DRAFT Acquisition Strategy V1.pptx
PPTX presentation 655 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- Not on record
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DRAFT Acquisition Strategy:
Visible Accessible Understandable Linked Trusted (VAULT)
FA701420R0008
Ms. Theresa Terry, AFDW PKS Capt Kevin Ward, AFDW/PKS 7 May 2019
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Air Force District of Washington
PRIDE … TEAMWORK … SUCCESS
DRAFT Acquisition Strategy All information provided in these charts are in DRAFT form. The purpose of this information is to receive feedback from industry on the DRAFT acquisition strategy Any teaming arrangements or money spent preparing proposals or responses is at the sole discretion of any potential offeror or organization and is not the responsibility of the Government Any feedback or information provided from industry may be considered Please provide feedback or comments via Microsoft Word™. Identify which slide and area the comment pertains to and provide any recommendations or changes.
Please send any feedback or comments to:
Contract Specialist – Kevin Ward, kevin.a.ward.mil@mail.mil Contracting Officer – Theresa Terry, theresa.l.terry.civ@mail.mil
All feedback / comments are due no later than 11 May 2020 at 1200 PM EDT. If you miss this opportunity to provide feedback there will be a DRAFT RFP released in the near future.
A feedback session via Webex will be held 12 May 2020 at 1000 AM EDT for 36 first come first serve slots. One line per organization with respect to this Draft Acq Strategy.
DRAFT acquisition strategy Competitive – Full and Open Competition posted via Beta.Sam.Gov Contract Type: Multiple Award IDIQ Contracting Ceiling: ~ $950M CLIN Types: Firm Fixed Price Ordering Period: ~ December 2020 – 2025 Primary Offerors shall posses a Top Secret Facility Clearance at RFP release. No exceptions.
Basis for Award: Based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation factors, up to five awards will be made to the Highest Technically Rated with an Acceptable Small Business Commitment Document, with a fair, reasonable, and balanced price, with a realistic Professional Employee Compensation Plan
DRAFT Instructions Step 1 Confirm Offerors participated in the Advisory Multistep Process 10-17 April 2020 Validate Top Secret Facility Clearance Review Small Business Subcontracting Plan for compliance Step 2 Offerors receive scenario upon release of RFP.
Questions due 1 day after Offeror receives scenario Scenario due 12 calendar days after receipt Offerors shall not make changes after submission to the Government. Any changes will render the Offeror ineligible for award Government schedules offeror for oral presentation The Government may ask questions to better understand the scenario solution in limited exchanges. The oral presentation is not an opportunity for the Offeror to change its proposal.
Factor 1: Technical Approach – (Scenario) Oral Provide offerors data sets to perform scenario Offerors will have 12 calendar days to complete the task Orally present solution
Technical Capability will be evaluated adjectivally based on the Offeror’s solution to the Government provided technical scenario. The Offeror’s solution will be evaluated in terms of the level of analysis described in the Scenario for both technical and data science competency. This presentation shall be used to explicate the Offerors scenario solution.
DRAFT Acquisition Strategy
| Adjectival Rating | Description |
| Outstanding | Proposal indicates an exceptional approach with analysis at an advanced level as defined in the scenario, a realistic strategy and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low. |
| Good | Proposal indicates a thorough approach, with analysis at an intermediate level as defined in the scenario, a realistic strategy and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate. |
| Acceptable | Proposal meets analytical requirements at the intermediate level as defined in the scenario, and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate. |
| Marginal | Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high. |
| Unacceptable | Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is extremely high. |
Factor 2 - Small Business Commitment Document WOSB, SDVOSB, HubZone, VOSB, SDB, NTSB, SBC's The Government will evaluate at SBPP for the following:
Proposed percentages for each SB, socio-economic group and NTSBs;
The extent to which such firms are specifically identified in proposals;
The extent of commitment to use such firms;
The complexity and variety of the work small firms are to perform;
The realism of the proposal;
| Adjectival | ||
| Rating | Description | |
| Acceptable | Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation. | |
| Unacceptable | Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation. |
Factor 3 - Price Fair, Reasonable, and Balanced Rate Card Fully burdened hourly rate per LCAT for base plus each option year Realistic PECP FAR Clause 52.222-46 Unburdened rate + fringe % Benefits
Factor 3 - Price (Continued)
LCATS:
LCAT Level - Contributor =C, Mgr =M Education
| Data Architect Senior | C3 | Master's |
| Data Architect 2 | C2 | Master's |
| Data Architect 1 | C1 | Master's |
| Solutions Architect Senior | C3 | Master's |
| Solutions Architect 2 | C2 | Master's |
| Solutions Architect 1 | C1 | Master's |
| Program Manager | M3 | Master's |
| Database Manager /Administrator | M1 | Master's |
| Systems Engineer /Integrator Senior | C3 | Master's |
| Systems Engineer /Integrator 2 | C2 | Master's |
| Systems Engineer /Integrator 1 | C1 | Master's |
| Data Engineer Senior | C3 | Master's |
| Data Engineer 2 | C2 | Master's |
| Data Engineer 1 | C1 | Master's |
| Senior Consultant | C3 | Master's |
| Data Scientist 1 | C1 | Master's |
| Data Scientist 2 | C2 | Master's |
| Data Scientist Senior | C3 | Master's |
DRAFT Ordering Requirements / Procedures AFTER award Governments will utilize FAR 16 – Fair Opportunity Ordering Procedures for each task order request to the maximum extent practicable Government will utilize the exception to fair opportunity at its sole discretion Task Order Proposal Request (TOPR) Response Times Extended 30 Days Standard 10 Days Expedited 3 Days No On Ramping Off Ramping Each Awardee allowed No more than 2 consecutive no bids OR 3 no bids annually (whichever comes first) Applies to Extended and Standard Only; DOES NOT apply to Expedited Does not apply if CO determines OCI Poor Performance Two (2) Marginal Technical Ratings over the five (5) year ordering period image1.png image3.png image2.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .