheduled by mutual agreement and shall be emailed to the POCs. The KTR shall provide written records of all significant conversations and email them to the TPOC and COR within three calendar days of the call.

b. Government POCs for This Task Order. The KTR shall provide written records of all significant conversations. The KTR shall be in contact with multiple Government POCs. The Contracting Officer is the only POC with the authority to direct the Contractor to perform services or change the terms of the task order. The Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) is delegated specific authorities with respect to oversight and administration of the task order. Government POCs under this task order are as follows:

MCR Nav PM

TPOC & COR

Contracting Officer

Contract Specialist

Invoices

c. Meeting Documentation. See descriptions under Mandatory Tasks 1 and 2 and Optional Tasks 3 thru 10.

10. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.

a. Metadata (if required). Any data, database(s) and/or geospatial data produced through this task order must be documented through the preparation of standard metadata (data about data) descriptions. The KTR shall ensure that the metadata delivered is compliant with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 19115:2003, North American Profile (NAP). The Standard is available for purchase at: http://www.webstore.ansi.org.

b. Codes and Standards. Work under this task order shall comply with the latest codes, standards, and regulations applicable to the work requested including USACE Engineering Regulations and Manuals, and Industry Codes and Standards.

c. Safety. This paragraph applies to contracts and purchase orders that require the KTR to comply with EM 385-1-1 (e.g., contracts that include the Accident Prevention Clause at FAR 52.236-13 and/or other safety provisions). EM 385-1-1 and its changes are available at http://www.usace.army.mil/CESO/Pages/Home.aspx. The KTR shall be responsible for complying with the current edition and all changes posted on the web as of the effective date of this contract action.

d. Additional Services. The KTR shall not perform any services under this task order that are considered by the KTR to be a change in work or services required by this agreement without the written approval of the Contracting Officer.

e. Correction of Unsatisfactory Work. The COR maintains the right to reject any work that is found to be in error, incomplete, illegible, or in any way not conforming to the specifications outlined in the task order. The KTR shall be liable for all costs in connection with correcting such errors. Corrective work may be performed by Government forces or by KTR forces at the discretion of the Contracting Officer

f. Use of Information. The information developed, gathered, assembled, and reproduced by the KTR or subcontractors, or their associates, in fulfillment of the task order requirements as defined in or related to this statement of work, will become the complete property of the Government. Therefore, the KTR shall not use the information for any purposes at any time without the written consent of the Contracting Officer.

g. Foreign Born Employees. For applicable Task Orders, the KTR shall submit photocopies of the green card work permits to the Technical POC for all KTR employees who are foreign born and have non-citizen status. These photocopies shall be submitted at least one month in advance of the start of work by the employees. This allows the Corps Security Office sufficient time to run a security check on these affected personnel. Contractor employees who fit the above description of non-citizenship shall not be permitted to work at the Project until they pass this security check in addition to other normal requirements.

h. Naturalized Citizens. For applicable Task Orders, the KTR shall submit photocopies of Government documentation (i.e., passport) for all naturalized citizens confirming their citizenship. These photocopies shall be submitted to the Technical POC at least one week in advance of the start of work by the employees.

i. Scope Clarification Memorandum (if applicable). Following the site visit the KTR shall prepare a Scope Clarification Memorandum identifying any elements identified during the site visit the KTR feels are different from the scope of services defined in this document. The scope clarification memorandum is anticipated to be one page or less and submitted to the Government’s Technical POC by electronic mail.

11. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND ACCOUNTING.

a. Quarterly Progress Reports. The KTR shall prepare a monthly progress report identifying the following information by task:

· Status of services performed since the previous reporting period.

· Discussion of issues or concerns.

· Confirmation that services performed to date are within scope.

· Confirmation that services performed to date are within negotiated budget.

The quarterly progress report shall be submitted via email to the COR and Nav PM each month and shall include a copy of the expenditure report.

b. Expenditure Schedule. U uses accrual accounting. Accrual accounting is the method in which expenses are recognized in the period earned, regardless of when payment is made or received. USACE typically stops processing payments on the 25th of each month. Services performed but for which an invoice has not been processed will be accrued. Appropriate documentation is required to record and support every accrual made. Contractor earning schedules are considered to be appropriate documentation.

Preparation Instructions:

· A sample expenditure schedule shall be prepared for each task order.

· The KTR shall identify the contract/task order and contact information as indicated in the top box of the schedule.

· The KTR shall input expenditure information for each task order line item.

This schedule shall be maintained by the KTR on a monthly basis and submitted to the COR on a quarterly basis. Per the form, monthly expenditure information should be cumulative and should project planned monthly expenditures to the best of the KTR’s knowledge.

c. Exposure (Man-hours) Report. The KTR shall report the total man-hours expended on a quarterly basis by all employees, including KTR and any subcontractor staff labor. Man-hours will be prepared and submitted with the Expenditure Schedule. This report shall be made by email to TBD.

d. Release of Information. Reports and information generated under this contract become the property of the Government and distribution by the KTR to any source, at any time, without the written consent of the Contracting Officer is prohibited

e. Payments. In accordance with the payment clause of the contract, the KTR shall submit monthly invoices utilizing Form ENG 93 every 30 days. Payment will be made in the amount of 100 percent of the value of services shown on the monthly invoice. Submit the original invoice in Adobe PDF format via email to TBD. Please ensure the firm’s address shown on the ENG 93 matches the address shown in SAM. In addition, please ensure the period of performance does not fall after the date the invoice is signed. All invoices shall be signed by the project manager. Any errors in invoice preparation will be cause for rejection. Assistance with the preparation of your invoice may be obtained from TBD.

f. Retainage. Retainage will not be withheld as long as the services under this task order are determined to be satisfactory. The Contracting Officer reserves the right to withhold retainage if it is determined that the KTR’s performance is less than satisfactory.

g. Final Invoice. The KTR shall submit with the final invoice a written “Release of Claims” signed by a KTR employee who has the authority to make the release specified therein.

APPENDIX A: PERFORMANCE METRICS

The performance metrics proposed for this task order are shown in the following table. These performance metrics shall be used as the basis for the Performance Requirement’s Summary (PRS), which defines assessment of the Contractor (KTR)’s performance. The KTR shall review the performance metrics and propose any desired revisions during the task order negotiation process. The final performance metrics shall be included in the statement of work contained in the task order award package and shall be used by the Government in the evaluation of the KTR’s performance.

PERFORMANCE METRICS

CONTRACT NO. W9127N-20-X-XXXX, MCR Stakeholder Meeting Facilitation

b. No technical deficiencies identified; and

c. All contract milestones met.

a. Submittal approved as submitted, although NTE 10% substantive comments issued for submittal; and

b. No technical deficiencies identified; and

c. All contract milestones met.

a. Submittal approved as submitted, although 10%-20% substantive comments issued for submittal; and

b. No technical deficiencies identified; and

c. All contract milestones met.

a. Submittal rejected as submitted, requires rework of at least one feature, or comment(s) issued that result in schedule slippage; or

b. No more than 1 technical deficiencies identified; and

c. Contract milestones missed.

a. Submittal rejected as submitted, requires rework of more than one feature, or comment(s) issued that result in schedule slippage; or

b. More than 2 technical deficiencies identified; and

c. Contract milestones missed.

b. No technical deficiencies identified; and

c. All contract milestones met.

a. Submittal approved as submitted, although NTE 10% substantive comments issued for submittal; and

b. No technical deficiencies identified; and

c. All contract milestones met.

a. Submittal approved as submitted, although 10%-20% substantive comments issued for submittal; and

b. No technical deficiencies identified; and

c. All contract milestones met.

a. Submittal rejected as submitted, requires rework of at least one feature, or comment(s) issued that result in schedule slippage; or

b. No more than 1 technical deficiencies identified; and

c. Contract milestones missed.

a. Submittal rejected as submitted, requires rework of more than one feature, or comment(s) issued that result in schedule slippage; or

b. No technical deficiencies identified; and

c. All contract milestones met.

a. Submittal approved as submitted, although NTE 10% substantive comments issued for submittal; and

b. No technical deficiencies identified; and

c. All contract milestones met.

a. Submittal approved as submitted, although 10%-20% substantive comments issued for submittal; and

b. No technical deficiencies identified; and

c. All contract milestones met.

a. Submittal rejected as submitted, requires rework of at least one feature, or comment(s) issued that result in schedule slippage; or

b. No more than 1 technical deficiencies identified; and

c. Contract milestones missed.

a. Submittal rejected as submitted, requires rework of more than one feature, or comment(s) issued that result in schedule slippage; or

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND ACCOUNTING

b. Invoices submitted each month.

a. No more than 10% of invoices require revisions; and

b. Invoices submitted each month.

a. No more than 25% invoices require revisions; and

b. Invoices submitted at least quarterly.

a. No more than 50% invoices require revisions; and

b. Invoices submitted at least quarterly.

a. More than 50% invoices require revisions; and

b. Invoices submitted at least quarterly.

b. Reports submitted each month.

a. Reports are accurate and complete; and

b. No more than 1 report missed.

a. Reports are accurate and complete; and

b. No more than 3 reports missed.

a. Reports are missing information; and

b. No more than 3 reports missed.

a. Reports are missing information; and

b. More than 3 reports are missed.

Quarterly Expenditure Reports (Required Only If Invoice Not Submitted)

For this task order, the following guidelines for the establishment of ratings will be used, supported by the weight of evidence documented during the KTR’s surveillance efforts:

Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the task or sub-task being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the KTR were highly effective.

Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefits. The contractual performance of the task or sub-task being assessed accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the KTR were effective.

Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the task or sub-task contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the KTR appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet all contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the task or sub-task being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The KTR’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the task or sub-task contains serious problems for which the KTR’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

APPENDIX B: PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY (PRS)

This task order shall contain a Performance Requirements Summary (PRS) table based on performance metrics established during the quality assurance process. The Contractor (KTR) shall review the performance requirements summary and propose any desired revisions during the task order negotiation process. The final performance requirements summary shall be included in the statement of work contained in the task order award package, and shall be used by the Government in the evaluation of the KTR’s performance.

PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

CONTRACT NO. W9127N-24-X-XXXX, MCR Stakeholder Meeting Facilitation

Remarks

4.b.i, 5.b

Remarks

APPENDIX C: QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)

The Contractor (KTR) shall be evaluated periodically during performance of this task order to ensure compliance with the proposed and accepted performance goals, regulations and guidance. This evaluation shall be performed according to a QASP. The KTR shall review the proposed QASP and propose any desired revisions during the task order negotiation process. The final QASP shall be included in the statement of work contained in the task order award package, and shall be used by the Government to evaluate the KTR’s performance. Failure to adequately complete any service or submittal to at least a satisfactory level of quality or timeliness may result in repeat of work, a poor performance evaluation, or both. The draft QASP is shown below:

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN FOR CONTRACT NO. W9127N-24-X-XXXX

MCR Stakeholder Meeting Facilitation

b. Poor performance evaluation

b. Poor performance evaluation

b. Poor performance evaluation

b. Poor performance evaluation

b. Poor performance evaluation

SEDIMENT CHARACTERIZATION

LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVER FEDERAL NAVIGATION CHANNEL

POST OFFICE BAR AND ALBINA TURNING BASIN

WILLAMETTE RIVER, PORTLAND, MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

Elk Rock Is.

Figure 1. MCR Location Map image1.wmf image2.png